Posted on 07/11/2012 5:53:57 AM PDT by Colofornian
Omitting the relevant sentence in the Trinity definition you sourced so that it fit the current Mormon assertion of “belief” in the Trinity was deceitful.
Bye.
Standing by principals is so old fashion, compromise and capitulation is where its at now days.
- - - - -
Well, just call me an old fashioned kinda gal...
:D
A small excerpt: "Why I fight vociferously against Romney is because he is false, doomed to fail from the start... And it takes all the air away from those who really could advance our cause, and actually do have a chance at waking up the sleeping giant. Reagan's great gift to Conservatives was to show us what we can do when we work together - And how that works (the only way it works) is when no one has to take a back seat... Where everyone's immovable 'first things' (principles, for those of you in Rio Linda) are honored and upheld. Romney cannot ... And I do mean CANNOT... be that guy. So let's get busy and find someone who can."
Let me see I can put this simple, I stopped reading when you wrote “Romney hater’. Until you can show me a single post where I said I hated Romney, I’ll read the rest.
Not ridiculous at all to those who are not wearing blinders.
Obamacare=Romneycare
Both are pro illegals
Both are pro gay marriage
Both appointed liberal judges
Both support gun bans
Both attended racist churches even
Mitt is just a ‘white and delightsome’ (to use a book of Mormon phrase) version of Obama.
Not ridiculous at all to those who are not wearing blinders.
Obamacare=Romneycare
Both are pro abortion
Both are pro illegals
Both are pro gay marriage
Both appointed liberal judges
Both support gun bans
Both attended racist churches even
Mitt is just a ‘white and delightsome’ (to use a book of Mormon phrase) version of Obama.
I understand that.
A purposeful ommission of relevant facts or context is deceit.
- - - - -
Then why do you keep doing it, BM?
I remember that post, it is a classic and worth a repost.
Why do you keep assuming we are staying home? There are other races, and I will vote for POTUS just not either of the clowns who apparently will be on the ticket (Mitt or Obama).
So, scram2 is a retread troll? I thought he smelled funny.
Pardon me?
I didn’t address you at all that I am aware of.
I did leave the thread until various psychopaths pulled me back into it with their worthless garbage spam.
Believe me when I tell you I want NOTHING to do with this forum or anyone in it.
It’s repugnant.
37, easiest way to deal with your “problem”, stop responding - it’s called ignore, ignore and ignore, and if that doesn’t work ignore, ignore and ignore again.
Yes, that’s the only opinion that matters. Based on the comments I read here on FR, most thought it was quite good.
Believe me when I tell you I want NOTHING to do with this forum or anyone in it.
Its repugnant.
- - - - -
So, religion is ‘repugnant’ to you? That explains a lot and I suppose is rather ironic. Or is FR repugnant to you as well since many of those on this thread also post elsewhere?
Why are you still here then?
You are right SV, it is an easy solution.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.