Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FAA Plans to Disarm Flight Crews
CNS News ^ | September 20, 2001 | Jeff Johnson

Posted on 09/20/2001 5:31:42 PM PDT by Moosejaw

(CNSNews.com) - A new Federal Aviation Regulation scheduled to take effect in November of this year would take away the right of pilots, co-pilots, and navigators to carry firearms and other weapons for self-defense.

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) spokesman Paul Takemoto acknowledged Thursday that flight crews have been authorized to carry firearms for the past 20 years.

"That will change on November 14," he said. "The new rule will not include authorization (to carry firearms) and crew members will no longer be allowed to carry arms."

Full Story


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last
Don't THAT beat all!?
1 posted on 09/20/2001 5:31:42 PM PDT by Moosejaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Moosejaw
HERE ARE THE FACTS GUYS!! YOU KNOW WHAT TO DO!!

FIVE THOUSAND LOST LIVES FOR THE WANT OF TWO THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED EIGHTY DOLLARS.

Israel Airlines bolts the Cockpit door and all Pilots and copilots carry Firearms.

(TELL THE AIRLINE PRESIDENTS AND CEO'S)

New Release

Ponder for a moment.

We trust a pilot with a 30 million-dollar plane knowledgeable of complex airplane functions, but government policy will not allow them to operate a simple firearm.

I’LL FLY AGAIN WHEN PILOTS ARE ARMED.

Israel Airlines bolts the Cockpit door and all Pilots and copilots carry Firearms.

Scanning the websites this week the following thread from Pilots, Law Enforcement, and American Citizens discuss ways to take positive action against air terrorism.

We trust a fancy security question (Thanks to Jim Kallstom, former FBI, did you pack your bags?) but not millions of active and retired law enforcement officers to Citizen Carry on an airplane.

May I rant for a second! Get these liberal, antigun activists out of our government decision making process. Consider, Israel Airlines policy is to bolt the door, arms it pilots, and has armed travelers in the cabin.

We allow lowly-paid gate-guards to gate dis-arm us, creating a "killing zone of disarmed citizens", as passingers "do battle" in the sky with terrorists, using passion for weapons because misguided government policy has left us defenseless.

The government can not protect you when the terrorist is eyeball to eyeball with you. Now they have ban my pocketknife used to clean my nails. What next, bottles, because they can be smashed for a weapon??

Most all of the former military pilots strapped firearms to their legs when on active duty. Today they are considered not capable, wear the wrong uniform, or untrust worthy.

This BS about putting a 9mm hole in the skin of an airplane will bring it down is more rhetoric and fiction than fact. Just ask the thousand of airmen who returned from flights over Germany in WWII. How about the 747 over Hawaii with a 20-foot hole in the side. Still got a problem with possible decompression? Consider the alternative!

I’ll trust anyday my life to any active or retired law enforcement officer to CITIZEN CARRY on any airline.

I’ll trust anyday my life to any pilot or copilot active or retired to carry on any airline.

I’ll trust any American citizen willing to CITIZEN CARRY after extensive training to carry on any airline. It is a huge responsibility, however, the current "Killing Zones" set up by faulty thinking is killing our husbands, wives, children, and our nation.

I am sure thousands perhaps millions of American’s would trust their life to armed pilots, copilots, air crew members, retired, policemen, FBI, CIA, ATF, or American Citizens willing to train, quality, and stay current with cabin safety issues keeping America airlines safe.

I personally trust all of the above personnel, rather than phony security questions, low-pay air guards, unlocked backdoor food and cleaning functions or gates at airports, or government officials with big titles.

WHO DO YOU TRUST THE GOVERNMENT? OR DO YOU TRUST HONEST AMERICAN CITIZENS WHO LIVE AND BREATH FAMILY SAFETY WHEN TRAVELING?

What do you want in your cockpit, a pilot and copilot with a firearm, or a terrorist? 2,180 dollars (four colt pistols)would have prevented all four terrorist acts and saved five thousand lives.

Government will spend billions of dollars with highly visible, and breach-able security that irritates American citizens during check-in when other more effective obvious solutions exist. Just ask Israel.

Thousands of American veterans, retired LEO's and American Citzens want to sign up today to fight terrorism. Don't tell them they are unqualified. If you do tell them they are unqualifed, they may have a word or two for you.

Visit keepandbeararms.com to carry the fight.

Paul Williams

( KEEPANDBEARARMS )

WWW.KEEPANDBEARARMS.COM

Advising Director

end Five thousand American Citizens lost their life for the want of two thousand one hundred eight dollars.

(TELL THE AIRLINE PRESIDENTS AND CEO'S)

Other websites with Pilot talk

( Federal Observer help pilots reclaim cockpits )

http://www.federalobserver.com/index.php?section=Arm+Pilots+NOW%21

(Five thousand lose live for want of a shoelace)

http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3ba6ac034145.htm

( Serra Times talk freedom )

http://www.sierratimes.com/archive/files/sep/18/arfs091801.htm

( Kamikaze Pilots on U.S. Soil)

http://www.sierratimes.com/archive/files/sep/14/arfl091401.htm

(Dear Airline Executives)

http://www.sierratimes.com/archive/files/sep/18/arnj091801.htm

(Where is Mommy?)

http://www.saveourguns.com/selfdefense.htm

( Mothers for Self defense )

http://www.2asisters.org/safety/index.htm

<a href="http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=24549”>( Captains to FAA Focus on cockpits Pilots argue for bullet-proof doors, cameras, guns)</a><P> http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=24549 <P> end <P>

2 posted on 09/20/2001 5:33:01 PM PDT by CHICAGOFARMER (lawjj2@allways.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moosejaw
Oh, #@$%ing brilliant!

Bureaucrats....

3 posted on 09/20/2001 5:34:03 PM PDT by BurkeanCyclist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: Moosejaw
What the <long string of expletives deleted> is Minetta thinking? Oh, that's right, he's the token DemonRAT.

It's time for the DemonRATs to be booted.

5 posted on 09/20/2001 5:38:50 PM PDT by steveegg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steveegg
We still have until November - time for some concerted Freeper action!
6 posted on 09/20/2001 5:40:23 PM PDT by Moosejaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Moosejaw
Lemmesee... they've been allowed to carry weapons for 20 years. And, in that time, uh, how many flight crew members have "gone postal?"

Church Lady voice: "Could it beeeeee ZERO?"


7 posted on 09/20/2001 5:41:35 PM PDT by EdZep (Socialists in Congress? Click on the zeppelin, Grasshopper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BurkeanCyclist
No, DemonRAT bureaucrats. Minetta is just that.
8 posted on 09/20/2001 5:41:52 PM PDT by steveegg (I demand Minetta's job on a silver platter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: steveegg
I just love this part of the full story:

He was not aware of whether or not the FAA had ever approved a firearms training course for flight crews, or whether such a request had ever been made.

Takemoto indicated that the agency was too busy to research the issue in light of the on-going investigation into the take-over of four passenger jets by terrorists armed with plastic knives and box cutters on September 11.

Gotta love this author's use of juxtaposition...

9 posted on 09/20/2001 5:45:52 PM PDT by Moosejaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Moosejaw
Methinks the FAA is the MOST sc***ed-up fed agency. May they use the next 6 weeks to revisit and reverse this plan.
10 posted on 09/20/2001 5:51:19 PM PDT by steveegg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Moosejaw
Duuuhhhhh, just in time for events. Absolute Frikkin' Idiots.
11 posted on 09/20/2001 5:53:49 PM PDT by ctonious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moosejaw
"The new rule will not include authorization (to carry firearms) and crew members will no longer be allowed to carry arms."

Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind,..."

1CO 6:9
12 posted on 09/20/2001 5:55:12 PM PDT by farmer18th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moosejaw
Heh. They don't need to carry arms to be dangerous, they are flying arms.

Idiots at FAA. Guess they, and Congress, don't want passengers for the airline industry they are going to prop up with tax bux.

13 posted on 09/20/2001 5:59:38 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moosejaw
Here is the text of the email I just sent the FAA.

Sirs,

I today heard a disturbing report that you plan to disarm America's airline pilots.

Removing at least the threat of an armed pilot is like telling terrorists, "here I am, kill me and ram this aircraft into a building!"

What can you be thinking? How I wish I had authority over you! I would certainly expand your employment opportunities.

John Erickson
Rogue River Oregon 97537-1825
14 posted on 09/20/2001 6:10:26 PM PDT by 1John
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steveegg
This is the same clown who, a couple of months ago, warned the airlines against "racial profiling" of folks who look like they're from the Middle East, if my disinformation is korrect.
15 posted on 09/20/2001 6:16:18 PM PDT by LimitedPowers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Moosejaw
Then the FAA is the biggest ally of the terrorists.
16 posted on 09/20/2001 6:18:20 PM PDT by PuNcH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moosejaw
At the risk of (once again) being called a statist...J6P's solution...

All airline crew should have the option of carrying, pending the completion of an industry standardized course.

The airlines are given the option of placing armed guards on flights on a basis of their choosing, from 50% to 100% of flights. The airlines fund the training and salary for these private sector employees who attend Air marshal courses at FLETC in Glynco. Private sector guards, paid for by the airlines, trained to a common, national standard, given Veteran's preference in hiring. Any terrorist would know he faced at least a 50% chance of being on a plane with at least one sub rosa armed guard. Airlines that chose, voluntarily, to increase the % could use that as a marketing tool.

Military personel, traveling on official orders, should be afforded the opportunity to attend an air-travel firearms qualification course in conjunction with their already mandatory travel brief, which would entitle them to carry their sidearm.

Private detectives/ personal security guards, and CCW license holders should have the option of adding to their licensing fees and qualifications, the option of applying for air-carry credentials pending completion of the appropriate training, which would allow them to pack on domestic flights.

Pilots, responsible for the safety and all other aspects of the flights, would be informed as to which passengers were armed. All armed passengers would be informed as to which other passengers were legitimately bearing as well, prior to the flight.

I firmly believe in the individual rights guaranteed by the Second Amendment, however the rights and responsibilities of a privately owned air-carrier to dictate standards and rules of behavior on their private property cannot be overlooked. The interstate commerce clause; likewise, cannot be thrown out the window.

While most here will find it anathema, the concept of Federal and state governments, working in conjunction with individuals and industry is possible...

17 posted on 09/20/2001 6:21:28 PM PDT by Joe 6-pack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LimitedPowers
I knew it was a mistake to leave a RAT in charge of anything.
18 posted on 09/20/2001 7:17:33 PM PDT by steveegg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: bang_list
Tell the FAA what you think of their plan; and tell them what they can do to enhance flight security !!
19 posted on 09/22/2001 6:22:50 AM PDT by tgslTakoma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack
Well if your idea wasn't criminal it might be all right, except that it breaks Gods law too. Try posting it at democrat.criminal.org, they'll probably love it!
From God's certificate, the bible:

Luke 22:36 (KJV) --Then said he unto them, But now, he that hath a purse, let him take it, and likewise his scrip: and he that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one.

Got sword? (M1 Garand ==>CMP)

No mercy, no quarter!
May the jihadists burn in hell for eternity!
Help speed them on their way!

Molon Labe!
Poll: bin Laden's skull can be best used as an ....

20 posted on 09/22/2001 10:25:50 AM PDT by TERMINATTOR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson