Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Refugees Get New Scrutiny Single men given extra attention in rigorous screening
New York Daily News ^ | September 28, 2001 | ROBERT INGRASSIA

Posted on 09/28/2001 2:09:13 AM PDT by sarcasm

ederal officials are taking a keen interest in refugees entering the U.S. from Afghanistan in an effort to make sure none of them are terrorists.Since the Sept. 11 attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon, hundreds of Afghan refugees have entered the country, including more than 150 who arrived at JFK on a single plane last week.

FBI agents and Immigration and Naturalization Service investigators have been interviewing the refugees, paying particular attention to single men.

"The INS and other federal agencies are watching very closely," said Andy Bruce, chief of mission for the International Organization for Migration, the agency that transported the Afghan refugees from Pakistan.

The questioning adds a final hurdle to an already arduous screening process that refugees undergo before being allowed into the U.S.

The Afghan refugees who arrived last week applied for entry into the U.S. months or, in some cases, years ago. Many left Afghanistan to escape persecution by the Taliban, the fundamentalist Islamic regime that rules the country.

Like the more than 2,200 Afghan refugees who have entered the United States during the past year, the new arrivals come from refugee camps in Pakistan. With the help of nonprofit aid groups, they have settled in homes across the country.

The resettlement process begins at the Pakistani camps, where officials from the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees interview Afghans who say they are refugees.

According to the Geneva Convention and other international accord standards, people who flee their homeland and can prove they were persecuted for their race, religious beliefs or political views can be considered refugees.

A Lengthy Grilling

"It's not enough to say, 'I disagree with the Taliban and I want to leave and go to the United States,'" said Panos Moumtzis, a spokesman for the UN agency. "It's quite a lengthy process."

UN officials, working with relief organizations, prepare case files on each applicant. They cross-examine family members and investigate an applicant's background, rejecting anyone with a criminal background or ties to violent groups.

The files are turned over to the INS, which has final say over which people the U.S. would accept as refugees.

People who are deemed refugees still face long odds in their quest to get to the U.S. Each year, about 23 million refugees worldwide seek haven in this country. This year, the U.S. is accepting a maximum of 80,000 refugees.

Despite the rigorous screening, not everyone is convinced that officials have excluded all the so-called sleeper terrorists, who live law-abiding lives for months or years before carrying out attacks.

Breezing Through JFK

An INS inspector at JFK phoned the Daily News yesterday to warn that Afghan refugees don't face much scrutiny at JFK when they arrive from Pakistan.

"We have no way of knowing who these folks are," said the inspector, who asked that he not be identified. "And this is a war?"

Federal investigators do not suspect that any of the 19 terrorists who hijacked the planes used as suicide bombs against New York City and Washington entered the U.S. as refugees. Some of the men used student or tourist visas, which, says Moumtzis, is a much easier way to gain entry.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
Since the Sept. 11 attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon, hundreds of Afghan refugees have entered the country, including more than 150 who arrived at JFK on a single plane last week.

Insanity.

1 posted on 09/28/2001 2:09:13 AM PDT by sarcasm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sarcasm

"Insanity."

That it is. The real insanity is that we continue to play the open border, easy access game. The enemy (I prefer that to the term 'terrorist' now) knows that, and is obviously taking full advantage of it.

Despite the 'tighter security' - 150 arrived, knowing full well that more than likely, most of them will be waved on into the country - despite some minor inconveniences.

2 posted on 09/28/2001 2:24:04 AM PDT by Ron C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
Declare a moratorium. Do not accept any Afghanis for 5 years.
3 posted on 09/28/2001 2:24:36 AM PDT by rebdov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
UN officials, working with relief organizations, prepare case files on each applicant. They cross-examine family members and investigate an applicant's background, rejecting anyone with a criminal background or ties to violent groups.

It seems to me that any "background" checks they may do are worthless unless they fingerprint them and take photographs of them as well. These people should be shipped back to the middle east somewhere....

The scrolling newswire on CNN said that some of the terrorists could try to infect themselves with contagious diseases and try to spread it around the US. Do they check refugees for diseases?

4 posted on 09/28/2001 2:28:36 AM PDT by Born in a Rage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Born in a Rage
It seems to me that any "background" checks they may do are worthless unless they fingerprint them and take photographs of them as well.

I wouldn't trust any background check done by the UN.

5 posted on 09/28/2001 2:34:21 AM PDT by sarcasm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: sarcasm
I keep posting the need to be protesting at INS and State Department to draw attention to this continuing mess. Another article says 3/4 of American's in favor of tightening the borders. It certainly would be a protest with American's support.
7 posted on 09/28/2001 3:50:15 AM PDT by not-an-ostrich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
This is indeed insanity. Our government continues to steadfastly refuse to take the single most effective step to protect American lives -- by controlling our borders -- while at the same time waging a campaign to get us back on airplanes and to spend more money in the name of patriotism! And this is being done in the face of public opinion polls stating that 75 percent of American want to control our borders!

Well I for one am waging a personal campaign -- I will not spend once cent on any item not vital for daily life until this government starts doing its job and controlling our borders (and that includes deporting all people here illegally). We obviously cannot depend on the ruling elites to protect us. Remember, on Sept 11th the only people to save lives were ordinary Americans on Flight 93, not the government. Not all the billions we have spent on government/defense/security over the past decades bought us one saved life. It was only average people seeing their duty and doing it, at the sacrifice of their own lives. Our "so-called" leaders have made it clear that they have no interest in controlling our borders even in the face of this threat, therefore "we the people" will have to demand they do it.

Call it a national strike for sanity in immigration policy. Since the ruling elites seem to care more about the gross national product that our very lives, lets stall the economy until we see a change in immigration policy --

Let's Roll!

8 posted on 09/28/2001 4:59:40 AM PDT by politeia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
Bump
9 posted on 09/28/2001 5:42:58 AM PDT by politeia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw, Franklin1776,Joe Hadenuf, t-shirt, mercuria,Brownie74, Bikers4Bush, FITZ,blam, madrussian,
ping
10 posted on 09/28/2001 3:38:15 PM PDT by sarcasm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: dennisw, Franklin1776,Joe Hadenuf, t-shirt, mercuria,Brownie74, Bikers4Bush, FITZ,blam, madrussian,
ping
11 posted on 09/28/2001 3:38:20 PM PDT by sarcasm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
One must be a good liar and belong to a special ethnic group to become a "refugee". All the "refugees" I've seen in the US have been just regular folks who were lucky enough to get the status.
12 posted on 09/28/2001 3:42:15 PM PDT by madrussian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
Federal officials are taking a keen interest in refugees entering the U.S. from Afghanistan in an effort to make sure none of them are terrorists.Since the Sept. 11 attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon, hundreds of Afghan refugees have entered the country, including more than 150 who arrived at JFK on a single plane last week.

Finally - after the attacks on the WTC and Pentagon and the loss of 7000+ lives, our federal officials are taking a keen interest in refugees entering the U.S.

I am so encouraged!! You knew this was going to happen. I knew this was going to happen. Now the Federales have finally figured it out.

Y'all keep a keen interest now ya hear?

/rant /sarcasm

13 posted on 09/28/2001 4:13:02 PM PDT by Brownie74
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
I would take ZERO refugees from Islamic nations territories zones ratholes etc. Allah will provide. Let the Islamic world sort it all out by themselves. We get zip from them.
14 posted on 09/28/2001 4:26:39 PM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
This is outrageous. Damn, close the door!
15 posted on 09/28/2001 4:35:29 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm ... insanity ...
... and OUTRAGE!!

Same as it ever was with the INS...WTF???

16 posted on 09/28/2001 9:54:59 PM PDT by Mercuria
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ron C.
Why would single Afghan men come to this country? Why don’t they go back and fight to free their own country and build up a good government and nation? Why are we taking in men who won’t fight for the freedom of their own country, when the rest of us Americans would die for the freedom of our country? Those cowards sure as hell won’t fight for us. And what’s this thing about all the hijackers being single men? That’s a little odd, isn’t it? And why do so many Arabs in the Arabian countries make slaves out of their women? What’s their problem?
17 posted on 09/28/2001 10:10:01 PM PDT by Fred25
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Fred25

"What’s their problem?"

Brainwashing with false and irrational religious drivel, my guess.

They think they are doing some good, yet know nothing of legitimate human good.

18 posted on 09/28/2001 10:55:07 PM PDT by Ron C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
ping
19 posted on 09/30/2001 6:53:39 AM PDT by sarcasm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
This is an outrage. You can bet that the Taliban and other extremist groups are using this window of opportunity to smuggle in as many sleepers as they can. I would not be surprised at all if they came in with families. After all, their families would be safer here than over there. Giving "single men" extra scrutiny isn't going to do it. These are extraordinary times and we must refuse ALL immigrants of Middle Eastern and Afghan descent until we get a handle on this terrorism.
20 posted on 09/30/2001 7:02:08 AM PDT by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson