Skip to comments.
A scriptural defense of the Perpetual virginity of Mary
Verga
| 4/15/16
| Verga
Posted on 04/15/2016 7:25:23 AM PDT by verga
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340, 341-360, 361-380, 381-398 next last
To: verga
To: kosciusko51
Mod 3, not base 3. In base 3, 2+2=11
To: kosciusko51
363
posted on
04/18/2016 8:38:05 PM PDT
by
MHGinTN
(Democrats bait then switch; their fishy voters buy it every time.)
To: MHGinTN
Wasn’t an insult. It was a serious response to a ludicrous question.
364
posted on
04/19/2016 2:52:31 AM PDT
by
verga
(Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely.)
To: HossB86
...the REQUIREMENT for salvation is faith alone. Amen.
Now every one of our FR Catholics will agree with this statement.
While conveniently leaving out the OTHER 'necessary' things that 'follow' faith.
365
posted on
04/19/2016 3:40:48 AM PDT
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: MHGinTN
Are you more clever than satan?Sure!
For I've thrown myself at Jesus' feet:
Lord; have nercy on me; a sinner.
366
posted on
04/19/2016 3:47:35 AM PDT
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: verga
No interpretation at all, plain reading of the text, the whole text.Ain't this a WONDERFUL concept!?!
You snakes. You brood of vipers.
367
posted on
04/19/2016 3:49:02 AM PDT
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: verga
And in the ORIGINAL GREEK it can mean cousins...While Rome INSISTS that it DOES mean cousins...
368
posted on
04/19/2016 3:50:22 AM PDT
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: verga
While Rome INSISTS that it DOES mean cousins...Francis should man up and INSIST that the next CATHOLIC translation of the verses into English say cousins!
369
posted on
04/19/2016 3:51:58 AM PDT
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: verga
IN YOUR OPINION> the facts say otherwise.Seven churches in Asia
370
posted on
04/19/2016 3:53:14 AM PDT
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: verga
Someone is projecting again.Mary is sinless
371
posted on
04/19/2016 3:54:24 AM PDT
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: kosciusko51
There are 10 kinds of people in the world.
Those that understand binary numbers and those who don't.
372
posted on
04/19/2016 3:55:33 AM PDT
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: verga
It was a serious response to a ludicrous question.It appears that the adjectives, in your sentence, got transposed.
373
posted on
04/19/2016 3:56:43 AM PDT
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: Elsie
Francis should man up and INSIST that the next CATHOLIC translation of the verses into English say cousins! Matthew 13:55 New American Bible (Revised Edition) (NABRE)
Is he not the carpenter’s son? Is not his mother named Mary and his brothers James, Joseph, Simon, and Judas?
374
posted on
04/19/2016 4:08:13 AM PDT
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: Elsie
...that the next CATHOLIC translation of the verses into English say cousins! But this would shift the 'argument' into the hands of the REALLY learned folks; and OUT of the hands of amateur Catholic apologist wannabes.
375
posted on
04/19/2016 4:10:22 AM PDT
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: Elsie
... the hands of amateur Catholic apologist wannabes.Who are left with appearing as Liberal who state, "Yes, the Constitution SAYS that; but it MEANS this."
376
posted on
04/19/2016 4:11:26 AM PDT
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: verga; Elsie; MHGinTN; HossB86; boatbums; ealgeone; metmom
It was not a ludicrous question, and just a simple yes or no would have sufficed.
Also, when you said, “If you are honest the very most you can say is: ‘There is scriptural backing, we just choose to read/ interpret it differently.’”, you implicitly supported the counter to your argument, since the counter to you argument has always been discussed from scripture, but not as you interpret it. You gave away the store with this statement, as you have allowed the option for other interpretations of the text.
To: kosciusko51
You gave away the store with this statement, as you have allowed the option for other interpretations of the textNot to people that view the Bible in it's entirety.
378
posted on
04/19/2016 6:09:53 AM PDT
by
verga
(Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely.)
To: verga
Not to people that view the Bible in it's entirety. Unfortunately, this is not something Roman Catholicism is equipped to do.
Hoss
379
posted on
04/19/2016 6:15:54 AM PDT
by
HossB86
(Christ, and Him alone.)
To: verga
Yet Catholicism reaches outside of the Bible for so much of its false theology including the belief Mary was a virgin her whole life.
BTW....still waiting on your Greek explanation of Like 1:34.
I'll be growing hay on the moon while you work on it.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340, 341-360, 361-380, 381-398 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson