Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pat Robertson Backs Legalizing Marijuana
Clem Britt/AP ^ | Jesse McKinley

Posted on 03/08/2012 8:30:25 AM PST by AnTiw1

Of the many roles Pat Robertson has assumed over his five-decade-long career as an evangelical leader - including presidential candidate and provocative voice of the right wing - his newest guise may perhaps surprise his followers the most: marijuana legalization advocate.

"I really believe we should treat marijuana the way we treat beverage alcohol," Mr. Robertson said in an interview on Wednesday. "I've never used marijuana and I don't intend to, but it's just one of those things that I think: this war on drugs just hasn't succeeded."

(Excerpt) Read more at mobile.nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Current Events; Evangelical Christian; Moral Issues; Religion & Culture
KEYWORDS: addicts; anarchy; cannabis; drugs; drugwar; ebt; gateway; jobless; legalization; losers; marijuana; narcos; pot; potheads; prayer; pushers; rehab; rehablosers; robertson; users; violence; warondrugs; welfare; whatthedeuce; wimps; wod; wodlist; wosd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 251-278 next last
To: GrandJediMasterYoda
" I have no problem with legalizing it as well, but remember; Once you do that they the left is going to demand legalizing everything else like meth and crack "

i just think common sense should tell us

since tobacco and alcohol are legal,

any drug that causes you less damage than those two cutural icons should be legal, too

i mean, cannabis sativa has been "vetted" for smoking use since 2700BC minimum...no surprises here

51 posted on 03/08/2012 9:32:36 AM PST by AnTiw1 ("Where Liberty is, there is my country.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

I onder if the government would “allow” me..........

Don’t you see the basic fallacy in leaving this up to the government?

Secondly, people are choosing drugs now and the government doesn’t “allow” it.


52 posted on 03/08/2012 9:33:54 AM PST by morphing libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: ejonesie22
A 14 year old should be free to ingest all the LSD he wants...

Is that how we treat alcohol?

Yes I am a “so called” conservative...

Confirmed earlier.

Thank God there are many more like me...

Do you drink alcohol? Do you think it should be made illegal?

53 posted on 03/08/2012 9:33:59 AM PST by gdani
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: JustSayNoToNannies
Ah...

We must have radically different definitions of sanity...

Good luck with your approach. Maybe one day you guys can enjoy you weed without worrying about the man.

Perhaps the deepening insanity of our society will give you the boost you need....

54 posted on 03/08/2012 9:36:01 AM PST by ejonesie22 (8/30/10, the day Truth won.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Thorliveshere

I would also deny welfare benefits for users, as well.

But at least they won’t go to jail for using, unless they commit some other crime.


55 posted on 03/08/2012 9:36:52 AM PST by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: AnTiw1

Total insanity and that is probably dimensia settin in.
Pot destroys lives.
It destroys potential.
It has destroyed Mexico.
Most all violent people in prison love their pot.

We now also have all these kids born with mental problems for life from using pot and other things while the baby was in the womb.

NO POT!


56 posted on 03/08/2012 9:37:15 AM PST by A CA Guy ( God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

I am stongly AGAINST legalizing Marijuana!


57 posted on 03/08/2012 9:38:13 AM PST by JFC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Wagonboy

Well, we should definitely repeal the War on Poverty.

We should also end the War on Drugs.

The majority of crime in this country revolves around drugs. End the War on Drugs, put the Mexican cartels out of business.

Morality cannot be legislated.


58 posted on 03/08/2012 9:39:38 AM PST by Retired Greyhound (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: gdani

I understand. We all have made mistakes in our past.

But the key premise amongst conservatives still remains. We do not want our government involved in trashing our young people with legal drugs.


59 posted on 03/08/2012 9:41:03 AM PST by Responsibility2nd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
YOU know better than to use drugs, but are perfectly fine with our government allowing others to become enslaved to the problems of drugs abuse.

I know better than to use tobacco, but I'm perfectly fine with our government allowing others to become enslaved to the problems of tobacco use.

How about you?

60 posted on 03/08/2012 9:41:49 AM PST by JustSayNoToNannies (A free society's default policy: it's none of government's business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: AnTiw1

The thing I hate most about drugs is that they cause folks
to write like morons without proper capitalization or punctuation.

Don’t you agree?


61 posted on 03/08/2012 9:43:05 AM PST by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: discostu
Um yeah.

Here are the facts. The WOD has failed, it needs to be revisited.

Legalizing drugs IS NOT the way way a sane and sober society interested in promoting the general welfare of its people goes about such things.

Make all the high minded (no pun intended) poetic and philosophical arguments you can but in the end it boils down to a group of folks who want to smoke pot without worrying about the man, nor the consequences to society as a whole.

62 posted on 03/08/2012 9:44:15 AM PST by ejonesie22 (8/30/10, the day Truth won.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: blueunicorn6
the Mexican drug lords will undercut the price of the legal stuff

Just like criminals regularly undercut the price of legal alcohol?

and we just increase the number of psychotic people

The hefty increase in marijuana use over the last few decades has not been accompanied by a corresponding increase in psychosis. So much for that Chicken Little fable.

63 posted on 03/08/2012 9:44:51 AM PST by JustSayNoToNannies (A free society's default policy: it's none of government's business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
So. YOU know better than to use drugs, but are perfectly fine with our government allowing others to become enslaved to the problems of drugs abuse.

Or the problems of Internet addiction.
Or the problems of eating too many carbs (actually with their food pyramid, they actually encourage that, but that's another story).
Or the problems of not getting any exercise.
Or the problems of ....

64 posted on 03/08/2012 9:45:01 AM PST by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
Pot destroys lives.
It destroys potential.
Most all violent people in prison love their pot.

We now also have all these kids born with mental problems for life from using pot and other things while the baby was in the womb.

All true of the drug alcohol. Is banning that drug the right answer?

65 posted on 03/08/2012 9:46:44 AM PST by JustSayNoToNannies (A free society's default policy: it's none of government's business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: AnTiw1

The word I prefer is “Decriminalization”, that does not imply “Normalization”....in others words, you won’t get thrown in jail for using marijuana, but don’t expect to get a job or any government benefits if you do use.


66 posted on 03/08/2012 9:47:06 AM PST by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Retired Greyhound

If it feels good do it!

Which party pushes that thinking?


67 posted on 03/08/2012 9:47:32 AM PST by A CA Guy ( God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: JFC
I am stongly AGAINST legalizing Marijuana!

Care to tell us why?

68 posted on 03/08/2012 9:47:54 AM PST by JustSayNoToNannies (A free society's default policy: it's none of government's business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: morphing libertarian

I onder if the government would “allow” me..........

Don’t you see the basic fallacy in leaving this up to the government?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I MIGHT see the basic fallacy if you rephrased that question in English.

I kid. I don’t answer to libertarians. I hate libertarians - morphing or otherwise. (re-adding tagline). And I also don’t answer to that just say no fool.

There are some people on this site that may someday be reached - that someday more be converted to Conservatism, but Just say no is a lost cause.


69 posted on 03/08/2012 9:47:54 AM PST by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This means Liberals and libertarians! NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
We do not want our government involved in trashing our young people with legal drugs.

Since kids report that they can now get marijuana more easily than cigarettes or beer, it follows that the best way to restict their access to drugs is to make them legal for adults only (thus giving those who sell to adults a disincentive to sell to kids - namely, the loss of their legal adult market).

70 posted on 03/08/2012 9:49:12 AM PST by JustSayNoToNannies (A free society's default policy: it's none of government's business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: JustSayNoToNannies
All true of the drug alcohol. Is banning that drug the right answer?

It isn't banned, but there certainly is today a stigma assigned to a person smoking or drinking while pregnant. You just don't see that anymore.

71 posted on 03/08/2012 9:49:32 AM PST by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: JustSayNoToNannies

Nice smokescreen. How much you makin’ or takin’? Look up the definition of psychosis or go over to the daily kos because you’re out of your league here.


72 posted on 03/08/2012 9:49:53 AM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Really, dfw???

You want to equate drug usage with internet addiction, eating too may carbs, exercise...?

You know better than than.


73 posted on 03/08/2012 9:51:14 AM PST by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This means Liberals and libertarians! NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Prostitution, like marijuana, should be a state issue, like it was at the time the of the Constitution.


74 posted on 03/08/2012 9:52:49 AM PST by Retired Greyhound (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
I would also however, allow employers to test for it and they should have the right to fire or not to hire those who do use.

Since you didn't use any qualifiers such as "employers of employees performing hazardous tasks - e.g., air traffic controllers," I take it that you truly do mean ALL employers should be allowed to require ALL of their employees to submit to drug testing, right?

In other words, you'd like to see employers be given carte blanche to extract body fluids from their employees, right? And to be able to fire them, even if the employees have only been using perfectly legal substances on their own time?

In other words: Employees = chattel.

That's a very strange opinion for someone with a regard for our Bill of Rights to hold!

Regards,

75 posted on 03/08/2012 9:52:50 AM PST by alexander_busek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
If it feels good do it!

That's the thinking behind the War On Drugs - it hasn't had any demonstrable effect on drug use, it has enriched criminals with all the ills that entails, but its supporters feel good about having laws against bad acts (however futile and counterproductive).

76 posted on 03/08/2012 9:53:45 AM PST by JustSayNoToNannies (A free society's default policy: it's none of government's business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

If you don’t understand the word morphing, there are plenty of online dictionaries.

I can understand why you hate libertarians after your remark about what the government will allow. I would respond further, but the government won’t allow me.


77 posted on 03/08/2012 9:54:05 AM PST by morphing libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: ejonesie22

Well you’re part way there,. you understand the WOD has failed.

Now for the other half, where you’re completely backwards. A SANE society let’s people take their own risks.

Make all the bad puns you want but in the end it boils down to are we a free society of not? Free societies allow people to take risks, even unreasonable risks. Free societies allow stupid behavior. It allows people to eat unhealthy food, read in dim light, not dress properly for the weather, drink and smoke dope. Once you decide the government gets to start dictating which “bad” behavior is and isn’t acceptable you open the door for all kinds of stupid tyranny like we’re getting now, with socialized medicine and governments outlawing fatty foods all for “our own good” because they “know best”. Screw them, it’s not their life, it’s not their call. If I want to eat transfats (which I do) it’s my business, not theirs, not yours. If I want to smoke dope (which I haven’t in decades) it’s my business, not theirs, not yours.

As long as people are keeping the risk to themselves it’s really nobody’s damn business. At least in a free society.


78 posted on 03/08/2012 9:54:18 AM PST by discostu (I did it 35 minutes ago)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
there certainly is today a stigma assigned to a person smoking or drinking while pregnant.

Stigmatization is the liberty-loving answer for those opposed to drug use; criminalization is the lazy way out.

79 posted on 03/08/2012 9:56:28 AM PST by JustSayNoToNannies (A free society's default policy: it's none of government's business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: AnTiw1
"I've never used marijuana and I don't intend to, but it's just one of those things that I think: this war on drugs just hasn't succeeded."

Pat - the war on drugs doesn't limit itself to marijuana. If you legalize it, then what about the war on all the other drugs - do you think it will just go away? Legalizing marijuana would be just the beginning. Other illegal drugs would necessarily soon follow, otherwise the war on drugs would not go away and you wouldn't have accomplished anything.

80 posted on 03/08/2012 9:56:38 AM PST by mtg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JustSayNoToNannies
That's because the lethal dose of THC is so large you'd have to smoke 240 joints in a row to get there.

Actually, the LD for THC is so large that you couldn't smoke enough to die - it isn't physically possible. You would basically fall asleep (or pass out) long before you could possibly smoke enough to kill you. If you extracted it and concentrated it, then you could get a lethal dose.

As for people who say, "Well, the war on murder, robbery, rape, etc., haven't eradicated those crimes, so we should just stop fighting them too", is making a completely bogus straw-man argument. The difference between marijuana (and I might add alcohol) use and all those other crimes, is that all of those other crimes involve an UNWILLING VICTIM. I would also add that in my entire life, I have never seen anyone who was high on marijuana get into a fight, beat their wife/girlfriend, be loud, rude, and obnoxious, or "smoke" themselves to death. The same cannot be said of alcohol.

Furthermore, one of the reasons marijuana is so vilified is that it is supposedly a "gateway" drug, and its use will lead people to harder, more addictive, and more dangerous drugs. There is precious little evidence to support this claim. There are millions and millions of Baby Boomers out there who smoked pot for many years of their lives (and many, many of them still do, I am sure). In the overwhelming majority of those cases, they never did any harder drugs like cocaine or heroin, though some undoubtedly did experiment with LSD, Mescaline, Psiloscybin, and other hallucinogens.

Is marijuana consumption GOOD for you? No, it isn't, but then neither is alcohol consumption. But you have to put this in perspective: marijuana is NOT a narcotic like cocaine, heroin, methampethamine, etc. It is also NOT addictive like those other drugs. Habit forming? To a degree, but as a (arguably very mild) hallucinogen, it is not an addictive drug (I won't waste space explaining why that is).

People need to get past the knee-jerk "ALL DRUGS ARE EVIL AND MUST BE BANNED AT ALL COSTS" attitude. They are no better than Carrie Nation, whose crusade led to a failed experiment in government intervention that led to gangsterism, corruption, and an enormous and entirely avoidable waste of resources and human lives.

It doesn't make sense to have a prohibition against marijuana any more than it made sense (or was feasible) to have a prohibition against alcohol. And as evidenced by changes in state laws over the past 15+ years, legalization in some form is coming, and it is going to happen. When, and to what degree, and how much the government will seek to control (and tax) it is the only question.

81 posted on 03/08/2012 9:56:55 AM PST by Sicon ("All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others." - G. Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Retired Greyhound

Go on.. go on...

Tell us more. Tell us how YOU beleive your state should LEGALIZE prostitution.

See? This is what I hate about libs who hide behind the Constitution. Libs who bring out the 10th Amendment to advance their liberal pro-porn, pot and prostitution agenda.


82 posted on 03/08/2012 9:58:17 AM PST by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Wagonboy

I spent 25 years working in the CA correctional system. 12 of those years in a Correctional Rehab facility. Weed is not the problem. Alcohol IS the main gateway drug. Always has been, always will be. When do we ban alcohol again? I believe the answer to all of this is personal responsibility. I should be solely responsible for whatever I do to my body. Society should not be obligated to bail me out medically, financially, or in any other way because of my decisions. If I deny someone else their rights by my actions-—that’s what laws and punishments should be for.


83 posted on 03/08/2012 9:58:28 AM PST by yadent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: backwoods-engineer

how do they plan to tax it? they can’t get a handle on
it even when its illegal.

In the great scheme of things this is waaay down the list.


84 posted on 03/08/2012 9:58:27 AM PST by RitchieAprile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
You want to equate drug usage with internet addiction, eating too may carbs, exercise...?

I'm not necessarily equating them....but how much government intrusion do you want to make sure people don't do those things? We want drunk drivers off the road, so what do we do, we monitor drivers...we don't ban alcohol, or make sure people don't drink. And if you truly want to decrease drug usage, use the power of social sanctions, as I mentioned earlier with how you no longer see pregnant women smoking or drinking....I don't necessarily think that's because they know it's bad for the baby, it's because they know that any one who see them doing it will be appalled, and they would be outcast.

85 posted on 03/08/2012 9:58:34 AM PST by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: blueunicorn6
The hefty increase in marijuana use over the last few decades has not been accompanied by a corresponding increase in psychosis. So much for that Chicken Little fable.

Nice smokescreen. How much you makin’ or takin’?

None and none. Your personal attack is duly noted, as is the weakness in your argument that it indicates.

Look up the definition of psychosis or go over to the daily kos because you’re out of your league here.

All your huffing and puffing isn't blowing away the simple fact I've noted. Too bad for you.

86 posted on 03/08/2012 9:58:53 AM PST by JustSayNoToNannies (A free society's default policy: it's none of government's business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: gdani
I enjoy wine, but don't drunk to get drunk.

Alcohol, while legal is still problematic. Kids still get it despite the laws and the fact that is so readily available makes such far more prevalent and easier than it should be.

So the "conservative" answer is to make MORE such drugs available, that will make society safer and people more productive?

Everyone running around drunk and stoned and high and spaced out as long as it is “legal” is a conservative argument?

Really?

Wow...

I think that sums up the gulf between conservative and libertarian rather succinctly, why Reagan always said Libertarianism is the heart of Conservatism, but never said they were equals. Conservatives understand responsibility sometimes goes beyond self interests.

87 posted on 03/08/2012 9:58:59 AM PST by ejonesie22 (8/30/10, the day Truth won.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: discostu
As long as people are keeping the risk to themselves it’s really nobody’s damn business. At least in a free society.

I agree, but we haven't lived in a free society in a long time, my FRiend.

There are big government types on the left and the right.

88 posted on 03/08/2012 10:00:00 AM PST by Retired Greyhound (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: alexander_busek
I take it that you truly do mean ALL employers should be allowed to require ALL of their employees to submit to drug testing, right?

No, I said they should have the right to do so.....it's a business decision...some businesses may not have a problem with hiring drug users, that should be their choice.

89 posted on 03/08/2012 10:00:39 AM PST by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
“We now also have all these kids born with mental problems for life from using pot and other things while the baby was in the womb.”

BS. There is absolutely no evidence of this. There is also no evidence that it causes brain damage or any irreversible brain changes. In fact, prior to prohibition, it was prescribed for menstrual cramps, labor cramps, PMS and morning sickness. Queen Victoria was the most famous patient.

Now, Alcohol is 100% proven to cause fetal damage. It is 100% proven to cause permanent brain damage. And it is 100% legal.

90 posted on 03/08/2012 10:00:46 AM PST by varyouga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero
Cannabis can precipitate the first episode of psychosis[.] If someone has a predisposition to a psychotic illness, such as schizophrenia, use of drugs such as cannabis may trigger the first episode in what can be a lifelong, disabling condition.

Gotta love those wiggle words!

Also: Source?

Also: And alcohol?

Also: I'm sure that it would be no problem carrying out a study to prove that inhaling gasoline fumes "could" pose a similar risk - Should we therefore also illegalize gasoline?

Regards,

91 posted on 03/08/2012 10:01:19 AM PST by alexander_busek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: mtg
Other illegal drugs would necessarily soon follow, otherwise the war on drugs would not go away and you wouldn't have accomplished anything.

Wrong - you'd have taken a big bite out of criminal profits by removing far and away the most popular currently illegal drug from the black market.

92 posted on 03/08/2012 10:02:30 AM PST by JustSayNoToNannies (A free society's default policy: it's none of government's business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: discostu
As long as people are keeping the risk to themselves it’s really nobody’s damn business

When you get ObamaCare, it will become EVERYBODY'S business......that's one reason Obama/RomneyCare must be stopped.

93 posted on 03/08/2012 10:02:37 AM PST by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: morphing libertarian

I’m sorry to attack you based on you screen name. You haven’t had it very long. If I were you, I’d abandon it and start over with a decent one.

I’m still getting over the fact that I had LIBERTARIAN JOE zotted yesterday. He was a typical lib. Supported RoPaul and had nasty things to say about Newt and Santorum.

I don’t know how he lasted here 11 years, but he is no more.


94 posted on 03/08/2012 10:02:47 AM PST by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: alexander_busek

Why should a business be forced by the government to hire drug users. Business owners should have rights as well.


95 posted on 03/08/2012 10:04:12 AM PST by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: discostu
As long as people are keeping the risk to themselves it’s really nobody’s damn business. At least in a free society.

And that's the problem right there...

The risk is not always self contained...

96 posted on 03/08/2012 10:04:30 AM PST by ejonesie22 (8/30/10, the day Truth won.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
Tell us how YOU beleive your state should LEGALIZE prostitution.

See? This is what I hate about libs who hide behind the Constitution. Libs who bring out the 10th Amendment

I'd vote for zoned, regulated prostitution in my state - it beats enriching criminals and having no control over where prostitution takes place. Nevadans made a similar choice. Where's the "hiding"?

97 posted on 03/08/2012 10:05:40 AM PST by JustSayNoToNannies (A free society's default policy: it's none of government's business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

” It’s amazing how hypocritical lbertaians can be. “

conservative for gingrich, not that it makes any difference, oh labeling one:

” One minute they are flaming away at RoPaul and Pat Robertson, the next - they are in agreement with them. “

links?

” It’s very simple. We should not surrender to Mexico. We should continue to fight the WOD. “

yup and hows that working out? taking MS13’s lunch money away doesn’t appeal to you?

” We shoulld tell all libertarians to put down that bong and shut up. “

i don’t have a bong, but i catch your drift...my address is on my profile, so nothing’s holding you back from ‘shutting me up’, is there?


98 posted on 03/08/2012 10:07:07 AM PST by AnTiw1 ("Where Liberty is, there is my country.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: RitchieAprile
how do they plan to tax it? they can’t get a handle on it even when its illegal.

Taxing is easier when it's legal - do you think bathtub gin was effectively taxed during Prohibition?

99 posted on 03/08/2012 10:07:07 AM PST by JustSayNoToNannies (A free society's default policy: it's none of government's business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Retired Greyhound

Yup. Everybody’s got their sacred cow, everybody wants control on some level. Even I’ve got a few, if you gave me a button to push that would eradicate the cellphone from American culture I’d push it so hard and so fast I’d probably injure myself, I see no benefit from them and lots of annoyance from their users. On some level I realize that my loathing of cellphones and my support of limiting their use is really counter to my usual small government instincts, but they still irritate me. So I try to be a little sympathetic to the drug warriors, we’ve all seen lives destroyed by addiction and I can certainly understand not wanting to see them legal because of it, but on this issue I can look past the personal to the big picture, which they can’t, but I can’t on cellphones. Everybody’s got a cow.


100 posted on 03/08/2012 10:08:00 AM PST by discostu (I did it 35 minutes ago)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 251-278 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson