FreeRepublic.com "A Conservative News Forum"
[ Last | Latest Posts | Latest Articles | Self Search | Add Bookmark | Post | Abuse | Help! ]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

clinton-Gore Laws of Gravitas

Crime/Corruption Opinion Keywords: CLINTON-CLINTON-GORE DEMAGOGUERY, CORRUPTION
Published: 7.27.00 Author: Mia T
Posted on 07/27/2000 08:45:35 PDT by Mia T

clinton-Gore's Laws of Gravitas
 
by Mia T
 
As soon as it became clear that Dick Cheney would be George W. Bush's choice for vice-presidential running mate, the clinton-Gore agitprop machine went into full attack mode. Democratic hack gasbags--Kerr(e)ys and Cuomo--and airheads--Boxer and Murray. . .and, of course, the useful idiots of the press from Alter to Hunt to Clift. . .began expelling in unison all manner of gaseous meshugaas concerning GRAVITAS, no doubt the latest talking-point nonsense faxed from the clinton-clinton-Gore White-House War Room.
 
I call this latest clintonian absurdity "clinton-Gore's Laws of GRAVITAS," not to confer legitimacy on the inanity, but rather to underscore by comparison with Newton the obvious, namely, that clinton-Gore's deficiencies extend beyond the moral to the cognitive.
 
Bill Safire (Safire's New Political Dictionary) defines GRAVITAS thusly: "political heft; weight or substance as a candidate, based on experience or intellectual capacity, or the seriousness with which the public treats his candidacy."
 
Note Safire's use of the word "or."
Note also the implication of the last definition. . .
If the GRAVITAS of a given candidate is a function of public perception, then it follows that GRAVITAS is not a fixed quantity because perceptions are mutable.
 
A search of Lexis-Nexis revealed that the first occurrence of the term "GRAVITAS" was contained in a comment made by Bill Bennett in 1994. . .to describe. . .none other than. . .Dick Cheney! (R. Limbaugh, 7.26.00, EIB Network)
 
Dick Cheney, it seems, is GRAVITAS. . .
 
It is no wonder, therefore, that all the gaseous clinton-Gore hacks are infiltrating the tube like a coiling miasma, making utter fools of themselves spouting the following inanities:
 
clinton-Gore's 1st Law of GRAVITAS:
For Republican masses, presidential GRAVITAS and vice-presidential GRAVITAS are inversely proportional.
 
This is incorrect and reveals a total lack of understanding of Newtonian physics.
As any high school senior (not from the public schools) knows,
 
g = m1 x m2 / d2
 
wherein m1 and m2 (the masses) are independent variables.
 
(At best, the argument is tautological, i.e., uses as its premise its conclusion, i.e., assumes a fixed value for g.)

 

clinton-Gore's 2nd Law of GRAVITAS:
For Republicans masses, GRAVITAS of the ticket is directly proportional to philosophical differences between the two candidates.
Again, this is incorrect and reveals a total lack of understanding of Newtonian physics.
As any high school senior (not from the public schools) knows,
 
g = m1 x m2 / d2
 
GRAVITAS of the ticket is inversely proportional to philosophical difference, i.e., the shorter the distance between m1 and m2 the greater the GRAVITAS.
 
clinton-Gore's 3rd Law of GRAVITAS:
For Democratic masses, "too much" Gore GRAVITAS makes permissible zero GRAVITAS for Gore's Veep. (The gasbags, airheads and useful idiots actually said this.)
Again, this is incorrect and reveals a total lack of understanding of Newtonian physics.

The Democrats are confusing Gore's density with his weight.

As any high school senior (not from the public schools) knows, GRAVITAS does not depend on a mass's chemical composition or density. A glob of chewed up GOREtobacco the mass of the Sun will have the same gravitational effect on the Earth as the Sun does.

 
corollary:
For Democratic masses, GRAVITAS is independent of character.
WRONG! clinton-Gore is the quintessential counterexample, to wit:

 

Rumor has it William Jefferson Clinton himself is to recite Honest Abe's lines in this New Year's Eve pageant. Whoever writes these scripts has a natural talent for irony. For some irrepressible reason, one cannot help but think of that costume party in "The Manchurian Candidate,'' complete with Red Queen and Abe Lincoln in stovepipe hat and fake beard.

Hillary Clinton says it's a great opportunity to unite the nation. (The way she's united New York?) But the Clintons are never so polarizing as when they are intent on uniting us. How can that be? Maybe it's their perfectly fabricated authenticity. The Nineties have had much the same effect, stirring the same vague dissatisfactions -- and sparking sudden outbursts of temper. What was it that poor, embarrassed David Brinkley, thinking his mike was off, said after the president's victory speech in '96? "We all look forward with great pleasure to four years of wonderful, inspiring speeches, full of wit, poetry, music, love and affection, plus more goddam nonsense.''

Still not finished, Mr. Brinkley added that this president "has not a creative bone in his body. Therefore, he's a bore, and will always be a bore.'' Oh, dear. The commentator's unintentionally public thoughts were all the more embarrassing for being so widely shared by any Americans still sentient four years into the Age of Clinton. But it's one thing to notice such things, quite another to say them out loud. Why belabor the obvious?

Hey, what a party!

New Year's at the White House

Mindless rhinestone-studded-and-tented kleptocracy
by Mia T

John Podhoretz recently asked, "Whence comes hillary clinton's reputation for brilliance?" For the answer, he intuitively, rather brilliantly in fact, looked to her anatomy and noted,"This isn't the first time she's shot herself in the foot."

The above anatomical analysis supports the Podhoretz thesis. Notwithstanding The Pod's erroneous conclusions concerning hillary clinton's heart and nerve, he basically has it right. Anatomy is destiny...

Ian Hunter recently observed that our leaders are shrinking. "From a Churchill (or, for that matter, a Margaret Thatcher) to a Tony Blair; from Eisenhower to Clinton; from Diefenbaker to Joe Clark; from Trudeau to Chretien -- we seem destined to be governed by pygmies."

The pols understand their anatomical limitations well; they attempt to mitigate them with veneer. And so we suffer mindless alpha-beta-beelzebubba grotesquerie. . .

 

and rhinestone-studded-and-tented kleptocracy.

With all the media genuflecting before the press-conference podium of bill clinton, it bears remarking yet again that the clinton intellect (an oxymoron even more jarring than AlGoreRhythm and meant to encompass the cognitive ability of both clintons) is remarkable only for its utter ordinariness, its lack of creative spark, its lack of analytic precision, its lack of depth.

The clintons' fundamental error: They are too arrogant and dim-witted to understand that the demagogic process in this fiberoptic age isn't about counting spun heads; it's about not discounting circumambient brains.

Politicos and reporters are not rocket scientists . . .

Professions tend to be self-selected, intellectually homogeneous subgroups of Homo sapiens. Great intellects (especially these days) do not generally gravitate towards careers in the media or politics. Mediocre, power-obsessed types with poor self-images do.

Thus, clinton mediocrity goes undetected primarily because of media mediocrity. ("Mediocrity" and "media" don't come from the same Latin root (medius) for no reason.) Insofar as the clintons are concerned, the media confuse form with substance, smoothness with coherence, data-spewing with ratiocination, pre-programmed recitation with real-time analysis, an idiosyncratic degeneracy with creativity.

Jimmy Breslin agrees. In Hillary Is the 'Me-First' Lady, Breslin laments:

"At the end of all these years and years that are being celebrated this week, the national press of America consists of people with dried minds and weak backbones and the pack of them can't utter a new phrase for the language or show the least bit of anger at a business or profession or trade or whatever this business is that is dying of mediocrity."
 

Listen carefully to the clintons. You will hear a shallow parody of the class president. Not only do they say nothing; they say nothing with superfluous ineloquence. Their speeches are sophomoric, shopworn, shallow, specious. Platitudinous pandering piled atop p.c. cliché

In seven years, they have, collectively, uttered not one memorable word save, "It was a vast right-wing conspiracy," "I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Ms. Lewinsky,"and, "It all depends on what the meaning of 'is' is."

Even the clintons' attempts at alliteration fall flat. Compare Agnew's (Safire's) "nattering nabobs of negativism" with clinton's "preachers of pessimism," an impotent, one-dimensional, plagiaristic echo (its apt self-descriptiveness notwithstanding).

Before they destroy their backs along with their reputations, media gentry genuflecting at the altar of the clinton brain should consider Edith Efron's, Can the President Think?

A wasted brain is a terrible thing.

P.S.
hillary clinton's valedictorian ruse:

 
  
Don't lose
Your head
To gain a minute
You need your head
Your brains are in it.
--an old roadside ad, Pushme-Pullyou
 
 
 
 
 
DON'T ELECT CLINTON!
DON'T ELECT GORE!
INDICT THEM BOTH!
INDICT THEM ALL!
RICO!


1 Posted on 07/27/2000 08:45:35 PDT by Mia T
[ Reply | Private Reply | Top | Last ]


To: Mia T

Do you suppose Algore is looking for someone with Levitas?

2 Posted on 07/27/2000 08:50:55 PDT by js1138
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]


To: Mia T

Hilarious! I am referring the UvCer's here. Another great job, MiaT!! Thanks so much!

3 Posted on 07/27/2000 08:51:31 PDT by Miss Marple
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]


To: js1138

Nope. Veritas.

4 Posted on 07/27/2000 08:52:26 PDT by Miss Marple
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | Top | Last ]


To: Mia T

WOW!

5 Posted on 07/27/2000 08:58:56 PDT by mercy
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]


To: Mia T

g = m1 x m2 / d2 GRAVITAS of the ticket is inversely proportional to philosophical difference, i.e., the shorter the distance between m1 and m2 the greater the GRAVITAS. clinton-Gore's 3rd Law of GRAVITAS: For Democratic masses, "too much" Gore GRAVITAS makes permissible zero GRAVITAS for Gore's Veep. (The gasbags, airheads and useful idiots actually said this.) Again, this is incorrect and reveals a total lack of understanding of Newtonian physics. The Democrats are confusing Gore's density with his weight.

Mia
You have it exactly right.
Since Gore's 'Gravitas' is zero, it doesn't matter who the VP nominee is. The 'formula' proves the end result. Zero times any number is ZERO.( in old-fashioned math anyway)

6 Posted on 07/27/2000 09:00:15 PDT by Vinnie
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]


To: Miss Marple

Veritas

Excellent.

7 Posted on 07/27/2000 09:02:18 PDT by js1138
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | Top | Last ]


To: Mia T

I certainly never knew that young Ms. Rodham was President of the Young Republicans at Wellesley as documented in the Wellesley memo. Life is strange.

8 Posted on 07/27/2000 09:03:31 PDT by w.bales
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]


To: Mia T

The only thing that this current bunch ever brought to the White House was demitasse ...

9 Posted on 07/27/2000 09:08:00 PDT by CaptainC
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]


To: Mia T

Your exposition on GRAVITAS has made my day! Thank you most kindly!

Hilarious!

10 Posted on 07/27/2000 09:12:01 PDT by elk
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]


To: Mia T

Great stuff! Thanks, you made my day.

11 Posted on 07/27/2000 09:41:20 PDT by UpInArms
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

[ Top | Latest Posts | Latest Articles | Self Search | Add Bookmark | Post | Abuse | Help! ]

FreeRepublic , LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
Forum Version 2.0a Copyright © 1999 Free Republic, LLC