Posted on 11/24/2014 1:07:14 PM PST by NYer
“Evolution? Even so, there was not enough time to change bones and such.”
Oh really? How long does it take to “change bones and such”?
“You’ve been focusing on it a lot more than I have. lol”
You brought it up, I’ve just been trying to figure out why you seem to think it matters in a Biblical discussion.
were you a believer, and studied in the word of God, you would have known that there are no “natural explanations of natural processes.
The reason would be obvious to a believer:
The universe is not something that occurred by “natural” means, but by a deliberate work of special creation.
The fact that all that has been promoted in favor of “natural processes” has been shown to be fraudulent should give you pause.
All things physical that exist were planned.
No understanding is evident in your posts.
.
I agree with your post and I do agree that most human achievements come from help from the Holy Spirit.
>> “The BOOK says: Let Us create Man in Our image. So there you get some ‘sons of God’; right??” <<
.
No! Absolutely not.
WE are not “Sons of God.”
Yeshua stated that we will BECOME sons of God. That is what will happen at the Last Trump, as Paul so plainly showed the Corinthians.
Sons of God are not produced biologically; they are each a special creation event of their own.
Sons of God are equipped to exist in the realm of the Father, as they are not of corruptible flesh.
All of the Angels are “sons of God,” being immortal, specially created beings.
Your chance at becoming a “son of God” will come at the first resurrection; have your “garment” on, for none that haven’t the garment will be admitted (parable of the marriage of the son, Matthew 22)
Stop that.
CLEAN YOUR OWN HOUSE FIRST!
Sorry, but no, he denounced all that CHANGED what the apostles taught.
The ‘catholic church’ brought in nothing but change from the apostles teaching. By the time that it was created, entropy alone had done massive damage, aside from the deliberate malfeasance of Rome. Hippolytus was probably the last to preach a gospel that was true to the apostles gospel.
.
Scientifically, I’m sure! :o)
.
It figuratively kills me to have to agree with Elsie, but in this case hew is correct. Gen_4:1 And Adam knew Eve his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain, and said, I have gotten a man from the LORD.
And yet to bears no relevance. As I said Ooooo goody!
Was that an official RC nihil obstat and imprimatur answer?
You see it differently. Agree to disagree on this one.
He didn’t say he was founding a church; he declared that he would build (increase) his already existing assembly.
There was no apostolic succession.
There are 12 apostles; the apostolic age ended with the death of John.
>> “Agree to disagree on this one.” <<
.
For now, I guess.
In my example I said more than 400 years.
You brought it up, I’ve just been trying to figure out why you seem to think it matters in a Biblical discussion.
There were about 30 posts dealing with the sixth day creation before I arrived, some yours, so you have more posts on it than I do. And it was you that brought up the curse of Cain and "subhumans", which has nothing to do with the sixth day creation. So, yes, it seems to matter to you more than anyone.
The bible says Adam is a son of God.
Imagine her surprise on having her first child. She did say "LORD", not Adam.
No, the Bible does not say that Adam was a “son of God.”
Instead, it's a matter of what is true and not just who has the longest religion.
It has nothing to do with longevity, it that was true than paganism would be what I was following, or Judaism. Both have longer histories than the Catholic Church.
My wife's brother engaged me in apologetics to get me back into the Catholic Church. A number of well meaning protestant friends of mine suggested Tim LaHaye and Lorraine Boettner books to counter his arguments. I poured through them and found them so filled with error about Catholic beliefs and practices that it wasn't even funny. This caused me to look much closer at history. This drew me to in depth scripture study. When I began to compare the various beliefs of the different groups the Catholic Church was the only one that held up to scriptural practices, historical accuracy and precedent (She was the only one that could show unbroken succession back to Christ.)
No not opinion at all, longer drawn out careful study by someone that was hoping he could find the truth somewhere, anywhere else.
Luk 3:38 Which was the son of Enos, which was the son of Seth, which was the son of Adam, which was the son of God.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.