Skip to comments.
GAO Report: Military and Overseas Ballots 4 Times More Likely to Be Thrown Out in 2000
AP ^
| 9/28/01
| Nedra Pickler
Posted on 09/28/2001 6:36:05 PM PDT by Jean S
WASHINGTON (AP) - U.S. military personnel and Americans living overseas were more than four times as likely to have their ballots thrown out than were domestic civilian voters, according to a report by congressional investigators released Friday.
The General Accounting Office was asked to look into balloting by 2.7 million military members and their dependents and 3.9 million citizens living overseas after last fall's Florida recount in the presidential election revealed a myriad of voting problems.
The GAO estimated through a telephone survey of county officials nationwide that 8.1 percent of military and overseas ballots were thrown out in counties with less than 60,000 residents. Not enough large counties responded to make a national estimate, but investigators found a similar pattern among those that did.
By comparison, about 1.8 percent of ballots cast by civilians living in the United States were disqualified.
During the Florida recount that led to President Bush's victory, election officials rejected hundreds of ballots cast by military personnel living overseas, many because they lacked postmarks or signatures. Critics said it was unconscionable that the votes of people who serve their country were disqualified for such infractions.
"We must make every effort to ensure that military members have a meaningful opportunity to vote and that every properly cast ballot is counted," said Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Carl Levin, D-Mich., who was among several lawmakers who asked the GAO to investigate.
The GAO recommended that the State Department improve its oversight of its voting assistance program for citizens living overseas. It also recommended that the Defense Department provide more trained voting assistance officers at bases.
The report found some bases had officers who explained the absentee voting process to newcomers, held voter registration events and passed out voting materials as the deadline approached. But other bases did not have enough absentee ballots or a voting assistance officer, as required by the Defense Department. And some voting assistance officers were not aware of key department requirements for voting, even though they are supposed to be trained under department policy.
The Defense and State departments agreed with the overall findings of the report and noted they already have taken steps to improve their voting assistance programs.
Florida changed its law after the election so that postmarks no longer are required. Voters simply must write the date they filled out the ballot and include a witness' signature for verification.
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
1
posted on
09/28/2001 6:36:05 PM PDT
by
Jean S
To: JeanS
I dare Algore to run again. I DOUBLE DOG dare him!
2
posted on
09/28/2001 6:38:43 PM PDT
by
MamaLucci
To: JeanS
Never again.
To: TLBSHOW
FYI
4
posted on
09/28/2001 6:39:13 PM PDT
by
Jean S
To: JeanS
The reason for the missing military vote:
To: JeanS
Little wonder those media outlets that have been "reviewing" the Florida votes have suddenly decided to hold off on publicizing their findings.
To: white rose
Little wonder those media outlets that have been "reviewing" the Florida votes have suddenly decided to hold off on publicizing their findings. They haven't got the guts. We should be pushing them every day to put up or shut up.
7
posted on
09/28/2001 6:45:06 PM PDT
by
jackbill
To: white rose
No joke. The news media services that swore up and down 8 months ago how they were going to conduct a rigorous investigation to show exactly how GW stole the election and how Gore actually got more votes have been dead silent ever since mid-March.
To: jackbill
They say it has been fixed, how has it been fixed and when?
To: Diogenesis
Don't forget that Bill Clinton by EO closed the polling places at US Military installations meaning that even US based service folks would have to vote absentee. Prior to this election the House passed a bill that would re-open the polling stations on military bases in this country and Senator Tom D'Aschole, SD, burried the bill so that it would not come to a vote in the Senate before the election.
10
posted on
09/28/2001 6:49:12 PM PDT
by
ImpBill
To: Hillary 666
Believe it or not, this latest count was of the votes REJECTED by the machines. The entire exercise was futile.
To: white rose
Tell this ALL to Conservative and GOP voters who are willing to vote for PUKE FAKE Warner in Va.... What a shame,,,,, after all this, GOP voters want WARNER..................., He is a RAT whose party ( RAT) gives a RAT a$$$$$$$$ on the armed forces.Shame on VA voters who plan to reward the DNC, by electing a fake conservative RAT as Governor...:---( while our Armed Forces are fighting for freedom:(
12
posted on
09/28/2001 6:53:28 PM PDT
by
KQQL
To: MamaLucci, JeanS
Imagine if this SOB was the POTUS right now. Mindboggling.
13
posted on
09/28/2001 6:55:22 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: Howlin
To think of that makes me sick. The right man is in place.
14
posted on
09/28/2001 6:58:15 PM PDT
by
swheats
To: ImpBill
incredible. but believeable given them.
To: ImpBill, Yellow Rose of Texas
Flagged for recurrent attention over the next 13 months. Can we count on you guys? Never forget.
16
posted on
09/28/2001 7:06:03 PM PDT
by
GopherIt
To: Diogenesis
Somebody better post a picture of this guy in a turban...
17
posted on
09/28/2001 7:08:07 PM PDT
by
xm177e2
To: Howlin
Imagine if this SOB was the POTUS right now.
Howlin...I simply cannot even GO there. By the skin of our teeth, we dodged a bullet.
To: Howlin
Can you immagine the morale in the military if Gore was president when this report came out?
19
posted on
09/28/2001 7:08:20 PM PDT
by
Jean S
To: ImpBill
Wow.......
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson