Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China offers access deal to News Corp and AOL (Mine: China Propaganda to be Broadcast in US)
Financial Times of London ^ | September 4, 2001 (Updated September 5, 2001) | By James Kynge and Robert Thomson in Beijing

Posted on 09/05/2001 4:06:15 AM PDT by Chairman_December_19th_Society

China is set to allow News Corporation and AOL Time Warner access to its domestic television audiences in return for their agreeing to distribute a Chinese government-sponsored channel in the US.

International broadcasters have fought for more than two decades to gain access to the Chinese market. Approval would be a particular triumph for Rupert Murdoch, chief executive of News Corp.

Xu Guangchun, the Chinese minister responsible for radio, film and television, said that it was his intention to allow both companies access to cable viewers in southern China. "We should say that [broadcasting by News Corp and AOL Time Warner] in a restricted area in Guangdong province would be fine," Mr Xu said.

He said the only outstanding issue was whether News Corp and AOL Time Warner would ensure that a China Central Television channel would be widely available in the US.

It is understood negotiations are far advanced for a general entertainment channel from News Corp's Star TV network to be carried in Guangdong, China's most prosperous province, which neighbours Hong Kong. Permission to broadcast in China will be particularly sweet for Mr Murdoch, who has spent the past eight years repairing a reputation damaged by his 1993 statement that satellite TV represents "an unambiguous threat to totalitarian regimes".

He dropped the BBC from the Star network in 1994 after a series of unflattering documentaries on China's politics and social problems invoked the government's wrath. Earlier this year, James Murdoch, his younger son and head of operations for News Corp in Asia, pleased the Chinese authorities with strong criticism of the outlawed mystic movement, Falun Gong.

Foreign companies have been banned from directly broadcasting into China, apart from in some tourist hotels and foreign residential compounds.

China's intention to allow News Corp and AOL Time Warner access to the domestic television market represents an unprecedented liberalisation in one of its most closed industries.

AOL Time Warner said: "We've been in positive and constructive discussions with the Chinese government to get increased access for China Entertainment Television in China."


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
WOW!!!!

This is beyond amazing. Lenin was right: the capitalist countries would gladly sell the rope with which to hang themselves.

1 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by Chairman_December_19th_Society
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DJ88
but I do know that this one has not done YET what it's been forecast to do.

I've not done too badly with this one so far. I guess living in the Washington area allows you to predict the unpredictable? ;>)

2 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by Chairman_December_19th_Society
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #3 Removed by Moderator

To: ALL
That's what happens when you have multiple windows open and haven't had coffee. Ignore #2, meant for another thread.
4 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by Chairman_December_19th_Society
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Chairman_December_19th_Society
China Propaganda to be Broadcast in US

Old news. CBS, NBC, ABC, PBS, etc. have been doing it for years.

5 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by Vigilanteman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman
CBS, NBC, ABC, PBS, etc. have been doing it for years.

I suppose you are right on this one - LOL!

6 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by Chairman_December_19th_Society
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Chairman_December_19th_Society
I guess we now know why the NY Post played down the EP-3 story.
7 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by aristeides (demosthenes@olg.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chairman_December_19th_Society
Lets see,nation wide commie channel versus cable in one small elite area. Oh yeah,sounds like a deal to me.

Murdock needs a little re-education himself.

8 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by tet68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: tet68
nation wide commie channel versus cable in one small elite area.

I'm sure the New York Times is kicking themselves for not having created a nationwide propaganda channel and allowing the Chinese communists to beat their communists to the punch.

9 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by Chairman_December_19th_Society
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Chairman_December_19th_Society
This is beyond amazing. Lenin was right: the capitalist countries would gladly sell the rope with which to hang themselves.

Selling the rope to hang yourself isn't whats stupid. It's selling high-quality rope for a handful of beans thats absurd.

Murdock and son really have been bending over to take it up the keister for the Reds though, hh?
10 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by WyldKard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chairman_December_19th_Society
Quick we must redesign the V chip.
11 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by bmwcyle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WyldKard
Murdock and son really have been bending over to take it up the keister for the Reds though,

But why are they asking the rest of us to bend over too?

12 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by Chairman_December_19th_Society
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Chairman_December_19th_Society
But why are they asking the rest of us to bend over too?

Because that's what the Chinese wanted out of the deal.

13 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by tet68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Chairman_December_19th_Society
Generally, I think the U.S. gov't and its corporations pull the trigger too hastily on trade deals without considering their ramifications. However, this is a little different: who in their right mind would watch the Commie channel? It'd get worse ratings than those public access stations.
14 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by mmmmmmmm....... donuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mmmmmmmm....... donuts
who in their right mind would watch the Commie channel?

Demonflops.

Oh, wait, you asked "who in their right mind".

15 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by Chairman_December_19th_Society
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Chairman_December_19th_Society
Science Fiction writer Arthur C Clark had a story about something like this decades ago: Russia decided to broadcast TV signals at US from satellite. Problem: how to get viewers to watch commie indoctrination. Solution: porn channel, with indoctrination interspersed.

Then again, that's not much different from prime-time network TV

16 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by SauronOfMordor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor
Solution: porn channel...

Then again, that's not much different from prime-time network TV

ROFLOL!!! Ain't that the truth!

17 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by Chairman_December_19th_Society
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Chairman_December_19th_Society
Need to come up with a "C" chip. One that blocks Red Chinese channels.....
18 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by b4its2late
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Chairman_December_19th_Society
What's the big deal? Do you think that Chinese propaganda is really a danger? I'm more concerned over the propaganda that gets spewed over our own networks.
19 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by TBall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBall
Do you think that Chinese propaganda is really a danger? I'm more concerned over the propaganda that gets spewed over our own networks.

See an earlier post. Do we really want more ABCNBCCBS?

20 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by Chairman_December_19th_Society
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson