Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

| |
|||||||||||||
| |
|||||||||||||
| |
|||||||||||||
| |
|||||||||||||
| TUESDAY AUGUST 1 2000 |
|||||||||||||
| |
ALL THE PRESIDENT'S SCANDALS Congress told of Project X in 1998 Ex-White House official says she briefed House panel lawyer By Paul Sperry © 2000 WorldNetDaily.com WASHINGTON -- Hearings into missing White House e-mail took a surprise turn yesterday when a former White House computer manager said she told Congress about gaps in e-mail records almost two years ago. The federal court testimony undercuts GOP lawmakers' claims that the White House never told them the subpoenaed e-mails were missing until this year. Sheryl Hall, a former branch chief in the White House's computer division, said she secretly briefed a House investigator in November 1998 about the records gap, known internally as "Project X." She says the Republican staff lawyer, who went on to work for the independent counsel, didn't follow up on her complaint. The lawyer, Keith Ausbrook, told WorldNetDaily he doesn't recall talking about Project X with Hall. Hall was the leadoff witness in a new round of hearings into charges the White House has been blocking the production of evidence relevant to several investigations. She also suggested a White House computer contractor misled Congress when he testified he kept no secret files of e-mails tied to various scandals. Hall said Northrop Grumman e-mail expert Robert Haas told her and another witness in a late June 1998 meeting in her office that he stored the files on a zip disk. He told Congress another story, she says, to save his White House job. Haas, while "pacing" in her office, told her and White House computer specialist Sharon Mitchell that he "feared for his life" and wanted to show a friend what he'd found while searching the trove of missing e-mail, Hall said. He said he'd stumbled onto e-mails tied to Chinagate, Filegate and other White House scandals, Hall recounted. Haas said the "results (of investigations) would be different and other people would go to jail" if investigators had the e-mails, she said. Though he has denied being afraid for his life, Haas has accused two White House officials of threatening him with jail if he didn't keep Project X secret. Hall's talk with Ausbrook also raises the question of what and when the independent counsel's office knew about Project X. Ausbrook joined the independent counsel's staff in February 1999 -- just over two months after Hall says she told him the White House didn't search all its e-mail records in response to subpoenas. Both Congress and Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr had issued subpoenas for White House e-mails. Starr's successor, Robert Ray, just this April launched a criminal probe to see if the White House tried to cover up the e-mail records gap. "If she had told me about it, I would have done something about it," Ausbrook said. Hall provided more details after the hearing. She said she met with Ausbrook at his House Rayburn Building office around 6 p.m. on Nov. 30, 1998 -- about five months after a huge gap in mostly West Wing e-mail was discovered by Haas and other contractors. "I told him there was a computer mistake and over 100,000 e-mails were missing," she said. "And all these (subpoena) searches have been invalid lately." She also recalled describing the problem as "Project X." Hall said she tipped Congress off because she didn't know where else to turn. Ausbrook had interviewed Hall in 1996 as part of a House Government Reform Committee panel's probe into charges the White House used a taxpayer-paid computer database called "WHODB" to solicit political donors. In hearings this year, House Government Reform Committee Chairman Dan Burton has blasted White House officials for failing to inform Congress about the hole in e-mail records. Asked if he'd had any contact with Hall in 1998, Ausbrook says he talked to her a "couple of times" and "might have met with her once." But he remembers discussing only WHODB-related issues and nothing about Project X. "I have no recollection of that," he said. After filling him in, Hall says Ausbrook told her he'd "think about it." "I expected him to follow up and pursue it," she said. "I was surprised he didn't do something like issue a new subpoena" for the missing e-mails. Ausbrook says that's exactly what he would have done -- if he'd known about it. "Even if Sheryl Hall did tell us," he added, "it still wasn't the White House telling us." That's an issue a federal grand jury is weighing. White House witnesses have already been questioned. And Ray has issued grand-jury subpoenas to the National Archives for documents related to White House records-keeping practices. WorldNetDaily has learned that Ray has assigned several prosecutors and FBI agents to the case. So far they've taken depositions from Hall and another whistleblower, former Northrop Grumman contractor Betty Lambuth. She says White House officials threatened her and others with jail if they talked about Project X. Investigators for Burton's committee have deposed another whistleblower, former White House computer division director Kathleen Gallant. They interviewed her at her Virginia offices more than a month ago. A staffer said she dropped some "bombshells." But Burton, who sent two scouts to yesterday's court hearing, hasn't called Gallant to testify in public hearings. His panel has been stretched thin since losing press secretary Mark Corallo to the Bush campaign. Gallant, however, will take the stand tomorrow as one of many witnesses government watchdog Judicial Watch plans to call to convince U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth to take the e-mail search project away from the White House. Related stories: Mark Lindsay knew Project X's 'scope' Obstruction hearings ordered by Lamberth Judge: White House withheld information White House defies judge in e-mail case Contractor searching for e-mail is green White House tightens grip on e-mail project White House now uncertain when e-mail ready Another tech 'error' scrubs Gore e-mail Despite claims, Hillary e-mailed via staff Subpoena sparks burning question Document backs cover-up charge 'The fix is in' on e-mail fix?
Firm won't take hit for Project X fiasco Paul Sperry is Washington bureau chief for WorldNetDaily.
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
E-MAIL PAUL SPERRY | GO TO PAUL SPERRY'S NEWS ARCHIVE GO TO PAGE 1 | GO TO PAGE 2 | GO TO COMMENTARY SEARCH WND | CONTACT WND |
||||||||||||
| © 2000 WorldNetDaily.com, Inc. Direct corrections and technical inquiries to webmaster@worldnetdaily.com Please direct news submissions to news@worldnetdaily.com |
|||||||||||||
I believe Ms. Hall is telling the truth. Her bombshell about contractors being threatened by Clintonistas was, despite Rep. Waxman's characteriztion to the contrary, verified by her coworkers quite convincingly. Looks like it's time to add Mr. Ausbrook to the list of those who might have single-handedly turned the tide during impeachment. Instead, he got a new job. I'd love to hear Barr and Schippers takes on this.
Hall's specific recollection of Mr. Haas telling her (in the presence of Sharon Mitchell) that he feared for his life because of what he'd seen in emails ought to be front page news.
Best wishes to you, Ms. Hall. You've been burdened quite outrageously, although we all share the yoke, knowingly or not, of the sick Clinton plans and practices.
Another great Paul Sperry article. Just what good is Congress? Apparently they have about as much authority (and far less outrage) in matters such as these I do (although they're very good at raising taxes and assessing "fees").
Bttt
bump
"The lawyer, Keith Ausbrook, told WorldNetDaily he doesn't recall . . .
"I have no recollection of that," he said.
Must be something in the water in DC.
Ausbrook joined the independent counsel's staff in February 1999 -- just over two months after Hall says she told him the White House didn't search all its e-mail records in response to subpoenas.
That was the during the impeachment and trial. Interesting.
OIC Lawyer Keith Ausbrook probably wrote the recently released FILEGATE Report. He responded to letters from players mentioned in the report and whose comments were included in the Appendix.
He denied the request of Secret Service Agents who wanted to correct the flawed FILEGATE report and refused to meet with them and fix it.
Hall's November 1998 meeting with Ausbrook, probably was followed up by Hall leaking the story to Insight Magazine who published the story in December 1998.
The key complaint of the House Government Reform Committee was that the WH never notified them of the Missing E-mails to clarify the issue of compliance with Congressional subpenas. The fact that Hall told a congressional aid is meaningless legally.
But, it is more proof of an intentional coverup by Congress and the OIC's Office of the Mising E-Mail story. Some House Government Reform Committee Members were also on the House Judiciary Committee Impeachment panel. They didn't want to know. After the Insight Magazine Story everyone knew about the Missing E-Mails including the Justice Department and they all did nothing.
Fox News (Brit Hume) reported yesterday that Hall testified that Haas found outgoing (from the WH) incriminating E-mails from Monica Lewinsky (not from her Pentagon e-mail account). The e-mails found by Haas could also have been Monica E-mails sent using the UPS Office's computer in the basement of the Watergate Complex. If they were sent after Janurary 1998, they could include incriminating coverup/OJ evidence. They probably were in Ashley Raines and Betty Currie's Notes Mail inbox.
Cheers
bump.
This sure didn't stay up for long today.
Thanks for the heads up on this thread lep. Would have missed it entirely.
Don't know if you've seen this.
BTTT
I hadn't! Thank you so much for the heads up!!!
BUMP!
BuMp
Your welcome bump. ;-)
volley bump!
BTTT
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
[
Top
|
Latest Posts
|
Latest Articles
|
Self Search
|
Add Bookmark
|
Post
|
Abuse
|
Help!
]
FreeRepublic , LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 Forum Version 2.0a Copyright © 1999 Free Republic, LLC |