Skip to comments.
China practices sinking U.S. carriers
WorldNetDaily.com ^
| Saturday, September 8, 2001
| Jon Dougherty
Posted on 09/08/2001 12:14:18 AM PDT by JohnHuang2

WARS AND RUMORS OF WARS
China practices sinking
U.S. carriers
Recent exercises had Beijing testing new anti-ship cruise missile
By Jon Dougherty
© 2001 WorldNetDaily.com
Chinese forces concentrated on attacking and sinking U.S. aircraft carriers using new anti-ship cruise missiles in recent military exercises designed to thwart expected American intervention in any conflict with Taiwan.
Weekly Internet-based intelligence digest Geostrategy-Direct.com reported the exercises, quoting U.S. intelligence officials who said they clearly show "that China is preparing for a future conflict with the United States, something U.S. government officials have been reluctant to acknowledge."
During the war games, which ended last month, Chinese forces also test-fired new anti-ship cruise missiles thought to be specifically designed to attack and sink the massive U.S. aircraft carriers that would be included in any force sent to protect Taiwan from Chinese invasion.
Official Chinese press accounts said the missiles "demonstrated that the People's Liberation Army is capable of destroying aircraft carrier battle groups," according to Geostrategy Direct.
Most of China's advanced weapons took part in the exercises, including Su-27 and J-8 aircraft, Sovremenny-class destroyers and Kilo submarines.
Meanwhile, the intelligence digest also reported that Russia is building a new cruise missile that is also plans to eventually export to China.
Moscow announced Aug. 23 that plans are moving ahead for an upgraded version of the X-22M cruise missile, which Russian officials have insisted is the only missile of its type in the world.
The X-22M is a supersonic anti-ship cruise missile with a conventional warhead and active radar guidance system, the digest said. It will be able to destroy ships as well as fixed land targets.
"The missile has a range of about 250 miles, and Russian missile designers say the weapon cannot be countered by current anti-missile systems," said Geostrategy Direct.
The X-22M is also known as the Kh-22M, and its NATO designation is AS-4 Kitchen.
U.S. intelligence officials say Moscow will likely sell these missiles to replace the SSN-22 anti-ship missiles currently deployed on Chinas two Sovremenny-class destroyers.
Related stories:
U.S. to target China with nukes
Next war in Iraq or Korea?
Russian military simulates nuke battle
U.S. inspectors to look for Russian nukes
Russia preparing Iraq for war?
For Education And Discussion Only. Not For Commercial Use.
TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
To: JohnHuang2
Thank you for the article and information JH.
To: JohnHuang2
China must be hoping that U.S. will get the message and stay out. If U.S. doesn't, China will go for using them in real battle. The sea around Fujian province is the Chinese battlefield of choice. No worry about overextended supply lines here. It is their home field. This is where China intends to deal a blow to America. China may get 10 blows in return. But if this single blow is big enough, they could prevail. So goes the Chinese reasoning, I think.
To: ChaseR , Ragtime Cowgirl, Mudboy Slim, Landru, goldilucky , freedomnews
Bump
To: flamefront ,68-69TonkinGulfYatchClub, Alamo Girl, ALOHA RONNIE,Victoria Delsoul, stand watie,
Bump
To: JohnHuang2
active radar
There is its weakness. That is the "beacon" that says come and kill me.
To: Snow Bunny, Ragtime Cowgirl, Mudboy Slim, Landru, ALOHA RONNIE
Good post John - Hankie time Snow...
bttt
7
posted on
09/08/2001 12:50:24 AM PDT
by
ChaseR
To: In veno, veritas
thanks for small favors - but still ...Hankie time
8
posted on
09/08/2001 12:51:34 AM PDT
by
ChaseR
To: ChaseR
It sure is.
To: JohnHuang2
Thank you Clinton. You should be tried for treason!
10
posted on
09/08/2001 12:54:39 AM PDT
by
Vicki
To: Vicki
To: JohnHuang2
To: JohnHuang2
Perhaps our military could practice nuking china!!!
Comment #14 Removed by Moderator
To: JohnHuang2
You know this reminds me of those cheesy ass chinese movies way back in the '70's, where by, the head honcho bad ass, was telling the head honcho good guy, that he is going to kick some major booty if he (the "Hero")is not complying.It reminds me, when NSA was saying in the '70's that the Russians were having tons of ICBM's, which later was proven wrong. I would suggest to get a huge load of ice on your head, chill out and think straight. We are full of feelings...the orientals do not...Thats why, they are laughing in our faces, when we throwing temper tantrums, instead dealing with the facts. The orientals are not swayed by feelings (thats a non issue for them)except facts. Thats the only way you get their attention, and a show of force. Just look what they are doing right now; trying to show muscles to the Taiwanese, hoping that they will drop their collective pants and play nice to the Beijing regime. The bigger the gun the more respect you get; it is that simple (the chinese did not evolve beyond this point period)!
15
posted on
09/08/2001 1:59:50 AM PDT
by
danmar
To: TigerLikesRooster
The sea around Fujian province is the Chinese battlefield of choice. No worry about overextended supply lines here. It is their home field. This is where China intends to deal a blow to America. This is my assessment, too. China does not want to "conquer" America. Just wants to keep us out of what she sees as her rightful "sphere of influence." We're at the end of our supply line over there. A couple of small nukes in key logistical areas and all our "superpower" toys are suddenly cut off. Are we going to massively retaliate against Chinese cities for a few vaporized military bases and supply depots?
Supposedly, an Indian general was asked what he learned after watching America roll over Iraq in the Gulf War. His answer was, "Don't fight America without nukes."
16
posted on
09/08/2001 5:50:06 AM PDT
by
Arleigh
To: all
Interesting article. Again, we hear stuff like this. We don't need another Pearl Harbor is what I like to say. China(and even Russia) are showing troubling signs. Those countries have always been insane, destructive people causing more trouble than is needed on this earth. I've always had a suspician that Russia/China are working to build up Iraq because they know what a madman he is. Why would they want to do that?! Hell, we know why. As much as we try to actually have good relations with Russia they continue to show they are incapable of trust or reason. Same old story. At least this info is getting out there. Patton and McArthur were right by the way.
To: Arleigh

The problem with the Chinese strategy is that it depends on Americans coming into the South China Sea like a bull in a china closet (so to speak). If you are the Americans, you counter this strategy by keeping your carriers around the Phillipines and Borneo. Make the Chicoms come to you. There are plenty of bases lying around that perimiter for our air force to use and we are developing a new kind of attack vessel nicknamed
Streetfighter. Apparently this vessel will be lightly manned but heavily armed, like the old PT's, and will be able to go in and take out Chinese naval targets while allowing the carriers to hang back away from the Chinese coast.
The unspoken assumption is that like the PT's before them, they are expendable. However, if they start taking out Chicom surface combatants and transports, the Chinese might have no choice but to try to come out into the Marianas and fight it out with us. That's when we stomp 'em.
Be Seeing You,
Chris
18
posted on
09/08/2001 6:05:20 AM PDT
by
section9
To: Otto von Bismark
We are full of feelings...the orientals do not...Thats why, they are laughing in our faces, when we throwing temper tantrums, instead dealing with the facts.
China's reaction to the EP3 incident this spring could only be described as an emotional temper tantrum. And they certainly were'nt dealing with the facts by claiming we caused the incident.
To: JohnHuang2
"China practices sinking U.S. carriers" Errrr, yea, so what. That's what a nations military is for, breaking and killing things (unless you're a lib, they thing the military is for meeting other homosexuals).
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson