I never was under the impression that the devotionals were dedicated to Mr. Osteen? They devotionals were from Mr. Osteen sent out to those who wish to receive them. Vision chose to share them, via FR, maybe with the thought that they might help someone?
Vision’s choice to answer or not, is his/her choice. If that upsets other Freepers, they should avoid the topic and/or user. It would not upset me, I would just move on.
I do think some people just look for a confrontation/fight. I don’t think Vision deserved the attacks tonight.
Go back and read the other Osteen threads. They rarely got any replies because discussions were not allowed. This is a discussion site. I even suggested another devotion be chosen since there are so many out there to choose from that are Biblical. I often wondered just how many viewed the thread. It just seemed like someone was following a man instead of God’s word.
Vision is not blameless in that regard.
Did you not read JR’s comments?
HE does not want the appearance of FR endorsing Osteen. (see post 7)
Posting threads that don’t allow for discussion give that impression, that FR is protecting Osteen’s teachings, therefore endorsing them.
You're right. That was sloppy wording on my part.
"Vision’s choice to answer or not, is his/her choice. If that upsets other Freepers, they should avoid the topic and/or user. It would not upset me, I would just move on."
Yes, it's his choice, but he gives a distinct impression when he refuses to comment on Osteen's controversial statements, while continuing to hold the man up as some kind of Christian example. What did Peter say....be ready to give a reason for what you believe? (paraphrase)
"I do think some people just look for a confrontation/fight. I don’t think Vision deserved the attacks tonight."
Well, Vision didn't exactly play the part of a wilted little innocent flower, either. He challenged the boss on his decision, insulted metmom, and flounced off in a temper fit.