Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
New World Order as New Fascism
Differences between neofascism and fascism are small: essentially the
ideology of both is to conquer the world by subjugating small
nations with all available means. - Both ideologies have waged an
information war, although the US have improved Goebbels'
philosophy of war propaganda. - Biggest differences are that Hitler
combined tanks and aviation while NATO is waging a war from high
altitude
by Dr. Gojko MILJANIC
Politika, Belgrade, FR Yugoslavia, June 22, 2000
Fascism developed between two world wars nurtured by large capital and
was the darkest ideology in the contemporary history and the negation of
values and achievements shared by the whole humanity. It violently
brought racism, anti-Semitism, Nazism and anti-Communism and
presented the world with a militaristic organization and party army led by
a charismatic leader. War and violence were the basis of that ideology.
They served as means for extermination of disobedient peoples and
people who were, according to their criteria, less valuable. Jews and Slavs
were the main targets. With such an extremist ideology they pulled the
world into the hitherto darkest war in which, as a result of a demented
mind, greatest genocide took place. It should be emphasized that the
Vatican and the Catholic Church, because of their anti-Slav and
anti-Communist preoccupations had a noted role in the development of
fascism.
Nevertheless, in the rest of the world good sense prevailed, so that the
leaders of opposing ideologies, communists and liberal democrats
(anti-Communists), allied in an anti-fascist alliance, brought fascism
down.
Neofascism has also been created by those who had nurtured fascism,
and based on all of its hitherto exhibited characteristics it has all criminal
traits of fascism from WWII. The essence of the ideology of both is the
conquest of the world by force and subjugation of small nations using all
means available.
However, it must be emphasized that fascism was not destroyed and
uprooted, but has been hiding under disguise and waiting for a chance to
step back on the world stage. Even during WWII fascism found a heaven
in the countries of Western democracy, even more than in Italy and
Germany. The game to preserve fascism was yet again led by the
Catholic Church, which as early as 1943 proposed to western
powerbrokers to sign a peace with Germany and turn together against
Communism and Soviet Union. At the time of the fascist defeat, many
war criminals from Germany, Poland, and Yugoslavia found shelter in
Western countries and, again in organization of the Vatican and the
United States, reached Latin America.
Globalization and Mondialism
The "new world order" is based exactly on the principles of ideology and
practice of fascism, and the system of globalization and mondialism are
today offered to humanity. Both fascist orders advocated supra-national
ideologies, limited sovereignty of others for the benefit of the leading
country and offered peace and democracy to the humanity through war
and propaganda.
All the basic ideological premises of fascism are built in in the theory of
the "new world order", in attempts of the US to thoroughly reorder the
world. Thus fascist ideas survived their defeat in WWII, based on the
well-known principle that an ideologist may be killed, but his ideology
survives. Fasicsm was capable of skillfully changing its image and mode
of action and turned out to be able to adapt to new conditions. Thus,
during the Cold War neofascism was successfully disguised and at the
given moment it took its mask off giving itself the right to get transformed
into a supposedly democratic order. A rehabilitation of fascism took place.
Many anti-fascist slogans, songs, films disappeared and many fascist
symbols were brought back. Many war criminals returned to their
countries. In Croatia, the fascist regime of Ante Pavelic was rehabilitated
and Havel apologized to Germans for the victims they had suffered.
These days, quislings and fascist collaborators with pride emphasize what
they did during the war. Thus, defascization was spreading rapidly and it
seemed that war horrors have been forgotten.
While in the thirties Hitler used German economy for the production of
weapons and equipment for his military machinery, today in the US 67%
of all scientific projects are targeting military needs. But, if about 10
million workers in the armaments industry are demanding consumption
and sale of their products, that can only mean war. The United States
today, just like the Third German Reich, has been converted into a
militaristic state. Both countries have opted to achieve their economic,
political and military goals using violence, and that implies reordering of
the world with application of force and brutal military violence. Both
countries use similar methods for subjugation of other nations; they both
use forceful propaganda, misinformation and lies; destructive activities for
undermining of other state systems through various political parties,
non-governmental organizations and foundations; development of
intelligence and subversive activities; they use terrorism as a method for
showdowns, organize a fifth column with reliance on various puppet
political forces, and if none of that gives results, they initiate wars. Unlike
Hitler, who used a combination of aviation and tanks for his wars, the US
and NATO lead wars from distance, as is made possible by modern
aviation and developed rocket systems. Both countries have waged
information wars: The US only further developed Goebbels' philosophy
of war propaganda. It is only necessary to recall that in 1939 Hitler
announced on radio that Poland had attacked Germany and that he was
forced to declare war on Poland. Or, on may 9, 1940, when German
planes had already started towards France, at 10pm Hitler on radio denied
rumors that Germany was about to attack France. It was necessary to
fool the victim. We are witnesses that the same methods are used today.
Diversions are staged and then victims are accused of committing crimes.
A victim becomes a criminal and the other way round. Therefore, almost
identical cases from WWII are repeated today.
Identical War Goals
German war aims from 60 years ago and present aims of the US and
NATO are almost identical. In both cases their goal is to obtain control of
energy sources in the Caucasus and the Caspian Sea region. Hitler used a
pincer movement, over central Europe and from the southern direction
over the Balkans and Turkey. Essentially, NATO has the same strategy.
In both cases they relied on Turkey, which was earlier purportedly
neutral, while now it is within the NATO southern flank as a basis for
further advance to the northeast...
Fascist Germany rejected all limitations imposed by international
institutions, left the League of Nations and thereby obtained open hands
for its actions, while the American neofascism has also rejected all
limitations and obligations towards the United Nations and the Security
Council, and has even harnessed them to work for it in the
implementation of its expansion and it has also established separate
institutions such as NATO and the Hague Tribunal, as well as many other
organizations. Our civilization is facing a catastrophic end because of
application of force and lawlessness. Therefore, the leading power has
circumvented all the existing international institutions, so that just like
fascist Germany it is acting with almost no limitations.
Large capital and large companies encouraged Hitler to establish armed
forces for protection against Communism, and when these forces gained
in strength they directed them against other nations and for conquest of
economic resources, above all oil and gas, as well as conquest of new
space. NATO was formed in a similar manner, several years after the
defeat of German militarism, purportedly for the protection of the West
from the Communist block in the East; later NATO grew in a force for
aggression against other disobedient nations and occupation of new
territories. The greatest paradox are assurances that the use of NATO is
in the interest of the protection of human rights and democracy, which
has never been the case. Thus, NATO has only supplanted the German
occupation forces in western Europe and became a tool for fulfillment of
aims of the "new world order", i.e. conquest of someone else's territories
and resources.
It should be emphasized that based on the experiences from WWII new
methods for genocidal extermination of peoples have been developed.
There I above all include ethnic cleansing, use of narcotics for worst
imaginable goals, spread of religious sects, as well as abuse of genetics as
the science for the destruction of people. Today, it is already public
knowledge that American products, above all medications and food
distributed as humanitarian assistance, have caused many disasters. What
cynicism!
Obstacle: Serb People
In all countries on the path of their conquest, the US and NATO are in
advance preparing forces for internal action, just like Germany did before
WWII. Thus during the aggression against Yugoslavia in 1941 German,
Hungarian, and Albanian ethnic minorities immediately put themselves in
service of the aggressor. The Ustashe emigrants had an especially
important role in the break up of Yugoslavia. History has repeated itself in
the last ten years. During the break up of the former Yugoslavia, NATO
found allies among domestic collaborators that enabled the break up of
the country and restoration of fascism and nationalism in Croatia, Bosnia
and Kosmet. Albanian profascist organizations assisted in the secession of
Kosmet just like in WWII, when Balli Combetar were the last German
ally in the country. Those same forces were converted into the "KLA"
and are to date an ally of NATO forces in the occupation of the Serbian
province.
Our neighbors have, just like 60 years ago, timely joined German and
now NATO aggressors to break up Yugoslavia. In both cases puppet
regimes in neighboring countries sided with the aggressor, all because of
their petty interests, but in the end most of them paid for such behavior.
In both cases they naively fell for empty words, flattery and fake
promises of the occupier.
Unlike Gemrany, the huge economic power of the US and its allies is
considered sufficient to with blackmail, pressures, sanctions, or even
bombardment from high altitude, just as they did in Bosnia and Kosmet,
make up for the use of ground troops that Hitler was forced to rely on in
WWII. That indicates that the "new world order" as transformed fascism
is dictating brutal violations of elementary human rights, even using
genocidal measures. Ethnic cleansing and dismemberment of Yugoslavia
were used by both. Instead of concentration death camps, contemporary
neofascists use the Hague Tribunal against innocent people, and
personally, or through quisling organizations, such as the "KLA" in
Kosovo and Ustashe in Croatia, they are carrying out mass murder of
civilians. Operations "Flash" and "Storm" in Croatia were conducted
under American control. Unfortunately, in both cases Yugoslavia and the
Serb people were used as training grounds for fascism and neofascism
and for experiments with expansionist political and military concept and
testing of the most murderous mass destruction weapons.
Because of its geostrategic and military importance in Southeastern
Europe, Yugoslavia has almost always found itself on the path of foreign
conquerors from both East and West as an obstacle to the fulfillment of
their strategic goals. Yugoslavia resisted fascism and neofascism in both
wars. The resistance of Yugoslavia and events from March 1941 were
experienced by Hitler as an unexpected blow. That was his first political
defeat. And his war against Yugoslavia had tangible consequences for the
events on the Eastern front in 1941, when the blitzkrieg strategy
experienced its first defeat. After 60 years, the situation is the same. The
rejection of the plan in Rambouillet is the same as the rejection of the pact
with Germany in 1941.
The successful resistance of Serbia and Yugoslavia in 1999 and the failure
of neofascist conquerors to finish the war in the Balkans also has far
reaching consequences on the international scene. The resistance of
Yugoslavia largely influenced the realignment of the forces in the world.
That in turn jolted large Euroasian powers into growing closer and setting
up a strong anti-American alliance in order to prevent the advance of
NATO towards East. That also largely influenced progressive forces in
the subjugated Western Europe, where a gradual awakening and sobering
up of the intellectual and patriotic forces in these countries has resulted.
Thus, after the unsuccessful aggression against Yugoslavia, the global
situation and balance of power in the world is gradually changing. We
shall see whether this is a turning point.
And finally, neofascism marked war as the means for the change of
balance of power in the world, just as fascism did on the eve of WWII.
However, all polls indicate that young generations will realize the danger
stemming from the restoration of fascism. That gives hope that
neofascism is an ephemeral phenomenon, although the warnings that in
WWII fascism was not destroyed but only defeated are correct. Because
of that, the struggle against fascism is not over yet.
The author is a university professor
Translated on August 1, 2000
He's right. Neofascism is with us camouflaged as "progressive" [formerly known as "liberal"] politics. As to the Balkans...I subscribe to Bismarcks statement. "The entire Balkians are not worth the bones of one good Pomeranian grenadier" Get our people out of the Balkans and out of Europe too. WW-2 is over. If they start WW-3 let 'em slug it out on their own. They won't anyway. Europeans are too degenerate, and too exhausted to do anything but whine and criticize the U.S. Isolationist Regards,
The clintonistas are working hard to give them the United States as it looks. He has offered 6000 citizens for targets and lots of our money.
He is right.
The parallels with Nazi Germany are horrifying. Even more startling is that the people of influence in the US state department, the ones charting US foreign policy are mostly Jews.
He's right. Neofascism is with us camouflaged as "progressive" [formerly known as "liberal"] politics.
Yes, the character of this neofascism is clearly demarcated by the morally vacuous liberal ideology which stripped classical liberalism of all its conservative elements and substituted this notion of monoculture, obsessive "toleration" (except when it comes to opposing that ideology itself), economic globalism, etc.
Even more startling is that the people of influence in the US state department, the ones charting US foreign policy are mostly Jews.
Easy. People like to parallel fascism and communism. Now look at the ethnic composition of the first Bolshevik government in Russia (I think there are, maybe, 3 or 4 Russians out of a couple of dozen).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
[
Top
|
Latest Posts
|
Latest Articles
|
Self Search
|
Add Bookmark
|
Post
|
Abuse
|
Help!
]
FreeRepublic , LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 Forum Version 2.0a Copyright © 1999 Free Republic, LLC |