Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate to Restore Missile Defense $
AP ^ | September 21, 2001, 2:39 PM EDT | CAROLYN SKORNECK

Posted on 09/21/2001 11:55:30 AM PDT by Jean S

WASHINGTON -- The Senate agreed Friday to restore $1.3 billion to the budget for missile defense, providing President Bush his full $8.3 billion request while giving him the option of using the money instead for anti-terrorism efforts.

The amendment to the $343 billion defense authorization bill for the year beginning Oct. 1 was approved by voice vote as debate on the overall bill began. It would put back money that Democrats on the Armed Services Committee had diverted to other defense purposes.

Both committee chairman Carl Levin and the panel's top Republican, John Warner of Virginia, urged support of the bill in light of last week's terrorist attacks.

"Our fury at those who attack innocents is matched by our determination to protect our citizens from more terror and by our resolve to track down, root out and relentlessly pursue the terrorists and those who would shelter or harbor them," said Levin, D-Mich.

Warner said, "This bill will communicate a message to our citizens and to the world that the United States resolves to do whatever is necessary to protect our homeland, our forces abroad, and to work with our allies in their mutual protection and to address the whole spectrum of threats that confronts our nation" and other nations around the world.

Bush had sought to boost this year's missile defense spending by $3 billion, for a total of $8.3 billion.

Levin and Warner cosponsored Friday's amendment in a bipartisan effort combining Warner's wish to fully fund missile defense and Levin's wish, if the money was going back in, to allow it to be used for anti-terrorism, Levin told reporters.

Panel Democrats had pushed the bill to the floor two weeks ago on a party-line vote, 13-12.

That rare division stemmed from Republican anger over a Democratic missile defense provision that the GOP believed would tie the president's hands in talks with Russia. The provision sought to require a vote of Congress before any money could be spent on missile defense activities that the president said would violate the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile treaty.

To help speed through the spending bill, Levin dropped that from the measure Wednesday and offered it as a separate bill that Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle, D-S.D., can bring to the floor later.

Other issues such as base closings may still pose stumbling blocks, Levin conceded. The panel approved one round of closings, 17-8. The House Armed Services Committee, by contrast, sought to derail base closings by omitting any mention of them.

Levin said the $1.3 billion amendment would actually boost the bill's total above the allowed limit of $343 billion, but he expected offsetting cuts would be made during the House-Senate conference that will resolve differences between the measures the two chambers approve.

The House began debate on its bill Thursday, but no final vote was expected until next week.

Levin and Warner anticipated the bill that emerges from the negotiating conference will include supplemental money the administration will seek after it determines its needs to fight the war against terrorism.

Separately, the House voted 401-0 to authorize $10.5 billion for military construction.

Copyright © 2001, The Associated Press


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 09/21/2001 11:55:30 AM PDT by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Nyuck, Nyuck, Nyuck...it certainly is fun to watch the lefties backtrack on their "core values"...drilling in ANWR and the Presidents energy policy is the next batter up!
2 posted on 09/21/2001 12:10:54 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Thank God! We frittered away eight years- let's hope we can buy enough time to get this in place.... FYI--

-Links for Missile Defense- Nuke News--

3 posted on 09/21/2001 12:14:11 PM PDT by backhoe (Has that clinton "legacy" made you feel *safer* yet? ? ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Another "stinging defeat" for GWB. Dan Rather must be livid.
4 posted on 09/21/2001 12:15:17 PM PDT by wny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Mega-bump.

The Left is in overdue retreat.

5 posted on 09/21/2001 12:18:27 PM PDT by FReethesheeples
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wny
Actually, I think Dan Blather is beginning to see the light!
6 posted on 09/21/2001 12:18:33 PM PDT by MHGinTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
S. 1439

It's everything we've needed for so long.

7 posted on 09/21/2001 12:42:23 PM PDT by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
...Boy does this ever gripe Enemy Within -Friend of HILLARY- Senator BARBAR BOXER off...BIG TIME.
8 posted on 09/21/2001 1:30:25 PM PDT by ALOHA RONNIE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Both committee chairman Carl Levin and the panel's top Republican, John Warner of Virginia, urged support of the bill in light of last week's terrorist attacks.

"Our fury at those who attack innocents is matched by our determination to protect our citizens from more terror and by our resolve to track down, root out and relentlessly pursue the terrorists and those who would shelter or harbor them," said Levin, D-Mich.

AMAZING how liberal haters of the Constitution SUDDENLY get patriotic and hawkish when something like this happens. THE SAD part is that it takes bloodshed before liberals will AWAKEN to the fact that we need a strong defense.

WHAT WILL IT TAKE TO GET LIBERALS TO LOVE THE SECOND AMENDMENT?? I DON'T WANT TO FIND OUT!

9 posted on 09/21/2001 2:39:30 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson