Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: marshmallow

While this is all true, the Church’s silence and capitulation on “no-fault” divorce hasn’t helped any. Then, to compound the Church’s culpability, at least in the U.S. and most of the Church in the West, it requires civil divorce (i.e., “no-fault” divorce) before the tribunals will accept a petition for nullity (annulment), thus further undermining marriage. Especially, when it is a near certainty that the annulment will be granted (over 90%).


3 posted on 05/20/2012 10:08:06 AM PDT by Catholic Iowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Catholic Iowan
Absolutely correct. The acceptance of no-fault divorce laws was the first stumble. But where the Church really fell is when it allowed the blanket rejection of Humanae Vitae by large segments of the laity (and clergy) to stand uncorrected. Rather than risk "downsizing" the church by inviting those who rejected Catholic teaching to be consistent and leave the Church altogether, instead they "compromised" and kept silent and so allowed the moral rot to seep from the secular culture through the pews and into the sanctuary itself.

The result is the enfeebled moral authority the Church has today.

6 posted on 05/20/2012 11:30:06 AM PDT by AustinBill (consequence is what makes our choices real)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson