good luck with that
I’ve read copies of that apocryphal “gospel” online. It reads exactly like the Koran. The last verse contains a blasphemy that accuses the apostle Paul of apostasy (against Allah that is).
"...it says Jesus was never crucified and that he was not the Son of God."
why can’t we just turn the whole place into a freaking sand bowl.
It was like that in OT times. You go against God, you get zotted. Some portray Jesus as a hippy but he wasn’t. Praise God that Christians are under a better covenant. Iran however, is NOT.
The paper also argues that in the text Jesus himself predicts the coming of Muhammad.
WOW!!! What a coincidence.
Found in Iran and it coincides perfectly with the blather found in the koran!!!
Who'd have thunk it!
Is that allah you got in yer bag o lies satan?
The Gospel of “Barnabas” = another book of “mormon”,
Christianity as it exists today is showing some real wheel wobble; i.e. “gay marriage” some of its leaders denying the Lords divinity etc. Some recently found pseudo gospel will not destroy Christianity, but its current leadership just might.
If Jesus lied about being the Son of God, why would I believe his prediction about Mohammad?
‘Gospel of Barnabas,’ by Dan Brown.
Another huge lie from the liar religion created by the biggest liar of all time: the Enemy of God.
I believe I am correct in saying that ALL the accepted canon of the New Testament were written either by Apostles (to include Paul) or their very close associates. For example, the Gospel of Mark is thought to actually be Peter’s account as told to Mark (John Mark, I think). I also think that all books of the NT have reliable dating before AD 80, only about 50 years after the crucifixion of Christ. Working on memory here, and I am not a trained Biblical scholar.
No way could a document written over 500 years later could even remotely be considered for canon. Many of the so-called gospels or books that were left out of canon were written by Gnostics, whose theolgy was clearly and forcefully debunked by Paul. The History and Discovery channels carry on a cottage industry of second guessing the books chosen for the canon by conjuring up a conspiracy theory as to why the Gnostic literature was excluded. Most Christians, sadly, do not know why.
The claims by the Iranians are laughable rubbish and probably mere hog dung propaganda for the consumption of their captive Muzzie audience.
Only the Bible says what happens thousands of years before it happens.
The Koran does not do this. It in an imposter.
I’ll wait for the Hollywood version.
Guys, it’s a fake. The idiots that produced this “Gospel” and the Enemedia that ran with the story didn’t even bother consulting anyone that can read Syriac to verify if what the Turkish/Iranian authorities are about the text are true.
It’s NOT 1500 years old aka written sometime in 500 AD. According to the text in the picture of the “Gospel” it was WRITTEN in 1500 AD. And that’s just one of the many problems with it.
Muslims are notorious liars (like how they claim Buddhist and Hindu scripture foretells of Mohammed’s arrival). For all we know this just another copy of the 15th-16th century Gospel of Barnabas that they (Muslims) tried to pass off as the real deal.
Long time lurker but I felt I needed to sign up to post this.
Gee a new ‘gospel’ that supports Islam written at the time that Islam started.
Well, the Romans and the Jewish leaders wanted to find the body pretty bad. They never did.