Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush snub no oversight
Toronto Sun ^ | Friday, September 21, 2001 | Bob MacDonald

Posted on 09/21/2001 9:28:46 AM PDT by Grig

U.S. President George W. Bush's non-mention of Canada in his historic speech last night may have been much more than a thoughtless oversight.

It just might have been deliberate -- a highly noticeable-to- Canadians way of indicating he is not getting the kind of all-out cooperation from Prime Minister Jean Chretien that he feels the present crisis demands.

For starters, Chretien has been dithering about including Canadian fighting soldiers in a U.S.-led force to go after international terrorists. And U.S. Ambassador Paul Cellucci got a kind of brush-off Wednesday by Immigration Elinor Caplan when he urged the U.S. and Canada work out a common system of handling visitors, immigrants, refugees or terrorists at our border. Caplan mumbled something about Canadian "sovereignty" possibly being threatened.

Perhaps Bush was trying to send a wake-up jolt to Chretien, despite Canada's contributions of help after last week's disaster and the loss of Canadian lives. His message: We are in a tough, real war against international terrorism and we want you to be with us 100%.

For instance, in contrast to Chretien, Canada's far-off sister Commonwealth nation, Australia, has promised full military support, including fighting troops to back the U.S.-led forces.

"There is no point in a situation like this, being an 80% ally," declared Australian Prime Minister John Howard.

He contended that an all-out effort had to be made at this time or people in free and democratic societies such as Australia (and Canada) will be forced to live in an increasingly fearful and threatened world.

Now, that's the kind of determined attitude Bush was talking about last night when he declared: "Every nation in every region now has a decision to make. Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists."

Bush made it very clear that the enemy in this war will be terrorists like Muslim terrorist Osman bin Laden and his global network of mass murderers.

"The enemy of America is not our many Muslim friends; it is not our many Arab friends. Our enemy is a radical network of terrorists and every government that supports them," said the president.

"We will direct every resource at our command -- every means of diplomacy, every tool of intelligence, every instrument of law enforcement, every financial influence and every necessary weapon of war -- to the disruption and defeat of the global terror network."

And that's the only way it will be accomplished.

However, Chretien keeps hanging back in making a commitment of fighting troops to the cause despite a national opinion poll this week that showed 79% of Canadians want a full military effort to disable the armies of countries that give safe haven to such terrorists. And 77% said Canada does a poor job of preventing terrorists from operating here.

However, Chretien may be afraid of offending the leftist, anti-American voters that have voted for him or the increasing number of Muslim voters.

If so, maybe that's why the federal government has been so zealous in not releasing the names of the estimated up to 60 Canadians killed in the attacks. And why Chretien didn't go to New York to view the disaster area -- or to Washington to see Bush as such leaders as British PM Tony Blair.

The foreign affairs department says their identities are "private" and media inquiries are referred to the U.S. government. So far, the names of only 11 of the Canadian victims have been filtered out by the media.

You get the feeling that the Chretienites don't want them known because media coverage about so many individuals and their suffering families might infuriate their fellow Canadians -- and increase demands for full military support.

And, on another front, Chretien is looking worse daily -- especially when he made the nutsy statement that there were no terrorists in Canada. That flew in the face of his own Canadian Security Intelligence Service that reported 50 terrorist groups and 350 individuals existed in Canada.

Now we have the report yesterday by Sun reporter Tom Godfrey that revealed a Middle Eastern man by the name of Nabil Al-Marabh lived in Toronto until six weeks ago and is believed to be the same man that the FBI agents arrested in Chicago in connection with last week's attacks. Unfortunately, Canada's longstanding reputation as "sucker nation of the world" in running a sieve-like immigration and refugee system is still intact.

But the heat is on to get with it 100% in going after bin Laden. And also in toughening our weak immigration system.

The blood of the 6,333 killed in the American attacks demands it. So does the blood of those nameless, anonymous Canadians.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-123 next last
Last night I was in the car at 9pm, so I listened to President Bush's speach over the radio. I thought it was fantastic. After it was a local call in program and some callers were complaining that Canada was not mentioned once in the whole thing. They were like a bunch of prissy school girls mad about not being the homecoming queen so I called in and said so (I was the 2nd last caller)

I'm glad to see that most Canadians realize that our lame PM is the cause for this deserved snub. We Canadians are true and loyal friends of the USA and are deeply embarased by our government and our PM. Please do not judge us by how they act.

I'm GLAD he 'snubbed' us, I hope he keeps on doing it till our government gets off it's behind and does something to EARN the world's respect instead of just sitting there expecting it and wanting to have our ego stroked.

On top of all this, the PM cut his visit to the US short and won't go to New York so he can dash back up here in time FOR A FUNDRAISER! Canadians died in New York too, but no, building up a war chest for the next election (at least 3 years away) is more important to him.

1 posted on 09/21/2001 9:28:46 AM PDT by Grig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Grig
Every word (or lack of words) in that speech was very deliberate.
2 posted on 09/21/2001 9:34:12 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
Bush snubbed Mexico too, since Mexico has this policy of not backing military action.

Fox has waffled, and Bush sent him a clear message last night.

3 posted on 09/21/2001 9:41:29 AM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Grig
Thank you for your words of support.

I believe many Canadians feel as you do, but I fear the Leftist elite ruling and intellectual classes have just about run the Dominion into terminal irrelevancy. How long until the Tories come back into power?

4 posted on 09/21/2001 9:41:42 AM PDT by TonyInOhio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
Flapdoodle ! The Brits still have a Navy. Canada doesn't.
That doesn't mean the US and Canada are no longer best friends.
5 posted on 09/21/2001 9:43:27 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Grig
Not to be ignorant or anything, but isn't it possible to have a vote of no confidence to at least place the PM and his party on notice that the Canadian public are pretty sure he's off the mark on this one?
6 posted on 09/21/2001 9:47:53 AM PDT by gaelwolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TonyInOhio
There is no Conservative party in Canada. The PC's are Progressives only.
7 posted on 09/21/2001 9:48:32 AM PDT by BillM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Grig
Thank you for that Article, and thank you for YOUR support, but your country has become a joke. It is sad how far to the left that Canada has gone, and the left is scared because after such an attack, this country has made a sudden lurch to the right. Maybe your PM is afraid that that is exactly what will happen up there if things really get going.

Canada NEEDS to come back to the right, BADLY, when that happens, I'll be very HAPPY for you!!
8 posted on 09/21/2001 9:48:52 AM PDT by Aric2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grig
Chretien has been dithering about including Canadian fighting soldiers in a U.S.-led force to go after international terrorists.

One wonders if this would really be of any help anyway. Canada's one proud military has been eviscerated by the lefties who desire the armed services to reflect society at large rather than to resemble a warrior society.

9 posted on 09/21/2001 9:49:26 AM PDT by Straight Vermonter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grig
When was the last time so many Canadians were killed in an act of terror or war? WWII?

I guess we know who are friends are.

The Tarheel

10 posted on 09/21/2001 9:50:16 AM PDT by Tarheel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grig
is canada with the terrorists or with the usa?
11 posted on 09/21/2001 9:54:05 AM PDT by Rustynailww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grig
Canada and the USA must forge the closest ties now. We have a long history and a long border to watch over. I hope the citizens of Canada speak up and insist that their leaders get with the program 100% or you may find terrorists bringing down Canadian buildings too.
12 posted on 09/21/2001 9:54:08 AM PDT by PoisedWoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grig
It just might have been deliberate -- a highly noticeable-to- Canadians way of indicating he is not getting the kind of all-out cooperation from Prime Minister Jean Chretien that he feels the present crisis demands.

Thanks for this article. Last night I was asking hubby, "Where is canada?" Hmmm? Interesting.

13 posted on 09/21/2001 9:54:37 AM PDT by Teacup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
Flapdoodle ! The Brits still have a Navy. Canada doesn't. That doesn't mean the US and Canada are no longer best friends.

Never said we aren't close friends with Canada. But in this case, Britain is the only ones standing firmly behind us in using our military and providing whatever assistance is needed. Canada and Mexico were snubbed intentionally. No doubt about it.

14 posted on 09/21/2001 9:54:48 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Grig
We have a thirty-something Canadian-born woman in my office who became an American ciitizen one month ago. She says that she is ecstatic to be one of us.

Look: we Yanks remember the Canadians helping us during the embassy takeover in Teheran and realize that the great majority of Canadians are great people--just elect someone with Bush's vision next time. (And I have always been a Dudley Dooright fan).

15 posted on 09/21/2001 9:55:29 AM PDT by Pharmboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grig
"We Canadians are true and loyal friends of the USA and are deeply embarased by our government and our PM. Please do not judge us by how they act."

We know.......................and don't worry, we don't.

16 posted on 09/21/2001 9:56:15 AM PDT by RightOnline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grig
Canada is irrelevant for military attacks. They are like Italy, either for you or against you they cost 10 divisions. During the Gulf War, Canada shipped a bunch of ancient destroyers with untrained crews to the Persian Gulf. They should have stayed home. They also shipped some fighter bombers to the war - but the Canadians only made 2 bombing runs. And, the Canadian populace and politicians were incensed when they found out about the bombings - if I remember right.

Canada should tighten up their visa policies, but I am sure they won't. The US will have to tighten its' border with Canada. I hope the Canadians also increase security at airports so that attacks can't be staged from that country.

17 posted on 09/21/2001 9:58:03 AM PDT by Gladwin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grig
Canada is irrelevant for military attacks. They are like Italy, either for you or against you they cost 10 divisions. During the Gulf War, Canada shipped a bunch of ancient destroyers with untrained crews to the Persian Gulf. They should have stayed home. They also shipped some fighter bombers to the war - but the Canadians only made 2 bombing runs. And, the Canadian populace and politicians were incensed when they found out about the bombings - if I remember right.

Canada should tighten up their visa policies, but I am sure they won't. The US will have to tighten its' border with Canada. I hope the Canadians also increase security at airports so that attacks can't be staged from that country.

18 posted on 09/21/2001 9:58:19 AM PDT by Gladwin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grig
Thank you so much for your words of support! Interesting article.
19 posted on 09/21/2001 9:58:33 AM PDT by nutmeg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
Isn't Canada part of Great Britain? Was Bush's exclusion simply that he didn't say "United Kingdom?"
20 posted on 09/21/2001 9:58:50 AM PDT by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-123 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson