I'd love to know why you continually set yourself up to be shot out of the water.
I know I'm wasting my time, but let's see you do a point-by-point, Scripturally-supported, factual refutation of the original article that that response is attached to. Oh, and you'll have to, for the moment, act like you don't believe that the book of Revelation was fulfilled in 70AD.
I can't wait to see this.
Excuse me? Did you even read what I wrote?
Oh, and you'll have to, for the moment, act like you don't believe that the book of Revelation was fulfilled in 70AD.
My position does not require that, and I don't hold to it.
If you're having trouble with making the necessary distinctions, ask, and someone will help.
You have to understand that, when it involves me, you will be called out on your misrepresentations and lame attempts to "prove" you are right by posting a response I made without addressing the subject matter or context that the response was made to.
I didn't expect you to be able to refute the article for many reasons, first of which is the fact that you would be required to deal with Scripture that you have had to discard and deny to make your "doctrines" work.
Anyone who may be interested can go to the original post and read the article and come away not only with an understanding of how people will be saved during the Tribulation and the requirements God has for one holding on to their salvation during the Tribulation, but also with a clear understanding that your posts are simply not to be taken seriously.