Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bin Laden British cell planned gas attack on European Parliament
The Sunday Telegraph (U.K.) ^ | 09/16/2001 | David Bamber, Chris Hastings and Rajeev Syal

Posted on 09/15/2001 5:31:56 PM PDT by Pokey78

ISLAMIC terrorists based in Britain and controlled by Osama bin Laden planned a devastating attack in February on the European Parliament building in Strasbourg.

 
Osama bin Laden: may have as many as 5,000 supporters among young Muslims in Britain

A six-strong terror cell funded by the Saudi fugitive planned to kill all 625 Euro-MPs, and scores of officials, by releasing sarin gas into the parliament building.

The attack was scheduled to take place during the session of parliament from February 11 to 14 this year and was to be the first in a series of assaults against prominent buildings across Europe. Algerian terrorists based in London and funded directly by bin Laden worked with counterparts in Milan and Frankfurt.

The plot was foiled after German police smashed the Frankfurt operation in a series of raids. The British-based six men were arrested and charged with offences under the Prevention of Terrorism Act.

The charges were subsequently dropped just days after the men appeared at Horseferry Road magistrates' court, London. The Crown Prosecution Service said that the decision was made for security reasons.

Senior Special Branch officials have told The Telegraph that the decision to cease action was prompted by a request from MI5. It is believed that the intelligence agency had uncovered details of further atrocities and wanted to monitor the group.

Details of the plan were kept secret from Euro-MPs. They were, however, sent an e-mail giving a warning about lapsed security in the building. One said: "Even after the e-mail was sent we still have a situation where people can wander in and out of the building."

In particular, there was concern that rules whereby visitors were supposed to present passports at the main reception were being ignored.

The Euro-MP added: "Many of the British MEPs in particular are concerned about security. Hardly anyone checks passes. The only time any one cares is at meal times and that is so they can control the numbers in the canteen."

Sarin gas is an easily made chemical weapon, 26 times more deadly than cyanide. Developed during the Second World War by the Nazis, it is odourless and almost impossible to detect. Its potential for use in a large crowd was proved when Aum Shinrikyo, a Japanese cult, killed 12 people and affected 5,000 more using sarin gas on the Tokyo underground in March 1995.

A spokesman for the European Parliament said: "We take all threats to security seriously and are constantly monitoring the situation."

The disclosure that the European Parliament was a target will raise concerns about the activities of bin Laden's followers in Britain and Europe. The Telegraph has learnt that the Special Branch in London is also examining allegations that two mosques in London have raised funds for a number of his terrorist organisations in the past few weeks.

One London mosque, where Afghans pray, has allegedly raised funds for the terror group al'Qaeda, run by bin Laden. Abu Hamza, the Egyptian-born cleric, has been accused of collecting funds for other proscribed groups at the Finsbury Park mosque.

Officers last year closed a community centre attached to a mosque in Birmingham after money was raised to help train British-born terrorists operating in Kashmir.

British activists, who have supported bin Laden's activities in the past, have also established a base in America. The Al Muhajiroun movement, members of which have called for a jihad, or permanent holy war, overseas, has set up in New York.

The organisation's founder, Sheikh Omar Bakri, one of the leaders of Britain's fundamentalist Islamic community, defended last week's attacks on America but denounced the civilian deaths.

He said: "The US Government and its military forces are a legitimate target as far as Islam is concerned. The American Government is engaged in aggression and atrocities against Muslims in Iraq, Palestine, Afghanistan and Sudan and supporting the pirate state of Israel."

The movement's new US members remain in close contact with followers in Britain, Pakistan and Lebanon. Anjem Choudary, who has now assumed responsibility for Al Muhajiroun, also condemned last week's attacks on civilians.

He claimed, however, that America had incited the response. "America itself has committed many atrocities in Muslim countries. You only have to see the strength in countries like Palestine to see how some people feel," he said.

It is not the first time that British fundamentalists have extended their operations to America. Last year The Telegraph revealed that a company called Sakina Security was training volunteers to handle explosives and guns at a base in the United States.

The company, which is under investigation by the FBI, has set up a bank account in London to raise funds for anti-Israeli forces among the Palestinians.

Security officials believe that as many as 5,000 young Muslims in Britain may support bin Laden. Most show their solidarity by making regular financial contributions, but about one in five of these supporters is believed to have taken part in some form of active military service abroad.

Dozens have also taken part in secret military training in sessions in Britain, after which they were drafted into the military wing of the International Islamic Front founded by bin Laden in 1998.

A number of such British volunteers later died during active service for Islamic forces in the conflicts in Chechnya, Bosnia and Afghanistan. Another was killed on a suicide mission after being recruited to the cause through a London-based group, Al-Maddad.

The full extent of bin Laden's British network was revealed during the trial in New York this year of four men in connection with the bombings in Africa and other plots to kill US citizens.

Some key figures in 21 terrorist groups outlawed in March by Jack Straw, the then Home Secretary, under the provisions of the new Prevention of Terrorism Act have gone into hiding since they were banned this year.

The ban is intended to prevent them from raising funds, recruiting or in any way supporting terrorist operations abroad. Sixteen of the banned groups are Islamic organisations led by bin Laden's al-Qaeda.

Some British volunteers who have fought for bin Laden are listed among the dead on "martyr websites", set up after the US cruise missile attack on bin Laden's camps following the 1998 bombing of American embassies in Kenya and Tanzania.

Khalid al Fawwaz, the leader of another suspected bin Laden organisation in Britain, is among six men being held in Brixton jail awaiting extradition to America over his alleged part in the embassy bombings.

He denies that his Advice and Reformation Committee was a front for bin Laden and he has been in prison for more than a year fighting the US request.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

1 posted on 09/15/2001 5:31:56 PM PDT by Pokey78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pokey78, rdavis84, askel5
The charges were subsequently dropped just days after the men appeared at Horseferry Road magistrates' court, London. The Crown Prosecution Service said that the decision was made for security reasons.

What kind of SECURITY REASONS could possibly justify this? Absolutely MIND-BOGGLING.

2 posted on 09/15/2001 5:38:05 PM PDT by independentmind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
"Security officials believe that as many as 5,000 young Muslims in Britain may support bin Laden." Would someone please explain why the West is letting into their countries all of these Muslims? Which nation of Muslims has successfully embraced democracy and adapted western civilization?
3 posted on 09/15/2001 5:39:41 PM PDT by WhatHappenedtoAmerica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdavis, Wallaby
It is not the first time that British fundamentalists have extended their operations to America. Last year The Telegraph revealed that a company called Sakina Security was training volunteers to handle explosives and guns at a base in the United States.

Where do you think AKAL fits in?

4 posted on 09/15/2001 5:40:52 PM PDT by independentmind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
So are we going to bomb Great Britain too?
5 posted on 09/15/2001 5:41:42 PM PDT by LaBelleDameSansMerci
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WhatHappenedtoAmerica
Well, after WW2, the nations of the world decided to mindlessly do the exact opposite of whatever Hitler would have done. So, they started on the course of multiculturism. They are now starting to pay the price.

Their intentions were good, but their historical research was poor.

6 posted on 09/15/2001 5:44:36 PM PDT by Bogie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: independentmind
Funny, we must have been reading this "yank the chain" at about the same time.

"Security Reasons" ... my guess is that, even in a nation where crossdressing is acceptable behavior among males, no one really feels safe when they find out their leadership has Condit-style proclivities or some other truly unsettling personal habit or compromising association.

I think "security reasons" another sort of euphemism along the lines of "resigned/quit/retired in order to spend more time with his family".

Crystal clear, both of them, when you think about it.

7 posted on 09/15/2001 5:49:01 PM PDT by Askel5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: WhatHappenedtoAmerica
f*c* this makes me sick. Did you know that four imigrants recentley won a court action, claiming that because when they came into the UK as ILLEGAL imigrants there're human rights were abused because they were held in a detention centre. The spinless, arab cock sucking EU actually agreed with them and said that they should be awarded damages! David Blunkett has lodged a complaint against this ruling, but it just goes to show you what f*c*ing ungrateful camel f*c*kers imigrants are. 'oh, your detention centre with pool tables and three square meals a day are so supresive, it's not like back home in the desert!' EU laws must be changed before the f*c*ing bastards get one over on us all!
8 posted on 09/15/2001 5:54:25 PM PDT by ALCuk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Askel5
I'm not sure I'm reading you correctly, Askel5. Either this story is true, in which case, not only the U.S. but Britain have had a monumental intelligence failures, or it's false. If it's false, then our own governments are lying to us and it is truly over.
9 posted on 09/15/2001 5:56:23 PM PDT by independentmind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Bogie
Is it possible all of our current immigration policies will be changed? Both of these terrorists have family here in the US (also citizens), so they probably arrived under the family reunification section of the law. What aspect of this trajedy does not have a link to something of our own making? We provided the citizenship, pilot training, housing, they could have been on the dole for all I know, and now I find we might finance it through Bin Laden's short selling of stocks. These guys are a tough opponent, but it appears they have made a mistake. Had they just waited long enough, we might have imploded on our own. Now, we just might fix things a bit.
10 posted on 09/15/2001 6:02:38 PM PDT by WhatHappenedtoAmerica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
For those who blame US foreign policy for terrorism, exactly what did the EU do? The EU has been the biggest Arab muslim rear-kissers for decades. Bin Laden had no better friends in the West than the EU. So what does he do? He attempts to gas the EU parliment to death. People really have to know what we're dealing with here.
11 posted on 09/15/2001 6:11:23 PM PDT by garbanzo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: independentmind, Nita Nupress
"What kind of SECURITY REASONS could possibly justify this? Absolutely MIND-BOGGLING"

Oh, most likely the same reasons our FBI had.

Smell a Plan yet?

12 posted on 09/15/2001 6:11:44 PM PDT by rdavis84
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: independentmind
Well, given the penetration of our intelligence agencies since the early 60's, I guess I'm hardpressed to characterize these as "failures" on their part.
13 posted on 09/15/2001 6:12:14 PM PDT by Askel5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: lady upthread
No bimbo, we will not bomb Britain. They do not shelter, finance and encourage fanatics. so they let them go, dumb but understandable. If you cannot comprehend the difference between a terrorist nation and a nation where terrorists infiltrate and set up housekeeping you are pretty dense.
14 posted on 09/15/2001 6:17:39 PM PDT by cajungirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
A six-strong terror cell funded by the Saudi fugitive planned to kill all 625 Euro-MPs, and scores of officials, by releasing sarin gas into the parliament building.

Hey, France! Germany! Read this, and then read it again. Imagine Strasbourg as the scene of a major loss of life, the greatest non-wartime "weapon of mass destruction" disaster of all time. Would you still be whining about a "careful and measured response?"

The entire civilized world is in this with us, whether they recognize it or not. And France, Germany, and any other country that's waffling on us either needs to get on the bus or get the hell out of the way.

}:-)4

15 posted on 09/15/2001 6:19:43 PM PDT by Moose4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: independentmind
Don't worry. No one here ever knows what the hell askie's talking about. You won't understand any response either. Best to just keep walkin'.
16 posted on 09/15/2001 6:20:20 PM PDT by Deb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: dighton, jjbrower, MadIvan
Moral dilemma: if they decide to attack the Guardianistas whose side are we on?
17 posted on 09/15/2001 6:27:17 PM PDT by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: independentmind

This Pop-Up window appears at this site about Sakina Security --- http://www.sakina.fsbusiness.co.uk/popup.html

Urgent Appeal

Al Aqsa Liberation Fund



Donate Now! Checks payable to: F.ETIM
Woolwich Bank
Bank Code: 10-80-02
Account #: 42032012
London, United Kingdom

Here's info on the above group -- http://www.aqsa.org.uk/aboutus.html

The Friends of Al-Aqsa is a non-profit making organisation with voluntary staff concerned with the defence of basic human rights of Palestinians as supported by various international groups and organisations. It also stands for the protection and safety of Al-Aqsa Haram Sharif (The First Qibla) in Al Quds (Jerusalem).

SAKINA SECURITY SERVICES

WE CAN ACT AS YOUR PARTNERS / AGENTS - OR WE CAN SUPPLY YOUR AGENCY OR COMPANY WITH INDIVIDUAL, OR GROUPS OF SECURITY OR LAW ENFORCEMENT PERSONNEL

18 posted on 09/15/2001 6:29:22 PM PDT by rdavis84
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: LaBelleDameSansMerci
So are we going to bomb Great Britain too?

That depends - where are you right now?

19 posted on 09/15/2001 6:31:22 PM PDT by Senator Pardek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Deb
As so aptly a part of her handle, Independentmind is not quite so dense as you and the rest whose reactions are inimitably predictable and therefore Bankable.

It's quite possible, with the clarification, she knows precisely what I mean.

As related in Putin's autobiography and (strangely enough, as if it happened yesterday) in recent news articles, Kissinger has a certain common ground with the former Soviet agent and told him once that "All the best people got their start in Intelligence."

Such a statement leaves only two options:

  1. Both the West's and the Soviet Union's intelligence operations were premised on incorrect ideals back when the likes of Kissinger and Putin were "getting their start" and each finally realized (the Soviets being slightly ahead of the game than we) that the "Third Way" of convergence was true ... more correct than either communism or Western notions of freedom and human rights which at one time were diametrically opposed.

    Or

  2. Someone made a BIG mistake compromising the truth to come 'halfway' toward the other.


20 posted on 09/15/2001 6:34:53 PM PDT by Askel5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson