Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Congressional Republicans Push For Cuts In Capital-Gains Taxes
Wall Street Journal | Sept, 4, 2001 | Shailagh Murray and Jim Vandehei

Posted on 09/04/2001 7:34:06 AM PDT by tom paine 2

WASHINGTON -- Republican congressional leaders, anxious about the sluggish economy, will seek to slash taxes on capital gains to stimulate investment.

The proposal, to reduce the capital-gains rate to 15% from its current 20%, is part of a stimulus package that House Speaker Dennis Hastert and Senate Minority Leader Trent Lott will pitch in meetings with President Bush this week as Congress returns from its August recess. But while Mr. Bush is open to additional tax cuts this year, he will likely give a cool reception to the idea of a capital-gains rate cut, aides said. "He will push for those tax initiatives he proposed" in his budget, including tax incentives for charitable contributions and energy production, said Bush spokeswoman Claire Buchan.

The stimulus package also would include an extension of a research-and-development tax credit, energy-related tax breaks and fast-track trade negotiating authority. "The economy is not doing well, and the speaker wants to do something about it," said John Feehery, a spokesman for the Illinois Republican.

A spokesman for Mr. Lott said the Mississippi Republican will ask the president for a new 15% rate on assets held longer than one year.

Under the proposal, the capital-gains tax cut would expire after two years unless Congress extended it in the interim. One option under discussion is to attach the rate cut to a Democrat-sponsored bill to increase the minimum wage, which could come up for a vote as early as next month. Mr. Lott, though, is looking for other legislative vehicles.

The move underscores GOP concerns about the weak economy and the trouble it could cause Republicans in next year's elections. As Republicans seek to regain control of the Senate and maintain their narrow hold on the House, they worry that President Bush's $1.35 trillion tax cut won't net the political capital and spark the economic revival that they had hoped.

Ms. Buchan said Mr. Bush is willing to sign into law the additional tax measures he is proposing, despite the tight budget and criticism that tax cuts are helping deplete federal funds and eating into the politically sacrosanct Social Security surplus. She wouldn't comment on the president's position on capital-gains tax cuts, but Mr. Bush's ambivalence could put him at odds with his own allies in Congress.

Congressional Republicans believe a capital-gains tax cut would provide an immediate stimulant to sagging investment in the stock market. Many White House officials think this would provide a boost to the economy, as well as a short-term increase in federal tax revenues. But the president's closest advisers believe the position is politically untenable given the dwindling federal budget surplus and relentless attacks by Democrats over Mr. Bush's 10-year across-the-board tax cut for individuals that he signed into law earlier this year.

Most Democrats take a dim view of further tax cuts, given the new fiscal constraints. In the Democrat-controlled Senate, leaders will probably try to confine further action to acting on expiring business tax credits and small-scale business incentives, as they try to push through energy legislation and the minimum-wage increase. The president, meanwhile, plans to step up his attacks on Democrats for failing to offer an economic-recovery plan. A senior GOP aide said the president doesn't want to get thrown off message by dealing with additional tax relief in the current political environment.

Write to Shailagh Murray at shailagh.murray@wsj.com and Jim VandeHei at jim.vandehei


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
The last time this was done it increased tax revenues.
1 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by tom paine 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: tom paine 2
Darn, the Republicans are showing once again there is no difference between them and the Democrats...
2 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
No, it's called seeing how bad the Dems want their stuff.

There's a big difference. I'd gladly trade an increase in the minimum wage for a large tax cut.

3 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by hchutch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tom paine 2
You know this old yarn of cutting here and cuttng there is getting very old. Why doesn't the GOP just show some cajones and eliminate the capital gains tax and federal income tax and replace it with a national sales tax and tariffs on imports. Why? Because the GOP doesn't have the cajones. Semper Fi, Mike
4 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by HEFFERNAN2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HEFFERNAN2
The reason is because despite the rhetorical differences a "national sales tax" is still an indirect tax on income since a sales tax decreases the value of a dollar earned. That is not to say I favor income or sales taxes that much however they are essentially the same thing since a sales tax,(flat taxes, VAT taxes, and all other indirect income taxes) still tax income.
5 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by Nightstalker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Nightstalker
au contrare...if you don't purchase anything you don't pay a tax. A national sales tax would of course exempt food.
6 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by HEFFERNAN2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: tom paine 2
Eliminate the tax on Social Security benefits.
7 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by larryjohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: larryjohnson
Then how would you pay the present beneficiaries' and future beneficiaries' benefits?
8 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by HEFFERNAN2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: HEFFERNAN2
that is true however you must look at the fact that your net income will purchase 25% or 35% less because of the sales tax. To be sure if you saved the money you would not have to pay the tax until the money is spent. However the negative side of that is those whose income had been previously taxed in prior years would now have it retaxed when they spent it. The point being that a sales tax is still an indirect tax on income.
9 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by Nightstalker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: tom paine 2
NOW WE ARE TALKING!!!!
10 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by Freedom'sWorthIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HEFFERNAN2
They might oppose tariffs because they are capitalists.
11 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Nightstalker
"your net income will purchase 25% or 35% less because of the sales tax" says who?
12 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by HEFFERNAN2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: tom paine 2
Let's get the cuts going NOW!
13 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by finnman69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson