FreeRepublic.com "A Conservative News Forum"
[ Last | Latest Posts | Latest Articles | Self Search | Add Bookmark | Post | Abuse | Help! ]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

HAARP TRANSMITTER NOW RUNNING AT FULL POWER: Can be Easily Heard Around the World on Shortwave Radio

Miscellaneous Front Page News Keywords: HAARP, KOREAN FLIGHT 800, RUSSIAN STEALTH FIGHTERS
Source: cryptome.org
Published: 19 February 2001 Author: BJNews by Marshall Smith
Posted on 02/20/2001 08:39:49 PST by Plummz

      As of this morning, Saturday Feb 17, 2001, HAARP began doing testing
      with greatly increased FULL power. The transmitter can now be heard all
      day long on 3.39 MHz. Very early this morning about 3 AM, HAARP could be
      heard at it's "old" normal signal strength. About 4 AM the signal
      changed in both its pulse timing and inter-pulse spacing. At 4:30 AM the
      signal strength suddenly increased tremendously.

      Unlike previous mornings, there was no regular F-layer daytime fade out
      when the sun rose here in California about 6:45 AM. I continued to
      monitor during the daylight. I have never heard the HAARP signal during
      the daytime before. The sun now rises in Gakona Alaska about 10 AM PST.
      The received signal again increased from about S5 to S9 at 10:05 AM.
      With sunlight at both the transmitter and receiver there is no F-layer
      skip to bend the powerful signal around the planet. This means this is
      an extremely powerful direct groundwave signal. And I'm only receiving
      the leakage off the side lobes of the antenna array.

      The full HAARP design power is supposed to be about 350 Megawatts. But
      that is only the published spec, not necessarily what is done in
      practice (as in those CB'rs running illegal 1KWatt linear amplifiers).
      There is a planned Air Force "Star Wars" test with two vehicles, one
      from California and the other in the south Pacific, similar to last
      summer's failed test. The tentative published launch is set for late
      March or April. I will monitor HAARP to confirm it is running full power
      during the launch, as it was last summer.

      Last summer's "failure" is exactly what a HAARP device is supposed to
      do; destroy the electronic controls of a vehicle so the second stage
      cannot separate from the booster. A very cheap, simple way to knock down
      missiles launched from anywhere on the planet. It also can destroy
      military satellites in low orbit. Maybe that's why the Russians and
      Chinese have been complaining in the last several weeks about Bush's
      intention to "build" the star wars system. Maybe they've been losing
      some of their "secret hardware." But of course, they won't say that in
      public.

      Its now 11 AM PST, on Saturday the 17th, and the signal is blasting in
      with the powerful pre-pulse tone around S+20 and the main signal about
      S9. The signal varies 3 to 6 db over a series of several pulses. Since
      this is not due to F-layer skip fading, I must assume they are slewing
      the beam of the antenna in various directions, and thus changing the
      amount of the side lobes in this direction. This must be a test of a
      simulated space warfare game with multiple targets. Rapid slewing of the
      antenna in just a matter of a minute or two is not useful for submarine
      communication, nor for their stated purpose of doing "ionospheric
      research."

      To show the HAARP signal is abnormally large, at this time, the 80 meter
      band is silent and WWV at 5 MHz cannot be heard, as would be expected
      during the daytime. WWV at 10 MHz is barely heard but does not even
      register on the S meter. Tuning back to 3.39 MHz, the S meter jumps off
      the top of the scale. Even the extremely powerful Russian "woodpecker"
      transmitters during the cold-war never did that, and they were aimed
      along the ground not out into space. I have no way to estimate how many
      Gigawatts that represents.

      It may be only coincidence but just several days ago, Russia announced
      it will be conducting a massive space war game, including the launch of
      numerous missiles, from both ground sites and submarines. Of course this
      is only a coincidence. You Think. Check out the details in Bill Gertz's
      article Russian forces conduct massive war-games exercise . And then
      don't forget you read it first in BroJon Gazette.

      For more information about HAARP, how the transmitter works and to hear
      what the transmitter sounds like, go back to the front page article
      about the HAARP facility and follow the links there.

      ************

      I should point out in 1985 a number of Air Force ER-135 electronic
      warfare planes were shot down in the Sea of Japan. They were apparently
      making a covert entry into soviet airspace to test the latest Russian
      technology. What the Air Force did not know then was the Soviets had
      developed a stealth fighter so the 135's never saw the Russians coming
      and all 5 of the US e-warfare planes were shot down. To cover this
      "covert" event, the US shot down a 747, a plane similar to the 135's (or
      modified Boeing 707's whose parts are very similar to a 747) so if plane
      parts are found in the Sea of Japan they are claimed to be the 747. This
      is the supposed "Russian" shoot down of Korean Airlines Flight 800, on
      Sept 15, 1985. I remember the event well, since it is my son's b-day.

      The proof of a covert event with stealth Russian fighters shooting down
      5 Air Force ER-135's is documented in R.W. Johnson's book, SHOOTDOWN,
      published in 1986. The most convincing evidence is the strange fact that
      27 US active duty electronic warfare officers somehow end up on the
      passenger list among the dead on the civilian Flight 800 going to Korea.
      I only point this out to show how high tech secret warfare between
      Russia and the US may result in deaths and the destruction of hardware,
      and yet is never reported to the public.

      The US did not announce and demonstrate deployment of its own stealth
      fighters until the Gulf War in '90-91, five years later. In 1991, three
      events occurred, (1) the US demonstrates stealth fighter-bombers which
      can travel anywhere in the world without detection, (2) the announcement
      of the construction of HAARP which would neutralize all soviet missiles
      coming over the pole, and (3) the collapse of the Soviet Union. To see
      these as unrelated events is to miss the point of history.

      At the present time, both the Russian's and Chinese have demonstrated
      their ability and inclination to engage in warfare, especially space
      warfare. It would thus seem clear the "coincidence" of the massive
      Russian war games and the sudden increase in the output of HAARP in a
      warfare mode, would indicate that on this Presidents Day Weekend 2001,
      warfare is actually occurring, not just games. Just as in 1985, when
      planes were destroyed and US airmen died, the story was completely
      covered up, but it nonetheless had great implications on the relations
      between the governments of the world.

      There are, of course, no airmen on the Russian missiles, nor the Chinese
      and Russian satellites in orbit. This is the new hi-tech robotic remote
      control warfare of outer space. But, the "war games" are real,
      nonetheless. The massive increase in the output of HAARP, under the
      control of the Air Force's Space Vehicles Command which operates HAARP
      and has the mission of engaging in space warfare, would indicate a lot
      of expensive space hardware is now biting the dust. The Russians will
      claim their exercise was a "success." The Chinese who have just lost
      their "eyes in orbit" will say nothing. And the US will claim, as usual,
      "What, who me? HAARP hasn't been in operation since October '99." But
      you can listen for yourself on any shortwave receiver by tuning to 3.390
      MHz. Good Listening.

      Marshall Smith

WHAT IS HAARP? HOW IT LOOKS AND SOUNDS!
http://www.geocities.com/brojongazette/index.html

Welcome to the HAARP Home Page
HIGH FREQUENCYACTIVE AURORAL RESEARCH PROGRAM
http://w3.nrl.navy.mil/haarp.html

The Latest HAARP Information
http://www.earthpulse.com/haarp/index.html


I haven't formed an opinion on the "true" purposes of HAARP, but I found this interesting and thought I'd throw it open to discussion.

1 Posted on 02/20/2001 08:39:49 PST by Plummz
[ Reply | Private Reply | Top | Last ]


To: Michael Rivero

Air disaster flag.

2 Posted on 02/20/2001 08:40:25 PST by Plummz
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]


To: Plummz

You know, I heard that buzzing sound this morning when I woke up early and couldn't figure out what woke me up. I went into my office and in my closet I have a TFH. I put it on and the buzzing stopped.

Now my back teeth hurt.

3 Posted on 02/20/2001 08:49:43 PST by Seeking the truth
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]


To: Plummz

This `experiment`* has been also using 20MHZ, the National Bureau Of Standards & Time channel, for a VERY long time, off & on..........

4 Posted on 02/20/2001 08:52:15 PST by dishedd
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]


To: Plummz

This morning at 4am I dreamt that I found a puddle of blood next to my father's vacant chair because he had a brain anuerism.

In my opinion, the U.S. is unable to get anymore good technology from the aliens because they stiffed us on the tech for abduction agreement, and HAARP is designed to screw up their EM propulsion units on their saucers.

5 Posted on 02/20/2001 08:52:47 PST by JohnYankeeCmpsr
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | Top | Last ]


To: Seeking the truth

Unfortunately, this is NOT foil hat stuff.

Originally, the `expertiment` was to suppposedly control battlefield WEATHER*

YOUR, tax monies, at WORK*

6 Posted on 02/20/2001 08:54:55 PST by dishedd
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | Top | Last ]


To: Plummz

The most convincing evidence is the strange fact that 27 US active duty electronic warfare officers somehow end up on the passenger list among the dead on the civilian Flight 800 going to Korea.

If that's the most convincing evidence, I'd hate to see the bad stuff. The Russians might have a stealth fighter now, but I doubt it. I'd bet a case of beer they didn't have one in 1986.

7 Posted on 02/20/2001 08:55:25 PST by VadeRetro
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]


To: Plummz

Dude, run quick and pull the shades before the "Matrix" gets you.

You are just the kind of person that will help be the cause of "short wave radio control" legislation (/sarcasm>.

Thanks for the heads up. This is similar in magnitude to the early development of radar just prior to WWII.

Tin foil hatheads...bug off!

8 Posted on 02/20/2001 08:58:38 PST by Rebelbase
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]


To: Plummz

BUMP.
 
(How long do you think this thread will last?)

9 Posted on 02/20/2001 09:00:19 PST by AnnaZ
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]


To: babylonian, 2sheep, Mercuria, DainBramage

bttt

10 Posted on 02/20/2001 09:01:33 PST by Thinkin' Gal
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]


To: dishedd

You make this sound like a bad thing. Why?

11 Posted on 02/20/2001 09:10:21 PST by stuartcr
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | Top | Last ]


To: Plummz

God I love this place ...... where tin foil and reality really DO converge.

12 Posted on 02/20/2001 09:12:40 PST by Centurion2000
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]


To: Plummz

bttt

13 Posted on 02/20/2001 09:13:34 PST by prognostigaator
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]


To: error99

ping myself

14 Posted on 02/20/2001 09:17:21 PST by error99
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]


To: Centurion2000

Note, Art Bell is back on the air and now this story of HAARP.

Coincidence? hmmmmmmmm? I think not!

:-)

15 Posted on 02/20/2001 09:22:42 PST by newfreep
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | Top | Last ]


To: Plummz

Wasn't it KOREAN FLIGHT 801? Anyway, I think this HAARP transmitter thing may have caused me to have a bad headache on Sunday morning. Fourteen beers and the increased power to the transmitter was not a good combination.

16 Posted on 02/20/2001 09:25:04 PST by TBall
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]


To: Plummz

This is the supposed "Russian" shoot down of Korean Airlines Flight 800, on Sept 15, 1985. I remember the event well, since it is my son's b-day.

It was KAL Flight 007, not 800.

17 Posted on 02/20/2001 09:30:31 PST by longshadow
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]


To: jedediah smith, rdavis

fyi

18 Posted on 02/20/2001 09:31:07 PST by mancini
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]


To: Seeking the truth

You tin foil hat comedians are goofier than real life. Martin Marietta was working on this technology to control weather back in the late '60's and '70's.

What's wrong, didn't Dan Rather or Peter Jennings fill you in on this?

Stay Awake for God's sake.

19 Posted on 02/20/2001 09:32:23 PST by kevin
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | Top | Last ]


To: Plummz

A google search for HAARP more about HAARP

20 Posted on 02/20/2001 09:54:35 PST by It'salmosttolate
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]


To: Plummz

I know a couple of HAM operators and this new signal caused a big stir in their world this weekend. Supposedly HARP has denied sending it. There's an effort going on world wide to document the signal strength 24/7 and pinpoint the origin. Interesting to see what they come up with.

21 Posted on 02/20/2001 09:59:06 PST by GVgirl
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]


To: Plummz

I should point out in 1985 a number of Air Force ER-135 electronic warfare planes were shot down in the Sea of Japan. They were apparently making a covert entry into soviet airspace to test the latest Russian technology. What the Air Force did not know then was the Soviets had developed a stealth fighter so the 135's never saw the Russians coming and all 5 of the US e-warfare planes were shot down. To cover this "covert" event, the US shot down a 747, a plane similar to the 135's (or modified Boeing 707's whose parts are very similar to a 747) so if plane parts are found in the Sea of Japan they are claimed to be the 747. This is the supposed "Russian" shoot down of Korean Airlines Flight 800, on Sept 15, 1985. I remember the event well, since it is my son's b-day.

Looney detector is fully pegged.

22 Posted on 02/20/2001 10:02:53 PST by AppyPappy
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]


To: AnnaZ

(whispering): i see little green aliens with tinfoil hats!

23 Posted on 02/20/2001 10:07:11 PST by Mercuria
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | Top | Last ]


To: kevin

Actually, it goes back to Tesler, which was way before Martin Marietta played around with it.

24 Posted on 02/20/2001 10:07:54 PST by Seeking the truth
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | Top | Last ]


To: AppyPappy

What he meant to say was RC-135, KAL-007, and 1 September 1983. Other than those glaring errors, he isn't completely full of sh*t. Unfortunately.

25 Posted on 02/20/2001 10:11:38 PST by struwwelpeter
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | Top | Last ]


To: struwwelpeter

So the US shot down KAL-007? I don't think so considering the Russians bragged about it.

26 Posted on 02/20/2001 10:13:41 PST by AppyPappy
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | Top | Last ]


To: dishedd

"Originally, the `expertiment` was to suppposedly control battlefield WEATHER*"

Wrong ...

27 Posted on 02/20/2001 10:16:34 PST by _Jim
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | Top | Last ]


To: Plummz

You may want to do some research here and here. BTW: The 'tango' model RC-135 lost in '85 was mechanical failure, but even NSA admits 40 PARPRO acft losses.

28 Posted on 02/20/2001 10:18:44 PST by struwwelpeter
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]


To: Seeking the truth

That's Tesla, but why the tin foil hat sarcasm?

Martin- Marietta, was doing this research under funding from the U.S. Military, and that's okay, but don't blow this stuff off so quickly.

I'm not advocating being a looney tune, but keep an open mind, there is alot going on that we are truly unaware of.

29 Posted on 02/20/2001 10:18:55 PST by kevin
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | Top | Last ]


To: struwwelpeter

The flight number didn't sound right to me, either, but I just pulled the keywords from the article. Thanks for the correc.

30 Posted on 02/20/2001 10:19:18 PST by Plummz
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | Top | Last ]


To: GVgirl

"I know a couple of HAM operators and this new signal caused a big stir in their world this weekend"

A few years ago HAARP did a public test in conjunction with the Hams to see where HAARP could actually be heard -

- turns out it wasn't all that impressive ...

If you search HAARP's site the results of this test can be found.

31 Posted on 02/20/2001 10:19:49 PST by _Jim
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | Top | Last ]


To: _Jim

If _jim shows up on a thread, you know his HANDLERS want discussion on this issue to be disrupted. _Jim thanks for showing up, when you formally deny something/some thread then we know better that we are somewhere closer to the truth. Now go back and crawl in your hole, youve earned your shekels for today.....

32 Posted on 02/20/2001 10:23:42 PST by HappyAndFree
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | Top | Last ]


To: dishedd

"This `experiment`* has been also using 20MHZ,

Why don't you add to this as well:

60 KHz, 2.5, 5, 10, 15 MHz.

And then there is CHU Canada at 7.333 MHz ...

And what about LORAN 'A' (1.7 - 2.0 MHz now defunct) and LORAN C (100 KHz still oprational) ...

33 Posted on 02/20/2001 10:24:00 PST by _Jim
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | Top | Last ]


To: AppyPappy

Heavens no, Moscow splashed it, and it had nothing to do with HAARP - it was merely that Moscow could not face the ridicule if the liner crossed into Soviet airspace (twice), refused to respond to signals, and was about to escape unmolested. Russians can handle just about anything except ridicule.

Any reference to RCs, KAL, or any airline disaster is the product of an over-active imagination. But there is a tiny, tiny element of truth there, unfortunately buried in unresearched cr*p.

But then perhaps that is the idea.

34 Posted on 02/20/2001 10:25:30 PST by struwwelpeter
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | Top | Last ]


To: Seeking the truth

Nikolai TESLA.

35 Posted on 02/20/2001 10:25:40 PST by That Poppins Woman
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | Top | Last ]


To: HappyAndFree

What -

- you've nothing to add to the discussion but that?

Some ASSET you are ...

There is far more RF transmitted in the continential US than HAARP could EVER hope to do ...

But you won't hear that from the fear mongers like the authors of this piece.

They dispense more 'isolated facts in a vacuum' for which but a very few have the ability to review let alone analyze -

Kinda like Y2K all over again ...

36 Posted on 02/20/2001 10:29:13 PST by _Jim
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | Top | Last ]


To: That Poppins Woman

Correct, I slurred my speech when I typed that.

37 Posted on 02/20/2001 10:34:56 PST by Seeking the truth
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | Top | Last ]


To: kevin

Personally, I'm gonna keep my judgement on all this on hold, at least until I can pick up one of the new Kenner's HAARP Playstations' due to hit Walmarts' everywhere in time for the '01 Christmas season.

38 Posted on 02/20/2001 10:36:27 PST by babylonian
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | Top | Last ]


To: kevin

Yes, I slurred my speech as I typed his name.

I never did say anything about a tin foil hat. I did refer to a TFH, which is a Tesla For Haarp fan club tee shirt.

Kevin, come on, lighten up, have fun in the old Freeper way. I've actually seen UFO's so I know I am not nuts!

39 Posted on 02/20/2001 10:39:07 PST by Seeking the truth
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | Top | Last ]


To: longshadow

It was KAL Flight 007, not 800.

Indeed it was, and it was an ADMITTED Soviet shoot-down for violation of their air-space because the plane was slightly off-course a whole 20 miles. Remember all the hero-worship their television and press gave the brave Mig pilot who shot down an unarmed passenger jet just as it was leaving Soviet airspace? America lost an incredibly important congressman, Lawrence McDonald R-Ga, who was flying to Japan. Spook scuttlebutt about this shoot-down has unblinkingly speculated in the CIA whether the Soviets didn't mess with the guidance beacons, causing the deviation, all so they could assassinate Larry McDonald. After all, its not every day the Soviets shot down a major airliner.

40 Posted on 02/20/2001 10:59:42 PST by Paul Ross
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | Top | Last ]


To: GVgirl

I know a couple of HAM operators and this new signal caused a big stir in their world this weekend. Supposedly HARP has denied sending it. There's an effort going on world wide to document the signal strength 24/7 and pinpoint the origin. Interesting to see what they come up with.

BUMP. This will prove interesting to see if it is of, US, Russian or Chinese origin. The sheer magnitude of the power supply to generate this signal is certainly non-trivial and should be a clear sign that someone is VERY serious about something, most likely military. Tin Foil Hats and Reality Converging, indeed.

41 Posted on 02/20/2001 11:06:18 PST by Paul Ross
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | Top | Last ]


To: All

I still don't understand why this is being treated by some, as something bad. It's just another weapons system!

42 Posted on 02/20/2001 11:10:14 PST by stuartcr
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | Top | Last ]


To: That Poppins Woman

NIKOLA Tesla.

43 Posted on 02/20/2001 11:11:37 PST by real saxophonist
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | Top | Last ]


To: Plummz

You can trust that all info about HAARP has been released to the public.
Only a fool thinks that the fed covers anything up.
(sarcasm\off)
The article certainly doesn't look 100% credible, but there is probably
much more to the HAARP project than meets the eye.
Thanks for posting this...
(Don't sweat the flames!)
:-)

44 Posted on 02/20/2001 11:13:44 PST by freefly
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]


To: Seeking the truth

". I did refer to a TFH"

I'm really sorry, see how defensive I've gotten from the last eight years.

I've seen a ton of your posts and the TFH actually didn't sound like you.

Once again sorry for being so anal!!

45 Posted on 02/20/2001 11:14:35 PST by kevin
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | Top | Last ]


To: real saxophonist

I think you're right ... I used to work with a Nikolai and I'm always using that form of the name.

46 Posted on 02/20/2001 11:16:30 PST by That Poppins Woman
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | Top | Last ]


To: Paul Ross

Some of the latest speculation says possibly a Norwegian defense data transmission.

Forgive, I'm not up on this radio transmission stuff. But as with the internet, I enjoy seeing the investigative process employed by the public.

47 Posted on 02/20/2001 11:19:36 PST by GVgirl
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | Top | Last ]


To: Paul Ross

Tin Foil Hats and Reality Converging, indeed.

One of the strangest convergences of tin foil and reality is the book, "The Secret Man : An American Warrior's Uncensored Story," by Frank Dux. (Amazon link to Dux's book)

Dux, a real person, is a famous American martial. In this book, he alleges that he is also a big time government operative and narrates all sorts of supposedly real ops he's worked on. At some point in this book, the author flat out states that everyone involved in government work knows that HAARP experiments (and a similar thing in Australia) caused the ozone holes.

Mark W.

48 Posted on 02/20/2001 11:26:24 PST by MarkWar
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | Top | Last ]


To: Octar

bump

49 Posted on 02/20/2001 11:37:46 PST by Octar
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | Top | Last ]


To: freefly

I never endorsed the article, so any flames here can't even be serously directed at me.

50 Posted on 02/20/2001 11:38:14 PST by Plummz
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | Top | Last ]


To: Plummz

Since this isn't written in decent English, I assume it's conspiracy nonsense. Jargon is one thing, lack of nouns is another thing - garbage sentences.

51 Posted on 02/20/2001 11:43:25 PST by japaneseghost
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]


To: Plummz

Out of curiosity, I went to the US Patent Office and look up the patents issued to Eastlund. Here's the most interesting parts of what I found:

Method for producing a shell of relativistic particles at an altitude above the earths surface
5,038,664
January 10, 1985

'...Shell 20, once formed, provides an anti-missile, relativistic electron barrier that will detonate or serverly damage the electronic system of any missile that passes therethrough. As illustrated in FIG. 3, an intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) that is launched along a trajectory such as shown by the heavy dashed line 25, will have to pass through shell 20 twice on its way to target X (once on its ascent and once upon reentry).

As the missile passes through shell 20, the (high intensity (e.g., 6 Mev) particles of plasma 12 penetrate the missile. As each particle does this, it loses energy principally by transferring energy to electrons in the missile by a series of elastic collisions giving a cascade of electrons which leaves the direction of the motion largely undisturbed. Eventually, the energy lost in the material of the missile manifests itself as heat thereby raising the temperature of the material where the particles collide. At the density and energy levels of plasma 12 within shell 20, the rate of energy deposition (i.e., heating) will be greater than can be dissipated and the material will melt or crack under thermal stress. Detectable damage will result either from burning through the walls of the missile's fuel container, damaging the electronic systems of the missile, or from detonation of the chemical-explosive triggers of the missile's warhead; the latter requiring about 200 joules per cubic centimeter of material impacted.

It can be seen from the above, that by generating a shell 20 of high density, relativistic particle plasma, an effective defensive shield can be provided to guard against offensive missiles.'


Method and apparatus for altering a region in the earth's atmosphere, ionosphere, and/or magnetosphere
4,686,605
January 10, 1985

'...This invention has a phenomenal variety of possible ramifications and potential future developments. As alluded to earlier, missile or aircraft destruction, deflection, or confusion could result, particularly when relativistic particles are employed. Also, large regions of the atmosphere could be lifted to an unexpectedly high altitude so that missiles encounter unexpected and unplanned drag forces with resultant destruction or deflection of same. Weather modification is possible by, for example, altering upper atmosphere wind patterns or altering solar absorption patterns by constructing one or more plumes of atmospheric particles which will act as a lens or focusing device. Also as alluded to earlier, molecular modifications of the atmosphere can take place so that positive environmental effects can be achieved. Besides actually changing the molecular composition of an atmospheric region, a particular molecule or molecules can be chosen for increased presence. For example, ozone, nitrogen, etc. concentrations in the atmosphere could be artificially increased. Similarly, environmental enhancement could be achieved by causing the breakup of various chemical entities such as carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, nitrous oxides, and the like. Transportation of entities can also be realized when advantage is taken of the drag effects caused by regions of the atmosphere moving up along diverging field lines. Small micron sized particles can be then transported, and, under certain circumstances and with the availability of sufficient energy, larger particles or objects could be similarly affected. Particles with desired characteristics such as tackiness, reflectivity, absorptivity, etc., can be transported for specific purposes or effects. For example, a plume of tacky particles could be established to increase the drag on a missile or satellite passing therethrough. Even plumes of plasma having substantially less charged particle density than described above will produce drag effects on missiles which will affect a lightweight (dummy) missile in a manner substantially different than a heavy (live) missile and this affect can be used to distinguish between the two types of missiles. A moving plume could also serve as a means for supplying a space station or for focusing vast amount of sunlight on selected portions of the earth. Surveys of global scope could also be realized because the earth's natural magnetic field could be significantly altered in a controlled manner by plasma beta effects resulting in, for example, improved magnetotelluric surveys. Electromagnetic pulse defenses are also possible. The earth's magnetic field could be decreased or disrupted at appropriate altitudes to modify or eliminate the magnetic field in high Compton electron generation (e.g., from high altitude nuclear bursts) regions. High intensity, well controlled electrical fields can be provided in selected locations for various purposes. For example, the plasma sheath surrounding a missile or satellite could be used as a trigger for activating such a high intensity field to destroy the missile or satellite. Further, irregularities can be created in the ionosphere which will interfere with the normal operation of various types of radar, e.g., synthetic aperture radar. The present invention can also be used to create artificial belts of trapped particles which in turn can be studied to determine the stability of such parties. Still further, plumes in accordance with the present invention can be formed to simulate and/or perform the same functions as performed by the detonation of a "heave" type nuclear device without actually having to detonate such a device. Thus it can be seen that the ramifications are numerous, far-reaching, and exceedingly varied in usefulness.'


Method and apparatus for creating an artificial electron cyclotron heating region of plasma
4,712,155
January 28, 1985

'...It can be seen from the foregoing that this invention can be applied to any artificial magnetic field or fields wherever located and whether uniform or nonuniform in nature. This invention can be employed in any region of the atmosphere or space where an artificial magnetic field or fields can be generated after which the electron cyclotron resonance heating is carried out as described herein. Thus, this invention can be practiced with a very small localized uniform or irregular magnetic field or with a much larger artificial magnetic field such as those approaching the size and uniformity of naturally-occuring magnetic fields. Although it may not be practical in some cases to employ an artificial magnetic field approaching the size of the earth's natural magnetic field, this invention can be employed to augment, complement or otherwise utilize or improve upon such naturally-occurring fields.'

52 Posted on 02/20/2001 11:57:02 PST by Ol' Dan Tucker
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]


To: kevin

Kevin, Kevin....I was just trying to be funny this am. I was having one of those "everthing is going wrong" kinda days. I had gotten two harassment phone calls today and my paranoid imagination was heightened when I read this post.

I had actually read it last night so, for this second posting, I figured to attempt some humor.

I hope we are ahead of our enemies in this field.

53 Posted on 02/20/2001 11:59:05 PST by Seeking the truth
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | Top | Last ]


To: mancini, plummz

If you recall, back in the mid-80s the space shuttle's computers once went down and the backup system had to be deployed. A friend of mine was involved in performing the calculations on the accident, which proved that the Russians had hit the shuttle with an electromagnetic weapon to destroy the electronics. The secondary computer system survived because it was turned off. Presumably the Russians did this to demonstrate to the U.S. that they had developed this capability.

According to Lt. Col. Tom Bearden, who specializes in this field, this was also about the time that the Russians had achieved functional electronic weapons. He says that ever since then, they have been able to shoot down airplanes in America with them, and have done so. The weapons can create action at a distance, and depending on the polarity, the jet turbines can be cooled and cause the thrust/weight ratio of a jet to be lowered. Unfortunately, the Russians are probably much more advanced in this field than we are.

54 Posted on 02/20/2001 12:08:29 PST by jedediah smith
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | Top | Last ]


To: Seeking the truth

bump!

55 Posted on 02/20/2001 12:10:54 PST by kevin
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | Top | Last ]


To: Plummz

Hi Plummz - I am located on the East coast of Florida (Daytona Beach ) and I hear nothing on my shortwave receiver at 1520 Hrs EST 2020 Hrs UT Perhaps the signal will improve as daylight hours depart around 1845 EST today... Will check again then. K2afe

56 Posted on 02/20/2001 12:22:54 PST by k2afe (Shortwave signal)
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]


To: struwwelpeter

Any reference to RCs, KAL, or any airline disaster is the product of an over-active imagination

Then Cobra Ball WASN'T in a similar flight path prior to KAL?

57 Posted on 02/20/2001 12:33:17 PST by Stand Watch Listen
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | Top | Last ]


To: Paul Ross

Okay...you really want to get into conspiracy theories...what about the sub/ship collision and the two helicopters colliding within days of each other, both in Hawaii. To add to that, figure in the recent incident of the two small planes colliding in mid-air off the coast of CA...the story completely disappeared off of the news (Fox), literally. I saw the original report which was "breaking news" earlier in the evening, then one more report showing that they had found one body...then "poof"...no more story, and I watched until midnight for details. Even went to several news websites the next day and there was nothing about the story. Could someone be playing around with systems that jam sonar/radar signals?

Granted, in the sub/ship collision a periscope was used to verify that there were no ships in the area, but that capacity is limited to 4-5 miles according to sources I have read, sonar/radar would have shown a wider area. If you figure in the fact that it took the sub longer than the normal to surface (according to reports), the accident occurred because the ship was not detected on the sonar/radar (jammed signals?), was too far away to be detected by periscope when it was utilized and was traveling towards the sub at a high rate of speed.

For the record...I am not a tin foil hatter. Hubby brought this possibility up after the helicopter crash (he said it was strange that both incidents happened in Hawaii so close together) and then the story of the two small planes colliding came out and disappeared, which intrigued me further. Any thoughts?

58 Posted on 02/20/2001 12:40:44 PST by ravingnutter
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | Top | Last ]


To: Ol' Dan Tucker

Fascinating. Thank you Ol' Dan Tucker for post 52.

Sincerely,

59 Posted on 02/20/2001 12:48:33 PST by servantoftheservant
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | Top | Last ]


To: Plummz

I am SO BOOKMARKING THIS!!!!!!!!!!!!

60 Posted on 02/20/2001 12:50:09 PST by cmsgop
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]


To: Stand Watch Listen

Gennady?! Is that you again, still trying to blame the 'Ball?! K chertu beri!

61 Posted on 02/20/2001 12:54:04 PST by struwwelpeter
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | Top | Last ]


To: Plummz

What the hell is this all about? An early morning buzzing sound? Alarm clock? Or somebody has a buzz on early in the morning? I've had that happen a few times, but it was left over from the night before. I also had cotton-mouth, a raging headache and a queazy stomach. No paranoid features with this phenomenon, though. Just felt like shit.

To show the HAARP signal is abnormally large, Gosh, I hope this HAARP business doesn't spread. What's HAARP mean, anyway? Hard Alcohol Always Rips Partakers? Hangover Arrives After Ripping-good Party?

62 Posted on 02/20/2001 13:04:10 PST by Dabney
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]


To: Mercuria

(OMGoodness! There's one on my desk!)

63 Posted on 02/20/2001 13:19:34 PST by AnnaZ (nothallucinating@all.conspiracy)
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | Top | Last ]


To: Ol' Dan Tucker

Big Time thank-you-for-the-facts Bump!

64 Posted on 02/20/2001 13:35:51 PST by GVgirl
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | Top | Last ]


To: AnnaZ

Stay calm. Do you have any beef jerky? They like beef jerky. If not, just give it some Post-it notes. They also like Post-its.

65 Posted on 02/20/2001 13:38:56 PST by Redcloak
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | Top | Last ]


To: Ol' Dan Tucker

Cool. I wonder if sufficiently compact versions could be made for battlefield use at lower altitudes. Never mind trying to knock missiles off course, this could be used to swat combat aircraft out of the sky. Think of it as plasma flak. Rather than trying to hit the plane or helicopter, one would only have to lead the craft and put a blast of high-temp plasma nearby. The resulting turbulence would rip the wings off of it. One might even be able to use it against ground targets. A burst of hot plasma would create quite a shockwave.

66 Posted on 02/20/2001 13:47:17 PST by Redcloak
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | Top | Last ]


To: Plummz

Tin foil hat brigade out in force! Firstly there is no aircraft designated "ER-135".
The aircraft you are referring to is the RC-135.

Considering that the Russian pilot, Gennadi Osipovich who flew the Sukhoi Su-15, was interviewed admitting that he shot the KAL Boeing 747 down with Anab air-to-air missiles I rather think that your theory is lame. The USAF's first use of F-117As was during Panama 1989 and not during the Gulf War.

Here is a list of RC-135 variants and as you can see no RC-135 was lost during 1983. (the year of KAL007 shootdown)

55-3121 RC-135T written off 25-02-1985,
59-1491 RC-135S written off 13-01-1969,
61-2662 RC-135S still active inventory,
61-2663 RC-135S still active inventory,
61-2664 RC-135S written off 15-03-1981,
62-4125 RC-135W still active inventory,
62-4128 RC-135W still active inventory,
62-4129 TC-135W still active inventory,
62-4130 RC-135W still active inventory,
62-4131 RC-135W still active inventory,
62-4132 RC-135W still active inventory,
62-4133 TC-135S still active inventory,
62-4134 RC-135W still active inventory,
62-4135 RC-135W still active inventory,
62-4137 RC-135E written off 05-06-1969,
62-4138 RC-135W still active inventory,
62-4139 RC-135W still active inventory,
63-9792 RC-135V still active inventory,
64-14841 RC-135V still active inventory,
64-14842 RC-135V still active inventory,
64-14843 RC-135V still active inventory,
64-14844 RC-135V still active inventory,
64-14845 RC-135V still active inventory,
64-14846 RC-135V still active inventory,
64-14847 RC-135U still active inventory,
64-14848 RC-135V still active inventory,
64-14849 RC-135U still active inventory,

TJ

67 Posted on 02/20/2001 13:47:20 PST by Tommyjo
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]


To: Dabney

How much power does it take to run this critter? Is that what all the blackouts in Kaliforina are about? WE WANT TO KNOW something, FOR A CHANGE. Gurgle.

68 Posted on 02/20/2001 13:50:45 PST by spooner
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | Top | Last ]


To: Tommyjo

FYI, neither the theory nor references are mine-- I suggest you track down the author and direct your comments to him/her.

Hope this helps.

69 Posted on 02/20/2001 14:01:00 PST by Plummz
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | Top | Last ]


To: jedediah smith

>The weapons can create action at a distance, and depending on the polarity, the jet turbines can be cooled and cause the thrust/weight ratio of a jet to be lowered. Unfortunately, the Russians are probably much more advanced in this field than we are.

I find this hard to believe. If scalar waves are real, then it seems to me that once any competent physicist or engineer has demonstrated for himself (or, I suppose, herself) that they are real, then exploiting them would be pretty straightforward. Based on the kind of math that physicists and engineers do now for things like magnetic containment and other applications, scalar work doesn't seem so far out that a skilled professional couldn't bring himself up to speed quickly. (And, as I understand it, the "action at a distance" stuff is just calculating the interception point of two scalar waves. Well, with all the computer work (and practical, active noise mufflers) that's been done on wave cancellation in recent years, I'd guess that the bulk of the work could be adapted quickly.)

Mark W.

70 Posted on 02/20/2001 14:15:27 PST by MarkWar
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | Top | Last ]


To: Redcloak

Do you have any beef jerky? They like beef jerky. If not, just give it some Post-it notes. They also like Post-its.
 
I ate the beef jerky -- I really, actually ate beef jerky -- and the post-its are currently in use and impossible to sacrifice.
 
On a more positive note, he hasn't moved once. He just stands there, staring at me.

71 Posted on 02/20/2001 15:01:14 PST by AnnaZ
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | Top | Last ]


To: Plummz

If these peoplt don't know the difference between an "EC-135," an "RC-135," and an "ER-135," I generally take what they write with a grain of salt...

72 Posted on 02/20/2001 15:04:16 PST by Poohbah
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]


To: AnnaZ

You're in luck. This means that he's stunned. (Either by HAARP or by FreeRepublic. It doesn't matter which.) If you place a small mirror in front of him so that he sees his reflection, you'll be safe. The sight of a genuine, honest-to-goodness alien will further stun him and maintain the catatonic state. (This can work for cats too.)

73 Posted on 02/20/2001 15:33:49 PST by Redcloak
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | Top | Last ]


To: ravingnutter

"...To add to that, figure in the recent incident of the two small planes colliding in mid-air off the coast of CA...the story completely disappeared off of the news (Fox), literally. I saw the original report which was "breaking news" earlier in the evening, then one more report showing that they had found one body...then "poof"...no more story, and I watched until midnight for details. Even went to several news websites the next day and there was nothing about the story. Could someone be playing around with systems that jam sonar/radar signals?"

I don't know about these other stories, but the two Cessna's that collided over the Long Beach practice area can most likely be attributed to "failure to see and be seen." Both Cessnas (a 150 and a 172) were owned by the Long Beach Flying Club and each was being flown by a CFI and a student pilot.

The collision occurred on a relatively clear day following several days of stormy weather --the perfect set-up for a mid-air. They were flying VFR and probably failed to clear the area prior to initiating practice manuevers. The 150 doesn't carry any type of radar equipment that could be jammed in such a way to cause a mid-air during VFR flight. Ditto for the 172.

While the timing might be suspicious, the circumstances of this particular mid-air is pretty mundane. In short, they were flying in a known practice area in a very busy airspace.

dan

74 Posted on 02/20/2001 16:06:23 PST by Ol' Dan Tucker
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | Top | Last ]


To: MarkWar

"everyone involved in government work knows that HAARP experiments (and a similar thing in Australia) caused the ozone holes.

Mark W."

My God - if *anything*, HAARP creats ozone at altitude rather than causing holes!

Why?

WHAT IS OZONE - it's 0 3.

What is regular atmospheric Oxygen - 0 2.

How is Ozone formed out of atmosphereic Oxygen - from an electrostatic discharge.

How is high-altitude Ozone formed - incident sunlight, a form of electromagnetic energy.

What is HAARP - a source of electromagnetic energy ...

My God ...

75 Posted on 02/20/2001 17:41:14 PST by _Jim
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | Top | Last ]


To: Ol' Dan Tucker

'...Shell 20, once formed, provides an anti-missile, relativistic electron barrier that will detonate or serverly damage the electronic system of any missile that passes therethrough.

What kind of tripe (that I doubt even YOU understand) are you passing off to the unknowing un-discerning public now?

An "relativistic electron barrier that will detonate or severly damage..."

Would that by any chance be called Lightning, Master Propagandist Dan?

76 Posted on 02/20/2001 17:47:49 PST by _Jim
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | Top | Last ]


To: spooner

WE WANT TO KNOW something, FOR A CHANGE

And you shall know. Read this.

While HAARP is at full research power the lights in Fairbanks have neither flickered nor dimmed. If anything the grid is running better than ever. Eventually the means to draw power directly from the aurora borealis will be realized.

77 Posted on 02/20/2001 17:49:21 PST by RightWhale
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | Top | Last ]


To: _Jim

Read the patent and see for yourself. "Relativistic" refers to electrons accelerated to between 2-5 MeV, at which energy they begin to experience relativistic mass increase effects. For once, this is a "tinfoil" thread that has the backing of real proof, such as U.S. patents issued to a real company for real devices and methods. Please check into these facts before slinging mud at other posters. While I don't know how to link to the patent, go to www.delphion.com or www.uspto.gov, and search for inventors under Bernard Eastlund.

78 Posted on 02/20/2001 17:52:13 PST by patlaw_guy
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | Top | Last ]


To: Ol' Dan Tucker

Absent conclusive evidence, never blame on HAARP that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.

79 Posted on 02/20/2001 17:53:00 PST by Poohbah
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | Top | Last ]


To: patlaw_guy

Patents stopped being worth a damn when the gubmint stopped requiring a working model of the item being patented.

80 Posted on 02/20/2001 17:54:27 PST by Poohbah
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | Top | Last ]


To: _Jim

Speaking of frequencies and lightning, you can catch Brooklyn's John P. Lightning on 7.415 MHz Sundays at 8:00 PM EST.

81 Posted on 02/20/2001 17:56:33 PST by Ironword
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | Top | Last ]


To: Ol' Dan Tucker

nice find

82 Posted on 02/20/2001 17:57:07 PST by wooly_mammoth
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | Top | Last ]


To: _Jim

Would that by any chance be called Lightning, Master Propagandist Dan?

You mean like the type of lightning that you once (erroneously) claimed regularly knocks out the electrical systems of airliners, _Jim?

No, this is man-made. I'd be surprised to see you conduct any real research beyond spouting the latest government propaganda.

Maybe John Danforth has the answers you're looking for.

dan

83 Posted on 02/20/2001 18:09:23 PST by Ol' Dan Tucker
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | Top | Last ]


To: Poohbah

Poohbah: "Absent conclusive evidence, never blame on HAARP that which can be adequately explained by stupidity."

Now, there you go again with that Occam's Razor stuff, just when we were starting to have FUN.

But here's MY proposed weapon system:

Nitrogen makes up approximately 65 percent of atmosphere, right? And oxygen, approximately 35 percent, right? And nitrous oxide is laughing gas, right? So....

All any enemy would need is a ring of simultaneously exploding chemical "bombs" around any major populated valley (like, oh, LA or Mexico City or Denver, but please, not Seattle) which bombs would cause a chemical reaction such as to combine the atmospheric oxygen and the atmospheric nitrogen in this "enclosed" area; then the entire area population would laugh itself to death.

84 Posted on 02/20/2001 18:20:51 PST by bikermike
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | Top | Last ]


To: bikermike

Sorry. Number 84 was OT. Sorry. I should have labeled it such.

85 Posted on 02/20/2001 18:21:58 PST by bikermike
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | Top | Last ]


To: Plummz

"on the "true" purposes of HAARP"

It's a scientific research facility only.

The energy of the HAARP photons is:

E=hv E=6.6*10-34*J*sec*3.3*106Hz*6.2*1018eV/J= 1.4*10-10eV

In other words there are no particles accelerated to high energy at all. No relativistic killer beams. This signal is a probe used to determine composition and dynamics of the different ionospheric belts. It is strictly a research tool. The maximum power emitted by the transmitters can only effect the temperature of the d and e layers during the day. Any temperature (and volume) change would be relatively small since the distance to and the volume of the layers is large.

There is no weapon capability hear at all, unless of course enemy troops are perched on the antennas when the switch is thrown. Although it may be used to probe deep sea comms, it is too vulnerable, slow and costly to ever be used for that purpose alone.

86 Posted on 02/20/2001 18:55:00 PST by spunkets
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]


To: spunkets

ooops...1.4*10-8eV

87 Posted on 02/20/2001 19:01:00 PST by spunkets
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | Top | Last ]


To: longshadow

That's right -- KAL007.

And my friend Larry McDonald died that night with 268 others.

The information I had was that there were some 40 South Korean intelligence agents aboard. They had just completed CIA training here.

If you were Andropov and could -- in one fell swoop -- take out one of your most outspoken western critic AND, as a bonus, kill 40 agents of the enemy of your client, North Korea, would you take the shot?

You bet your ass you would.

And the 220 other men, women and children They just happened to be at the wrong place at the wrong time.

88 Posted on 02/20/2001 19:02:18 PST by Dick Bachert
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | Top | Last ]


To: Ol' Dan Tucker

"You mean like the type of lightning that you once (erroneously) claimed regularly knocks out the electrical systems of airliners, _Jim?"

Look Luddite, you're making a claim here that is false, and in fact, I have claimed just the opposite.

In fact, NASA under took an activity using a small number of aircraft for flight into and through T-storms for just the purpose of measuring the effect of lightning on airframe AND avioncis gear ... and guess what? All the A/C in that program survived ...

I've seen first hand several times what a direct lightning strike - the 'finger of God' - can do to the solid bronze tip of a commercial 2-way antenna, the vaporization of coax inner-conductors and the subsequent (and varied) damage to gear down in the 'equipment hut' -

- have you?

89 Posted on 02/20/2001 19:20:43 PST by _Jim
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | Top | Last ]


To: patlaw_guy

"Read the patent and see for yourself. "Relativistic" refers to electrons accelerated to between 2-5 MeV, at which energy they begin to experience relativistic mass increase effects."

No connection whatsoever with HAARP, this topic on an as-yet unproven 'weapon' was brought in by another poster hoping to obfuscate and, somehow, by implication, link HAARP to sinister purposes and uses FAR beyond it's intended use and FAR beyond what it is actually capable of.

During active ionospheric research, the signal generated by the transmitter system is delivered to the antenna array, transmitted in an upward direction, and is partially absorbed, at an altitude between 100 to 350 km (depending on operating frequency), in a small volume a few hundred meters thick and a few tens of kilometers in diameter over the site.

The intensity of the HF signal in the ionosphere is less than 3 microwatts per cm2, tens of thousands of times less than the Sun's natural electromagnetic radiation reaching the earth and hundreds of times less than even the normal random variations in intensity of the Sun's natural ultraviolet (UV) energy which creates the ionosphere.

The small effects that are produced, however, can be observed with the sensitive scientific instruments installed at the HAARP facility and these observations can provide new information about the dynamics of plasmas and new insight into the processes of solar-terrestrial interactions.

Next ...

90 Posted on 02/20/2001 19:30:26 PST by _Jim
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | Top | Last ]


To: dishedd

"This `experiment`* has been also using 20MHZ, the National Bureau Of Standards & Time channel, for a VERY long time, off & on..........

And NO-ONE makes mention of the *Russian Woodpecker that operated for years in the HF spectrum and 'garbaged up' the Amatuer bands ...

* Russian Woodpecker = the 'OTH' (Over the Horizon) RADAR operated by the Soviets all througfh the later part of the cold war.

91 Posted on 02/20/2001 19:35:59 PST by _Jim
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | Top | Last ]


To: Plummz

THIS is the cause of all the ruckus you're raising?

I just thought the accused should be present during this 'trial' ...

92 Posted on 02/20/2001 19:38:58 PST by _Jim
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]


To: Ironword

"Brooklyn's John P. Lightning on 7.415 MHz Sundays at 8:00 PM EST."

I'll have to tune up the old Yaesu and give a listen ...

93 Posted on 02/20/2001 19:48:51 PST by _Jim
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | Top | Last ]


To: Paul Ross

"The sheer magnitude of the power supply to generate this signal is certainly non-trivial"

Would you believe six large diesel generators?

From:

http://w3.nrl.navy.mil/projects/haarp/power.html

Prime Power Generation


HAARP Power Requirements

The HAARP facility will utilize two primary power sources. For general office functions such as lighting, heating, computer systems and general maintenance, power is obtained from the local power utility.

The amount of power that can be obtained from commercial sources is severely limited, however, and during research periods, the HAARP facility will generate additional power on-site for operation of the High Frequency transmitter and for the major scientific and diagnostic instruments.


The HAARP Power Building

Prior to the beginning of the HAARP program, the Gakona site was planned by the Air Force, to be an Over The Horizon Backscatter (OTH-B) radar installation. Under that program, a large, 21,000 square foot building (shown in the photo to the left) was constructed to house the prime power producing equipment for the facility.

The main OTH-B power source was to be a large coal-fired steam generator with six large diesel generators serving as a backup power source. At the termination of the OTH-B program, the steam generation equipment was completely removed from the site; the diesel generators were provided to the HAARP program for use in generating the power required to operate the HF transmitter system that will be used to conduct active ionospheric research at the facility.

When the facility is completed and all six of the diesel generators are installed in the power plant building, there will be sufficient generation capacity on-site to produce all of the prime power needed to operate the HF transmitter system as well as the Incoherent Scatter Radar (ISR).

The HAARP Diesel Generators

The photograph to the left shows one of the diesel generators as it is currently installed in the power plant building at the Gakona site. The engine is rated at 3,600 HP and the generator can produce 2,500 kW of electrical power. This single generator will be sufficient to operate the current 48 element HF antenna array at its rated Radio Frequency (RF) power level of 960 kW.

As the facility continues to be developed, additional diesel generators will be installed in the building until all six are in place. The total number of generators that will be required to operate the completed facility is determined by the efficiency of the transmitters and on the power requirements of their cooling and support subsystems.

We anticipate that four of the diesel generators, producing approximately 10 MW of prime power, will allow operation of the final, completed facility at its maximum rated RF power level of 3.6 MW.

94 Posted on 02/20/2001 20:01:14 PST by _Jim
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | Top | Last ]


To: _Jim

>My God - if *anything*, HAARP creats ozone at altitude rather than causing holes!

Well, I certainly see your point -- and please don't hold me responsible for the quote I was referencing, I was just calling it to people's attention -- but I think you're overlooking something, too.

The "hole" in the ozone is about a specific characteristic of a specific structure. The ozone "layer" is a dynamic, structure composed of ozone high in the atmosphere. HAARP and similar devices may certainly generate the same material the structure in question is made of, but _by upsetting the dynamic equalibrium by which the structure maintains itself_, the structure itself may be changed/modified/destroyed.

I'm not saying I believe it, I'm just saying it's not as absurd as your post would present it. [shrugs]

Mark W.

95 Posted on 02/21/2001 07:28:03 PST by MarkWar
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | Top | Last ]


To: Plummz

Some more links --

HAARP home page -- http://server5550.itd.nrl.navy.mil/projects/haarp/

http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/haarp/
http://www-star.stanford.edu/~vlf/HAARP/
http://www.fas.org/irp/program/collect/haarp.htm

More info (not favorable) -- http://www.earthpulse.com/haarp/
http://skywatch.iwarp.com/texas/
http://www.elfrad.org/2000/haarp.htm
http://www.padrak.com/ine/HAARP97.html
http://www.earthisland.org/journal/haarp3.html

List of HAARP patents -- http://www.padrak.com/ine/HAARP97.html

Live HAARPcam -- http://www.crystalinks.com/haarp.html

HAARP and Tesla -- http://www.borderlands.com/newstuff/research/teslahaa.htm

96 Posted on 02/21/2001 08:03:37 PST by That Poppins Woman
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]


To: Plummz

For those who may be interested, I checked back with my Ham radio friend. I'm not up on the techical jargon so in plain terms this is his report: The signal lasted approximately 72 hours and began on Saturday. The signal did not diminish during daylight hours and was received in Hong Kong, London, Norway, Germany and throughout the U.S. (Some unconfirmed reports from Russia and Central America, so far all reports from the Northern Hemisphere.)

Signal strength reports confirm the point of origin as Alaska. HAARP has denied trasmitting. It is believed to be a digital message. HAARP announced yesterday they will be conducting a test soon.

97 Posted on 02/21/2001 10:37:54 PST by GVgirl
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]


To: Uncle Bill, Mr_Magoo

FYI

98 Posted on 04/04/2001 14:51:28 PDT by MadAsHell
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | Top | Last ]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

[ Top | Latest Posts | Latest Articles | Self Search | Add Bookmark | Post | Abuse | Help! ]

FreeRepublic , LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
Forum Version 2.0a Copyright © 1999 Free Republic, LLC