To: .45MAN; AKA Elena; al_c; american colleen; Angelus Errare; Antoninus; aposiopetic; Aquinasfan; ...
posted on 03/02/2003 10:35:42 AM PST
I would maintain that Adamec simply has no canonical basis to threaten a priest (or anyone else) with excommunication for speaking out.
Excommunication is to be used for objectively evil actions, and damaging the diocese financially is not objectively evil.
I'd be interested in somebody submitting this to a canon lawyer.
In any event, this indicates that Adamec's got something to hide. You guys keep up the pressure. We've got the Dallas Morning News campaigning against Bishop Grahmann in Dallas; hopefully the drumbeat will drive him from office.
posted on 03/02/2003 11:30:09 AM PST
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson