Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Gay' Republican Official Threatened Salvation Army: "I'll Bring You Down"
US Newswires | 9/6/01 | Concerned Women for America

Posted on 09/06/2001 7:42:20 AM PDT by anniegetyourgun

Culture and Family Report: To: National Desk
Contact: Rebecca Riggs of Concerned Women for America, 202-488-7000

WASHINGTON, Sept. 6 /U.S. Newswire/ -- In an exclusive article published in today's Culture and Family Report, Robert Knight and Peter LaBarbera reveal a tantrum thrown by one of the nation's most prominent "gay Republicans." Knight and LaBarbera report that a homosexual District of Columbia Councilman boasted in crude terms about how he threatened Salvation Army officials over their policy on homosexuality.

"The remarks show that the 'gay' Republican agenda is all about advancing homosexuality by whatever means," said Robert H. Knight, director of the Culture and Family Institute, an affiliate of Concerned Women for America. "This display of sheer arrogance should send chills down the spines of freedom-loving Americans."

Recalling a phone conversation with a national Salvation Army official, David Catania related: "I said, 'this faggot controls federal grants in the district as well as local and you'll never see another cent as long as you live. I'll subpoena every one of you mother (expletive)s and I'll bring you down and I'll turn my chamber into a national circus. Do we understand each other?'"

The statement is in a posting on the pro-homosexual Liberty Education Forum Web site. Catania is quoted during a "Redefining the Gay Agenda" panel at the Liberty for All National Leadership Conference, held July 21 in Chicago.

Catania made news on July 11, 2001, when he threatened the Salvation Army and the Boy Scouts with cutting off city grants in the wake of a Washington Post report that Salvation Army officials had tried to reach an agreement with the Bush White House on the faith-based charity initiative. The Post had reported that Salvation Army officials wanted assurances that they would be exempt from local or state policies mandating special rights for "sexual orientation."

"It's time for Americans to rally around the Salvation Army, the Boy Scouts, and anyone else who is threatened by homosexual pressure groups who care more about their self-centered agenda than in feeding and sheltering the poor and homeless," Knight said.

For permission to reprint articles from the C&F Report in their entirety, contact Ken Ervin at the Culture and Family Institute, 202-488-7000

Concerned Women for America is the nation's largest public policy women's organization.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141 next last

1 posted on 09/06/2001 7:42:20 AM PDT by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
Gay Republicans are simply Rats in RINO clothing.
2 posted on 09/06/2001 7:44:58 AM PDT by Pete53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
But I thought gays were just asking for equal treatment by PUBLIC organizations/institutions? Sounds to me like they're now into coercing PRIVATE organizations to kowtow to their agenda.
3 posted on 09/06/2001 7:45:35 AM PDT by VoodooEconomist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: MissAmericanPie, xzins, Ol' Sparky
"The remarks show that the 'gay' Republican agenda is all about advancing homosexuality by whatever means," said Robert H. Knight, director of the Culture and Family Institute, an affiliate of Concerned Women for America. "This display of sheer arrogance should send chills down the spines of freedom-loving Americans."
5 posted on 09/06/2001 7:48:57 AM PDT by TrueBeliever9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
When even a Republican homosexual can behave this way, it certainly makes it hard to believe that homosexuals generally can be good neighbors to the rest of us. But I beseech you all: Judge each individual as an individual only, please! As much as I deplore their sexual choices, I concede that their bodies are theirs to pollute, and their salvation is their own affair. Shun them if you wish, argue against their politics and practices at every opportunity, but don't attach the odium justly earned by some to the shoulders of all.

Freedom, Wealth, and Peace,
Francis W. Porretto
Visit the Palace Of Reason: http://palaceofreason.com

6 posted on 09/06/2001 8:06:09 AM PDT by fporretto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
All homosexuals have a chip on their shoulders and a Blaine in their bedrooms.
7 posted on 09/06/2001 8:23:22 AM PDT by Paul Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carol-HuTex
Aggree, but he does have the power to go down on a gay bar.
8 posted on 09/06/2001 8:44:50 AM PDT by Valin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
I'm not sure why the homosexulas don't get it . . . being gay is not a civil right. It's a sexual orientation/preference/choice, period. The Salvation Army is a Christian organization that set standards of morality and conduct. The practicing homsexual lifestyle is not a part of Christianity, and if this institution only hires moral Christian people, then sorry guys, you won't cut it. All I have to say is sorry, do what you want in your own bedroom, but don't try to convine the rest of us that this lifestyle entitles you get jobs, be married, or any other special entitlement. Be gay and leave the rest of us alone.
9 posted on 09/06/2001 8:53:48 AM PDT by realpatriot71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: realpatriot71
Good comments.

"Be gay and leave the rest of us alone."

They can't - not if there's to be a next generation of "fresh meat". There is no "gay gene" and they don't breed so there has to be constant recruitment.

10 posted on 09/06/2001 9:03:53 AM PDT by Brute_Force
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Brute_Force
I have actually been sneeringly referred to by a gay I know as a "breeder". Cute, huh?
11 posted on 09/06/2001 9:14:49 AM PDT by realpatriot71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: realpatriot71
being gay is not a civil right.

People don't have a right to engage in sexual activity with other consenting adults, behind closed bedroom doors?

12 posted on 09/06/2001 9:19:41 AM PDT by OWK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: OWK
You sure have the right to have sex with any consenting adult that you want, but its NOT a civil right. It's not a racial things, it's not a religious things, etc. Check the definition of "civil right".
13 posted on 09/06/2001 9:26:27 AM PDT by realpatriot71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
Catania made news on July 11, 2001, when he threatened the Salvation Army and the Boy Scouts with cutting off city grants in the wake of a Washington Post report that Salvation Army officials had tried to reach an agreement with the Bush White House on the faith-based charity initiative. The Post had reported that Salvation Army officials wanted assurances that they would be exempt from local or state policies mandating special rights for "sexual orientation."

"It's time for Americans to rally around the Salvation Army, the Boy Scouts, and anyone else who is threatened by homosexual pressure groups who care more about their self-centered agenda than in feeding and sheltering the poor and homeless," Knight said.

I agree.

Nukem

14 posted on 09/06/2001 9:27:36 AM PDT by Alas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VoodooEconomist
But I thought gays were just asking for equal treatment by PUBLIC organizations/institutions? Sounds to me like they're now into coercing PRIVATE organizations to kowtow to their agenda.

So much for inclusiveness.

Seems like the only cure for these blowhards is back in the closet.
Maybe a bigger padlock this time?

15 posted on 09/06/2001 9:32:11 AM PDT by Publius6961
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: OWK
People don't have a right to engage in sexual activity with other consenting adults, behind closed bedroom doors?

Is that the new definition of "gay"?

16 posted on 09/06/2001 9:34:17 AM PDT by Publius6961
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: realpatriot71
You sure have the right to have sex with any consenting adult that you want, but its NOT a civil right. It's not a racial things, it's not a religious things, etc. Check the definition of "civil right".

Public school educated?

17 posted on 09/06/2001 9:34:18 AM PDT by OWK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
Typical leftist MO. They start by demanding "tolerence". Tolerence soon becomes "acceptance", then "approval", and ultimately intolerence of any who disapprove of them.
18 posted on 09/06/2001 9:43:23 AM PDT by Hugin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
This is truly outrageous. Every decent person in Washington ought to give the highest priority to bringing down this despicable political thug. The Salvation Army should not have to worry about this person; he needs rather to have to worry about the decent people whom he is supposed to be serving.

As for the Boy Scouts, see The Boy Scouts Of America & A Leftwing Agenda.

Since Washington is a Federal preserve, the clown in D.C. is in the final analysis Congress's responsibility. People should demand a thorough investigation by the Committee on the District Of Columbia--give the bully back in kind just what he is threatening for others.

William Flax Return Of The Gods Web Site

19 posted on 09/06/2001 9:46:56 AM PDT by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hugin
Typical leftist MO. They start by demanding "tolerence". Tolerence soon becomes "acceptance", then "approval", and ultimately intolerence of any who disapprove of them.

Standard leftist PC tactic for just about any subject.

20 posted on 09/06/2001 9:50:14 AM PDT by OWK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson