Replies

It is hard to answer that question. Some Anglicans are very close to us. Others are more like Presbyterians. Some Anglican priests have valid orders through the Old Catholic Churches (Utrecht) -- which Rome recognizes as valid but not licit. In general Rome rejects the validity of Anglican Orders in themselves. The priest on the Journey Home did not possess Holy Orders through the Old Catholics -- so though he believed in the Real Presence, he had come to believe that he was not a validly ordained priest (so no Real Presence no matter how much he wanted it to be so) -- then he became a Roman Catholic

I have known Anglicans whose devotion to St. Mary was greater than most Catholics I've known. I've also known some Anglicans who thought of praying with the saints as idolatry. An Episcopalian priest I know (who is about to be received into the Catholic Church) told me that it is impossible to know what the theology actually is in any given parish. The architecture may be medieval Catholic, but the priest may also be a New Ager, a Calvinist, or an Anglo-Catholic. Gee, it almost sounds like the Roman Catholic Church today....
< / sarcasm off >

Sorry, for that last bit. The bottom line is that a big chunk of Anglicans would make GREAT ROman Catholics. And a bunch of our liberal Catholics ought to go be Episcopalians. I've long advocated a sort of an "exchange of hostages" -- not everyone likes that idea, but when it is someone like Father Moyer I would move a mountain if we could see him become a Catholic priest.