Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CIA armed Bin Laden’s terrorists to fight Soviets
The Scottsman ^ | Friday, Sept. 14, 2001 | Rory McCarthy

Posted on 09/16/2001 1:25:08 PM PDT by TheQuestion

CIA armed Bin Laden’s terrorists to fight Soviets

OSAMA bin Laden may now be the United States’ most wanted terrorist suspect, but once he was "their man", supported by the CIA and used in the war of resistance against the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan.

Born in Saudi Arabia, he first arrived in Afghanistan after the Soviet invasion in 1979 to co-ordinate the Mujahideen resistance. He used his £200 million fortune, inherited from his father’s construction business, to funnel weapons and recruits into Afghanistan through his Services Office based across the Pakistani border in Peshawar.

Just 14 days after the invasion the first CIA-funded weapons, mainly ancient .303 Lee Enfield rifles, began arriving. Funds were delivered to Pakistan which were handed on to the Mujahideen commanders, Bin Laden among them.

The Saudi soon commanded Arab fighters funded by the Americans and who for the next decade fought alongside Afghanis in the guerrilla war.

As the war progressed, the CIA assistance came to include extensive satellite reconnaissance findings on Soviet targets in Afghanistan and information on Soviet military plans based on satellite intelligence and intercepts.

Sophisticated communications equipment, long-range sniper rifles, and wire-guided tank missiles also followed.

By February 1986, the US had approved the supply of Stinger missiles to counter the growing use of Soviet assault helicopters. In total, some 250 launchers and 1,000 missiles were given.

In 1992, the CIA tried to start a buy-back programme as concern grew that the weapons were being diverted into terrorist organisations, but several hundred of them remain unaccounted for.

The United States believed it was supporting a national liberation struggle against a communist oppressor. In total, $6 billion dollars was siphoned into the resistance movement. The Americans were always distanced from the Islamic fighters, who received their money and refused CIA requests to train the fighters themselves.

Few among the US officials involved realised they were helping to develop a new international terrorist movement that would one day come back to haunt them.


Rory McCarthy In Islamabad
Friday, 14th September 2001
The Scotsman

top |



TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
How many more bin Ladens will we create in the effort to get bin Laden and other terrorists?
1 posted on 09/16/2001 1:25:08 PM PDT by TheQuestion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TheQuestion
The CIA had no direct control over any Afghan resistance. The handling was done by Pakistan's ISI, which cultivated various fundamentalist groups to do its own bidding, not America's.

Much of the "covert aid" intended for Afghan resistance groups never found its way into the field. It was siphoned off by corrupt Pakistanis, sold on the international black market, or given to anti-American groups which did practically no fighting and attacked the other groups who were fighting the Soviets.

2 posted on 09/16/2001 1:30:01 PM PDT by AGAviator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheQuestion
We have to play the international cards dealt at the time. The world is not static, but a fluid dynamic place that requires us at times to side with potential future enemies. Would those who expound protectionism/isolationism have preferred we not align with Stalin to defeat Hitler? Unfortunately, we can't know what the consequences are of every action. Hindsight is 20/20.
3 posted on 09/16/2001 1:41:32 PM PDT by A Navy Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheQuestion
So what's your point, that we shouldn't fight the war because some of the people on our side might be less than pure?
4 posted on 09/16/2001 1:43:50 PM PDT by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheQuestion
You know what 'TheQuestion', don't even bother responding. I looked at your home page and it is apparent you are one of these antiwar.com types. I already know what you are going to say, so there is no need to respond.
5 posted on 09/16/2001 1:46:30 PM PDT by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheQuestion
Thanks for the stunning report, Captain Obvious!

I was about to post "U.S. Armed Soviets To Fight Nazis".

The savages will taste our wrath, and your cacophonous uluations will not stop it.

6 posted on 09/16/2001 1:52:27 PM PDT by Senator Pardek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheQuestion
The faces of allies and enemies often change when trading the lesser of two evils. Go post this at your local gas station the next time you fill up.
7 posted on 09/16/2001 1:54:50 PM PDT by Aura Of The Blade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson