FreeRepublic.com "A Conservative News Forum"
[ Last | Latest Posts | Latest Articles | Self Search | Add Bookmark | Post | Abuse | Help! ]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Columunist Steve Neal attacks Senator Fitzgerald (R-IL) as "spolied rich kid"-- FREEP this idiot!

Miscellaneous Editorial Editorial
Source: Chicago Sun-Times
Published: Feb. 20, 2001 Author: Steve Neal
Posted on 02/21/2001 21:14:45 PST by BillyBoy

WARNING: MAJOR BARF ALERT AHEAD!!!!

Idle rich are foolishness' playground

February 21, 2001
BY STEVE NEAL SUN-TIMES COLUMNIST

He's never accomplished anything.

Yet Sen. Peter G. Fitzgerald (R-Ill.) is quick to find fault with others. His gratuitous criticism of House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert and Gov. Ryan is getting a lot of attention. But it is difficult to take him seriously.

Fitzgerald, 40, who gave or loaned himself $14 million of his personal fortune to buy his senatorial seat, is the least productive senator from this state in recent memory. He is trying to make himself look good at the expense of others. He has publicly questioned Hastert's integrity and suggested last week that Ryan should not run for re-election next year. The senator is making a fool out of himself.

What is surprising about Fitzgerald's assault on Hastert is the senator's audacity. In Hastert's two-decade public career, he has been untouched by scandal. On both sides of the aisle, the bearlike Hastert is liked and respected. Until Fitzgerald began wagging his tongue, Hastert's integrity never had been questioned.

When Fitzgerald sought to hold up funding for the Lincoln Presidential Library, Hastert outmaneuvered him. Fitzgerald sounded like a pipsqueak in alleging that Hastert's intervention was "morally and ethically wrong."

Fitzgerald is getting even by declining to seek Hastert's advice in the selection of U.S. attorneys for this state. Hastert isn't challenging Fitzgerald's senatorial privilege to recommend federal prosecutors. But it would be smart for Fitzgerald to seek Hastert's input. As a member of Congress, Hastert has taken an active role in criminal justice issues, including the war on drugs. Fitzgerald is misguided in implying that Hastert wants to cut short the investigation of public corruption in this state. Hastert takes public corruption seriously and doesn't think that anyone is above the law, regardless of his or her political party.

The senator's treatment of Ryan has been cowardly and mean-spirited. His suggestion last week that Ryan should not seek re-election was typically self-serving. There is speculation in GOP circles that Fitzgerald is goading Ryan to run for another term and that the senator wants to run against him in the primary. Fitzgerald said last week that he will encourage others to run against Ryan if the governor runs again.

Fitzgerald has suggested that public corruption will be a litmus test in his selection of federal prosecutors and has made it known that Ryan's advice isn't welcome. Though Ryan hasn't been accused of wrongdoing, he is a potential target in the federal probe of the bribes-for-licenses scheme. Ryan said that he welcomes the probe and isn't trying to influence the selection of federal prosecutors.

From the start of the federal probe, Fitzgerald has taken unfair advantage of Ryan. During the GOP convention last summer, he demanded a meeting with presidential nominee George W. Bush and told an intermediary that he would be willing to take Ryan's place as state chairman of the Bush campaign. Fitzgerald's camp leaked that this was a done deal. According to Bush insiders, Fitzgerald set several conditions: Ryan was to be dumped, and none of the senator's staffers would work for any of Ryan's staffers. Fitzgerald got shot down.

Fitzgerald isn't pulling his weight as a member of the state's congressional delegation. He recently refused to sign a letter with colleagues from the delegation asking Bush's help for Illinois projects. Fitzgerald self-righteously wrote Hastert that "the mere fact that a project is located somewhere in Illinois does not mean that it is inherently meritorious and necessarily worthy of support." Just last week, Fitzgerald was a no-show at an Illinois delegation luncheon attended by 16 of his 21 colleagues.

At some point in his legislative career, Fitzgerald may need a favor from one of his colleagues. Most of them are appalled by his lordly manner and loose tongue.

The key to understanding Fitzgerald is that he is a spoiled rich kid who bought himself high political office as the result of the wealth loophole in federal election law.

Under a 1976 ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court, the $1,000 limit on contributions was upheld with the exception of what candidates may donate to their own war chests. Without this loophole Fitzgerald wouldn't be a senator. He spent an Illinois record of more than $17 million, more than double former Sen. Carol Moseley-Braun's war chest. His expenditures were greater in this election than the combined spending of the four major party nominees in the two previous Illinois elections for the U.S. Senate.

Among the faults that Fitzgerald finds with his senatorial colleagues is that they spend too much time raising money. That's because most of them have to do it in $1,000 increments. Fitzgerald, though, may have to learn more about fund-raising. He's just been named chairman of the National Republican Senatorial Committee's premier contributors club and is selling access to $10,000-a-year GOP donors. It would be more admirable if he was putting in this kind of effort for the working people of Illinois.


Neal's column is totally out of left field. His selective outrage is amazing for a center-left political writes who ususally TRIES to be neural and objective. Note that according to Neal:
When Fitzgerald spents $14 mil of his own money to get a Senate senate, it makes him a "spoiled rich brat", but when Jon Corzine spent TWICE that of HIS money in New Jersey to the same thing, it showed the committment of an honest man "fighting against the establishment". Also note that according to Steve Neal, it's OKAY for Hastert to butt-in on Fitzgerald's job (naming district Attn.), but NOT okay for Fitzgerald to butt-in on Hastert's. The list of hypocracy goes on and on. I think he's just angry that most conservative senator from the midwest got elected in a CENTRIST state and still 10X more popular than his liberal sucessor. Compared Fitz to other midwester Senator's lifetime records of voting conservative:

Conrad (ND)... 20%
Dorgan (ND)... 17%
Kerrey (NE).... 8%
Hagel (NE)..... 82%
Daschle (SD)...13%
Johnson (SD)...21%
Wellstone (MN)..4 %
Dayton (MN).......??%
Grassley (IA).... 82 %
Harkin (IA)..........9 %
Kohl (WI)............5 %
Feingold (WI)......10 %
Durbin (IL)........... 8 %
Fitzgerald (IL)..... 94 %
Lugar (IN)............78 %
Bayh (IN)............14 %
Levin (MI).............6 %
Stabenow (MI)......?? %
DeWine (OH)........83 %
Voinovich (OH)......76 %
Bond (MO)............81 %
Carnahan (MO)......?? %

I know I just tried to talk a bunch of freepers into writing Jim Edgar in a post a week ago, so this time let me stress that writing Neal is totally pointless and merely a suggestion. But it would be fun to give this #@$%^^%&$% a sample of what "the people of Illinois" (not to mention the nation) REALLY think.

1 Posted on 02/21/2001 21:14:45 PST by BillyBoy
[ Reply | Private Reply | Top | Last ]


To: BillyBoy

Fitzgerald and Arizona's Jon Kyl (well, along with Helms) are the Senate's two staunchest anti-collectivist statesmen. No way Arizona will EVER dump Kyl (McCain, otoh, is in bad jeopardy), but, as with Rod Grams of Minnesota, the Left sees an opening with regard to Sen. Fitzgerald.

All you Illinois FReepers should be spending a couple hours a week now and a couple dozen hours a month down the road, to keep this good man in office.

2 Posted on 02/21/2001 21:53:14 PST by greatspectacular
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]


To: BillyBoy

Letter will be written in the morning when I have more energy to fire off a cogent letter.

3 Posted on 02/21/2001 22:15:56 PST by MadAsHell
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]


To: Mr_Magoo, MamaLucci, Mrs_Stokke, STD, jreb, fu-fu2, MarketR, A.J. Armitage

Heads up! Time to write to the Sun-Times and let them know what we think!

4 Posted on 02/21/2001 22:17:45 PST by MadAsHell
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]


To: BillyBoy

He's never accomplished anything. Yet Sen. Peter G. Fitzgerald (R-Ill.) is quick to find fault with others.

I wonder what he thinks of Hillary? America's smartest woman? (If that's the case we should take back sufferage. Not that it is the case. Every woman I know except one is more intelligent and just all around better than Hillary.)

Though Ryan hasn't been accused of wrongdoing

Wha...?[sounding confused]

Fitzgerald isn't pulling his weight as a member of the state's congressional delegation. He recently refused to sign a letter with colleagues from the delegation asking Bush's help for Illinois projects. Fitzgerald self-righteously wrote Hastert that "the mere fact that a project is located somewhere in Illinois does not mean that it is inherently meritorious and necessarily worthy of support."

There is a political figure with correct principles and the guts to stick to them. In other words, a statesman.

And don't you just love how "pulling your weight" means grabbing as much as you can in a kind of geographic looting contest?

5 Posted on 02/21/2001 22:18:01 PST by A.J.Armitage
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]


To: Mr_Magoo

P.S. Where is the URL for the Illinois FR list? TIA

6 Posted on 02/21/2001 22:18:46 PST by MadAsHell
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]


To: BillyBoy

I wish Fitzgerald wasn't such a gun hater though.

7 Posted on 02/21/2001 22:19:48 PST by Dan from Michigan
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]


To: MadAsHell

Here.

8 Posted on 02/21/2001 22:23:14 PST by A.J.Armitage
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | Top | Last ]


To: usconservative

Though Ryan hasn't been accused of wrongdoing

Accuse away.

9 Posted on 02/21/2001 22:26:08 PST by A.J.Armitage
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]


To: BillyBoy

Italics begone.

What the Sun-Times is worried about here is that Senator Fitzgerals will excersize his privilege to name the next U.S Attorneys for Illinois.

Ryan and Daley are scared s***less that Senator Fitzgerald won't pick one of the 'good old boys' hand picked by Ryan and Daley.

L

10 Posted on 02/21/2001 22:31:38 PST by Lurker
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]


To: BillyBoy

When Fitzgerald sought to hold up funding for the Lincoln Presidential Library, Hastert outmaneuvered him.

What gives? Isn't it a little late for a Lincoln Presidential Library?

11 Posted on 02/21/2001 22:45:08 PST by x
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]


To: BillyBoy

FITZGERALD
FOR
GOVERNOR

Illinois * 2002

;-)

12 Posted on 02/21/2001 23:52:17 PST by BillyBoy
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]


To: Dan from Michigan

>> I wish Fitzgerald wasn't such a gun hater though.

He's not. Fitzgerald is not AS pro-gun AS you'd like him to be, but he's no gun grabber. He just throws some moderates a bone ONCE in a while. That is, unless you think the Illinois Rifle Association (of which my father is a member) is lying when they pass out their "2nd amendment scorecards":

PETER FITZGERALD (R-IL)-- B
HENRY HYDE-- (R-IL) C+

Again, I will remind you... OUR Republican congressmen are MORE conservative than Michigan's delegation overall.

;-)

13 Posted on 02/21/2001 23:58:29 PST by BillyBoy
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | Top | Last ]


To: BillyBoy

Disagree.
Well, I think the Illinois Rifle Assoc screwed up with a B.

Fitzgerald voted with LAUTENBERG and DURBIN on the gun bill. Not even Spence Abraham, who wasn't my favorite AT ALL, did that. And Hyde I don't think much of either. Like Kalamazoo's Fred Upton IMO. If Pete voted against that bill, Gore wouldn't have broken the tie. If it's between Blagojevich, Lane Evans, or Bobby Rush and Fitzgerald, you have to do what you have to do.

We have Stabusall now, and that's another story. At least my new congresscritter Mike Rogers is solid on the 2nd amendment.

As for overall delegation - On the state level, I doubt it(At least until 2002). I'd put Sue Tabor, Larry Julian, Valde Garcia, and the West Michigan(Your southern Illinois) gang up against anybody.

On our federal reps - We suck. Two awful repubs(Ehlers and Upton), 8 awful dems(including Durbin's best buddy Lenin and idiot stab). One dem that's bad outside abortion(Kildee) and one that is great on guns, but not much else(Dingell), and one I'd vote for without hesitation(Jim Barcia). 6 fairly solid repubs and one solid dem in Congress. No John Hostettler's or Don Manzullo's(sp) here though.

14 Posted on 02/22/2001 00:20:48 PST by Dan from Michigan
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | Top | Last ]


To: Dan from Michigan

Italics be gone

I like Sen. Fitzgerald MORE after this article. He seems to be against knee jerk spending (pork barrel). Why is Neal for it? What's wrong with spending his own money to run for Congress? Isn't that allowed? I never understand Senate finance reform. Money doesn't buy votes--it only buys advertising. Anyone with brains can find details about the candidates and decide whom to vote for.

15 Posted on 02/22/2001 05:30:43 PST by Forgiven_Sinner
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | Top | Last ]


To: Forgiven_Sinner

More italics be gone.

16 Posted on 02/22/2001 05:31:39 PST by Forgiven_Sinner
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | Top | Last ]


To: Forgiven_Sinner

Gone yet?

17 Posted on 02/22/2001 05:32:37 PST by Forgiven_Sinner
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | Top | Last ]


To: BillyBoy

I think a "nice" letter to this columnist is in order; thanks for the heads up...

18 Posted on 02/22/2001 07:26:20 PST by March I up
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]


To: A.J.Armitage

Thank you!

19 Posted on 02/22/2001 07:29:31 PST by MadAsHell
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | Top | Last ]


To: March I up, forgiven_sinner, BillyBoy, A.J.Armitage, usconservative, Mr_Magoo

The snail-mail address of the Sun-Times is:

CHICAGO SUN-TIMES
401 N. Wabash, Chicago, Illinois 60611
312-321-3000

E-mail for:

Michael Cooke, Editor-in-Chief

I can't find direct e-mail for Steve Neal.

Letters to the editor can be directly submitted by e-mail to letters@suntimes.com.

Chicago Sun-Times Rules for Comment

The Chicago Sun-Times reserves the right to use and post comments submitted via e-mail or otherwise and edit such submissions without any compensation to or approval from the sender. The Chicago Sun-Times may freely choose to publish or not to publish comments or any related topics at its own discretion and the Chicago Sun-Times may, at its sole discretion, choose to include the sender's name and e-mail address in connection to comments or thoughts submitted for publication. All comments received by the Chicago Sun-Times via e-mail or otherwise shall become "content" as that term is used in the Chicago Sun-Times Online Terms and Conditions of Use.

20 Posted on 02/22/2001 07:45:08 PST by MadAsHell
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | Top | Last ]


To: MadAsHell

Letter is on its way........

21 Posted on 02/22/2001 07:48:46 PST by diotima
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | Top | Last ]


To: MadAsHell

Grazie, MadAsHell! Will do.

22 Posted on 02/22/2001 07:55:32 PST by MamaLucci
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | Top | Last ]


To: diotima

Very good! Maybe they'll publish only one of our letters, but the more they get, the more they'll get the message that we're paying attention out here, and we don't like the slanted tripe they published out of Mr. Neal's word processor.

23 Posted on 02/22/2001 07:57:31 PST by MadAsHell
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | Top | Last ]


To: MadAsHell

I hope they publish what I am writing, although I will feel so dirty having my words published in the Sun-Times.

24 Posted on 02/22/2001 08:13:50 PST by diotima
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | Top | Last ]


To: diotima

Just take a long shower :-).

25 Posted on 02/22/2001 08:20:30 PST by MadAsHell
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | Top | Last ]


To: MadAsHell

I just sent them this letter:

Steve Neal's column exemplifies everything that's wrong with modern American political discourse. He writes that Fitzgerald is not "pulling his weight" as a member of the Illinois delegation because he isn't engaged in the geographic looting contest that seems to be all that's left of our once-great Congress. I, and the other people who supported him in 1998, see his mission not as our designated beggar, but as a supporter of limited government. It is inappropriate for a member of Congress to beg the executive branch for favors, so Fitzgerald was exactly right in refusing to sign the letter humbly seeking the blessing of our still imperial presidency.

I can see why the Left in this state is worried about Fitzgerald's selection of federal prosecutors for Illinois(a privilege left over from the days when the President deferred to Congress, not the other way around). Necro-Americans(dead people) as a base of support for the Democrats of Cook County may be a source of humor, but election fraud undermines our system of government and must be ended. I can also see how Governor Ryan would be concerned about the same issue, in light of his own past. And also in light of Fitzgerald's own criticism, which was yet another thing Neal attacked Fitzgerald on that is, in fact, something of which Fitzgerald and his supporters can be proud. In short, Neal's attack points to Fitzgerald's positives, not his negatives. And as to whether Fitzgerald's ever accomplished anything, I have two questions for Mr. Neal. First, since when does accomplishment consist only of finding new and exciting ways of expanding the government? And second, is this as opposed to that great paragon of past accomplishment Sen. Hillary?

26 Posted on 02/22/2001 10:21:42 PST by A.J.Armitage
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | Top | Last ]


To: MadAsHell

Letter sent.

I think they are getting tired of hearing from me...

27 Posted on 02/22/2001 11:08:10 PST by Mr_Magoo
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | Top | Last ]


To: MadAsHell

Might try (I repeat try) steveneal@suntimes.com.

His email address is not publushed, but this is the Sun-Times email template.

Good luck!

28 Posted on 02/22/2001 11:19:11 PST by March I up
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | Top | Last ]


To: BillyBoy

Fitzgerald self-righteously wrote Hastert that "the mere fact that a project is located somewhere in Illinois does not mean that it is inherently meritorious and necessarily worthy of support."

It is obvious that Fitzgerald doesn't understand "big gummint". In many cases a "record of doing nothing" is the best of conservative credentials.

29 Posted on 02/22/2001 11:32:01 PST by MileHi
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]


To: A.J.Armitage

Though Ryan hasn't been accused of wrongdoing

Accuse away

Oh, Ryan's certainly been accused alright: by me, the media, and members of his own party. Or how about the Willis family, who lost 6 of their children in a firey crash on I-94 several years ago, due to a truck driver who bought his CDL in the "licenses for bribes" scandal under Lyin' Ryan's watch as Secretary of State.

Funny how like EX-RIPOTUS Clinton, everyone around Ryan is guilty of something or another, but (again, like EX-RIPOTUS) Ryan didn't know.

George Ryan makes Bill Clinton look like Mr. Clean by comparison.

good enough for ya?

30 Posted on 02/22/2001 12:21:55 PST by usconservative
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | Top | Last ]


To: A.J.Armitage

Necro-Americans(dead people) as a base of support for the Democrats of Cook County may be a source of humor, but election fraud undermines our system of government and must be ended.

ROTFLMFAO!!!!! What a great line, and a great letter. I hope it makes it to print. WTG!!

31 Posted on 02/22/2001 12:24:55 PST by usconservative
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | Top | Last ]


To: A.J.Armitage

Very, very good! Excellent! Here's hoping it'll make the print edition!!!

32 Posted on 02/22/2001 20:57:22 PST by MadAsHell
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | Top | Last ]


To: March I up

I tried it and it hasn't bounced on me .... yet. Maybe it'll get through.... but that doesn't me (ahem) he'll read it. But I feel better anyway! :-)

33 Posted on 02/22/2001 20:59:37 PST by MadAsHell
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | Top | Last ]


To: Mr_Magoo

LOL - I guess I'm one of the diehards out here who still have faith that the written input does get through. I'm always inclined to write the letter then cc a whole lot of levels of hierarchy within the editorial staff to make sure they get the message loud and clear.

34 Posted on 02/22/2001 21:02:20 PST by MadAsHell
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | Top | Last ]


To: usconservative

Yes, I love A.J.'s flair with words. Ain't it great? I sure as heck am glad he's on our side :-).

35 Posted on 02/22/2001 21:03:10 PST by MadAsHell
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | Top | Last ]


To: MadAsHell

Yes, I love A.J.'s flair with words. Ain't it great? I sure as heck am glad he's on our side :-).

Thank you.

36 Posted on 02/22/2001 22:56:33 PST by A.J.Armitage
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | Top | Last ]


To: MadAsHell

Dear Mr. Editor, Since when was it immoral to spend your own money to run for office? When did they make it a crime for our US Senator to appoint Federal Judges? Ask Mr.Neal when it became unacceptable to support the Constitution and the Second Amendment.

What the socialists are really afraid of here in Illinois is the loss of control at the Federal level. When a free thinking patriot like Sen. Peter FitzGerald does his duly elected duty and appoints good people untouchable by the corrupt Daley/Ryan machine, Mr. Neal wets his pants. I want a government in Chicago, Springfield and Washington representing Illinois that we don't have to be ashamed to call our own.

When I travel people still ask me about our Illinois' League of Political Rogues. It's embarrassing! I'm tickled pink that we have a new Senator that won't stoop to their level. Attaboy!

37 Posted on 02/24/2001 06:29:40 PST by STD
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | Top | Last ]


To: MadAsHell

Dear Mr. Editor,

Since when was it immoral to spend your own money to run for office? When did they make it a crime for our US Senator to appoint Federal Judges? Ask Mr.Neal when it became unacceptable to support the Constitution and the Second Amendment.

What the socialists are really afraid of here in Illinois is the loss of control at the Federal level. When a free thinking patriot like Sen. Peter FitzGerald does his duly elected duty and appoints good people untouchable by the corrupt Daley/Ryan machine, Mr. Neal wets his pants. I want a government in Chicago, Springfield and Washington representing Illinois that we don't have to be ashamed to call our own.

When I travel people still ask me about our Illinois' League of Political Rogues. It's embarrassing! I'm tickled pink that we have a new Senator that won't stoop to their level. Attaboy!

38 Posted on 02/24/2001 06:31:24 PST by STD
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | Top | Last ]


To: BillyBoy

Idle rich are foolishness' playground

Golly, would this include the sainted Kennedys????

39 Posted on 02/24/2001 06:32:32 PST by Fintan
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]


To: BillyBoy

I knew nothing of the senator until reading this article and seeing his voting record- sounds good to me. Also tend to like Fitzgerald for taking on Hastert, who I classify with Trent Lott.

40 Posted on 02/24/2001 06:46:44 PST by Re-electNobody
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | Top | Last ]


To: Re-electNobody, STD

Fitzgerald IS a "winner". I've done a lot of campaign work in the past, and one of the things that attracted me to throw my hat in the ring to help out his campaign in 1998 was SPECIFICALLY the fact that he was using his own money to finance the campaign just so he wouldn't be beholden to special interests (and the Rep. National Committee, as well).

STD's letter was right on target, in that regard.

41 Posted on 02/24/2001 07:28:47 PST by MadAsHell
[ Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | Top | Last ]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

[ Top | Latest Posts | Latest Articles | Self Search | Add Bookmark | Post | Abuse | Help! ]

FreeRepublic , LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
Forum Version 2.0a Copyright © 1999 Free Republic, LLC