Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fight the Right War
THE NEW AMERICAN ^ | September 11, 2001 | William Norman Grigg

Posted on 09/12/2001 4:05:30 AM PDT by Israel

Fight the Right War

by William Norman Grigg
Within the space of about an hour, our nation was struck by three terrorist attacks that may eventually yield tens of thousands of casualties. Although the identity of the assailants is unknown at this time, our nation has endured a murderous act of aggression that simply cannot go unpunished.

As Americans struggle to absorb the horror resulting from this morning’s unprecedented attacks upon our nation, it is vitally important that we keep in mind several key principles. One of the most important is contained in Alexander Hamilton’s warning that war or the threat of war

“will compel nations the most attached to liberty to resort for repose and security to institutions which have a tendency to destroy their civil and political rights. To be more safe, they at length are willing to run the risk of being less free.”
Hamilton’s words have an eerie resonance now that fighter planes are orbiting New York City and Washington, D.C., and armed guards are patrolling the evacuated White House. The carefully orchestrated terrorist attack, in which civilian jetliners were converted into weapons of mass destruction and aimed at the symbols of our nation’s financial and military power, was perfectly calibrated to rupture America’s sense of security. In the immediate aftermath of the attacks, prominent voices in the Establishment’s opinion-molding class took up the refrain that new impositions upon liberty will be necessary in order to win the war against international terrorism.

Senator John McCain (R-Az.), who correctly described the attack as “an act of war,” told Judy Woodruff of CNN, “our lifestyles won’t be the same for a long time.” NBC News Anchor Tom Brokaw’s assessment was even more pointed: “We will have to revisit many of our freedoms as a result of this attack.” Former Defense Secretary William Cohen has stated that because of the attacks Americans will be forced to make “choices between security and civil liberties.” British Prime Minister Tony Blair has urged that the world’s democracies “join together” in a global war upon terrorism. Other figures, including former federal government officials, have insisted that we are living in a “new day” and that dramatic changes may have to be made in our society’s governing institutions and principles.

Obviously, those responsible for the atrocious crimes committed on September 11, 2001 must be found and punished, and this should be done through our existing constitutional system.

If this crime has been carried out by a foreign power, or coalition of foreign powers, a declaration of war would be an appropriate (if tragic) response. If the attack was perpetrated by a quasi-state terrorist network, such as that operated by Osama bin Laden, the Constitution provides the means to respond: Congress has the authority to “define and punish” such crimes as piracy and terrorism, and to grant “letters of marque and reprisal” against the likes of bin Laden – should he or his associates bear the responsibility for these attacks.

Why review such arcane matters at a time like this? It is important to recognize right away that the attack upon our nation provides neither the need nor the justification for the use of extra-constitutional measures.

While heightened vigilance would be wise, we cannot allow our country to become a garrison state. Although it may be necessary to cooperate with friendly governments, there is no reason to believe that new entangling alliances are necessary. In fact, this morning’s terrorist attack illustrates, to tragic effect, some of the deadly consequences of our government’s insistence upon becoming entangled in the wars and conflicts of other nations.

All Americans worthy of the name will support timely, constitutionally sound actions to protect our nation and punish this despicable act of mass murder. But Americans also have a duty to demand answers from our leaders about some very important questions:

In a July 26, 1999 op-ed column for the Washington Post, then-Secretary of Defense William S. Cohen warned of the possibility that our nation’s foreign military interventions might lead to terrorist attacks within this nation. But rather than recommending that our nation extricate itself from those conflicts, Cohen argued that the military would have to take a greater role in domestic security matters.
 “Fears about the military’s role in domestic affairs are unfounded,” Cohen soothingly wrote. “There need be no fear or foreboding by the American people of the preparations of their government. On the contrary, the greater threat to our civil liberties stems from the chaos and carnage that might result from an attack for which we had failed to prepare and the demands for action that would follow.”
The approach recommended by Cohen, ironically, complements very well the classic strategy pursued by terrorists. Marxist militant Carlos Marighella, whose tactical blueprint has been followed by terrorists worldwide, explained that terrorists attack innocent people in order to provoke governments
"to intensify repression. The police roundups, house searches, arrests of innocent people, make life unbearable.... Rejecting the 'so-called political solution,' the urban guerrilla must become more aggressive and violent, resorting without letup to sabotage, terrorism, expropriations, assaults, kidnappings, and executions, heightening the disastrous situation in which the government must act."
Marighella went on to explain how this cycle continues until the existing political order is completely subverted, and a revolutionary regime takes power.

The gravest danger presented by today’s terrorist attacks is that the effort to find and punish perpetrators will become a war upon the liberties of the American people. Yes, those responsible for the attacks must be found and punished with pitiless severity. But at the same time Americans must demand an immediate end to our interventionist foreign policy, which exacted such a tragic price in American blood on this terrible day.
 


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 09/12/2001 4:05:32 AM PDT by Israel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Israel
Bump.
2 posted on 09/12/2001 4:08:29 AM PDT by Inspector Harry Callahan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Inspector Harry Callahan
a reflective bump. We have given up so much and still got a McVeigh and now this. Will we be any safer safter this, will we be less free after this?
3 posted on 09/12/2001 4:12:36 AM PDT by A+Bert (Outta here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Israel
Oh shut up!!! All that Chicken Little "the sky is falling" paranoid silly crap. WE DON'T CARE IF WE HAVE TO STAND IN LINE ALITTLE LONGER AT AIRPORTS....and no one is going to come get our guns just because these cowards did this.
4 posted on 09/12/2001 4:15:09 AM PDT by Moby Grape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

To: Impeach the Boy
Very well thought out and reasoned response you have there. When you are done acting like a two year old, you may want to reconsider just how high of a price of freedom you are willing to pay for security that will never come anyway. Before you answer though, your ways would not just effect you, they will also effect me and my children. I take that very seriously.
6 posted on 09/12/2001 4:30:36 AM PDT by riley1992
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Impeach the Boy
America was built on the Bill of Rights and the Constitution not on restricted Liberty. Free people fight the hardest!
7 posted on 09/12/2001 4:37:42 AM PDT by B4Ranch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: riley1992
An excellent article. This is the great fear, that America as we know it will be destroy in an illusory attempt at finding security at the expense of liberty. I too noted that the OldDominantLiberalMedia immediatly started telling us that we would have to give up liberties. What nonsense. We need only stop the failed policy of Victim Compliance, and we win.
8 posted on 09/12/2001 4:39:47 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Impeach the Boy

Salvation in the State?

Pay attention.  You fought two world wars without corrupting yourself into a full tyranny.  The British endured thousands of missile attacks on their cities, and did not become a tyranny.  You suffer one attack and are ready for the gulag!

Here is the word of the Lord from Jerusalem for today.  Pay attention.

States will have to constantly enlarge their police force, yet terrorism will continue to hit rich and poor alike. Every third citizen will have to become a policeman in order to protect the people and their homes.

At every intersection there will have to be security guards checking bags and clothes to make sure
that no one is carrying a bomb or various poisons.

The democratic states will be unable to continue living lives of freedom and prosperity, as people will, out of necessity, give their support to various dictators who will promise security for their lives and property.

By then it will be too late – they will lose their freedom, but they will not gain security.

Then, instead of “Torah will go forth from Zion, the word of God from Jerusalem,” terror, murder and mourning will go forth from Palestine.

All of this will come to pass because the Western leaders failed to distinguish between the righteous and the evil in the Israeli struggle against the Palestinian Authority.


9 posted on 09/12/2001 4:41:56 AM PDT by Israel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Israel
The Trade Center and the Pentagon were hit for symbolic reasons. The scum dancing around the streets are responding to this symbolism. We need a symbolic response.

I ask myself what the Romans would have done in a situation like this. When they finished off Carthage at the battle of Zama, they killed 450 thousand of the half million inhabitants, sold the 50 thousand remaining into slavery in the far corners of the world, and sowed the fields of Carthage with salt so nothing would ever grow there again.

Our response MUST be as symbolically memorable to the Arab world, or these attacks will continue. Our response must be calculated not only for retribution (which is very necessary) but also to deter any future action. So what to do.

First, stop all foreign aid to every Arab country (and maybe give it to Israel instead!). Kick every Palestinian out of Israel (and every non-citizen Arab out of the U.S. -- Let the Supreme Court find this to be illegal five years from now after they are all gone).

Second, bomb every known terrorist base, training center, etc. that American intelligence knows about, but that we haven't bombed to date because we might offend the international community.

Third, send a couple of cruise missiles into crowds of celebratory arabs in Middle Eastern Capitals.

Fourth, NUKE all arab military targets worldwide. Maybe NUKE their airports as well. If they can't use modern aviation responsibly, they shouldn't be allowed to fly at all.

Fifth, if you really want to make a statement that will stop all of this bullshit once and for all...

NUKE Mecca. Trust me, this shit would end.
10 posted on 09/12/2001 4:47:18 AM PDT by SullaFelix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Israel
Thank you for the excellent editorial.
11 posted on 09/12/2001 4:51:22 AM PDT by Deep_6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Israel
Why, given the vast expenditures on our military, intelligence, and law enforcement bodies, was there “no warning” about today’s attack?

Because we have virtually zero human intelligence inside the various PLO splinter groups. Neither do the Isrealis, and they've been fighting them longer.

12 posted on 09/12/2001 4:54:36 AM PDT by kevkrom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Israel
It seems to me America would solve a lot of our security problems by sending home many of the militant Islamic students and others here on visas who call for the destruction of our constitution and freedoms. It seems to me we have become a country that also harbors terrorists.
13 posted on 09/12/2001 5:24:02 AM PDT by mykids'mom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mykids'mom
re:

"...It seems to me America would solve a lot of our
security problems by sending home many of the militant
Islamic students and others here on visas who call for
the destruction of our constitution and freedoms. It
seems to me we have become a country that also harbors
terrorists...."

It is that very freedom; to enjoy the ability to
denounce our own government, that we have fought so
many wars to preserve.

You have totally missed the point of the editorial.

Too, too many voices are shouting for the trading
away our precious freedoms for the illusion of security.
14 posted on 09/12/2001 5:44:06 AM PDT by Deep_6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
We need only stop the failed policy of Victim Compliance, and we win.

Actually, victim compliance "worked" pretty well up to yesterday. This was the first airplane suicide bombing attack ever. It is unrealistic to expect anyone to have implemented strategies to defent against an attack that had never happened.

It's a lot like Columbine. Previous to the attack on the school, doctrine (which had always worked reasonably well with attackers who wanted to get attention or negotiate) was to pull back, stabilize the situation and work from there as a way of minimizing fatalities. Such an approach was obviously totally counter-productive with attackers whose goal was to kill as many as possible. Doctrine on dealing with public building invasions has changed as a result.

Victim compliance on airliners died yesterday. The terrorists killed it.

(Actually, the term "victim compliance" is redundant. Those who die fighting back may be just as dead, but they are not victims.)

15 posted on 09/12/2001 6:14:13 AM PDT by Restorer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

To: Israel
Simple BUMP, without my usual graphical tidbits, so as to save bandwidth. (FR sure has been slow the last couple of days!)

William Norman Grigg hits the nail squarely on the head once again.

17 posted on 09/12/2001 11:23:41 AM PDT by Joe Brower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Israel
"Fears about the military's role in domestic affairs are unfounded," Cohen soothingly wrote.

This is very nearly treasonous. To implement it is treason. Never must Americans live under Martial Law. It contradicts our very existence as free people.

There are three very critical elements needed for Martial Law, and utter, complete totalitarianism.

1. Citizens are banned from owning weapons.
2. Military is used as domestic law enforcement.
3. The civil authority becomes subservient to the military authority.

Once #1 and #2 are in place, #3 become possible, maybe even inevitable. If we aren't VERY careful #1 and #2 are very likely to occur. This must be fought!!! This must NEVER happen!!! .

18 posted on 09/12/2001 6:10:50 PM PDT by freeeee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Israel
At the risk of wasting some cyberspace, thank you. It's good to know there are other people out there who understand "the price of liberty"...
19 posted on 09/12/2001 7:28:46 PM PDT by icywandrin (dhyoung@hotmail.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Restorer
I disagree. If we had not started with victim compliance, we would have lost one or two at the beginning, and then no more. We made a mistake in starting to negotiate.

Even if you make a case that we saved a couple of hundred lives, the 10,000 we lost on the 11th make a complete mockery of it. By the way, I think we are pretty much in agreement.

20 posted on 09/13/2001 9:52:50 PM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson