Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China practices sinking U.S. carriers
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | Saturday, September 8, 2001 | Jon Dougherty

Posted on 09/08/2001 12:14:18 AM PDT by JohnHuang2

WND
WARS AND RUMORS OF WARS
China practices sinking
U.S. carriers

Recent exercises had Beijing testing new anti-ship cruise missile


By Jon Dougherty
© 2001 WorldNetDaily.com

Chinese forces concentrated on attacking and sinking U.S. aircraft carriers using new anti-ship cruise missiles in recent military exercises designed to thwart expected American intervention in any conflict with Taiwan.

Weekly Internet-based intelligence digest Geostrategy-Direct.com reported the exercises, quoting U.S. intelligence officials who said they clearly show "that China is preparing for a future conflict with the United States, something U.S. government officials have been reluctant to acknowledge."

During the war games, which ended last month, Chinese forces also test-fired new anti-ship cruise missiles thought to be specifically designed to attack and sink the massive U.S. aircraft carriers that would be included in any force sent to protect Taiwan from Chinese invasion.

Official Chinese press accounts said the missiles "demonstrated that the People's Liberation Army is capable of destroying aircraft carrier battle groups," according to Geostrategy Direct.

Most of China's advanced weapons took part in the exercises, including Su-27 and J-8 aircraft, Sovremenny-class destroyers and Kilo submarines.

Meanwhile, the intelligence digest also reported that Russia is building a new cruise missile that is also plans to eventually export to China.

Moscow announced Aug. 23 that plans are moving ahead for an upgraded version of the X-22M cruise missile, which Russian officials have insisted is the only missile of its type in the world.

The X-22M is a supersonic anti-ship cruise missile with a conventional warhead and active radar guidance system, the digest said. It will be able to destroy ships as well as fixed land targets.

"The missile has a range of about 250 miles, and Russian missile designers say the weapon cannot be countered by current anti-missile systems," said Geostrategy Direct.

The X-22M is also known as the Kh-22M, and its NATO designation is AS-4 Kitchen.

U.S. intelligence officials say Moscow will likely sell these missiles to replace the SSN-22 anti-ship missiles currently deployed on China’s two Sovremenny-class destroyers.

Related stories:

U.S. to target China with nukes

Next war in Iraq or Korea?

Russian military simulates nuke battle

U.S. inspectors to look for Russian nukes

Russia preparing Iraq for war?

For Education And Discussion Only. Not For Commercial Use.



TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

1 posted on 09/08/2001 12:14:18 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Thank you for the article and information JH.
2 posted on 09/08/2001 12:29:27 AM PDT by Snow Bunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
China must be hoping that U.S. will get the message and stay out. If U.S. doesn't, China will go for using them in real battle. The sea around Fujian province is the Chinese battlefield of choice. No worry about overextended supply lines here. It is their home field. This is where China intends to deal a blow to America. China may get 10 blows in return. But if this single blow is big enough, they could prevail. So goes the Chinese reasoning, I think.
3 posted on 09/08/2001 12:35:56 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChaseR , Ragtime Cowgirl, Mudboy Slim, Landru, goldilucky , freedomnews
Bump
4 posted on 09/08/2001 12:36:16 AM PDT by Snow Bunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flamefront ,68-69TonkinGulfYatchClub, Alamo Girl, ALOHA RONNIE,Victoria Delsoul, stand watie,
Bump
5 posted on 09/08/2001 12:38:09 AM PDT by Snow Bunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
active radar

There is its weakness. That is the "beacon" that says come and kill me.

6 posted on 09/08/2001 12:45:30 AM PDT by In veno, veritas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Snow Bunny, Ragtime Cowgirl, Mudboy Slim, Landru, ALOHA RONNIE
Good post John - Hankie time Snow...

bttt

7 posted on 09/08/2001 12:50:24 AM PDT by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: In veno, veritas
thanks for small favors - but still ...Hankie time
8 posted on 09/08/2001 12:51:34 AM PDT by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ChaseR
It sure is.
9 posted on 09/08/2001 12:53:38 AM PDT by Snow Bunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Thank you Clinton. You should be tried for treason!
10 posted on 09/08/2001 12:54:39 AM PDT by Vicki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vicki
Time to FReep Ashcroft to prosecute Clinton

VOICE YOUR OPINION!

Free Internet Fax Service
Free E-Mail to Fax from your computer, just fill in form on page , they do the rest.
Make sure you enter fax # like this 12024562461 (no spaces or -)
Areas they SEND free faxes to includes ALL of WASH. DC Area Code 202


Is the number you want them to SEND FREE FAX covered?

Complete list of areas they SEND FREE FAXES to

White House Fax (202) 456-2461
(202) 456-6538 alternate fax number given out by White House

Congress.Org -- Write to Congress and State Legislators
Locate Legislators for your zip code, gives you links to YOUR local Legislators with phone, e-mail etc info.

Guide to Local Media
Locate media in your zip code, gives you links to YOUR local media with phone, e-mail etc info.
11 posted on 09/08/2001 1:42:36 AM PDT by 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
I'm sure Ted Turner and Rupert Murdoch will spin this story for the sheeple.
China AOL Time Warner and News Corp (aka Fox News) "Deal" - The REAL Story - from China
12 posted on 09/08/2001 1:45:11 AM PDT by 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Perhaps our military could practice nuking china!!!
13 posted on 09/08/2001 1:47:31 AM PDT by alaskanfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #14 Removed by Moderator

To: JohnHuang2
You know this reminds me of those cheesy ass chinese movies way back in the '70's, where by, the head honcho bad ass, was telling the head honcho good guy, that he is going to kick some major booty if he (the "Hero")is not complying.It reminds me, when NSA was saying in the '70's that the Russians were having tons of ICBM's, which later was proven wrong. I would suggest to get a huge load of ice on your head, chill out and think straight. We are full of feelings...the orientals do not...Thats why, they are laughing in our faces, when we throwing temper tantrums, instead dealing with the facts. The orientals are not swayed by feelings (thats a non issue for them)except facts. Thats the only way you get their attention, and a show of force. Just look what they are doing right now; trying to show muscles to the Taiwanese, hoping that they will drop their collective pants and play nice to the Beijing regime. The bigger the gun the more respect you get; it is that simple (the chinese did not evolve beyond this point period)!
15 posted on 09/08/2001 1:59:50 AM PDT by danmar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
The sea around Fujian province is the Chinese battlefield of choice. No worry about overextended supply lines here. It is their home field. This is where China intends to deal a blow to America.

This is my assessment, too. China does not want to "conquer" America. Just wants to keep us out of what she sees as her rightful "sphere of influence." We're at the end of our supply line over there. A couple of small nukes in key logistical areas and all our "superpower" toys are suddenly cut off. Are we going to massively retaliate against Chinese cities for a few vaporized military bases and supply depots?

Supposedly, an Indian general was asked what he learned after watching America roll over Iraq in the Gulf War. His answer was, "Don't fight America without nukes."

16 posted on 09/08/2001 5:50:06 AM PDT by Arleigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: all
Interesting article. Again, we hear stuff like this. We don't need another Pearl Harbor is what I like to say. China(and even Russia) are showing troubling signs. Those countries have always been insane, destructive people causing more trouble than is needed on this earth. I've always had a suspician that Russia/China are working to build up Iraq because they know what a madman he is. Why would they want to do that?! Hell, we know why. As much as we try to actually have good relations with Russia they continue to show they are incapable of trust or reason. Same old story. At least this info is getting out there. Patton and McArthur were right by the way.
17 posted on 09/08/2001 5:59:47 AM PDT by bushfamfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Arleigh
The problem with the Chinese strategy is that it depends on Americans coming into the South China Sea like a bull in a china closet (so to speak). If you are the Americans, you counter this strategy by keeping your carriers around the Phillipines and Borneo. Make the Chicoms come to you. There are plenty of bases lying around that perimiter for our air force to use and we are developing a new kind of attack vessel nicknamed Streetfighter. Apparently this vessel will be lightly manned but heavily armed, like the old PT's, and will be able to go in and take out Chinese naval targets while allowing the carriers to hang back away from the Chinese coast.

The unspoken assumption is that like the PT's before them, they are expendable. However, if they start taking out Chicom surface combatants and transports, the Chinese might have no choice but to try to come out into the Marianas and fight it out with us. That's when we stomp 'em.

Be Seeing You,

Chris

18 posted on 09/08/2001 6:05:20 AM PDT by section9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Otto von Bismark
We are full of feelings...the orientals do not...Thats why, they are laughing in our faces, when we throwing temper tantrums, instead dealing with the facts.
China's reaction to the EP3 incident this spring could only be described as an emotional temper tantrum. And they certainly were'nt dealing with the facts by claiming we caused the incident.
19 posted on 09/08/2001 6:43:13 AM PDT by Blue Team
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
"China practices sinking U.S. carriers" Errrr, yea, so what. That's what a nations military is for, breaking and killing things (unless you're a lib, they thing the military is for meeting other homosexuals).
20 posted on 09/08/2001 7:00:08 AM PDT by ScreamingFist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson