Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: SoothingDave
I do have to disagree somewhat. I think that if people coudl behave, certain closed threads could be beneficial. For instance, if Catholics want to discuss what we gave up for Lent, ther is no need for a thread of that nature to turn into the usual mess.

Then you see where we're driving. Good.

It is perfectly rational for trinitarians to discuss objections to trinitarianism. It would be a common discussion in seminary, catechism, etc. There's nothing confrontational about that.

Likewise, the title is not confrontational. If it said, "All Non-Trinitarians are going to hell" then I'd consider that confrontational.

However, if within the conversation someone voiced a common trinitarian belief that non-trinitarians are going to hell, then that would not void the thread group-specific nature. In fact, they could even slam other groups, imho, and that would be common conversation that you'd find in any seminary class, sunday school class, sermon, or group discussion.

We are in a free speech zone provided there is no threatening or seditious language.

49 posted on 02/27/2003 11:32:26 AM PST by xzins (Babylon, you have been weighed in the balance and been found wanting!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: xzins; SoothingDave; CCWoody
We are in a free speech zone provided there is no threatening or seditious language.

As defined by Pastor xzins.

it is free HERE only if you are a Trinitarian...

You have some real control issues xzins

54 posted on 02/27/2003 12:05:29 PM PST by RnMomof7 (Pro 16:2 All the ways of a man [are] clean in his own eyes; but the LORD weigheth the spirits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson