Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ann Coulter: FUTURE WIDOWS OF AMERICA: WRITE YOUR CONGRESSMAN
Yahoo News ^ | Wednesday September 26 08:17 PM EDT | Ann Coulter

Posted on 09/26/2001 7:22:02 PM PDT by Keyes For President

After the World Trade Center was bombed by Islamic fundamentalists in 1993, the country quickly chalked it up to a zany one-time attack and five minutes later decided we were all safe again. We weren't. We aren't now. They will strike again. Perhaps they will wait another eight years. But perhaps not.

The enemy is in this country right now. And any terrorists who are not already here are free to immigrate. The government has been doing an excellent job rounding up suspects from the last two attacks. But what about the next attack? We thought there was only one murderous Islamic cell in America the last time, too.

Congress has authority to pass a law tomorrow requiring aliens from suspect countries to leave. As far as the Constitution is concerned, aliens, which is to say non-citizens, are here at this country's pleasure. They have no constitutional right to be here.

Congress has it within its power to prevent the next attack, but it won't. When the Sears Tower is attacked, the president is assassinated, St. Patrick's Cathedral is vaporized, anthrax is released in the subway systems or Disneyland is nuked, remember: Congress could have stopped it, but didn't.

Pious invocations of the Japanese internment are absurd. For one thing, those were U.S. citizens. Citizens can't be deported. So far -- thank God -- almost all the mass murderers of Americans have been aliens.

But even more blindingly obvious: There was no evidence that the attack on Pearl Harbor was staged by Japanese saboteurs living in California. The Japanese internment was a pure land grab implemented by liberal politicians -- President Franklin D. Roosevelt and California Gov. Earl Warren (later the namesake of the infamous Warren Court). The internment was vigorously opposed by J. Edgar Hoover.

This time, the very nature of the enemy is that they have infiltrated this country and pass themselves off as law-abiding, quiet immigrants. The entire modus operandi of this enemy is to smuggle mass murderers to our shores.

But the country refuses to respond rationally. Rather, Congress is busily contemplating a series of "anti-terrorism" measures most notable for their utter irrelevance to the threat. What precisely would a national ID card accomplish? The hijackers were in this country legally! A few may have overstayed their visas by a few days -- a minor bureaucratic oversight that they surely would have remedied had they not been about to commit suicide in a monstrous attack.

Sen. Joe Biden, D-Del., has bravely proposed that we take the aggressive step of asking aliens in the country to register periodically with the government so we know where they are. That's already the law in Germany. Several of the hijackers in this attack lived in Hamburg; they obediently complied. The mastermind of the most vicious terrorist attack in the history of the world, Mohammed Atta, was in Florida on a "vocational status" visa (in order to attend flight school). Let's say Atta had registered. Now what, Joe?

As the entire country has been repeatedly lectured, most Muslims are amazingly peaceful, deeply religious, wouldn't hurt a fly. Indeed, endless invocations of the pacific nature of most Muslims is the only free speech it is safe to engage in these days.

This is a preposterous irrelevancy. Fine, we get it. The New York Times can rest assured that every last American has now heard the news that not all Muslims are terrorists. That's not the point. Not all Muslims may be terrorists, but all terrorists are Muslims -- at least all terrorists capable of assembling a murderous plot against America that leaves 7,000 people dead in under two hours.

How are we to distinguish the peaceful Muslims from the fanatical, homicidal Muslims about to murder thousands of our fellow citizens? Are the good Muslims the ones who live quiet lives, pray a lot and obey the law? So did the architects of Bloody Tuesday's mass murder. Are the peaceful Muslims the ones who loudly proclaim their hatred of Osama Bin Laden? Mohammed Atta did that, too.

The only thing we know about them -- other than that they live among us -- is that they are foreign-born and they are Muslims. The government has been remarkably tight-lipped about precisely how many Muslim visitors we are currently accommodating, but from unofficial estimates, there appear to be more than a million. Even if the attorney general instigated latter-day Palmer raids, it will take years and years to investigate and infiltrate every potential terrorist cell operating on our shores. The investigations should not be conducted while the enemy continues residing here, plotting the next attack.

It's an extreme measure, but we face an extreme threat. It is suicidal naivete to think we can simply seal off every water supply, air vent, food supply and crop duster from now until the end of time. We cannot search every truck, every passenger, every shopper, every subway, every person entering every building -- every American every day.

It is impossible to stop Islamic fundamentalists who believe that slaughtering thousands of innocent Americans will send them straight to Allah. All we can do is politely ask aliens from suspect nations to leave -- with the full expectation of readmittance -- while we sort the peace-loving immigrants from the murderous fanatics.

More benefits of the plan next week, but the beauty part of the Terrorist Deportation Plan can't wait. There will be two fail-safes: (1) Muslim immigrants who agree to spy on the millions of Muslim citizens unaffected by the deportation order can stay; and (2) any Muslim immigrant who gets a U.S. senator to waive his deportation -- by name -- gets to stay.

This is brutally unfair to the Muslim immigrants who do not want to kill us. But it's not our fault. It is the fault of the terrorists who are using their fellow Muslims as human shields. So far, America's response to a calculating cold-blooded enemy has been to say, "Excuse me, you seem to have dropped your box-cutter."


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-188 next last

1 posted on 09/26/2001 7:22:02 PM PDT by Keyes For President
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sarcasm, Logic Society, tshirt,
ping.
2 posted on 09/26/2001 7:23:30 PM PDT by Keyes For President
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Keyes For President
BTTT
3 posted on 09/26/2001 7:26:55 PM PDT by harpo11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: l0newolf
Congress has authority to pass a law tomorrow requiring aliens from suspect countries to leave. As far as the Constitution is concerned, aliens, which is to say non-citizens, are here at this country's pleasure. They have no constitutional right to be here.

ping.

5 posted on 09/26/2001 7:27:20 PM PDT by Keyes For President
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: t-shirt
ping.
6 posted on 09/26/2001 7:27:52 PM PDT by Keyes For President
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Keyes For President
Where has Ann been since her first column? Has she been exiled from the punditocracy?
7 posted on 09/26/2001 7:30:00 PM PDT by cicero's_son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Keyes For President
Some say this is extreme. I call it prudent. O'Reilly calls it nonsense.
8 posted on 09/26/2001 7:31:00 PM PDT by Osinski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Keyes For President
People have said here on FR that Ann doesn't always mean what she says. So, just asking, is this one of the things that she means, or is this like the "Kill their leaders and convert them all to Christianity" piece?
9 posted on 09/26/2001 7:31:26 PM PDT by ConsistentLibertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Keyes For President
Bravo Ann. Send them back, and send them a message. Maybe when they're all back at home, those who wanted to be here will take their anger out on those who have ruined it for them.
10 posted on 09/26/2001 7:31:35 PM PDT by July 4th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConsistentLibertarian
Both.
11 posted on 09/26/2001 7:32:10 PM PDT by Keyes For President
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: baasheeple
intern camps can be humane.

And a lot of fun, too. Bubba has already volunteered to be a warden.

12 posted on 09/26/2001 7:34:14 PM PDT by longleaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Keyes For President
Clarification please: "(1) Muslim immigrants who agree to spy on the millions of Muslim citizens unaffected by the deportation order can stay;" Those who agree would be agents of the State. Do we want the government spying on citizens just because they have particular religious beliefs?
13 posted on 09/26/2001 7:35:07 PM PDT by ConsistentLibertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Keyes For President
Crack.... and its outta the park!!! We Win,We Win.
14 posted on 09/26/2001 7:35:07 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #15 Removed by Moderator

To: harpo11
:
16 posted on 09/26/2001 7:35:54 PM PDT by Sans-Culotte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Keyes For President
You mean, she meant both? Freepers have been insisting that anyone who reads her stuff knows she doesn't always mean what she says. It's hard to know what to think when people who seem to know her work have conflicting views on such a basic point.
17 posted on 09/26/2001 7:37:53 PM PDT by ConsistentLibertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Keyes For President
When the Sears Tower is attacked, the president is assassinated, St. Patrick's Cathedral is vaporized, anthrax is released in the subway systems or Disneyland is nuked, remember: Congress could have stopped it, but didn't.

On the one hand, it seems she's ghoulishly listing nightmare scenarios so that later she can say she told us so. On the other hand, each of these things is at least possible.

Yikes.

18 posted on 09/26/2001 7:38:33 PM PDT by Petronski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConsistentLibertarian
Do we want the government spying on citizens just because they have particular religious beliefs?

If the government asks these people to keep their eyes and ears open in their community and let authorities know if they hear any terrorists plots--yes.

19 posted on 09/26/2001 7:41:28 PM PDT by Keyes For President
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Trog
I'm of the opinion the Constitution guarantees (or used to guarantee) the rights of citizens.

Sadly, you are wrong. The operative language in the Constitution refers to 'persons' and the caselaw on the subject makes it clear that anyone inside the limit of territorial waters has at least some rights under the law.

20 posted on 09/26/2001 7:41:33 PM PDT by Petronski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-188 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson