Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What drove English and American anti-Catholicism? A fear that it threatened freedom
Catholic Herald ^ | November 12, 2013 | DANIEL HANNAN

Posted on 11/12/2013 3:47:47 PM PST by NYer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-219 next last

1 posted on 11/12/2013 3:47:48 PM PST by NYer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick; GregB; Berlin_Freeper; SumProVita; narses; bboop; SevenofNine; Ronaldus Magnus; tiki; ...

Ping!


2 posted on 11/12/2013 3:48:17 PM PST by NYer ("The wise man is the one who can save his soul. - St. Nimatullah Al-Hardini)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Could it have been that Catholicism is incorrect?


3 posted on 11/12/2013 3:53:29 PM PST by Dutchboy88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
The biggest single factor driving English Anti-Catholicism was the fear that a return of the Catholic church would result in the return of the confiscated church lands. The English nobles fostered hostility to the church in order to protect their new land holdings.

After the French revolution the Vatican wisely renounced all of the church's claims to confiscated lands in France.

4 posted on 11/12/2013 3:57:50 PM PST by SeeSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dutchboy88

Could it be you are ignorant?


5 posted on 11/12/2013 3:57:52 PM PST by sean327 (God created all men equal, then some become Marines!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dutchboy88
the bellicose anti-Catholicism that powered the American Revolution 

Any day is a good day for historical revisionism!

6 posted on 11/12/2013 3:58:33 PM PST by Alex Murphy ("the defacto Leader of the FR Calvinist Protestant Brigades")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Well, there was a long history of persecuting Protestant “heretics”. And also the fact that as late as the late 1800s the official position of the Pope was that republican government was against the will of God, and the only acceptable form of government was a Catholic monarchy.


7 posted on 11/12/2013 3:58:43 PM PST by Hugin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dutchboy88

The inquisition wouldn’t have anything to do with it would it?

Beside, Catholicism is not incorrect nor correct. It’s a faith. So, set your head straight, you having faith in something that others do not, does not equal wrong or right for either side.


8 posted on 11/12/2013 4:01:28 PM PST by Usagi_yo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Fear of divided loyalties was legitimate but not specific to Catholics. Franklin wanted Germans gone because so many had fought as mercenaries for the British. Today we Americans of German lineage are probably the single largest group in the country.

Today we Protestants mostly see Catholics as natural allies and assets in our fight to save America.


9 posted on 11/12/2013 4:03:34 PM PST by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Anti-catholicism was justified in the past, back in the days when Popes issued papal bulls calling for the oppression of ‘heretics’ and compelling adherents of the Catholic faith to turn against any government or ruler that was not Roman Catholic. It gave ideological support to the concept of monarchical absolutism and theocratic despotism. I fully understand why the Whigs of old equated ‘Popery’ with slavery.

That said, that was the Catholic Church of old, back in the days when the Pope got far too involved in temporal affairs. It is different now, and the Catholic Church of today is for the most part a force for good with a moral influence and authority that acts as a check on the worst excesses of secular government, but it wasn’t always so.


10 posted on 11/12/2013 4:06:53 PM PST by sinsofsolarempirefan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Our founders were not fond of state religions. Catholicism is the original state religion.


11 posted on 11/12/2013 4:09:33 PM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dutchboy88

Former FReeper Jodyel made a similar statement. Notice I typed former. Even Jim Rob got involved in that skirmish.


12 posted on 11/12/2013 4:09:38 PM PST by goodwithagun (My gun has killed fewer people than Ted Kennedy's car.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sinsofsolarempirefan

I’m happy to put that past behind us. There are some Catholics (and others) who want to pretend it never happened though, and portray all anti-Catholicism of the past as simple bigotry akin to racism.


13 posted on 11/12/2013 4:11:57 PM PST by Hugin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Too bad they (Catholics) vote overwhelming Democrat.


14 posted on 11/12/2013 4:23:16 PM PST by yellowdoghunter (Welcome to Obamastan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SeeSharp

The return of church land was not a big factor on the minds of Englishman. The biggest factor was the overturning of the English Constitution, unwritten but understood. The conflict between absolute monarchy and constitutional monarchy was thought parallel with The RC and Protestantism.
It is seen in the Anglosphere in coming to a head with our first revolution, Michael Barone’s term, the Glorious Revolution of 1689. James II was seen as embracing Catholic absolutism of the continent. This justified his overthrow to protect the English constitution, limiting the powers of the monarch through Parliament.


15 posted on 11/12/2013 4:26:11 PM PST by gusty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Going back to Henry VIII and his break with Rome, is the basis for the English and American anti-Catholicism. Remember that Queen Mary brought back Catholicism and ordered the execution of her father’s supporters of the break with Rome. As Henry had done with those who refused to break with Rome. It was also a world where Rome had political influence and was allied with Spain, France and the Holy Roman Empire.

In America, the English colonists saw the Spanish and French as enemies, both political and religious.

But one needs also to remember that in Maryland was a colony established for English Catholics. And it succeeded as a colony and also sought independence from England.

And in the late 1800s and early 20th Century, the immigrants from Catholic areas of Europe, also was seen as bringing socialism with it. Thus a new political issue was mixed into the old religious fears.

The key point is that many have striven to overcome these old hates as something that deserves to be in the past and NOT be used as reasons to keep them alive today.


16 posted on 11/12/2013 4:26:16 PM PST by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NYer

The really interesting thing about America’s founding is that as much as Protestants feared being dominated by the Church of Rome, the ideas which Jefferson immortalized in the Virginia Declaration of Rights and Declaration of Independence are uniquely Catholic.

Jefferson captured three main ideas: that our rights are endowed by God and cannot be denied by the state; that rulers rule by consent of the governed; and that power within governments should be distributed among multiple branches at both the local and central levels where they can best be addressed and absolute power is never attained by a tyrant. He based these ideas on his reading of De Laicis: Treatise on Civil Government by Catholic Cardinal (and Saint) Robert Bellarmine. Bellarmine had written the treatise in response to the consolidation of power over the Church in England by Henry the VIII. — Jefferson had a copy of the book in his library and it had his handwritten notes in the margins throughout. — It is also interesting to note that the divine right of the kings was defended by Sir Robert Filmer in “Patriarcha or of the Natural Power of Kings.” Filmer wrote in direct response to Bellarmine to defend the King’s control of the Church in England. So the mostly Protestant Founders embraced Catholic doctrines in order to protect religious freedoms which many Protestants at the time feared were threatened by the Catholic Church. —Ain’t history fun?


17 posted on 11/12/2013 4:27:35 PM PST by Bill Russell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hugin

Restrictions on Catholic immigration were lifted pretty quickly after the revolution. That’s good enough for me to consider it over.


18 posted on 11/12/2013 4:31:17 PM PST by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Who’s Charles Carroll of Carrollton?

He is a signer of the DoI.


19 posted on 11/12/2013 4:35:38 PM PST by ifinnegan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinsofsolarempirefan

I think your comments are reasonable. I would say most modern-day anti-Protestantism and anti-Catholicism is just simple bigotry. There is justifiable rationale for either side to prefer their theology over the others but these “battles” get far too personal and irrational IMO


20 posted on 11/12/2013 4:39:15 PM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-219 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson