Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gilder Report: OSAMA BIN LUDDITE
Gilder.com ^ | September 14, 2001

Posted on 09/14/2001 10:49:14 AM PDT by giotto

Tragedy purges the mind of trivia. Perhaps the horror of a new Black September can rescue our culture from its thrall of humorless TV Conditry. From gossip about the moral codes of mayors and actors. From the search for the combination to the loony bin of politicians and economists who believe in the lockbox for Social Security. Instead, we can focus on what is truly important: the glass ceiling facing millionairettes at Morgan Stanley. Having survived the vaporization of its 24-floor former World Trade Center offices, the Wall Street power now faces a second wave from the gender cops.

Purged too of trivia, perhaps some of the deeper minds of Silicon Valley can let go of their obsession with the threat possibly posed by computers to human dignity and supremacy, and get back to work. Computers pose no threat to humans beyond Microsoft's blue screen of death and fatal-error messages. Indeed, information tools alone can save us from the depredations of desperate technophobes -- the Bin Luddites, for whom a mud-brick New Jerusalem ("Afghanistan, Land of Nothing," The New York Times headlined one dispatch) apparently harkens relief from the tribulations of freedom and wealth. The Bin Luddites could no more build a 767 -- much less a World Trade Center, or even a flashlight -- than they can feed (never mind, free) the oppressed masses whose interests they claim to advance. But armed with hijacked technologies and apocalyptic grudges, they pose a devastating menace to all civilization.

The chief thing terrorists have going for them is the lack of usable information about them. The U.S. commands the world's supreme information technology. Neural networks -- already used to scan mortgage applications and currency market turbulence -- integrate huge amounts of sparse data and recognize crucial patterns (or countenances). New analog optical processors sort through troves of information in real time. Bin Laden's bands left bit trails through the airlines, car rental companies and federal agencies. He put an infomercial video on the Net. Tom Clancy provided his plan of attack. But there was no effective integration.

We cannot win by imitating our adversaries. In a rivalry focused on secrecy and control, demonic cliques will always outperform democratic bureaucracies. Freedom and openness are our chief enduring assets. As Edward Teller points out, the U.S. nuclear and missile programs, shrouded in secrecy, could not even keep their edge against the Soviet Union's Sputnik and hydrogen bombs. But the U.S. triumphed through entrepreneurial industries, whose innovations -- and the wealth they generate -- are the real foundation of our security. Washington now needs to summon those and the distributed resources of insurance firms, financial institutions, security consultancies and commercial data farms -- together with the factious teams of government intelligence -- to address fiendish threats to open society. Without stifling it in the process.

We should stop using the word "cowards" to describe people who board a 757, ruthlessly kill the pilots, take the controls and fly the plane into the side of an office tower. They are brave and evil. Nor should we pay attention to the pretense of their having some legitimate historic grievance over the loss of territory. Bin Luddites do not care about history or territory. They resent the Israeli demonstration that even a semi-capitalist garrison state can grow flowers and sell them all over Europe, build semiconductors in Herzlia, practice democracy under fire and supply a third of Silicon Valley's key communications technologies.

Such envy of creative capitalists provoked all the horrors of the Twentieth century, from the Holocaust, the liquidation of Russia's Kulaks and the expulsion of white colonists from Africa, to the massacres of Ibos in Nigeria, Indians in Uganda and the Chinese in Indonesia. Despots always promise development, but their first acts are invariably to kill or banish as many of the actual developers as they can. The Israelis are desperate to help the Palestinians out of poverty; their own leaders prefer instead that they die as suicide bombers.

In the light of the burning Trade towers, Democrats and liberals and European tut-tutters should consider that opposition to missile defense is tantamount to advocating the destruction of Israel. Without anti-missile technology, Israel is simply not defensible. It is hard to believe that Democrats are too stupid to see this. Israel has become as crucial to U.S. defense as we are to Israel's. Israeli outposts in Silicon Valley contribute indispensably to all the leading technologies that uphold the U.S. economy. Unlike many American technologists -- wringing their hands over the threat of global warming, "gray goo" and humanoid robotics -- Israelis are unembarrassed to work on the weapons that will save us all.

What the enemies of Israel -- and America -- really hate and fear is human creativity. Flourishing only under capitalism, creativity is our key endowment, in the image of our creator. Without the miracle of mind, expressed in the art and enterprise of a free society, human beings become mere meat. Without the word that breathes spirit into creation, nature is brutal, deadly and Darwinian. Soulless butchers rule, and rush to bury civilization under the rubble. Human creativity reflects divine creation. And this arouses the unending abomination of nihilists everywhere. That is the real evil in the Luddite urge -- the annihilation of the sapient creativity that lifts humans beyond the beasts and the Bin Ladens.


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 09/14/2001 10:49:14 AM PDT by giotto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: giotto
Gilder: "Recovery Is The Best Revenge."

When the markets open again, everyone should take whatever money they can spare and buy shares of their favorite stock. Then hold that stock forever, or at least until NASDAQ is back to 5000. That's what I plan to do.

2 posted on 09/14/2001 11:01:21 AM PDT by giotto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: giotto
Great article, thanks for the post.
3 posted on 09/14/2001 11:10:08 AM PDT by Reason4Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Reason4Man
You're welcome.
4 posted on 09/14/2001 11:28:18 AM PDT by giotto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: giotto
bump
5 posted on 09/14/2001 11:31:23 AM PDT by rdf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: giotto
As far as I know, markets work best when millions of agents pursue their self-interests. To prop up unsustainable financial markets by buying shares out of political reasons is against this free market ideal everybody professes to love. This move only benefits financial big shots who wantonly fanned irrational exuberance who is now desperate to delay the fall which is the direct consequence of such insanity.

I propose that only big boys, Goldman Sachs, Salomon-Smith Barney, BoA, etc put their money to prop it up. They should not use this monumental tragedy to lure in suckers to cough up their money. If somebody is supposed to be killed by diving plane, they should have been the ones. They are globalists, they do not have allegiance to America. They do business with anybody who can pay them.

It is grotesque to watch them suddenly wrap their body with flags and champion economic patriotism. This is the new low for folks whom I know were pretty low.

6 posted on 09/14/2001 12:05:38 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: giotto
As usual, Gilder goes too far. Arabs are not jealous of Silicon Valley nor other technological achievements of West. They hate Western materialism, though. Faith and market economy is not incompatible. Gilder always see things from narrow prism of economist. He also chided Balkan people about waging a "zero sum" game of territorial warfare and instead conduct business to make money.

To people like him, everything has a right price and all the social conflict is solved by naming a right price. His flight from reality is getting worse. According to his logic, he can buy out his safety by paying enough to hijackers and hijackers will drop him off at some airport and take off and go ramming WTC. And if part of the deal includes him being silent about hijackers, he will honor that contract, too.

7 posted on 09/14/2001 12:20:39 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
No one should ever invest money he is not able and willing to risk losing. NASDAQ 5000 may have been a bubble, but NASDAQ 1700 is badly oversold. Everyone is just waiting for the next big rally. All I'm saying is that investors should make their own rally, rather than wait for the Goldman and Morgan Stanley sharks to create one artificially.
8 posted on 09/14/2001 1:18:48 PM PDT by giotto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Gilder is a champion of innovation, entrepreneurism, individual liberty, and free-market capitalism. What part of that equation do you find so disagreeable?
9 posted on 09/14/2001 1:22:40 PM PDT by giotto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: giotto
Re #9 I agree with what he champions. It is just that he seems to believe that his view can be used to solve just about every social problems, such as Geopolitics. Economists tend to forget that economy is only part of a society, not the whole society. He carries this simplification too far. That is only possible in globalist utopia, where there is no political or military conflicts, only business transactions.
10 posted on 09/14/2001 1:31:15 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: giotto
What the heck is he talking about?
11 posted on 09/14/2001 1:34:34 PM PDT by Revolting cat!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: giotto
Indeed, freedom builds strength.
12 posted on 09/14/2001 1:51:46 PM PDT by meta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: giotto
Nor should we pay attention to the pretense of their having some legitimate historic grievance over the loss of territory. Bin Luddites do not care about history or territory.

No, they care about the lives that have been lost by Israelis shooting at them.

They resent the Israeli demonstration that even a semi-capitalist garrison state can grow flowers and sell them all over Europe, build semiconductors in Herzlia, practice democracy under fire and supply a third of Silicon Valley's key communications technologies.

Yeah, their children are bleeding to death in their arms from Israeli bullets -- but what really ticks them off is that the Israelis are selling orchids to Europe!

Such envy of creative capitalists provoked all the horrors of the Twentieth century, from the Holocaust, the liquidation of Russia's Kulaks and the expulsion of white colonists from Africa, to the massacres of Ibos in Nigeria, Indians in Uganda and the Chinese in Indonesia.

Hello, George, this isn't the Cold War. Communism is dead (except on US college campuses). Even the Chinese are welcoming capitalists. The Arab shieks want us to buy their oil; it's only so much black goo, otherwise.

Despots always promise development, but their first acts are invariably to kill or banish as many of the actual developers as they can. The Israelis are desperate to help the Palestinians out of poverty; their own leaders prefer instead that they die as suicide bombers.

Not much disagreement here. The leaders of the Palestinians are just as corrupt and power mongering and eager to shed blood as our own leaders often are. It's called statism. Gotta hate it.

I don't have anything against Jewish capitalists. I have a lot against Jewish statists. It's not because they're Jewish, but because they're statists. And like all statists, they're using perpetual war to build up the power of the State.

In the light of the burning Trade towers, Democrats and liberals and European tut-tutters should consider that opposition to missile defense is tantamount to advocating the destruction of Israel. Without anti-missile technology, Israel is simply not defensible.

Yeah, wouldn't want to not defend Israel. Incidentally, a missile defense would protect the United States -- but that's a side issue in comparison to the trascendent importance of Israel.

Folks, is it really anti-semitism if I point out that the United States is more important than Israel?

It is hard to believe that Democrats are too stupid to see this. Israel has become as crucial to U.S. defense as we are to Israel's.

This is the Mexican illegals argument all over again. There we were told that our economy would collapse if we didn't have the Mexicans to clean our toilets. Now we're being told that America would cease to exist if the Israelis weren't out there shooting little Palestinian kids.

Israeli outposts in Silicon Valley contribute indispensably to all the leading technologies that uphold the U.S. economy.

Yes, now our economy would collapse without Israel. We're just a bunch of helpless morons in America, aren't we? Can't clean toilets, can't defend ourselves, can't build computers.

So here's a tail (Israel) of four million people wagging a dog (America) of 270 million people, and if you point out the obvious arithmetic -- why, you're anti-semitic! Arithmetic is anti-semitic, did you know that!

Unlike many American technologists -- wringing their hands over the threat of global warming, "gray goo" and humanoid robotics -- Israelis are unembarrassed to work on the weapons that will save us all.

If the Israelis were a little more embarrassed about working their weapons on the Palestinians, maybe we wouldn't need saving.

What the enemies of Israel -- and America -- really hate and fear is human creativity. Flourishing only under capitalism, creativity is our key endowment, in the image of our creator.

Read the Bible. You'll find that in the Old Testament (written by Jews), God twice rejected his Chosen People -- once in Egypt, and once under Babylon. In the New Testament (which, come to think of it, was also written by Jews), it's stated that God has rejected them a third time. (Shortly after the New Testament was written, the Romans came in, destroyed Jerusalem, and dispersed the Jews out of Palestine. Yeah, I'd say that was prophecy fulfilled!)

Now, I didn't want to bring up the Bible in a secular foreign policy discussion, but remember, Gilder first brought up the Creator. My only question is, "Which Creator are you talking about?" Certainly not the one in the Bible -- and by any other Creator, the Jews have no claim to Palestine at all.

13 posted on 09/14/2001 2:26:21 PM PDT by 537 Votes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #14 Removed by Moderator

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson