Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Iraqi Connection
The Wall Street Journal ^ | 13 September 2001 | Laurie Mylroie

Posted on 09/14/2001 4:41:01 AM PDT by John Valentine

Edited on 04/23/2004 12:03:31 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

Whether Osama bin Laden was involved in Tuesday's terrorist assault remains to be seen. Yet if that proves to be so, it is extremely unlikely that he acted on his own. It is far more likely that he operated in conjunction with a state--the state with which the U.S. remains at war, namely Iraq.


(Excerpt) Read more at opinionjournal.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: mylroie
Ms. Mylroie is very credible and no less than Admiral James Woolsey takes her very seriously indeed. See my further posts on this subject.
1 posted on 09/14/2001 4:41:01 AM PDT by John Valentine (john@valentines.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: John Valentine
I'll bet the farm that Saddam is behind this.
2 posted on 09/14/2001 4:47:03 AM PDT by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Valentine
< Country Maps

City Maps

Regional Maps

Tactical Pilotage Charts

Thematic Maps


Iraq Maps on Other Web Sites


3 posted on 09/14/2001 4:47:18 AM PDT by vannrox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Valentine
bump
4 posted on 09/14/2001 4:47:35 AM PDT by Zorobabel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox

5 posted on 09/14/2001 4:48:25 AM PDT by vannrox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: John Valentine
IRAQ is behind this act, along with Bin-Laden.
6 posted on 09/14/2001 4:48:29 AM PDT by truth_eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Valentine
Indeed, the possibility of Iraqi involvement was probably a line of inquiry that the Clinton White House was not interested in pursuing--although it could have been legitimately asked whether bin Laden alone really had the capability to carry out simultaneous bombings of two major U.S. targets.

Not surprising....

Glad to see the WSJ bring Iraq into question in this cowardly act.

7 posted on 09/14/2001 4:49:28 AM PDT by b4its2late
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
I'll bet the farm that Saddam is behind this.

You have to ask why this attack occurred under the Bush regime rather than under the Clinton regime. This could be explained by Saddam's desire for revenge against GH Bush's son.

8 posted on 09/14/2001 4:55:41 AM PDT by Aquinasfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Aquinasfan
Look at the thread where the US is already ruling out Iraq because it wants a coalition with Egypt and Jordan. I DON'T WANT A COALITION WITH EGYPT AND JORDAN! I DON'T TRUST THEM AT ALL. Egypt let the Aquille Lauro terrorists escape. We want these people for friends? They are the problem. During the Gulf War Jordan sided with SADDAM!! We want them in our coalition?
9 posted on 09/14/2001 5:11:35 AM PDT by rebdov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: John Valentine
BUMP this one up after the lies told to the 9/11 commission.
10 posted on 03/28/2004 2:38:54 PM PST by truthandlife ("Some trust in chariots and some in horses, but we trust in the name of the LORD our God." (Ps 20:7))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson