Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vatican Speaker on Climate Thinks There Are 6 Billion Too Many of Us
Breitbart ^ | 12 June 2015 | by Austin Ruse

Posted on 06/14/2015 5:40:09 PM PDT by ebb tide

Edited on 06/14/2015 7:50:33 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last
To: Farmer Dean

Yes. When is this “speaker” gonna remove himself? After all, he’s part of the problem.

What a left-wing wacko. (the “professor”)


21 posted on 06/14/2015 6:32:04 PM PDT by SaveFerris (Be a blessing to a stranger today for some have entertained angels unaware)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: lucky american

“Telling the story of a woman he met in a parish in Rome several months ago who had given birth to seven children via cesarean section and was pregnant with an eighth, Francis asked: ‘Does she want to leave the seven orphans?’

” ‘This is to tempt God,’ he said, adding later: ‘That is an irresponsibility.’ Catholics, the pope said, should speak of ‘responsible parenthood.’

” ‘How do we do this?’ Francis asked. ‘With dialogue. Each person with his pastor seeks how to do that responsible parenthood.’

” ‘God gives you methods to be responsible,’ he continued. ‘Some think that — excuse the word — that in order to be good Catholics we have to be like rabbits. No.’ “


22 posted on 06/14/2015 6:35:32 PM PDT by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

Aren’t Catholics supposed to have a lot of offspring, or was that Muslims?


23 posted on 06/14/2015 6:48:15 PM PDT by Old Yeller (Civil rights are for civilized people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

I just got a chill as I thought that maybe the rapture isnn’t just an instantaneous vanishing, but a prolonged one.


24 posted on 06/14/2015 7:32:57 PM PDT by reed13k (For evil to triumph it is only necessary for good men to do nothings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

As a 62 year old protestant, I think the Pope would just as soon load me in the first group to go. I will leave it to him to tell how he plans to rid the planet of over 5 billion people.


25 posted on 06/14/2015 7:47:04 PM PDT by healy61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

It is just to create an endless “crises” where the elite get to do anything they want.

Oceana has always been at war with EastAsia.

This activist has no real data, and no real science. He has an agenda and an ideology.


26 posted on 06/14/2015 8:03:16 PM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

29% of Earth is land mass. Of that 29% humans occupy less than 1% of that area. Of the remaining 28% about 40% is pure wilderness.

I’d say there is about 80 billion too few people!


27 posted on 06/14/2015 9:33:13 PM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dp0622

[[As a Catholic, I dont know what to think.]]

I’m not a catholic, but I’ll tell you what to think- God will destroy this planet and create a new one- man is NOT going to destroy the planet- God will do so- period- the pope should know this- Why the doom and gloom from Him? This planet isn’t even close to beign full capacity (see my previous post)- humans take up just 1% of the 29% land mass- just 1%- that’s it- it is said that every last person on earth could be gathered into the single state of texas all at once- 9 billion sounds like a lot- but it isn’t really- this planet can handle many many more billions- and be just fine-

Man will NOT destroy the world via climate change- infact, man’s contribution of CO2 to the atmosphere amounts to just 0.00137% of the total atmosphere- approximately 2 one thousandth’s of one percent- not even 1 percent- not even close to 1 percent!

IF the pope believes man is responsible for climate change, then he has bought into a colossal lie- there is NO way 0.00137% of our atmosphere can possibly capture and then back radiate enough heat to cause the temperature to rise in even one square foot of air let alone the whole planet- period! And people pushing the lie that man is responsible should be ashamed of themselves- yet it appears everyone is buying into this lie- even the pope apparently-

God has stated that in the end times, He will send a powerful delusion- and I personally believe the powerful delusion will somehow involve the lie of ‘man-caused’ climate change- because this WILL be used as a massive form of control over the world- We’re already seeing the negative effects climate change regulations is having- and it’s going to get much much worse as they blame EVERYTHING on ‘man-caused ‘climate change from here on out- EVERYTHING will be subjected to ‘climate change regulations, fees and fines’ until the world is dead broke, living in poverty, and begging the one world government for relief-

It does Not bode well that the pope has taken up the issue of climate change in favor of the lie that man is responsible for it


28 posted on 06/14/2015 9:48:59 PM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bob434

thanks for the insight. it is terrifying. i feel betrayed. the one he is listening to says 6 billion humans need to die!! it’s frightening


29 posted on 06/14/2015 10:15:03 PM PDT by dp0622
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Bob434

Somewhere back at the house I have my calculations of how much space each person would have if Texas was flat and shared out equally among the world population.

Actually a lot of room IIRC.


30 posted on 06/15/2015 2:20:03 AM PDT by ExGeeEye (The enemy's gate is down....and to the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide
“In a very cynical way, it’s a triumph for science because at last we have stabilized something –- namely the estimates for the carrying capacity of the planet, namely below 1 billion people.”

mmmmkay.

31 posted on 06/15/2015 2:41:27 AM PDT by piusv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

“Exactly. The never want to talk about what it would take (assuming anything would do what they claim to want) and who would enforce such drastic measures and how.”

Here’s a small thought experiment. If you assume that we need to reduce emissions to the level of the early 1950s, then we’d have to reduce energy consumption accordingly. No TVs. No A/C. One car per family. Etc.

Now, in the interest of fairness, carry this a step further. Why should we in America be allowed to live like that when so many elsewhere live at much lower levels. Shouldn’t emissions be done on a per person basis across the world. How far would we have to reduce our standard of living to match the rest of the world? 1850?

BTW, there was an article in the Guardian a few years back. An environmentalist laid out a program which would reduce emissions sufficiently to bring them into alignment with what other environmentalist think would be necessary to stabilize world temperature levels.

I don’t remember all the things he said would be necessary but here are a few. No heat would be allowed for privately owned residences. This was necessary to encourage people to move into government approved and designed housing which would be very small. The government would determine who could take a commercial flight. Vacationers would be limited to one flight in their lifetime. Workers would be required to live very close to their workplace. No private automobiles and very limited public transportation. The list went on.

The point of the article was to outline how draconian the necessary steps and shame the politicians into getting serious with the necessary actions.

Personally, I don’t believe in global warming. I don’t think most politicians or environmentalists do either. Otherwise, they would be laying out programs like the one in the Guardian. One can only conclude that they care more about remodeling our civilization than global warming.


32 posted on 06/15/2015 6:34:02 AM PDT by DugwayDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke

Yes, this is exactly what I say to people.
IF you are really serious about this, here is what would need to be done ... but then they ramble on a about solar panels and electric cars.

Bottom line is they don’t one to change their lifestyle on little smidgeon.


33 posted on 06/15/2015 7:06:00 AM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: dp0622
This is insanity. As a Catholic, I don't know what to think.

The reality?

For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God; Romans 3:23

The Good News?

For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord. Romans 6:23

34 posted on 06/15/2015 7:19:45 AM PDT by BwanaNdege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke

The other option is to go back to 19th century technology.


35 posted on 06/15/2015 7:21:51 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

“Bottom line is they don’t one to change their lifestyle on little smidgeon.”

I don’t blame them. After all, they’ve been told by most everyone that if we just put up a few solar panels or buy a smaller car, all will be unicorns and rainbows.

I wonder if that message has been tailored to get people to buy into an vague agenda. Once the agenda is in place, will people learn that they’ve agreed to much more draconian measures? An environmental bait and switch?


36 posted on 06/15/2015 7:22:07 AM PDT by DugwayDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: central_va

“The other option is to go back to 19th century technology.”

Which is the equivalent of a reduction in the standard of living. No electricity, no TV, no A/C, no cars, no aviation, mostly sailing ships. Railroads? Maybe. No medicine to speak of. Life expectancy of mid-40s, more or less.


37 posted on 06/15/2015 7:25:14 AM PDT by DugwayDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke

I do know, I watch Bonanza re runs and think life wasn’t so bad. If you combined that with modern medicine it might work.


38 posted on 06/15/2015 7:27:02 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: ExGeeEye

‘Somewhere back at the house I have my calculations of how much space each person would have if Texas was flat and shared out equally among the world population.”

http://persquaremile.com/2012/08/08/if-the-worlds-population-lived-like/


39 posted on 06/15/2015 7:49:30 AM PDT by BwanaNdege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: BwanaNdege

Area of Texas in square miles: 261,797

Square mile in square feet: 27,878,400

Area of Texas in square feet: 7,298,481,484,800

Approximate population, H. sapiens (Planet Earth only): 7,000,000,000

Square feet of Texas per individual H. sapiens, divided equally: 1,043

Exact measurement of each side of square territory, in feet: 32.2899397973159


40 posted on 06/15/2015 1:35:24 PM PDT by ExGeeEye (The enemy's gate is down....and to the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson