Posted on 06/27/2020 9:30:48 AM PDT by JAG 5000
I don’t know... They sounded quite “progressive”.
>They Had Sunk To The Very Bottom On The Immorality Scale:<
Let’s not be too proud of our lifestyle.
“Who are the Canaanites today?”___Aquila48
The Democratic Party.
LOL
/Just kidding
What fso301 said:
“During which time they only grew worse. When God did give the land over to Israel, he told Israel not to think it was because of their own righteousness.”___Fso301
No doubt.
So do the Democrats.
And Hollywood.
And many others.
“Sounds like San Franshitsco.”___Beethovenfan
LOL
I hear ya.
By the way, that crowd in SF legally allowed
public nudity and the nudists took them up on
it and began appearing stark naked in restaurants
and of course sitting naked on the seats, and
leaving fecal matter on the seats. It got so
bad they had to urge them to bring their own
towels to lay on the seats to absorb the fecal
matter.
I read that in a reputable source awhile back.
Just imagine how you’d feel to come behind one
of them and find yourself sitting in poop?
Crazy Town that SF.
Isn’t that Nancy’s digs?
``
“What bothers many many readers of the Old Testament is why God, after commanding Israel not to murder, uses their nation as an instrument of genocide to punish.
Why not just destroy the Canaanites the same way He destroyed Sodom and Gomorah and not involve people killing other men, women and children?”___SeekAndFind
Yah.
Its a problem.
A Christian Apologist, Paul Copan, wrote a book
in an attempt to reply to that issue. He titled it
“Is God A Moral Monster: Making Sense Of The Old testament God.
Amazon.com keeps it in stock
You can get it cheap now.
It been out awhile.
`
That was a super good post.
Made a very good contribution to the thread.
Interesting.
Thanks, Flag_This
.
Its surprising that, so soon after the flood, the tribes were starting to go off the deep end again, as if the flood had never happened.
It looks to me that Canaan’s tribe were supposed to have gone further south into Egypt and North Africa to settle, but had settled on land that was set aside for Shem’s clan, which would be Abraham’s family. As it is, when Abraham went to Canaan in the beginning, he did so peacefully and was (mostly) accepted peacefully.
They later settled in Egypt due to the famine, and then settled in to stay. Again, they were never supposed to be in Egypt, Canaan was land promised to them, not Egypt. So while Abraham was able to settle there peacefully, when they came back centuries later they had to fight their way in.
When Israel returned they were told to drive Canaan out completely. They didn’t, so the survivors settled around and amongst them. This was in part the source of problems later. They were ordered not to intermarry with them, but again, that was ignored and was the source of problems later.
““{C} Murdered Their Own Children {Molech}.”
I’d put that higher than (C)”___Ifinnegan
I see your point.
‘Course I wasn’t grading the immorality.
I’s just randomly listing it.
We’d have to put that up at top I guess if
we were grading the evil.
I don’t know were we’d put incest with CLOSE FAMILY
MEMBERS — that’s “off the charts” I reckon.
“Its surprising that, so soon after the flood, the tribes were starting to go off the deep end again, as if the flood had never happened.
It looks to me that Canaan’s tribe
were supposed to have gone further
south into Egypt and North Africa
to settle, but had settled on land
that was set aside for Shem’s clan,
which would be Abraham’s family. As
it is, when Abraham went to Canaan
in the beginning, he did so peacefully
and was (mostly) accepted peacefully.
They later settled in Egypt due to the
famine, and then settled in to stay.
Again, they were never supposed to be
in Egypt, Canaan was land promised to
them, not Egypt. So while Abraham was
able to settle there peacefully, when
they came back centuries later they
had to fight their way in.
When Israel returned they were told to
drive Canaan out completely. They didn’t,
so the survivors settled around and
amongst them. This was in part the
source of problems later. They were
ordered not to intermarry with them,
but again, that was ignored and was
the source of problems later”___Marron
Interesting post.
Thanks.
I believe the general term Canaanities was
applied to a wide variety of tribes living
at that time. The command to “totally destroy”
them only applied to 6 of those tribes. And
the absolute total” destruction was never
actually carried out because you see some
of those 6 tribes appearing later in the
Old Testament.
I think I listed those 6 tribes in my OP.
“>They Had Sunk To The Very
Bottom On The Immorality Scale:<
Let’s not be too proud of our
lifestyle.”___353FMG
I hear ya.
But , , ,
, , , to be sure we ain’t sunk that low.
I mean not INCEST WITH CLOSE FAMILY.
Maybe once and awhile out there
in San Francisco but to be sure not
in mainstream America.
And not murdering our children
in religious rites.
Sure! Abortion Clinics, but that’s
not the same at those Cain-ah-nites
were doing.
But I do get your point.
JAG
“Nothing new then.
Humans have been disobedient to God’s laws
since there WERE human beings.”___Cloudmountain
I disagree.
The Canaanites introduced a “new” level of depravity.
Very few {and maybe none} nations in history have
sunk to the level of immorality like the Canaanites.
This is why they were not salvageable and why God
ordered them destroyed.
{1} Blood-lust{in their religious rituals}
{2} They murdered their own children {in religious rituals}
{3} Murder {as in crime and violence.}
{4} Incest with close family members
{5} Sex with animals
I think I am in agreement with about 99% of your post. I do believe the Flood, was brought on the earth, SPECIFICALLY to kill off the Nephilim. There was a second, smaller outbreak of the Nephilim in the promised land. Once again, like with the Flood, God ordered their complete destruction. They were Nephilim, hybrids.
I would only digress slightly, in that I think the second outbreak of Nephilim, was caused by alien abductions, just like it is today. 🤗 Or, it might be like you say. We just don’t know for sure. Either way, they were there. 🤪😂😆🤣👍
However, I do understand your disgust at the Canaanites. But, when you think of what the horrible tyrants of the past have done...then you might think again.
Mass murderers of history will educate you on human nature. Murder doesn't give anyone a second chance. The Canaanites were merely depraved.
What is MORE depraved than to kill one third of a continent? Genghis Khan murdered ONE THIRD of Asia. He was especially horrible because he knew that people HID their young women and treasures. So he would leave for a few days then RETURN, knowing that people would think that he was finished with them. But, he wasn't.
Their "punishment" for hiding treasures and young women was unspeakable. We don't have the vocabulary to describe his "depravity."
The other mass murderers were "poster boys" for depravity. What WORSE depravity is there than to slaughter millions of people, all the while torturing, burning, looting, raping--and such?
The Canaanites were boy scouts compared to what this world has produced in DEPRAVITY.
The differentiation is that the Cananite hybrids were sourced in anit God efforts by the fallen angelic beings. Human depravity as with Khan is not angelic derived. Think as in ‘angelic sourced direct evil’ versus ‘angelic urged / influencing evil by humans’.
The abductions continue to happen as planned.
“...to be sure we ain’t sunk that low...”
. We are Christians and should know better. The canaanites were totally oblivious of God’s law and are therefore less culpable. I repeat, let’s not be too proud of our lifestyle.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.