Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Review of: The Mormon Concept of God: A Philosophical Analysis
Foundation for Ancient Research and Mormon Studies (FARMS) ^ | 2002 | Reviewed by Blake T. Ostler

Posted on 02/14/2003 11:49:21 AM PST by restornu

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last
To: P-Marlowe
I agree.
41 posted on 02/24/2003 8:06:18 AM PST by Wrigley (3 Days Till Freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Revelation 911
I am perfectly willing to discuss, and to be told I'm wrong, to be SHOWN why I'm wrong.

I'm not willing to deal with pointless flames, lies and distortions of our doctrines or the teachings of our leaders.

It is possible to respectfully disagree, even on something as fundamentally divisive as religion.

I'm not even asking that you respect my views, inwardly, but just show a modicum of decency, outwardly.

42 posted on 02/24/2003 9:38:56 AM PST by Illbay (Adam fell that men might be; and men are, that they might have joy. -- 2 Nephi 25)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
Show me where I'm in error. If "pet to owner" sounds too sarcastic, then give me another analogy.

From what I can see, many sectarian christians see us as beings created with intelligence, with presumably infinite ability to learn and to grow and to accumulate knowledge, to understand the nature of our Creator, yet with no clear purpose in the universe other than to "glorify God."

I ask "how then do you glorify God?" What is our role and our relationship to him?

If you are a Calvinist (which I understand represents a minority view among the christian sects) you believe the fix is in a priori, and thus I am left even FURTHER in the dark as to what our purpose is.

Why were we created? How am I to regard this god you paint, as anything but arbitrary and capricious, when he apparently creates intelligent beings most of whom have no purpose other than to roast in flames for eternity?

Please help me understand your views in this regard, because, frankly, "pet to owner" sounds a far more gentle relationship than some analogies I could draw!

43 posted on 02/24/2003 9:44:11 AM PST by Illbay (Adam fell that men might be; and men are, that they might have joy. -- 2 Nephi 25)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe; xzins; Wrigley; scripter; CCWoody
Illbay: Please help me understand your views in this regard, because, frankly, "pet to owner" sounds a far more gentle relationship than some analogies I could draw!

youre religion looks somewhat denigrated P-marlowe

44 posted on 02/24/2003 10:57:11 AM PST by Revelation 911 (free drstevej the compassionate calvinist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Illbay; P-Marlowe; Revelation 911; Corin Stormhands
If you are a Calvinist... ~ Illbay Woody.
45 posted on 02/24/2003 11:11:44 AM PST by CCWoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Revelation 911; P-Marlowe; Wrigley
Careful Rev, somebody's got an itchy trigger finger.
46 posted on 02/24/2003 11:15:26 AM PST by Corin Stormhands (free drstevej)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Revelation 911
youre religion looks somewhat denigrated P-marlowe

Coming from SickBay, that is a compliment. I wear any denigration from people like that as a badge of honor. Bring it on, SickBay.

47 posted on 02/24/2003 11:16:40 AM PST by P-Marlowe (Free Dr. Steve!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Corin Stormhands
itchy or not - read my 39 -
48 posted on 02/24/2003 11:22:51 AM PST by Revelation 911 (free drstevej the compassionate calvinist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Corin Stormhands; xzins; Revelation 911; P-Marlowe
You aren't kidding about that.

I think this is the first time I pinged only Arminians.

Mark it down.
49 posted on 02/24/2003 11:25:29 AM PST by Wrigley (32hours til freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Revelation 911
Yes, but it's okay if they say stuff like that...
50 posted on 02/24/2003 11:33:41 AM PST by Corin Stormhands (free drstevej)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Wrigley
I think this is the first time I pinged only Arminians.

See, there is hope! Walk towards the light Wrigley...

51 posted on 02/24/2003 11:34:40 AM PST by Corin Stormhands (free drstevej)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Wrigley
I think this is the first time I pinged only Arminians.

are "feeling" effeminate yet LOL

52 posted on 02/24/2003 11:34:45 AM PST by Revelation 911 (free drstevej the compassionate calvinist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Wrigley
I think this is the first time I pinged only Arminians.

Why was I pinged?

:-)

53 posted on 02/24/2003 11:42:26 AM PST by P-Marlowe (Free Dr. Steve!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe; Wrigley; Revelation 911
Why was I pinged?

Ah, poor P-Marlowe. The man without a sect. ;-)

54 posted on 02/24/2003 12:04:47 PM PST by Corin Stormhands (free drstevej)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Corin Stormhands
As long as you follow me as it leads towards Calvinism.
55 posted on 02/24/2003 1:54:46 PM PST by Wrigley (30hours til freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Revelation 911
No, but I'd be man enough to admit if I were.
56 posted on 02/24/2003 1:55:33 PM PST by Wrigley (30hours til freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
I didn't want you to feel left out.

That and I was following your comments on that other thread.
57 posted on 02/24/2003 1:56:21 PM PST by Wrigley (30hours til freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: CCWoody
"Get whipped on one thread, bail, and start another....

Not to mention falling back on the usual Mormon tactic of whining about being "victims" of "bashing" when confronted with evidence proving the cultic nature of Mormonism, so they can get the thread deleted.

58 posted on 02/24/2003 2:59:30 PM PST by Isaiah_66_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Illbay
To: Revelation 911 I am perfectly willing to discuss, and to be told I'm wrong, to be SHOWN why I'm wrong.

Really???

Only after I'd posted the verbatim quotes from Brigham Young 5 times, saying there were certain sins that the Blood of Jesus could NOT cover, and your vehemently saying that was a "lie" and BY never said such, did you finally agree that BY did say that, and you agreed with BY, but only after bashing me time and time again, along with a couple other Mormons.

59 posted on 02/24/2003 3:08:43 PM PST by Isaiah_66_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Isaiah_66_2
Brigham Young quotes again:

Discourses of Brigham Young, p.385

"There is not a man or woman, who violates the covenants made with their God, that will not be required to pay the debt. The blood of Christ will never wipe that out, your own blood must atone for it; and the judgments of the Almighty will come, sooner or later, and every man and woman will have to atone for breaking their covenants. 3:247.

60 posted on 02/24/2003 3:17:08 PM PST by Isaiah_66_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson