Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Afghan opposition keep Taliban out of impregnable Panjshir Valley
Agence France-Presse ^ | 19 Sept 2001 | Henry Meyer

Posted on 09/19/2001 2:27:01 PM PDT by KC Burke

MALASPA, Afghanistan, Sept 19 (AFP) - Rusting wrecks of Soviet tanks litter the landscape in the strategic Panjshir Valley, a reminder of repeated failed attempts by the Red Army to capture this mountainous enclave.

Assassinated Afghan opposition military chief Ahmad Shah Masood, known as the "Lion of Panjshir," defended his stronghold first from the Soviets during their 1979-89 invasion and then the Taliban who ousted him from Kabul in 1996.

Forced to retreat five years ago into the Panjshir Valley, northeast of the capital, Masood ordered his men to dynamite a section of the road just above Jabal Saroj, the entrance to the valley, virtually sealing it off.

Since then, Masood twice more blocked this key route from the plains outside Kabul into the Panjshir, which elsewhere is protected on all sides by mountains stretching up to 5,000 metres or more.

Buried last Sunday in his beloved birthplace, in the Panjshir's Baraka district, Masood's 15,000-strong forces still remain the only bulwark against the Taliban, controlling the valley as well as a slice of northeastern Afghanistan and pockets of territory elsewhere.

Taking advantage of his absence from the battlefield, the Taliban launched an assault two days after Masood was targetted by assassins on the frontline beyond the valley, 40 kilometres (25 miles) north of Kabul.

But the attack was repulsed, and the front's commander, General Babajan, is hoping for US aid now that Washington is poised to retaliate against the Taliban and their "guest," Saudi-born Osama bin Laden, prime suspect for the terrorist attacks on Washington and New York.

Within striking distance of Kabul, the impregnable Panjshir Valley is a major asset for the opposition as it seeks to regain the initiative against the Taliban, which has stamped its rule on more than 90 percent of Afghanistan.

In Shasht village, at the northern end of the valley, elder Ali Mirza Akrami, dressed in a turban and Afghan trousers and tunic, sighed as he recalled Masood.

Haunting prayers for the veteran 49-year-old guerrilla commander read by the mosque's Imam (preacher) resounded throughout the dusty village as black flags fluttered in the wind from its baked-mud one-storey houses.

But Akrami was confident that even without its inspirational leader, the fragmented opposition would hold onto the Panjshir.

"First of all, the Taliban are worried about their own skins now, not about us. Secondly, if there are attacks we have defended ourselves for more than 20 years and we will do so again," he said. ..........(see link for balance)


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Will we end up as their backers? Then it appears we will be at war with Pakistan who oppose them through the Taliban.
1 posted on 09/19/2001 2:27:01 PM PDT by KC Burke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

A regional map showing the common borders, including the common border with China (!) is here
2 posted on 09/19/2001 2:34:01 PM PDT by KC Burke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KC Burke
First we destroy the Taliban's ability to wage terror. Then we arm the oposition to the hilt. Then the Taliban can jihad till the pigs come home.
3 posted on 09/19/2001 2:34:13 PM PDT by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fhayek
Funny, I just thought of something.

We could use the Pansjhir as a jumping off point for airmobile SF operations as long as it's in control of the "friendlies" (this is where bribe money comes in).

Be Seeing You,

Chris

4 posted on 09/19/2001 2:44:55 PM PDT by section9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: fhayek
However, without Pakistan's tacit approval, we will have their opposition and if we have their opposition we will have China's as well. China will use there small common border with Afghanistan as well as their larger border with Pakistan to involve themselves quite deeply in the forthcoming action, I'm quite sure.
5 posted on 09/19/2001 2:51:11 PM PDT by KC Burke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: fhayek
Look at this map showing the relationship between the Panjshir valley and Kabul as well as the borders. Note that in fighting Kabul, China AND Pakistan will be at their backs.
6 posted on 09/19/2001 2:55:24 PM PDT by KC Burke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Hamiltonian, amom other Silk Road /Pipeline followers
Look at the maps I link in my lower posts after you look at the article and tell us how the pipeline issues will tie into this and draw/excuse China in this area, with or without Pakistan, if you please, oh wise ones.
7 posted on 09/19/2001 2:59:32 PM PDT by KC Burke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: KC Burke
This valley is to the south and east of the pipeline. Boy that is some rough mountainous area! I can see why he'd hole up there. Take a look at the map here and see what you think. Then we'll both wait for Hamiltonian's reply. :-)

Good maps of the natural gas infrastructure and pipelines for the Caspian project.

Good map of Eursian pipelines.

8 posted on 09/19/2001 4:57:50 PM PDT by amom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: KC Burke
I can't see the strategic purpose of this small bit of land in the middle of all those mountains for oil activity. That said what if the arab countries wanted to route the caspian oil down to their neck of the woods...would they bother with that area or just tie into their existing pipelines? I don't know. Maybe there are minerals? LOL I'll let you know if I find anything interesting.

Hamiltonian I eagerly await an experienced persons input. :-)

9 posted on 09/19/2001 5:10:51 PM PDT by amom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: fhayek
Let Afghanis do the dirty work
10 posted on 09/20/2001 8:17:05 AM PDT by Marc Poor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: amom
The Frontierpost.com from Pakistan is reporting that bin Laden has withdrawn to the Wakhan Corridor after the Clerics decision. The Wakhan Corridor is that small neck of lend extending to the Chinese border. Anyone want to estimate the chances that we will invade or encroach on China to go after him. Nil to none.

Whether or not this link here is true, this is a possible scenerio that is daunting.

11 posted on 09/21/2001 9:03:56 AM PDT by KC Burke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: KC Burke
T H E T H R E E P A S S E S O F W A K H A N C O R R I D O R

Some interesitng background info.

12 posted on 09/21/2001 12:16:52 PM PDT by amom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson