Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Sin of Sodom and Gomorrah is not about “Hospitality”
Blog: Archdiocese of Washington ^ | 04/08/2014 | Msgr. Charles Pope

Posted on 04/08/2014 6:44:54 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

1 posted on 04/08/2014 6:44:54 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
It probably does not surprise you that I got push-back from certain homosexuals who wrote in to “remind” me that the sin of Sodom “has nothing to do with homosexual acts, or homosexual rape. Rather,” they said, “It is only about violations of hospitality rules of the ancient near east.”

Because homosexual acts, and homosexual rape are completely moral acts that God doesn't bring judgment against < /sarc>

2 posted on 04/08/2014 6:49:15 AM PDT by Alex Murphy ("the defacto Leader of the FR Calvinist Protestant Brigades")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Actually, it was. But that doesn't mean the Sodomites' habit of homosexual rape of strangers wasn't a capital offense.

Why does everyone assume that the story of Sodom is the source and proof-text for the sinfulness of homosexuality? Homosexuality is explicitly forbidden in Leviticus 18.

3 posted on 04/08/2014 6:50:37 AM PDT by Zionist Conspirator (The Left: speaking power to truth since Shevirat HaKelim.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zionist Conspirator

What do you say to Homosexuals who would agree that it is about Hospitality AND gang rape BUT NOT consensual sex (especially when both partners love each other)?

The reason I ask is because I’ve heard this reasoning many times from gay friendly churches.

Also the gays would argue that Leviticus was not even written yet during the time of Sodom and Gomorrah...


4 posted on 04/08/2014 6:55:25 AM PDT by SeekAndFind (If at first you don't succeed, put it out for beta test.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Ever since Vatican II, which seemed to be the kick-off point for homosexual apologetics, the clergy have been hastening to tell us that the sin of Sodom was not homosexuality.

However, the fact that the word “sodomy” existed long before Vatican II indicates that most people understood it this way, that is, that the sin of Sodom was sexual sin.

The first time I heard in a homily that it was “failure to provide hospitality,” I almost burst out laughing.


5 posted on 04/08/2014 6:58:12 AM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Do gays think God changed his mind between the time of Sodom and the writing of Leviticus 18:22,24?


6 posted on 04/08/2014 7:03:16 AM PDT by MulberryDraw (Repeal it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Oh-oh ... how long befor Monsignor is called in for a dressing down from ++Wuerl over this essay?


7 posted on 04/08/2014 7:04:35 AM PDT by jtal (Runnin' a World in Need with White Folks' Greed - since 1492)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
It is only about violations of hospitality rules of the ancient near east.

What, not setting out the guest towels? It must be that, never mind the buggery.

8 posted on 04/08/2014 7:06:13 AM PDT by Last Dakotan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Lot (horrifyingly) proposes that they have sex instead with his daughters “who have never slept with a man” (i.e. his virgin daughters).

I found this by Daniel Greenfield (whose writing I really enjoy) about a 'show offer'.

He talks about a 'show offer' and explains that Lot was really saying was 'there is about as good a chance of me turning these guys over to you as there is to me giving you my virgin daughters'. Per Daniel, the mob understood what he was saying and there were livid.

9 posted on 04/08/2014 7:10:08 AM PDT by LearnsFromMistakes (Yes, I am happy to see you. But that IS a gun in my pocket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

What was the sin of Gomorrah?


10 posted on 04/08/2014 7:10:40 AM PDT by Citizen Tom Paine (An old sailor sends)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LearnsFromMistakes
and there were livid.

and they were livid.

11 posted on 04/08/2014 7:13:52 AM PDT by LearnsFromMistakes (Yes, I am happy to see you. But that IS a gun in my pocket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Tom Paine

They partied with the Sodomites.


12 posted on 04/08/2014 7:16:11 AM PDT by Just mythoughts (Jesus said Luke 17:32 Remember Lot's wife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Tom Paine

RE: What was the sin of Gomorrah?

Same as Sodom’s... the two are often mentioned as a PAIR.

See Matthew 10:15 and Jude 1:7 for instance.


13 posted on 04/08/2014 7:17:26 AM PDT by SeekAndFind (If at first you don't succeed, put it out for beta test.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Zionist Conspirator
Actually, it was. But that doesn't mean the Sodomites' habit of homosexual rape of strangers wasn't a capital offense. Why does everyone assume that the story of Sodom is the source and proof-text for the sinfulness of homosexuality? Homosexuality is explicitly forbidden in Leviticus 18.

How would the Sodomites have known about Leviticus 18? Moses had not yet been born to even pen the book when God destroyed the perverts.

14 posted on 04/08/2014 7:19:31 AM PDT by Just mythoughts (Jesus said Luke 17:32 Remember Lot's wife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The story is as clear as a bell, what it is about. Anybody who says the sin of Sodom was lack of hospitality is rationalizing. The Bible makes clear that the men of Sodom were almost all given in to homosexuality. Those wanting to engage in homosexuality reject all authority. They will bend and distort any truth that gets in their way, even to include the meaning of marriage.
These people are so far gone that nothing can be done with them. I’m sorry but they are lost. Only God can turn their heads.


15 posted on 04/08/2014 7:22:24 AM PDT by maxwellsmart_agent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Very solid analysis.


16 posted on 04/08/2014 7:24:32 AM PDT by LS ('Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually.' Hendrix)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zionist Conspirator

Exactly, the problem with Sodom was SIN. The homosexual acts were just one manifestation of it.


17 posted on 04/08/2014 7:26:52 AM PDT by sigzero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Zionist Conspirator
Why does everyone assume that the story of Sodom is the source and proof-text for the sinfulness of homosexuality? Homosexuality is explicitly forbidden in Leviticus 18.

Everyone? [exaggeration] Source? [a very good one, but certainly not the only one as you point out] Proof-text ....

Sodomite. As words go, it's a pretty powerful one. No surprise that its use is verbotten in the current PC environment. But in truth, even though forbidden to say in public, Sodomite = homosexual = 'gay'. And the origin of the word is absolutely clear from the Bible. As a "proof-text", IMHO, that is hard to beat.

18 posted on 04/08/2014 7:34:24 AM PDT by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Also the gays would argue that Leviticus was not even written yet during the time of Sodom and Gomorrah...

And they are correct. None of scripture was written at that time - Moses, author of the first five books, did not come along until quite a while after Sodom was destroyed. The relevance of this objection should be addressed to those that actually lived in Sodom. Oops! They're dead.

19 posted on 04/08/2014 7:35:07 AM PDT by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
What do you say to Homosexuals who would agree that it is about Hospitality AND gang rape BUT NOT consensual sex (especially when both partners love each other)?

The reason I ask is because I’ve heard this reasoning many times from gay friendly churches.

I'd say that male homosex is a capital offense, Genesis 19 or no Genesis 19.

Also the gays would argue that Leviticus was not even written yet during the time of Sodom and Gomorrah...

For that matter, neither was Genesis. (That's not actually true. The Torah was written before the universe was created.)

I don't understand the problem you're having. Homosexual relations are forbidden. Why do so many people think the whole issue hangs on Genesis 19?

20 posted on 04/08/2014 7:37:08 AM PDT by Zionist Conspirator (The Left: speaking power to truth since Shevirat HaKelim.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson