Posted on 03/14/2014 9:18:55 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
No worries, it happens. Glad we cleared it up.
Blew each.... Flawed logic all around. Don’t bother to respond. You can practice forgiveness all you want
In other words, you're saying you didn't read the article I linked to?
Because even the Pentagon does not assert it can't be audited because of classified info.
Importantly, there needs to be a name change to the death penalty that will destabilize its opponents.
Instead of calling it the “death penalty” or “capital punishment”, say that the state is “euthanizing” these savage killers.
This works in two different ways against liberals.
Which they cannot. It is a Catch-22.
If the Pentagon budget is "classified" then what exactly is this referring to?
This topic isn’t about OTHER countries, it’s about what WE perceive as just. Ted Bundy escaped prison and went on to murder or maim four more women. There are too many cases of people convicted of a crime, then set free early, who go on to murder again.
Or, call it a post-murder abortion.
You make blank assertions which are no argument. This isn’t about forgiveness but justice. If they executed someone in your place it would be unjust double jeopardy for them to execute you for the same crime.
Prison: where amateur criminals become hardened and knowledgeable at the knee of depraved criminal lifers. Then the amateurs get out and are free to use their newly-acquired knowledge on society.
Any penetrative sex act on a child should merit a death sentence.
Looks like the PPE briefing guide or press release.
The "Pentagon" has two meanings.
--1 is the actual building, the care and feeding of the grounds, security, utilities and administration of the facility (not including military personnel, contractors or civilians working for the respective branches).
--2 would be the DoD in general. The document you linked to is the DoD Plans, Programs and Execution portion of the budget. The first line gives you the right clue: "Discretionary" which means each branch in general at the discretion of the SecDef, who receives a budget each year from the respective 4 branches. These budgets are sub-portions of what is called the POM (Program Objectives Memorandum) and details plans for a variety of programs and facilities for a 5-year span, planned 2-4 years prior to POM execution. So you are looking at 7-10 years in the future with every POM evolution. This is in keeping with each branches Commanding General's 20-year vision.
Monies are planned per fiscal year, but programs run much longer than that and become Programs of Record (POR) and can run decades. I managed a multi-year program that was in excess of $25 million estimated lifecycle, which was estimated to be 15 years minimum, making it a defacto ACAT-1b program giving it Congressional oversight. Mine was a small POR.
Were you to add all of the dollar amounts on that paper you linked to, you would find lots of discrepancies due to classified projects that may or may not be part of the discretionary funds. This is intentional as classifed budgets cannot officially exist, but they do. Even the President has a classified budget, which is considered discretionary and I am sure that the current resident of the White House uses it to the fullest extent...
You are statistically incorrect on that. Atheist tyrannies such as communism/socialism/fascism are the most murderous force on earth. You are also incorrect to lump all belief systems under one word, "religion." Christianity and Islam are as different as night and day.
I honestly believe that you do not know what "double jeapordy" means.
I did not understand what you are trying to say here. Could you rephrase it or explain your point differently?
Mom: "Just because all the other kids are doing something is no reason for you to do it."
The things we learn from our parents...
What have I said that makes you think that?
Why is it "out of context" for a conservative American to consult the Bible for guidance on moral issues, such as whether capital punishment is justifiable?
Double Jeapordy is when one person suffers punishment twice for the same crime. You are speaking of two people suffering punishment for the same crime where one was innocent.
It should be on the moon, or at least Antarctica; not Alaska.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.