Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

James Carville: Romney’s Mormon religion still a problem [Mitt silent on bishop, gov roles]
Daily Caller.com ^ | July 6, 2012 | Jeff Poor

Posted on 07/08/2012 8:01:01 AM PDT by Colofornian

n an appearance on WWL radio in New Orleans earlier this week, James Carville surveyed the Romney campaign and said the presumptive GOP nominee still hasn’t overcome the issue of his Mormon religion.

According to Carville, who has a forthcoming book called “It’s the Middle Class, Stupid,” Romney’s reluctance to talk openly about that is keeping him from dominating the campaign against President Barack Obama.

“One of the problems that Romney has honestly is — the thing against him the most is his religion,” Carville said. “And he doesn’t understand the reasons. He doesn’t talk about that. He was a bishop in his church. And he doesn’t talk about the one public office that he held much and that was being the governor of Massachusetts. So, he talks about Bain, but that’s become sort of a big issue in the campaign. He’s got to, you know — if you look at the numbers, Romney should win this campaign.”

“So, I think Romney is going to come out — I think they’re going to recalibrate their strategy a little bit,” he said. “I think they’re going to have to. And he just going to have to be more aggressive talking about some of the things he has done and give people a window into as who he is.”

The best thing for Romney to do, Carville said, would be to highlight his ability to “fix things.”

“I would say, look people are looking for someone that can fix things,” Carville said. “And you got to tell them Romney is that guy. You know, you accomplished that with the Olympics. You actually accomplished that when you were governor of Massachusetts. And you actually accomplished that when you ran Bain.”

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2012/07/06/carville-romneys-religion-still-a-problem-with-his-presidential-candidacy/#ixzz202gM8gr0


TOPICS: Current Events; Other non-Christian; Religion & Culture; Religion & Politics
KEYWORDS: 2012; carville; inman; jamescarville; lds; mittromney; mormon; mormonism; romney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 251-270 next last
To: dragonblustar
It’s good to see some conservatives vet Romney unlike the elites in the GOP.

"Vetting" is what you do when deciding whether to choose one thing instead of something else.

The choice before us in November is between Romney and Obama.

Those here on FR who say they will not vote for either Obama or Romney, and who continually trash Romney, are not "vetting" Romney. They are campaigning against him. The only possible result of this trashing is to make Romney more likely to lose the election.

These are simple, undeniable truths, yet they are denied here on FR every single day.

This is what passes for "true conservatism" here these days.

51 posted on 07/08/2012 10:23:06 AM PDT by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip
...admit that Romneycare has been unmitigated financial disaster for Massachusetts...

Romneycare is Massachusetts state law and is the responsibility of the MA legislature and the people of MA. If they like it, fine. If they want to change or eliminate it, they can. You arrogantly declare that it "has been unmitigated financial disaster" but apparently the people living with it do not agree.

...and explain just exactly how he will euthanize Obamacare.

Romney has done this. Why do you claim otherwise?

52 posted on 07/08/2012 10:28:46 AM PDT by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: albie
It really doesn't matter if you vote for obama or for romney. There's no fundamental difference between the two, and when it comes to all of the relevant issues of the day, they are both on the wrong side.

When you vote for romney you are voting for the wrong side of all relevant issues and ending up with a President just like obama.

I look forward to the convention.

53 posted on 07/08/2012 10:30:59 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: svcw

They are filled with fear. Not one ABO can stand here and honestly say they are ‘standing up for what they believe in’. If they can, then they believe in abortion, a homosexulaized country, Romney care and the rest of Mitt Romney’s record.

If that’s what they want, they’ll get it. It’s their choice to make. If every ABO in America voted for Goode or Tom, then then we’d have neither O or MR. But because they are too afraid of what ‘might’ happen, they will not. FEAR...they haZ it! And we are all in deep poop because they refuse to stand ‘for’ something.

Imagine all the founding fathers with a pragmatic attitude and situational ethics... We’d have Rule Britania as the national anthem.


54 posted on 07/08/2012 10:33:06 AM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39
Nothing would make the FReeper Hater Club of One happier than for him to have the power to banish all those who refuse to kiss his "choose the right" ring.

It would be hard to point to a more clearly distilled example of "projection" than this.

55 posted on 07/08/2012 10:33:06 AM PDT by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam

Hey Yam, why do you keep ducking my question?


56 posted on 07/08/2012 10:35:32 AM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam

I’m voting for Romney. The GOP shoved him down our throats and now we are stuck with him.

If the GOP wanted this man then they will have all this flaws chained to their necks. If Romney does anything like he did when he was gov of Massachusetts then that too will be chained to the necks of the GOP.

Just because I’m voting for Romney, I will not hide from the truth of who he is. He is a class one fraud. My only hope is for the Tea Party conservatives to hold his feet to the promises he’s made.


57 posted on 07/08/2012 10:38:12 AM PDT by dragonblustar (Allah Ain't So Akbar!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart
You tell me how a conservative can vote for a liberal without abandoning his conservative beliefs to do so and I’ll campaign for Romney.

A simple request that you continue to make excuses for and duck out of. Come on Yam...tell the class how it’s done.

I have done that repeatedly and you know it.

You claim otherwise because you have no integrity.

58 posted on 07/08/2012 10:38:38 AM PDT by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam
That would be a perfect post on TBL, just copy and paste.

You know zero in my opinion about conservationism otherwise you would not be supporting Romney an abortion supporter, homosexual agenda supporter, man made global warming supporter, government mandate supporter, big government supporter..........and on and on supporter of liberal programs.

59 posted on 07/08/2012 10:38:41 AM PDT by svcw (If one living cell on another planet is life, why isn't it life in the womb?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam

You are a liar.

I invite everyone here to view Yam’s post history over the last 2-4 days. They show definitively he has not.

He flatly REJECTED my offer and told me I was not sincere.

Do I HAVE to post it for you Yam? Or will you just admit you are a liar and be done with it?


60 posted on 07/08/2012 10:42:30 AM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam; Norm Lenhart
I have done that repeatedly and you know it.

Well, do it again because I missed it. I even went back to read your posts, and couldn't find it.

So to humor me because I missed it, please repeat how a conservative can support a liberal as well as disparage other conservatives who disagree with you.

Thanks.

61 posted on 07/08/2012 10:44:44 AM PDT by svcw (If one living cell on another planet is life, why isn't it life in the womb?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: svcw

Here it is. His “Answer”

Team Romney: No, we’re not declaring ‘cease-fire’ on Obamacare
Tuesday, July 03, 2012 1:09:20 PM · 41 of 508
rogue yam to Norm Lenhart

My estimation is that your offer is utterly insincere.

Thus, no deal.
Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies


62 posted on 07/08/2012 10:54:04 AM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart; svcw

No, Norm, it is you who is a liar.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2902450/posts?page=239#239


63 posted on 07/08/2012 10:55:19 AM PDT by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam

Team Romney: No, we’re not declaring ‘cease-fire’ on Obamacare
Tuesday, July 03, 2012 1:09:20 PM · 41 of 508
rogue yam to Norm Lenhart

My estimation is that your offer is utterly insincere.

Thus, no deal.
Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies


64 posted on 07/08/2012 10:57:00 AM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: svcw
Here's the problem with the GOP-e candidates:

Landon lost.

Willkie lost.

Dewey lost.

Dewey lost again.

Nixon lost.

Goldwater lost.

Ford lost.

Dole lost.

McCain lost.

Their brand is not doing as well as random chance!

It's time to start viewing them as a minority party seeking to subvert the Republican party. Hold their feet to the fire on credentials ~ first NO RINOS ~ and that's going to be TWO DEFINITIONS. First, no one who was ever elected as a Democrat is allowed to register with the party to run as President. Second, no one who ever contributed to a Democrat is allowed to register with the party to run as President.

You guys might add a third standard regarding Conservative voting records if you want, but that's not as hard and fast as being a Democrat in public.

Romney donated to a Democrat!

We also need to do a one-time purge of the Republican National Committee excluding former Democrat party campaigners.

65 posted on 07/08/2012 10:57:26 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam
Romney has done this.

Where in his bedroom or in front of his bathroom mirror.

Why do you claim otherwise?

Because he hasn't done it.

66 posted on 07/08/2012 10:58:50 AM PDT by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam

Not one word of that explains the impossible scenario of how a conservative can vote for a lib without abandoning his beliefs to do so. It is paragraphs of self justifying bull$hit.


67 posted on 07/08/2012 10:59:24 AM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam; Uncle Chip
Romneycare is Massachusetts state law and is the responsibility of the MA legislature and the people of MA. If they like it, fine. If they want to change or eliminate it, they can.

OBAMAcare is United States Law and is the responsibility of the Congress and Senate and the people of The United States. If they like it, fine. If they want to change or eliminate it, they can.

Do you disagree with that? Is Obamacare a legitimate exercise of Legislative Power?

Under what theory of Liberty would you authorize Massachusetts to institute Romneycare and punish people who just want to be left alone and take care of themselves?

68 posted on 07/08/2012 11:01:23 AM PDT by P-Marlowe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Colofornian

I have a bigger problem with Obamas communistic principles.


69 posted on 07/08/2012 11:04:02 AM PDT by television is just wrong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

I like it.
A little bothered by once a democrat though.
I want people to get with the program, having said that Romney become Republican just to run for office, that should end. Before that he and his family were big liberal dems. (Now they are just big liberal Rs).


70 posted on 07/08/2012 11:04:26 AM PDT by svcw (If one living cell on another planet is life, why isn't it life in the womb?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Colofornian

Ping for later.


71 posted on 07/08/2012 11:07:33 AM PDT by ConjunctionJunction
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart
They are filled with fear. Not one ABO can stand here and honestly say they are ‘standing up for what they believe in’. If they can, then they believe in abortion, a homosexulaized country, Romney care and the rest of Mitt Romney’s record.

It's not just the ABO crowd.

The people we've elected were suppose to uphold the constitution. They did not!

How could America turn upside down in just a few years? I'd blame Obama but part of the blame goes to the Republicans. Where the hell were they? Why the hell have they been so silent?!

You damn right people are filled with fear. We are afraid for the future, for our loved ones, for our children!!!!!

Blood isn't just on the hands of those voting for Romney but also for those who supported those so called conservative candidates who said they'd defend us. They did not!!!!

I'm not asking anyone to vote for Romney but I am opposed to those who toss around comments that we are some how supporting abortion, gays etc. The truth is, the majority of the candidates we've voted for have lied to us and have let us down, otherwise we would not be in the mess we are in today.

Romney is going to be a back flipping weasel. He's proven that before and it's only logical that he will do it again.

The only thing we can hope for is that the people will demand the RINO to keep the promises he's made. If Obama stays in office, we will have no voice at all.

If there is another plan to take back America, I'm all ears.

And for those who vote for Romney, at least keep your eyes open when you do vote him. Don't ignore the truth about him because it will come back to haunt you. Don't go to sleep and think he's going to rescue us, because he won't. He'll be like some of the other republicans that were elected to do something and did not.

72 posted on 07/08/2012 11:13:16 AM PDT by dragonblustar (Allah Ain't So Akbar!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: svcw

Not just ‘once a Dem’, but elected as a public official under the Dem label!


73 posted on 07/08/2012 11:14:18 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
Neither ObamaKKKare nor RomneyKKKare are a legitimate exercise of legislative power.

They violate fundamental rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

74 posted on 07/08/2012 11:16:19 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: expat1000
Romney is not going to get sucked in to letting the Carville’s of this world define the terms of the debate as to who should be President.

Carville is no champion of Obama. He understands the importance of O losing and frets about Romney's inability to step up. Carville's criticism is perfectly approipriate. Mormanism is notoriously opportunistic and amoral. We do not need another consummate politician in the WH. We have one now and he is an unmitigated disaster. Better the devil we know than the devil playing god.

75 posted on 07/08/2012 11:16:35 AM PDT by Louis Foxwell (The day liberals grow up is the day tyranny ends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam
Ok, I am reading your alleged answer to me on how a conservative can vote for a liberal.

First thing I see is this:

I do not necessarily answer this or other simple questions asked of me by the worst Mitt-haters on this site, because the fact is there are numerous posters here that have completely abandoned reason, honesty, and decency in their single-minded campaign to prevent the GOP nominee from being elected President.

Admitting you do not answer "simple questions", whatever that means.

Several lines disparaging reasoned conservatives, then this.

I believe he has very few conservative accomplishments in politics because his only office was as Governor of a Democrat-dominated state. In Massachusetts he got along by going along with liberalism.

Then you add:

I support him for President now, and believe that in doing so I am not setting aside my conservative principles, is because of the circumstances of this moment. I hope that the GOP will control both houses of the next Congress and that the tea party movement will exert substantial influence on the legislation that Congress passes and sends to Pres. Romney for signature.

The above statement still says nothing about how a conservative can vote for a liberal, except you HOPE he does the right thing.

Then this line comes along:

Romney says he will repeal Obamacare. I believe he will. Obama will not.

The real question is why do yo beleive him. He in essence wrote obamaCare, his advisers DID write it AND they have said Romney will not repeal it.

Then you continue by trashing FR and conservatives, making the claim you are a conservative and people who disagree with your analysis can not possible be anything but Romney haters.

So I realize you have declared you will not answer what in your mind are simple questions because it is a waste of your time, just pretend this is a really complimented question: how can you claim to be a conservative and vote for a liberal?

76 posted on 07/08/2012 11:19:40 AM PDT by svcw (If one living cell on another planet is life, why isn't it life in the womb?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
So you're saying Goldwater was a "GOP-e" candidate? Why not Reagan, while you're at it? And didn't Nixon (another "GOP-e" candidate?) win at least once? And the Bushes weren't Republican elite candidates?

Your list proves nothing. Parties lose sometimes. They lose when they have weak candidates or strong opponents. They win when the economy is with them and lose when it's against them. Sometimes the right conditions produce the right candidate, sometimes not, but you can't expect the wrong conditions to produce a good candidate.

Landon, Willkie, Dewey, Ford, Dole and McCain were weak candidates. Anybody running against FDR was bound to lose. Nor is it likely a Republican could have prevailed in 1996 (running against incumbent Clinton and spoiler Perot in prosperous times) or in 2008 (with economic crisis and all the hostility to the Bush administration).

If there were a strong candidate who could have beaten Dole or McCain for the nomination, that candidate would have gotten the nomination. Maybe that candidate would have won the election, probably not. But there was no such candidate. It was a weak field that produced a weak nominee who was weak in the general election.

That suggests that "our brand" as well as "their brand" has some real problems. Saying that Non-existent Imaginary Fantasy Dream Candidate was really stronger than the people who actually got the nomination is wishful thinking. You run with who you have and if you don't have a candidate strong enough to beat the feeble candidates who get the nomination, then you're worse off than the (now largely imaginary?) "GOP-e".

77 posted on 07/08/2012 11:23:11 AM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam
It would be hard to point to a more clearly distilled example of "projection" than this.

Those who accuse others of "projection" don't seem to realize that the accusation itself is "projection". And as usual, it's a straw man built to try and derail the discussion.

Question is, does Rogue Yam receive a regular payment from the Romney campaign? If not, IMO he should.

78 posted on 07/08/2012 11:24:53 AM PDT by greyfoxx39 (Until the 52K LDS missionaries claiming Christian faith is bogus quit, I will post LDS truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: dragonblustar

“I’m not asking anyone to vote for Romney but I am opposed to those who toss around comments that we are some how supporting abortion, gays etc.”

I do not see any logical way around the reality that when we intentionally cast our vote for a person, we give power to that person.

When that person has told us he supports abortion, gace money to support abortion, signed legislation supporting abortion, said he supports gay rights, signed legislation that supports gay rights...and on and on...; and we empower that person with our vote, then he has been given the power to do more of it. By the people who supported him/ner and his actions/policies etc...WITH THEIR VOTE.

It’s my opinion that many people are simply not fully thinking this through. If they ARE thinking this through and still vote for such a person, it logically follows that they willingly support his positions and thus are part of the problem themselves.


79 posted on 07/08/2012 11:27:26 AM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: expat1000

Not a Romney fan, but Car-vile is all wet. The media never vetted The First Dictator and were content not finding out who he was. After all, a Leftist, reared by Communists and Muslims, wouldn’t have contributed to their fairy tale.


80 posted on 07/08/2012 11:29:21 AM PDT by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: svcw

Go get ‘em SVCW!


81 posted on 07/08/2012 11:30:45 AM PDT by greyfoxx39 (Until the 52K LDS missionaries claiming Christian faith is bogus quit, I will post LDS truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: svcw; rogue yam

Well...”obviously” you missed the ‘nuance’ of his complicated thesis. So did I.

I’ll just stand by my statement, backed up by his diversionary rambling that he did in fact lie, that liars cannot be trusted by conservatives or anyone else valuing principle over situational ethics, and that he abandoned any conservatism he once had to back a full blown liberal.

Pretty sure his very statements that I and he posted show I’m not the liar here. ;)


82 posted on 07/08/2012 11:36:04 AM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart; rogue yam

Norm you are correct. There is a liar, deceiver, confiscator of the truth, dancer around issues........ and it’s not us.


83 posted on 07/08/2012 11:39:02 AM PDT by svcw (If one living cell on another planet is life, why isn't it life in the womb?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart
It’s my opinion that many people are simply not fully thinking this through.

How many times have you vote in your life? Can you account for every vote your candidate has cast?

Your looking for absolutes. I'd love to vote for the perfect person. Hell, I thought I had a couple of times, turns out once they get to Washington, they turn into something different.

Right now, there's two people running for president. Obama and Romney. I don't like that but that's what it is, that's the the almighty GOP gave us... What else are we to do?

I want Obama out and Romney is not the savior. It will take a long time to undo what Obama has done and it won't happen with one person. It will only happen if the people start to change. We can't expect to have to perfect candidate when the culture is so corrupt. Fix the culture and you'll have a better candidate. You can't do it the other way around.

84 posted on 07/08/2012 11:45:14 AM PDT by dragonblustar (Allah Ain't So Akbar!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: x
So, you want to actually argue that the anti-social Conservative candidates were not the product of GOP-e intrigue?

The reason Goldwater lost is simple ~ he gave away the 30% of the black vote previous Republicans had received AND he gave away the Social Conservative vote ~ maybe not as big back then as now, but the idiot gave it away.

Nixon is almost a special case since he later on won two times, but in his first race he was the GOP-e (liberal lite) candidate against the more Conservative Democrat JFK.

Nixon never ran that way again.

Pappy Bush won when the Reagan Conservative base still thought of him as their kind of Conservative. When they found out he was a GOP-e backstabber they dumped him like yesterday's garbage.

Dole and McCain failed to come to grips with the demographic realities of today's Republican party and gave too much head to the GOP-e. In fact, McCain hired on all of Romney's backstabbers and that pretty much nullified any social Conservative leverage he'd gained with Sarah Palin on the ticket.

Here's how bad it is for your boy Romney. His life's experience, his political and social beliefs, and even his voting record, who he associates with, his likes and dislikes parallel those of Wendell Willkie. Roosevelt was a sick man and his campaign ran through Willkie like (p..p) through a goose!

A NOTE: I've noticed almost none of the Mittbots are unwilling to discuss Willkie.

85 posted on 07/08/2012 11:49:16 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: svcw

All he can really do is say “I am not obama and obama sucks”.

******************

I believe that is the plan, and it might be sufficient. This year should have been a redux of 1980. But instead it will be a reset to 2007. At best.


86 posted on 07/08/2012 11:49:31 AM PDT by Psalm 144 (Voodoo Republicans. Don't read their lips. Watch their hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip

There is one thing that Romney can do to solidify his conservative support, and that is to admit that Romneycare has been unmitigated financial disaster for Massachusetts, and explain just exactly how he will euthanize Obamacare.

That’s all —

*************************

I’ve been thinking about that quite a bit. What would it take to be able to vote for this singularly repugnant man? First, to admit (or state) that abortion is wrong, despite what ‘mom’ thought. Second, admit that mandated government health control is always and everywhere coercive and counterproductive.

There are still many, many things which are odious about him and his record, but this would be enough to bring me over. Anyway he won’t do it. I don’t think he has ever admitted error.


87 posted on 07/08/2012 11:54:56 AM PDT by Psalm 144 (Government HealthControl. Uniting the compassion of HMOs and the diligence of bureaucracy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam; Norm Lenhart; svcw

Whenever you offer your lengthy explanation for your commitment to vote for Romney this November, I supplement your explanation in my own mind with the reminder that, since you live in California, your choice of candidate will have no impact on the outcome of the election no matter what you do. Since you don’t really have a vote that might matter, it may be easier for you to avoid confronting any conflict that might arise from voting for a liberal like Romney.

In other words, what difference does it make if you vote for a liberal? If it doesn’t make any difference to you, then it won’t make any difference to anyone.


88 posted on 07/08/2012 11:55:12 AM PDT by Tau Food (Tom Hoefling for President - 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
Is Obamacare a legitimate exercise of Legislative Power?

I do not want Obamacare to continue to be the law of the land.

That is why I will vote for the one Presidential candidate with a chance of winning who has said he will repeal Obamacare: Mitt Romney.

89 posted on 07/08/2012 11:57:04 AM PDT by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: dragonblustar

I have voted Republican all my life. As I have gotten older I have become far more discerning in who and what I vote for. In the last presidential election I voted McCain/Palin, solely for Palin. And that was the LAST time I will ever split the baby.

As whacked as he is, McCain has some identifiable conservative votes on his record. Romney has none I am aware of. Certainly none on any issue of serious import.

As I posted above, I’ll vote for someone who shares my values. No one but me will ever share them 100%. But in serious issues, I will not compromise. I have learned that by compromise, we only lose the battle 50% at a time instead of 100% at a time.

Let’s get it over with and start rebuilding what remains into the country the founding fathers gave us. Or better yet, all the ABOs in America can join me and we’ll win.

I find it interesting that a supposed conservative will compromise their principles to support the ultimate liberal republican but not ‘compromise’ them to vote for an actial conservative.

Some things are not worth ‘winning’.


90 posted on 07/08/2012 11:57:04 AM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39; rogue yam

There is no rebuttal. This is the fear vote on steroids.

These have been with us always. Some wanted to cling to Britain at the Revolution, some wanted to duck out on Britain against Hitler, preferring no resistance if any cost would be attached, as there always is to anything meaningful.


91 posted on 07/08/2012 11:58:53 AM PDT by RitaOK (NO ROMNEY, NO COMPROMISE. NO WAY. NO HOW. NOT NOW. NOT EVER.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam
The why is such and Uber Conservative such as yourself even bothering with FR anymore? You have pointed out that your words are falling on the deaf ears of us dummies. So why spit into the wind so?
92 posted on 07/08/2012 12:01:53 PM PDT by ejonesie22 (8/30/10, the day Truth won.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK

Rita, as I said recently, these people want to be able to say and do whatever they want and do it with a clear conscience. They are screaming for justification for their clearly non-conservative actions.

In short, they want to be able to support a man who supports dead babies, homosexuals, the lib agenda etc, and do so with a clear conscience. Because their vote for a man who supports all those things SAYS THEY DO to anyone who believes that truth isn’t some mutable entity.

No matter how they justify themselves, the truth always outs.


93 posted on 07/08/2012 12:04:43 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: ejonesie22; rogue yam

Because like a child having a tantrum on the floor of the checkout isle, Rogue Yam wants attention. That and he ‘may’ well be a paid shill for Romney. But we can be 100% sure about the tantrum part.


94 posted on 07/08/2012 12:07:45 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: ejonesie22
You have pointed out that your words are falling on the deaf ears of us dummies. So why spit into the wind so?

There are many FReepers who continue to embrace reason and truth-seeking.

I hear directly from them every day.

95 posted on 07/08/2012 12:07:56 PM PDT by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam
And you trust that the Man who provided the actual real world model for Obamacare to will not turn on that or invoke his own version...

Uh huh...

96 posted on 07/08/2012 12:08:18 PM PDT by ejonesie22 (8/30/10, the day Truth won.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam

I’m sure you do...


97 posted on 07/08/2012 12:09:08 PM PDT by ejonesie22 (8/30/10, the day Truth won.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam

Over on True Blue Liberty you mean?

BTW, I just got a FReepmail invite to go there ;)

BTW, we all await your answer to my question. Still.


98 posted on 07/08/2012 12:10:58 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam

Yam, your vote for Romney means NOTHING, NADA, ZIP because you live in California.
Just as my non vote for Romney means NOTHING, NADA, ZIP because I live in California.
So why are do you keep on pressing other conservatives to suspend all conservative principles and vote for the R called Romney the liberal.


99 posted on 07/08/2012 12:13:45 PM PDT by svcw (If one living cell on another planet is life, why isn't it life in the womb?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

I moved out of a socialist country with my family to get away from “national health care”. I swore that my kids would have a better life and never have to go through what I went through when I had surgery at a London hospital.

I would have never thought that in less than 13 years America would go down the path of socialized medicine.

Where do I go now?....... I’m so damn angry.


100 posted on 07/08/2012 12:16:53 PM PDT by dragonblustar (Allah Ain't So Akbar!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 251-270 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson