FreeRepublic.com "A Conservative News Forum"
[ Last | Latest Posts | Latest Articles | Self Search | Add Bookmark | Post | Abuse | Help! ]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

RENO JUSTICE ORCHESTRATES CHINAGATE COVERUP

Crime/Corruption News Keywords: JUDICIAL WATCH RENO CHUNG
Source: Judicial Watch
Published: 7-16
Posted on 07/16/1999 10:49:16 PDT by cd jones


JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. PRESS RELEASE
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: Tom Fitton
July 16, 1999 (202) 646-5172

RENO JUSTICE ORCHESTRATES CHINAGATE COVERUP

Johnny Chung Ties Top Justice Official To Fix'

Reno Justice Department Tells Chung to Call 911 If Life Threatened

(Washington, July 16) Johnny Chung, a Clinton fundraiser who admitted to
funneling money from the China's military to the Democratic National
Committee to help Bill Clinton, testified to Judicial Watch last week that
the Reno Justice Department didn't want to hear all the information and
evidence he had on Clinton Administration illegal fundraising and that he
was abandoned by the Reno Justice Department despite repeated threats to
his life from Chinese operatives. The complete text of Chung's testimony
is now available on the Judicial Watch Internet site at www.judicialwatch.org.

Mr. Chung also implicated an unnamed top official of the Justice
Department, head of the Civil Division, in an effort to keep him quiet by
fixing the case against him on campaign fundraising. In fact, Mr. Chung
received no jail time. But Judicial Watch believes that the Eric Holder,
the number two at the Justice Department, is the likely culprit here.
Another star witness in this case, Nolanda Hill, implicated Holder in
similar activity -- accusing him of wanting to keep her quiet about what
she knows about the illegal fundraising of her former confidante Ron Brown,
the Clintons, and Al Gore.

Chung also implicated President Clinton directly in a scheme to keep Chung
quiet. Chung testified that he was told by a Chinese operative that
President Clinton had a deal with the Chinese that Chung would be pardoned
as long as he kept quiet. Chung also gave testimony indicating that
Clinton and the Chinese President had agreed together on a cover story to
explain away the Chinagate scandal.

Hillary Clinton, former Energy Secretary Hazel O'Leary, the Commerce
Department, and other government officials were also tied to illegal
fundraising, bribery, and other crimes in Chung's sworn testimony. Chung's
testimony came in Judicial Watch's Chinagate lawsuit against the Commerce
Department over its sale of taxpayer-financed trade mission seats in
exchange for campaign contributions and related issues.

Chung also testified about threats to his life from at least two squads of
Chinese operatives sent to the United States to harm him and his family.
Despite these and other threats, Chung was recently told by the U.S.
Attorney (appointed by Reno) overseeing his case that he should "call 911"
if any future threats occurred.

"Apparently, the Clinton Administration wouldn't mind seeing Chung harmed,"
said Larry Klayman, Chairman of Judicial Watch. "Chung is to be commended
for his forthright testimony. He did wrong, but now he wants to do
something for his country. His latest testimony puts him at significant
personal risk and is an act of patriotism. The fact that Reno, with
Chung's testimony and other evidence, hasn't indicted one high-level
official is absolute proof of a massive cover-up, one that Judicial Watch
is committed to unraveling."###


The Judicial Watch INFONET email listserv

To unsubscribe from this list, send an email to: listserv@judicialwatch.org
with no subject line and put the following in the body of the message:
unsubscribe general

This email address does not take correspondence. To email Judicial Watch,
write to info@judicialwatch.org


1 Posted on 07/16/1999 10:49:16 PDT by cd jones
[ Reply | Top | Last ]

To: cd jones

bump

2 Posted on 07/16/1999 10:58:34 PDT by tball
[ Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]


To: cd jones

How would one say, in Chinese, "dead man walking?"

3 Posted on 07/16/1999 11:12:33 PDT by struwwelpeter
[ Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]


To: cd jones

Hey! Hey! Hey! Hey! Hey! CBS,NBC,ABC,CNN! Is anyone out there? out there? out there? out there?

4 Posted on 07/16/1999 11:13:17 PDT by dls442
[ Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]


To: tball

I don't suppose there's any chance this could get talked about on the Sunday talk shows?

5 Posted on 07/16/1999 11:15:36 PDT by heyhub
[ Reply | To 2 | Top | Last ]


To: heyhub

Nope the "free press" will suppress.

6 Posted on 07/16/1999 11:23:11 PDT by tball
[ Reply | To 5 | Top | Last ]


To: heyhub

Sure, similar to that snowball's chance...

7 Posted on 07/16/1999 11:25:14 PDT by Coop
[ Reply | To 5 | Top | Last ]


To: tball

There really is "No controlling legal authority"....
except for Judicial Watch.

8 Posted on 07/16/1999 11:58:24 PDT by MamaLucci
[ Reply | To 2 | Top | Last ]


To: Judicial Watch

THANK YOU!

9 Posted on 07/16/1999 12:05:44 PDT by flamefront
[ Reply | To 8 | Top | Last ]


To: cd jones

Good for Klayman!

Of course if the GOP was worth a hill of beans, Klayman wouldn't have to bear all of the burden of investigating this den of criminals. They would have already thrown them out.

But that will never happen because the GOP is just about as corrupt as the Democrats. And anyone who wants to argue about it just answer one question.

Why haven't they impeached him for the Chinese Treason Scandal?

10 Posted on 07/16/1999 12:15:24 PDT by Rule of Law
[ Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]


To: MamaLucci

If Iran-Contra had a witness like this, PBS would have run it every day for a month.

11 Posted on 07/16/1999 12:16:42 PDT by ParrotsUp
[ Reply | To 8 | Top | Last ]


To: dls442

Hey, I love your fonts. You are gooood!

Yesterday, the Republican and Democrat chairmen of the committees met to talk about oversight. I watched it on C-SPAN last night. They all complained about Justice keeping cases open to thwart their efforts at getting testimony. And to hear the Dems call it, these committees were "partisan". Has anyone seen clips from that hearing on the news? Hummm thought not!

12 Posted on 07/16/1999 12:24:58 PDT by nsmart
[ Reply | To 4 | Top | Last ]


To: cd jones

"...he should "call 911" if any future threats occurred..."

Ummm...911? Is this 911?...There's this really bad looking Asian man standing in my door...and he has this really big gun, and...and...

I don't know about Johnny Chung, but I would pretty scared if this was the response I got from our law enforcing Justice Department. Whew.

13 Posted on 07/16/1999 12:25:42 PDT by Victor (vcappetta@yahoo.com)
[ Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]


To: heyhub

"I don't suppose there's a chance this could get talked about on the Sunday talk shows?"

Of course not. Don't you know they have more important issues to discuss - like Hillary's NY senate campaign? :o)

14 Posted on 07/16/1999 14:42:50 PDT by Sunflower
[ Reply | To 5 | Top | Last ]


To: cd jones

Reno will have her day in JAIL!

15 Posted on 07/16/1999 15:29:33 PDT by Texbob
[ Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]


To: cd jones, ALL

Chung was recently told by the U.S. Attorney (appointed by Reno) overseeing his case that he should "call 911" if any future threats occurred.

Anyone who says, "You don't need a gun, the police will protect you," at best is mis-informed and at worst is simply lying. To offer such advice suggests that police have a duty to provide protection and usually will provide it. The police have no such duty. And, while the police may try hard to provide protection -- and a failure to do so can be catastrophic - there is no legal recourse for person harmed by that failure. [empahsis mine] Read the whole article at: DIAL 911 AND DIE!

16 Posted on 07/16/1999 15:34:01 PDT by zon
[ Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]


To: nsmart

Thanks for the compliment. But I am just learning HTML. Mostly I go to VIEW...PAGE SOURCE...and try to figure out what has been done and copy it.

17 Posted on 07/16/1999 17:01:30 PDT by dls442
[ Reply | To 12 | Top | Last ]


To: tball

Please e-mail this to opinion@msnbc.com, everybody do it, we can at least get their attention.

18 Posted on 07/16/1999 17:21:44 PDT by big bad easter bunny
[ Reply | To 2 | Top | Last ]


To: Texbob

Quidam, is that you?

19 Posted on 07/16/1999 17:29:45 PDT by POP
[ Reply | To 15 | Top | Last ]


To: cd jones

BTTT

20 Posted on 07/16/1999 17:54:37 PDT by Kim C (CHINA IS THE REASON FOR THE TREASON)
[ Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]


To: cd jones

However discouraged I get, my spirits are lifted by the perseverance of Larry Klayman. It just brings home, that to keep and restore our freedoms continuous diligence is required. Thank you Judicial Watch!

21 Posted on 07/16/1999 19:06:08 PDT by seattlesue
[ Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]


To: POP

by the way has anybody heard from quidam recently?

22 Posted on 07/16/1999 19:14:39 PDT by i want to know
[ Reply | To 19 | Top | Last ]


To: i want to know

BTTT

23 Posted on 07/16/1999 19:18:49 PDT by madmama
[ Reply | To 22 | Top | Last ]


To: madmama

Bttt! I've always been a lazy sort of person, but this shit that is going on is driving me nuts. Sanders today, ____ tomorrow. Wow, treason at the highest levels! Is that bad? That is Baaaaaaaaad. I hear the alarms, but fear that the play has already been written. lambs? I hope not yet. Goodnight.

24 Posted on 07/16/1999 19:41:15 PDT by tball
[ Reply | To 23 | Top | Last ]


To: amom, CitizenX, Jolly, Alamo-Girl, Born in a Rage!!!!

For Our ChinaGate Draft!!!!:-) Thanks, cd jones!!!!:-)

25 Posted on 07/17/1999 19:05:17 PDT by Defender2 (We Have to Defend Our Freedoms!!!)
[ Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]


To: all

btt

26 Posted on 07/19/1999 12:52:51 PDT by cd jones
[ Reply | To 25 | Top | Last ]


To: cd jones

BUMP!!!!:-)

27 Posted on 07/19/1999 16:17:53 PDT by Defender2 (We Have to Defend Our Freedoms!!!)
[ Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]


To: cd jones

BUMP!!!!:-)

28 Posted on 07/21/1999 18:24:52 PDT by Defender2 (We Will Defend Our Freedoms!!! )
[ Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]


To: cd jones

BUMP!!!!:-)

29 Posted on 07/24/1999 20:05:06 PDT by Defender2 (We Will Defend Our Freedoms!!!)
[ Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]


To: Joe Montana

Bttt

30 Posted on 08/07/2000 23:15:16 PDT by Uncle Bill
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | Top | Last ]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

[ Top | Latest Posts | Latest Articles | Self Search | Add Bookmark | Post | Abuse | Help! ]

FreeRepublic , LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
Forum Version 2.0a Copyright © 1999 Free Republic, LLC