FreeRepublic.com "A Conservative News Forum"
[ Last | Latest Posts | Latest Articles | Self Search | Add Bookmark | Post | Abuse | Help! ]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Survival odds for Russia

News/Current Events Front Page Editorial
Source: Washington Times
Published: Monday, January 22, 2001 Author: Arnold Beichman
Posted on 01/21/2001 22:08:54 PST by JohnHuang2

January 22, 2001

Survival odds for Russia


Arnold Beichman

     More than three decades ago Andrei Amalrik published a small book with the intriguing title, "Will the Soviet Union Survive Until 1984?" The young Soviet dissident, who died in 1980 at the age of 40, predicted a protracted and devastating war between the Soviet Union and China, one which would lead to the demise of the Soviet Union. Few foresaw the fall of the Kremlin as the result of a Cold War.
     Today the title of such a book could well be: "Will Russia Survive Until 2084?" This time the country's potential demise would not be the result of war, hot or cold. Rather it would be the result of a population decline of such magnitude that President Vladimir Putin said a few months ago that, if it continues, "the very survival of the nation will be endangered." In his first annual presidential address last July, Mr. Putin listed the "most acute problems" facing Russia. Of the 16 problems on the list, his No. 1 problem was the uninterrupted decline of Russia's population.
     I have been studying a 5,000-word article in the Wilson Quarterly by Murray Feshbach, the acknowledged leading U.S. expert in Russian demography, who is presently a senior scholar at the Wilson Center. His article, titled, "Russia's Population Meltdown," raises the most serious questions about Russia's ability to surmount its interminable economic crisis and whether Russia can create the political institutions necessary to reverse its depopulation.
     Mr. Feshbach's findings about what he calls "a looming demographic catastrophe" go something like this:
     • Russia's population decline "raises the twin prospects of political disintegration and subsequent consolidation under an authoritarian leader hostile to Western interests." In other words an end to any hopes for a democratized Russia.
     • Russians are dying at significantly faster than they are being born. Russian women are bearing little more than half the number of babies needed to sustain the population at current levels.
     • The incidence of HIV/AIDS, syphilis, tuberculosis, hepatitis C and other infectious diseases is soaring.
     • The Russian health care system is "staggering": 40 percent of the nation's hospitals and clinics lack hot water or sewage disposal.
     • Only about 25 percent of Russian babies are born healthy. Only 5 percent to 10 percent of Russian children are healthy.
     • By 2050, Russia's population will shrink by one-third, i.e. from 145 million to 100 million, "a blow that even a stable, prosperous country would have difficulty sustaining," to quote Mr. Feshbach.
     • An estimated two-thirds of all pregnancies now end in abortions.
     • An estimated 20 million Russians, or more than one-seventh of the population, are alcoholics.
     These are a but a few of the appalling revelations in the Feshbach article. I have omitted his findings, bolstered by reports of official Russian organizations, which deal with the polluted environment, rivers, lakes and farmland, a phenomenon which has produced an extraordinary disclosure — only 25 percent to 50 percent of Russia's fresh water is potable. Mr. Feshbach estimates it would take 20 years and $400 billion to clean up the water supply, $6 billion to clean up the chemical weapons storage sites, hundreds of billions to clean up the nuclear waste.
     "And yet despite how daunting the task may seem, and how long the odds of success," Mr. Feshbach concludes, "we cannot simply ignore the ruin of Russia. The United States and other nations of the world have a profound interest in helping to avert an economic and demographic Chernobyl that would give a fearful new meaning to the word meltdown."
     In the meantime, Russia's war in Chechnya goes right on, Russian fighters buzz an American aircraft carrier in the Pacific, President Putin has a love-fest with Fidel Castro, a rule of law has yet to materialize, Iran gets strategic weapons — submarines, helicopters, battleships, modern tanks — from Russia, tolerance of dissent diminishes, corruption is still endemic.[

Arnold Beichman, a research fellow at the Hoover Institution, is a Washington Times columnist.

For Education And Discussion Only. Not For Commercial Use.


1 Posted on 01/21/2001 22:08:54 PST by JohnHuang2
[ Reply | Private Reply | Top | Last ]


To: JohnHuang2

There are a lot of odd things happening in Russia right now, and I have no idea how it will turn out. My feeling is that either Russia will become the world's next great free republic, or it will become, again, a "Northern Resource Area."

2 Posted on 01/21/2001 22:16:07 PST by patton
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]


To: all

a rule of law has yet to materialize,

Where there is no rule of law, there
will be no "outside" investment.

3 Posted on 01/21/2001 22:17:43 PST by dbbeebs
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]


To: JohnHuang2

The United States and other nations of the world have a profound interest in helping to avert an economic and demographic Chernobyl that would give a fearful new meaning to the word meltdown."

Uh? Is this guy nuts? We need to help a nation cope with its habit of mass infanticide? Is the guy suggesting we should repopulate Russia with the wombs of American mothers too?

Someone "h@ng" those communist journalists.

4 Posted on 01/21/2001 22:26:02 PST by lavaroise
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]


To: JohnHuang2

"And yet despite how daunting the task may seem, and how long the odds of success," Mr. Feshbach concludes, "we cannot simply ignore the ruin of Russia.

And why should we? We deserve a great deal of the credit ... and will share in the spoils of militant atheism, even, if we continue on the path we're on.

5 Posted on 01/21/2001 22:35:24 PST by Askel5
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]


To: JohnHuang2

Russia is truly in a shambles. Yet we receive very little press coverage on this. 20 years ago, their closed society and secrecy prevented us from learning the truth. Now, with free information flow, our press does not deem it worthy of coverage. Why? Because our communists (the press) don't want Americans to see the results of communism. Of course, our communists believe that the problem wasn't communism... it was the fault of the Russian people.... "If only it had been implemented by people like our 'enlightened' liberals."

6 Posted on 01/21/2001 22:44:54 PST by TheEngineer
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]


To: TheEngineer

It may just be the fault of abortion-on-demand and state-enforced sucularism, not communism.

7 Posted on 01/21/2001 22:47:15 PST by patton
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | Top | Last ]


To: JohnHuang2

Gee...if only we could send all our "preservationist" Marxist environmentalist over there...

Think what a great deal that could be. They would bolster the Russian population, there would be so much for them to fix, and they would be in a country that they love. (One more thing...we wouldn't miss them.)

8 Posted on 01/21/2001 22:51:37 PST by Lizzie
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]


To: Lizzie

Gee...if only we could send all our "preservationist" Marxist environmentalist over there...

That's the Rush Limbaugh formula: Export liberalism...er, Marxism ;^)

9 Posted on 01/21/2001 22:54:31 PST by JohnHuang2
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | Top | Last ]


To: patton

" the result of a population decline..."

...in Europe from the black plague was, if I recall Connections correctly, salutary.

10 Posted on 01/21/2001 23:01:34 PST by gcruse
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | Top | Last ]


To: JohnHuang2

On a more serious note: living in San Diego within sight of the Mexican border one cannot become acutely aware of the irony of a political border.

There is nothing different about the dirt on the other side of the San Ysidro border crossing. Same climate. Same ocean. Same vegetation. Same history, up to a point, and many of the same families and people.

But the completely man-made, man-invented absurdity that is a political border could not be more pronounced if it were, literally, marked on the ground like it is on a map.

And what made San Diego grow up into a clean, beautiful, productive city while Tijuana stumbles along as a dirty jumbled mess, surrounded by colonias of impoverished Mexicans?

The difference is their political systems.

Poor Russia is doomed for spending the most important eighty years in the world's history under the yoke of Communism, and I don't think they will ever get over it.

11 Posted on 01/21/2001 23:03:32 PST by Lizzie
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]


To: gcruse

I love that show. Ran into the host on a flight from MN to DTW, once, but he didn't want to talk. Too bad.

12 Posted on 01/21/2001 23:04:14 PST by patton
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | Top | Last ]


To: Lizzie

" up to a point" is the point.

13 Posted on 01/21/2001 23:06:31 PST by gcruse
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | Top | Last ]


To: JohnHuang2

Survival odds for Russia

Whose gonna run the pool for the bets?

14 Posted on 01/21/2001 23:11:25 PST by unix
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]


To: JohnHuang2

Doesn't it give you a nice, warm feeling to know that the people educating your children in college and high school and all of your news media together have the warmest regard and highest respect for Communism and socialism? I am sure it will work much better when they try it here in the United States. The Russians just didn't do it right. ;>(

15 Posted on 01/21/2001 23:13:04 PST by alaska_seeker
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]


To: patton

Thanks for the reply. But I don't think that the two (communism and forced-atheism) can be considered as separate causes. It must go back to the communists' idea that religion is part of the problem, not the solution.

Our ultra-lib commies are fueled by atheism. Take Hitlery, for example. She looks about as comfortable in church as she looked at those Arkansas football games. Seriously, even the so-called religious leader Democrats give their primary allegiance to party over religion.... Something that we don't generally see from religious conservative republicans. The Reverand? Jesse Jackson... In what church is he a reverand? Does this church not condemn abortion? How about Joe Lieberman? Does Orthodox Judaism not condemn abortion? I doubt it. The "Catholic" Ted Kennedy? He seems as if he has never seen an abortion that he wouldn't want to personally perform.

Like the communists, the liberals worship "the state". Because of what has happened in Russia, every one of our schools should be teaching kids now what happens when communism/atheism runs a country. But they won't be... at least not by liberal NEA teachers.

16 Posted on 01/21/2001 23:21:03 PST by TheEngineer
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | Top | Last ]


To: Lizzie

Eloquent.

17 Posted on 01/21/2001 23:25:11 PST by JohnHuang2
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | Top | Last ]


To: TheEngineer

As a catholic (I am actually a decendant of Sts. Margaret & David of Scotland), I am dumfounded by the idea that a catholic could vote for a democrat. It seems like when they get to the Pearly Gates, god would look at them and say, "You voted for what?! You go to He!!

18 Posted on 01/21/2001 23:26:53 PST by patton
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | Top | Last ]


To: TheEngineer

"Russia is truly in a shambles."

What should be done about their problems? Any assistance rendered could generate miserable failures as in the past...but by not helping, would we do just as much harm? Hungry soldiers make very fierce fighters, "hungry" governments sell-off high tech weaponry to the highest bidders.

The best solution in my opinion would be for the Russian people to effect change, but after so many years under Communist rule, are they even capable of an organized rebellion? Carefully directed funding aimed at groups with the greatest chance of success is an option...but at great cost to us (remembering that little problem in Central America).

I don't have any solutions, but I am sympathetic to the plight of all oppressed people.

19 Posted on 01/21/2001 23:40:39 PST by LeeMcCoy
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | Top | Last ]


To: Sawdring, PeaceKeeper, Ironword, Hopalong, passin pilgrim

fyi

20 Posted on 01/21/2001 23:45:07 PST by LSJohn
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | Top | Last ]


To: Lizzie,madrussian,Joe Murphy

Good points Lizzie, well made.

Imagine what Russia could be today, if the Duma and Kerensky had survived in 1917.

The Bolsheviks were a malignant cancer, and Russia is still sick from the effects of the disease.

21 Posted on 01/21/2001 23:49:23 PST by Travis McGee
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | Top | Last ]


To: LeeMcCoy

Thanks for the reply. As you are, I am also sympathetic to all oppressed and suffering people. Should we help them? Certainly... Even for those who aren't sympathic, I think that it makes sense if only to keep them from selling off strategic arms to terrorists. I think that Bush is much less naive about the Russians than Algore was (as demonstrated by Algore's secret agreement with Chernomyrdin). I think that any help he extends will have strong strings attached... or hopefully "ropes".

22 Posted on 01/22/2001 08:55:04 PST by TheEngineer
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | Top | Last ]


To: TheEngineer

"I think that Bush is much less naive about the Russians than Algore was (as demonstrated by Algore's secret agreement with Chernomyrdin). I think that any help he extends will have strong strings attached... or hopefully "ropes". "

Thankfully, President Bush has access to his father's expertise. Aside from this input though, President Bush appears to be very well informed through his own channels. I believe many people and governments are going to be quite surprised at how astute and shrewd he really is, and as you remarked, any help we send will come with serious strings attached.

A new day dawns...

23 Posted on 01/22/2001 14:47:44 PST by LeeMcCoy
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | Top | Last ]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

[ Top | Latest Posts | Latest Articles | Self Search | Add Bookmark | Post | Abuse | Help! ]

FreeRepublic , LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
Forum Version 2.0a Copyright © 1999 Free Republic, LLC