Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - The Los Angeles City Council on Tuesday voted 11 to 0 to cut the city's ties with the Boy Scouts of America, saying the group's exclusion of homosexuals and atheists was discriminatory.
The vote followed similar moves by municipalities, police departments and groups across the country to show displeasure at a Supreme Court decision last June that upheld the Boy Scouts right to exclude homosexuals. The court, by a 5 to 4 vote, said the Scouts had the right to set its own moral code and espouse its own viewpoint.
But City Council members said Los Angeles law prevents relationships with organizations that discriminate. ``We don't have a choice legally. Both the spirit and the content of existing city law is very clear: the city shouldn't participate in a discriminatory practice or policy,'' Councilman Mike Feuer said.
He added: ``Nobody, including the Boy Scouts ... has articulated what the difference is between discriminating on the basis of race, on the one hand, which they would agree ought never happen, and discriminating on the basis of sexual orientation.''
A Boy Scouts spokesman declined to comment on the vote Tuesday. ``It came so quick we're just looking at our options as to just exactly what we are facing here,'' Boy Scouts spokesman Joey Robinson said.
Police Department To Dismantle Its Explorer Unit
Under terms of the measure, the Los Angeles Police Department will be asked to dismantle its Explorers unit, a Boy Scouts-affiliated police cadet training program for young people, within 90 days, and create an alternative, said Laura Esquivel, assistant to Councilwoman Jackie Goldberg, a gay rights activist who heads the city's personnel committee and was a major backer of the measure.
All other city departments will be audited to determine whether other contractual relationships exist with Boy Scouts affiliates, and all city contracts will be examined to ensure they contain non-discriminatory clauses, and are in compliance with city code, Esquivel said.
In addition, the city's department of Parks and Recreation will, in the future, charge the Boy Scouts a fee to use its facilities for camping and other activities, Esquivel said.
``They had been in the practice of waiving fees for certain scout activities. We pointed out that their criteria should be consistent with the city's non-discrimination policy. The Boy Scouts no longer qualify to be subsidized by taxpayer money because we have an obligation not to subsidize organizations that discriminate,'' Esquivel said.
The Boy Scouts exclude ``avowed homosexuals'' from its ranks, maintaining they violate the Scouting oath to be ``morally straight'' and the Scouting law to be ``clean.''
The Scouts has recently initiated a separate, non-discriminatory values education program to be used in public schools, hospitals, fire departments and police cadet programs called ``Learning For Life'' which has no membership rules and is open to girls and homosexuals, spokesman Robinson said.
More than 90 million Americans have joined the Boy Scouts since the organization was founded in 1910. It
now has nearly 5 million members between the ages of 11 and 17 and nearly 1.3 million adult leaders
I hate to see that. You have to have standards. Opening programs to girls and homosexuals is a step away from maintaining those standards.
Anyone motivated to FREEP the entire City of Los Angeles?
The LAPD has repeatedly demonstrated that it isn't worthy of a relationship with Explorer Scouts.
Actually this is for the best. The Los Angeles government is controlled by commie totalitarians. Who would want to be linked to them? Also what is really offensive here is the fact that the commies who control the Los Angeles government are trying to use state power to force people to approve of homosexuality.
Opening programs to girls and homosexuals is a step away from maintaining those standards.
as a woman who just sent our local BSA a contribution, you refer to girls as if they were the plague....It seems to me that the cub scouts and the boy scouts would be no where if it were not for the millions of moms that ran cub scout meetings, baked the cookies, and sewed on patches over the years. ...I think the bsa should be for boys as well, but don'trash girls over it.
Homophile Dictionary
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 2000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
254 'boy words'
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Editor's note: The following column contains content of a sexual nature
that
some readers may find objectionable.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
By Judith A. Reisman & Eunice Van Winkle Ray
© 2000, WorldNetDaily.com, Inc.
Those debating whether homosexuals should be scout leaders should take
a
look at the dictionary to help decide whether or not homosexuals have
an
inordinate interest in young boys. Or is it really as gay rights leaders
say -- they just labor in young boys' best interests. Let's look it
up and
see if pederasts (men who sexually assault boys) comprise just a small
cadre
within the much larger male homosexual population.
The dictionary I am talking about is not in your local library. There,
molester may be the only word "straights" would think of for men who
sexually assault boys. No, I am talking about "The Queens' Vernacular"
(QV),
which is advertised as, "Everyman's dictionary to the gay underworld"
and
the "current language of a very large group of people who are members
(part
or full-time) of the homosexual community." In the QV there are 254
words
for boys, most of these involve men sexually abusing boys.
Think about it. A dictionary has many words with subtle nuances for
that
which is important and fewer words for the obvious or trivial. Noah
Webster
collected 12,000 new words describing the governmental differences
between
America and Britain for his 1828 American Dictionary, which displaced
Johnson's English dictionary. In "The Queens' Vernacular," anthropologist
Bruce Rodgers also collected 12,000 words which describe the essential
differences between "gays" and "straights." Yes Virginia, gays have
their
own 12,000 word dictionary because "straight" language cannot describe
their
world. It is really that different.
When homosexuals debate Boy Scouts they mean something very different
than
those relying on Webster's dictionary. According to Rodgers' authoritative
homophile lexicon, "Boy Scout" and "boys" are defined in the following
ways:
Boy-scout queen: (sexually experimenting boy scouts who fear giving
a
response); one who pretends to snooze as he is f---ed or s---ed off.
But, is QV an esoteric, unknown vocabulary? Here is what homophile leaders
have to say. The 420 page "Long Road To Freedom: The Advocate History
of the
Gay and Lesbian Movement" (1994) reports that:
The Queens' Vernacular ... firmly remains a form of homosexual slang.
... To
gay men ... something of a secret code ... in a hostile culture (emphasis
added).
Writing in his anthology of homosexual "dictionaries and glossaries,"
Wayne
Dynes, editor in chief of the "Encyclopedia of Homosexuality," notes
that QV
is the foremost gay lexicon, "reissued without change as Gaytalk."
"The Joys
of Gay Sex" authors Silverstein and White and Dennis Altman in "The
Homosexualization of America" say amen to that!
Rodgers writes that his microcultural analysis required:
years of interviews with hundreds of informants ... revealing the common
speech of a traditionally oppressed minority. ... It is a book about
words
... agreed-upon symbols for recognizing things and actions. ... We
use words
to give expression to our thoughts about our experience. ... The Queens'
Vernacular demonstrates the imagination, subtlety, humor, self-pity
and
downright masochism with which gay people have forged the common language
into a means of communicating their experience.
These authors happened upon QV while conducting research on "Partner
Solicitation Characteristics as a Reflection of Male Sexual Orientation"
(Judith Reisman and Charles Johnson, 1995). So what are some uniquely
gay
words for boys? Well remember this; boys are the largest -- most
important -- thematic category in the QV/"Gaytalk." Following is a
small
sample of the 254 "gay" words for boys, described as "chicken." Chicken
is
the primary QV term; it clearly implies that boys are for consumption:
Chicken: a young recruit; any boy under the age of consent, heterosexual,
fair of face and unfamiliar with homosexuality.
Freshly killed: (butchered) recently introduced to a-- f---ing. "See
how
bowlegged that chicken walks -- looks like he was freshly killed in
the
hayloft."
Pluck some feathers: rip off a drumstick; skin some chicken.
Head and heels: describing physical allurement, despite extreme youth,
but
too young or small to know what to do in bed: he must be helped by
someone
more experienced who will clasp the boy by his head and heels to lift
him
onto the c---.
Jail tail: any boy below the age of consent with whom sex merits a stretch
in the pen.
Egg: a male child too young to be sexually developed and therefore
considered neuter. Syn: bibette; peepee meat; yo-yo. Related terms:
egg-sucker, a cradle robber; man who likes very young boys. Syn: peepee
lover. ... "Anything older than ten is over the hill to a peepee lover".
...
"(R)eady to crack open," said of a boy on the verge of puberty. Also
see
chicken.
Cupcake: young girlish boy, though not necessarily gay ... cupcakes;
small
but rounded buttocks, most temptingly found on narrow hipped boys.
Syn:
English Muffins; hone rolls; hot cross buns; rounders. "Ask that kid
with
the rounders if he'd be interested in joining in an ancient Greek initiation
rite."
Bait: attractive, young male in league with the police or criminal element
to entrap homosexuals into performing an act of sex in a public place.
"Be
careful of that tearoom ... there's usually some bait positioned around
the
throne-room."
Benny house bordello: featuring young boys for its homosexual customers.
Syn: boy's smoking house; fag factory, flower house ... sugar loaf;
a kept
boy; sugar babe, talent; young attractive boys; talent scout, person
recruiting what he considers promising young boys.
Peter Pan: 1. superboy; 2. young hustler who charges an arm and leg
for
f---ing; 3. a winsome boy hired to act as bait to entrap prominent
homosexuals. Syn: worm for the hook.
Poultry dealer: man who pimps boys to interested homosexuals. ...
Professional guest: kept boy who doesn't put out for his host. Syn:
fresh
fruit; freshly butchered; freshly killed; fresh meat; fresh one; fresh
piece; fried chicken f---ing boy; gay lad; gay milk bar; half-boy;
kept boy;
rent boy; roundeye (if the lad is still a virgin, anally, he is called
a
kewpie doll); punk; gal-boy; girl-boy; green boy; kid; pussy boy; sex
boy;
youngster to be active in force-f---ng; to emasculate another man
figuratively, etc.; praising a young, little, firm body, "I did this
hitchhiker I picked up -- he sure was a cute, little, tight thing."
Sexteenager: young man who tries out homosexuality, see chicken. Syn:
come-on boy; decoy(er); fairy hawk ... angel with a dirty face; babette;
baby; baby buggy; baby butch; baby Crockett; baby discovers; baby paste;
baggage-boy; bait; bait the hook ... Barbie dogs; young action; young
enough
to get under the gate ... youngster ... young stuff, youthos.
And on and on, for over a hundred more such terms. This lingo is absent
from
all normal national dictionaries -- for now. And, no Virginia, affectionate,
non-sexual or helpful words for boys did not exist.
It is fair to say that Rodger's 12,000 word QV lexicon supports Webster's
statement -- that language grows among the common people, and that
it is the
common language which most accurately describes that group's beliefs,
conduct, hopes, legal and political aspirations.
In 1828, Webster explained his "new vocabulary directly reflected the
American philosophy of government ... (t)he Christian concept of individual
liberty and property established under the Constitution." So too is
Rodger's
"new vocabulary directly related to the (homosexual) philosophy of
government." In 254 words, this "traditionally oppressed minority"
would
legalize access to any age boys ("chickens") for sex.
So, the homosexual view of "life, individual liberty and property" is
radically subversive of the document known as the Declaration of
Independence. The QV should inform the debate on the Boy Scouts, age
of
consent, affectional and sexual orientation and a wide array of "gay"
programs which would eliminate the constraints of American law. As
in "The
U.N. Rights of the Child," sexual psychopathic zealots would have children
become free agents, emancipated from their parents' legal protections
and
controls. This was exactly what Alfred C. Kinsey, the father of the
sexual
and gay rights revolutions, planned to occur in the second half of
the 20th
century.
Let's come to terms in the debate. Look it up! Go get the homosexual
dictionary and really learn what homosexual leaders -- including
legislators, judges, prosecuting attorneys -- mean when they use their
12,000 word "secret code" among themselves. The real "gay" language
exposes
the well-hidden, vulnerable underbelly of the homosexual political
agenda.
As parents' rights to rear and protect their children are destroyed
to make
room for more and more homosexual "civil rights," these sexual
revolutionaries celebrate, making their way, classroom by classroom,
toward
legal access to all our children.
Hey, don't blame us, we just read the dictionary.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Reisman, president of the Institute for Media Education in Crestwood,
Ky., is the author of "Kinsey, Crimes & Consequences," the second
edition of
which is available at the WND storefront).
Eunice Van Winkle Ray is president of RSVP America.
Homophile Dictionary 2
FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 17, 2000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cracking the 'chicken' code
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Editor's note: The following column contains content of a sexual nature
that
some readers may find objectionable.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
By Judith A. Reisman & Eunice Van Winkle Ray
© 2000, WorldNetDaily.com, Inc.
Those who read our Nov. 14 column, "254 'boy words,'" saw the quote
from the
prestigious homophile book, "The Long Road To Freedom," explaining
that, for
homosexuals, the gay dictionary, "The Queens' Vernacular ... firmly
remains
... something of a secret code ... in a hostile culture."
Ordinary heterosexuals can no more understand the secret homophile argot
than can ordinary Americans understand Mandarin Chinese. Dr. Reisman's
formal academic studies included training in a World War II scientific
method used to decode the Axis intentions by reading, categorizing
and then
analyzing their words and phrases. Today this same "content analysis"
method
opens up the secret code of the pederast-homophile movement.
The following case study uses the QV to decipher the "secret code" of
"gay
men" found in a recent invitation to an important public event:
On Oct. 1, the Gay, Lesbian & Straight Education Network of Boston,
Mass.,
mailed invitations to a charity ball starting today, Nov. 17, which
celebrates "Adornment V: The Oldest Profession ... A Return to the
Chicken
Ranch."
The primary theme in the QV is boys (254 out of 12,000 words and phrases
focus on them). And what's a boy to the QV? A "chicken," which it defines
as
"a young recruit; any boy under the age of consent, heterosexual, fair
of
face and unfamiliar with homosexuality." Was it from naivete that GLSEN
chose "chicken" as its theme and as "the oldest profession" to which
it
seeks a return?
GLSEN auctioneers expect philanthropists to arrive in Boston by air,
car and
train (cheaper than Thailand and tax deductible!) Yet, GLSEN warns
it
"assume[s] no liability for personal belongings, actions or room damage
during Adornment weekend."
What other group has a disclaimer absolving them of the "actions" of
charitable attendees? What bad "actions" would GLSEN expect? Why fear
"room
damage" from philanthropists interested in helping "teenagers who are
gay or
suspected of being gay"?
"Adornment V," the announcement reads, "The Oldest Profession Meets
the New
Millennium: A Return to the Chicken Ranch: Meat Market Auction: Hunks
and
hunkettes from the near and far get on the block for your bids! All
the food
groups will be there -- BEEF, PORK, CHICKEN, SAUSAGE, and surprise
delicacies. So much fun, it's almost illegal. Relax after the Ball
with [a]
Texas Tea Party."
Well, here are your handy lil' ol' code breakers. GLSEN's theme is a
slave
auction of men and boys. But can GLSEN's choice of the many unusually
mixed
words above be a coincidence? The QV defines much of GLSEN's secret
code.
For example, who knows the meaning of the "In & Out Show," a "performance"
GLSEN advertised for Nov. 17? And who would think that so many common
words
have a wholly different homophile connotation?
In & Out: According to the QV, "normal copulation between a man
and a woman.
Syn: regular trick, straight lay: western lay."
Meat Market Auction: "Meat," according to the QV refers to the penis,
"the
membrun virile, see 'c---'. Outdoor setting such as a promenade in
a public
park, where homosexuals gather to parade their wares and meet new friends."
Hunks and hunkettes: "Hunk: handsome, broad shouldered man." "Hunkette"
would be a hunk variation on "babette ... baby: baby-faced teen who
appeals
to the paternal side of the mature homosexual."
Get on the block for your bids!: It's the slave auction theme.
Beef: The QV pegs this, first, as the penis and, second as "a masculine
man
... ranchhand ... armed forces (he stood in the back playing with his
'beef.')"
Pork: Like "beef," this refers to the penis. QV says it's "mainly black
and
southern, pork enema [my apologies to the reader], etc.)"
Chicken: A boy for sex as defined above. The QV offers several related
terms: "chicken coop, chicken dinner, chicken feed, chicken freak,
chicken
hawk, chicken house, chicken hunter, chicken-little, chicken-looking,
chicken on a spit, chicken plucker, chicken pox, chicken queen,
chicken-recruiter, chicken rustler" and others.
Sausage: Another synonym for penis. ("Well, you and that Polish sausage
weren't playing jacks.")
Surprise delicacies: Remember the announcement: "So much fun, it's almost
illegal." No precise QV definition, but it seems to imply new kinds
of child
abuse activity protected from legal fallout.
Relax after the Ball with Texas Tea Party. "Texas" in the QV refers
to males
who are "well hung" as in "Texas Longhorn." As for "tea," it's "an
appointment kept with someone in a public john." There are several
more
"graphic" descriptions of the teahouse and tearoom trade, etc., which
are
available should someone decide to arrest or sue the GLSEN leadership.
As
for "party" and "ball":
"Party: 1. orgy, sex session, see pig pile 2. to copulate, see f---."
"Ball: See f---." QV's example: "I haven't balled any a-- since I left
the
military academy."
What a secret code! This Massachusetts party invitation seems to says
that
"after" the official party, there will be an orgy with lots of "well
hung"
boys and men for the "in" crowd.
GLSEN says its "chicken" party will make "schools safe for gay, lesbian
and
bisexual teenagers." But decoding the QV "secret code" in their party
announcement finds GLSEN toxic for all youth. Using the homophile-accredited
QV to decode the GLSEN ball invitation one finds an advertised, planned
pederast, child molestation party. Here vulnerable boys are redefined
as
prostitutes (the "oldest profession") and allegedly will be auctioned
off
for sexual services to "philanthropists" who donate to GLSEN's "charity"
teahouse ball.
The skeptic asks if homosexual child molesters (pederasts) control GLSEN's
tax-funded "Safe Sex Schools Program of Massachusetts?" How else could
the
formal GLSEN announcement to the "hostile culture" read (as decoded)
that
their "ball" is a man and boy sex-slave sale under cover of a tax-deductible
charity?
GLSEN says that it provides "services through the Safe Schools Program
of
Massachusetts, retreats for educators, and an annual conference related
to
these issues for students and professionals from all across new England."
Legal access to all our children is the program, and, as seen in the
Boy
Scout attack, it is well planned and in place.
Remember, don't blame us, we just broke the code.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
For further information, consult "Partner Solicitation Characteristics
as a
Reflection of Male Sexual Orientation" (Judith Reisman and Charles
Johnson,
1995).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Judith Reisman, Ph.D., is the author of "Kinsey, Crimes & Consequences,
2nd Edition" (2000), which is available here at WND. Eunice Van Winkle
Ray
is founder and director of RSVP America.
If I was an LA taxpayer, I wouldn't. If I was an LA police department, fire department or other civic supporter of city associations, I wouldn't. If I was an LA voter and they needed a bond issue referendum, I wouldn't. If they had any City Council meeting with a public comment period, I would. If they had a term limits referendum, I would. If an incumbent had an opponent, I would vote against all incumbents. But I am not an LA resident.
We all live somewhere and I suspect we may all get the opportunity to stand up for rights. Sooner or later we are going to get a shot at the flat tax and all these phony charity contributions that are nothing more than political fronts will go by the way side.
Not only should we FREEP the entire city of Los Angeles, it's about time we did our best to figure out exactly how much clout the decent people of this country really have.
I would gladly help to organize a massive boycott of the city, not only from a tourist perspective but also in general economic terms. We can use this forum to prepare a list of major companies headquartered in the city, then use the power of the internet to exhort our fellow citizens to avoid doing business with those companies.
If the U.S. government could use its economic muscle to pressure South Africa into ending apartheid, then certainly we can use the same tactics against Los Angeles. I've included my e-mail address if anyone would like to pursue this. In addition, I think the pocketbooks of decent, right-minded Americans can be used as a powerful weapon in other ways. Perhaps we can awaken a sleeping giant.
Sooner or later we are going to get a shot
at the flat tax and all these phony charity contributions that are nothing more than political fronts will go by the way side.
I confess I don't understand your posting, and may not understand your point of view. For one thing, are you saying that organizations for whch donations are tax deductible "nothing more than political fronts?" Are you saying that one doesn't have a moral responsibility to donate money to private charities? Are you also saying that what happens in Los Angeles does not affect the entire nation?
Of course, if we all boycotted LA, we'd also have to boycott San Francisco.... What impact would that have on the people of those cities? (Don't know, me-self.)
So now LA is discriminating against the BSA. Does this mean that they cannot use their own facilities?
You're right about that, but the key to any boycott is that it must be selective enough to deliver a narrow, but devastating, message. What we are trying to do here is make an economic wasteland out of one or more cities that use these issues to "send a message" to their constituents.
Los Angeles may only be the beginning, too. We can organize a list of municipal governments that have passed similar legislation and do the same thing to them.
Take it from someone who used to live in New York. The threat of dire economic circumstances tends to make right-wing extremists out of even the most socialist of politicians.
Darn we're going to miss 'em....BWAAHAHAHA!
"I think the bsa should be for boys as well, but don'trash girls over it."
I couldn't agree with you more, but let's keep our eye on the ball here.
Having been involved in Scouting when my boys were of that age, I think it is the most wonderful program that man ever devised for the betterment of our youth.
We are in a war, make no mistake.
We are losing this war slowly but surely.
The LAPD has repeatedly demonstrated that it isn't worthy of a relationship with Explorer Scouts.
Oh, I'll agree with that. The BSA should cut its ties with all governmental organizations.
Also what is really offensive here is the fact that the commies who control the Los Angeles government are trying to use state power to force people to approve of homosexuality.
The BSA should distance itself from all governmental organizations. When politics intrudes, high standards and the ability to function correctly exit.
as a woman who just sent our local BSA a contribution, you refer to girls as if they were the plague....
The contributions made by millions of mothers to the BSA is enormous. The BSA could not function without them.
But Boy Scouts must be for boys. It trains boys to grow up to be men. We do not want them growing up to be women and we don't want girls growing up to be men. Surely there are some areas in life where we may segregate the sexes.
I don't want boys to join the Girl Scouts. Why would you want girls to join Boy Scouts?
Anyone motivated to FREEP the entire City of Los Angeles?
Here is the URL to Los Angeles City Council: http://citycouncil.cityofla.org/index.htm
I urge every one in LA to contact them and let them know how you feel. Let them know that this was a bad decision.
For those who do not live in LA please contact them and let them know you support the Boy Scouts. The Boy Scouts have not changed only the left. Please help. Time to FREEP! Thank you.
We are in a war, make no mistake.
We are losing this war slowly but surely.
And what is the goal of this "war"? What is the prize? What exactly do you feel you are fighting for?
So now LA is discriminating against the BSA. Does this mean that they cannot use their own facilities?
You see, it's OK to discriminate against decency. Decency isn't politically correct.
11-0. That is incredible. The dems have filled the government positions in the big city's with pure filth. Probably a lot of it was done by cheating. The 4/5 of the country that is so out rightly polluted should cut the other 1/5 off.
If I have to answer that question for you, then you need to go back to your fudge-packing forum.
You see, it's OK to discriminate against decency. Decency isn't politically correct.
Too true. However, if the Supremes said the BSA has a right to their beliefs, and public facilities were allowed the BSA prior to the Supremes ruling, isn't it not only discrimination, but persecution of freedom of conscience to deny them these facilities after the ruling?
Boy Scouts are usually supported by United Way contributions. If your United Way drops the Scouts, then I suggest you drop the United Way and make direct contributions to the Scouts.
You can thank the hate-mongering, lesbian, City Council member and ex-Berkley radical Jackie Goldberg for this. A truly disgusting human being.
Alan Dershowitz also went on a screaming rant he other night on Geraldo to "Stop contributing to the Boy Scouts. Stop it! Don't give them a dime! Not a dime! They're a HATE GROUP!!"
I suggest that everyone dig down deep and send them a pile of cash. I did.
<< But City Council members said Los Angeles law prevents relationships with organizations that discriminate. ``We don't have a choice legally. Both the spirit and the content of existing city law is very clear: the city shouldn't participate in a discriminatory practice or policy,'' Councilman Mike Feuer said. >>
I'm incensed by this. I think the only thing left to do is fight fire with fire. Let us get together in mass and JOIN those Gay Rights, Womens Rights and Minority Rights organizations that are the most vocal. As Mike Feuer said, the city then can't have ANY relationship with them if they refuse to let us join. THEN let us outvote their existing membership whenever their membership votes on ANY issue. Turn their organizations into something THEY won't like.
Boy Scouts are usually supported by United Way contributions. If your United Way drops the Scouts, then I suggest you drop the United Way and make direct contributions to the Scouts.
I dropped the United Way long ago. They have been against the BSA for years. Besides, the overhead on the United Way is tremendous.
but persecution of freedom of conscience to deny them these facilities after the ruling?
But persecution of decency is good--if you are a hate-filled homosexual activist.
Turn their organizations into something THEY won't like.
We are the ones without freedom of association. They would be protected by the leftist government from such a takeover.
But persecution of decency is good--if you are a hate-filled homosexual activist
Sad but true. Reminds me of a comment made by a protester in CA recently over Mr. Netanyu's appearance there. She believed in freedom of speech - except for Mr. Netanyu.
The best action now is to flood the LA City Council with e-mail, telephone calls, and the like. Go here Los Angeles City Council
Let them know that they are excluding a group that has been a great benefit to the city for the inclusion of a divisive few. FREEP!
URGENT*URGENT*URGENT!!!! I need help posting an urgent bit of info to all freepers in Michigan! I'm not very computer savvy so please help me get this posted for all Michifreepers to see! U.S. Congressional District #8, mid-Michigan, formerly held by Hilary wannabe Debbie Stabenow, is now being subjected to a RECOUNT!!! Republican Mike Rogers, now our Congressman-elect, won the seat against DemocRat Dianne Byrum who has called for a recount! THIS IS A U.S. CONGRESSIONAL SEAT THAT IS BEING CHALLENGED!!! At least 100 volunteers are needed to help oversee the recount, which is scheduled to begin December 4th and continue for at least a week! URGENT CALL FOR VOLUNTEERS!!! If you live in Michigan and can help out in ANY way, shape or form contact Mike Rogers at (517)367-2000. GET THE WORD OUT!!! URGENT!!!
Georgia in Lansing
The Boy Scouts will put the Queers where they belong, in the closet of SHAME.
Would praying for an earthquake be too harsh??
If I were the BSA I would put out a public statement welcoming the gesture of the city of Liberal Anarchists. I would say that we uphold values, morals, and God, country, and family, etc. I would go further to say that we, the BSA, held a vote and concluded that LA is corrupt, immoral, unethical, unAmerican, communist, etc. and we want no part of it.
Would praying for an earthquake be too harsh??
It depends on whether you're more into the Old Testament or the New Testament.
If I were the BSA I would put out a public statement welcoming the gesture of the city of Liberal Anarchists. I would say that we uphold values, morals, and God, country, and family, etc. I would go further to say that we, the BSA, held a vote and concluded that LA is corrupt, immoral, unethical, unAmerican, communist, etc. and we want no part of it.
Or perhaps they should just stay out of politics completely...
Not only should we FREEP the entire city of Los Angeles, it's about time we did our best to figure out exactly how much clout the decent people of this country really have.
In general, I do not consider myself politically active. However, I'll do more than usual to help defend the BSA. If you're organizing something, please count me in.
Drew Garrett
Click here for a list of Michigan FReepers.
<< The best action now is to flood the LA City Council with e-mail, telephone calls, and the like. >>
Which they will ignore just like liberals always do. The only way to change things is by economic boycotts and by using the rules they are using against us ... against them.
Then tell them you will boycott LA. These people are wannabe two-bit politicians. They don't like heat.
Yep, no more trips to LA, Palm Beach, Miami, Disney World, New York or any of the other hell holes inhabited with DemocRats.
Los Angeles may only be the beginning, too. We can organize a list of municipal governments that have passed similar legislation and do the same thing to them.
I decided to be pro-active rather than reactive. I emailed my local school board representative and encouraged her to continue supporting the Boy Scouts of America. I look forward to her response.
#3 Cherry don't miss the big picture. There is also a great organization called the Girl Scouts. Both the Boy Scouts and Girl Scouts are under a siege by the homosexuals. Can you imagine letting your child be under the influence of one of these pedophiles? Hang in there gal.
CUT OUT THE WHOLE STATE AND FLOAT IT OUT PAST THE MERITME LINE THEN PUT GORE AND CLINTON ON IT AND THE ENTIRE U.N. AND MAKE THEM THE COUNTRY THEY ALWAYS WANTED COMMUNIST LEFTIST GAY LOVING USSR 2.
Estra Jean, on Wednesday, voted 1 to 0 to cut ties with the city of Lost Angeles saying the city's exclusion of The Boy Scouts of America was discriminatory, unAmerican and child abuse--"and I am unanimous in this!"
If I have to answer that question for you, then you need to go back to your fudge-packing forum.
In other words, you don't know, exactly. You know you hate certain kinds of people and you want to hurt them. Period. This is typical of your personality type, from what I can see.
"and I am unanimous in this!"
They'll probably demand a recount. Hope you don't have any dimples for them to examine. ;->
"You know you hate certain kinds of people and you want to hurt them. Period."
Bravo, fudge-packer.
You got that exactly right.
I'd like to see you and your kind kicked so far back in the closet you'd NEVER see daylight.
"Hope you don't have any dimples for them to examine."
No need to worry, no one has been interested in my dimples in years-- and besides, they would have to find me amid the mountain of Boy Scout popcorn I've purchased lately to encourage that organization.
As a Scoutmaster of a troop for the last 6 years and with 2 boys in scouts, I find the actions of the LA city council discriminatory and disturbing as well. I do not think bashing other people is going to get things done. I understand the need to display a little anger but we need to operate within the bounds we say we stand for. If a person disagreeing with us is reading this forum, there is a chance they may get a little better educated with information that is not slanted by our liberal media. We need to not inflame them but inform them. Also to the issue that the boy scouts discriminate, EVERYONE of us discriminates every day when we choose what area of town we want to live in, what kind of car we want to drive, who we want to associate with, what food we want to eat. It is no surprise that the Boy Scouts have been called discriminatory, we are! just like every organization that asks people to fill out an application. We discriminate against felons, petifiles, and people whos background check reveals problems, and Yes we do discriminate against ADULT male AVOWED homosexuals. It is not fair to put unsuspecting boys in an environment where they would be a target of a persons sexual preference. We do not discriminate against boys with the same persuasions unless they act on them or have any of the other disciplinary problems that would have us cast out any other boy. Everyone please uphold the high standards of the BSA as we fight through this problem...
Sorry, but my time of tolerance for the homosexual agenda is over.
We have been tolerant far too long.
We are being swept under by a tide of degeneracy which doesn't stop with the BSA.
It's time to fight fire with fire.
I refuse to stand by and watch fringe groups destroy the moral values of this great country.
We are not fighting for the future of the BSA; we are fighting for the future of this country.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
[
Top
|
Latest Posts
|
Latest Articles
|
Self Search
|
Add Bookmark
|
Post
|
Abuse
|
Help!
]
FreeRepublic , LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 Forum Version 2.0a Copyright © 1999 Free Republic, LLC |