Posted on 09/29/2001 5:04:20 PM PDT by remaininlight
Immigration Reform Prophets vs. The Treason Lobby - Sam Francis if (self != top) top.location.href = location.href;
Immigration Reform Prophets vs. The Treason LobbyBy Sam Francis While the open borders lobbywhich now perhaps should more appropriately be known simply as the "Treason Lobby" has for years ignored, sneered at and denounced as "racists" and "xenophobes" anyone who warned of the consequences of mass immigration, some of those consequences became agonizingly clear on Sept. 11. Yet for years prior to the atrocities committed that day, critics of mass immigration and advocates of immigration restriction have argued that uncontrolled immigration would lead to precisely what it led to. Here are some quotations from out of the past to support that claim: "... in recent years our lack of border and immigration security has led to the development of serious national vulnerabilities.... The massive influx of immigrants and refugees into the United States thus represents an opportunity for foreign terrorists, for domestic extremists, and for hostile foreign powers to destabilize this country." Palmer Stacy and Samuel Francis, "Lax ImmigrationThreat to Internal Security," in American Security Council's Washington Report, April, 1982. "Our poorly guarded borders and lax visa, asylee and refugee policies provide inviting opportunities for terrorists, as well as other criminals."Wayne Lutton and John Tanton, The Immigration Invasion, 1994. "The Detroit Metro area has the largest Mid-East population on the globe outside of the Mid-East.... Terrorism experts indicate that Canada has become an assembly point for potential terrorists seeking U.S. targets.... During the Gulf War the Detroit Border Patrol was in a high state of security. We received intelligence almost daily of potential terrorist smuggling efforts from Canada in our area of operation."Mark P. Hall, president of Local 2499 of the National Border Patrol Council, Testimony on Northern Border Security before House Immigration Subcommittee, April 14, 1999. "One of the most dangerous threats to our national security is the risk of a terrorist crossing our Northern Border undetected. This happened in 1997 when Gazi Ibrahim Abu Mezer crossed the Northern Border and attempted to blow up the New York subway system.... Since 1995, there have been at least thirteen other cases of terrorists crossing the border from Canada, two in Blaine, Washington, alone." Rep. Lamar Smith, chairman, House Immigration Subcommittee, April 14, 1999. The list of quotes could go on and on, but these are among the clearest and most succinct warnings about what should have been a major security problem obvious to everyone. It wasn'tbecause the Treason Lobby consistently denied the threats and succeeded in massaging the rest of the country into denial also. Last year, when Michigan Sen. Spencer Abraham was opposing measures that made the tracking of foreign terrorists who had gained entry to the country easier for federal authorities, the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) sponsored ads against the senator asking, "Why is Senator Spencer Abraham trying to make it easier for terrorists like Osama bin Laden to export their war of terror to any city street in America?" Mr. Abraham responded by denouncing FAIR as a "hate group," and Treason Lobby ideologue Paul Gigot called the group "racist" in his Wall Street Journal column. No recognition of the need for enhanced security at any border was acknowledged. Aside from the security problems of false passports, easily obtained visas, expired visas, lack of adequate tracking and the absence of interior enforcement of immigration laws by the Immigration and Naturalization Service, the larger problem caused by mass immigration is the evolution of alien subcultures within the country that serve as safe havens and alternative social structures in which terrorists (as well as criminals and drug dealers) can live, hide, move and operate. Such counter-cultures are one of the toughest anti-terrorist nuts for law enforcement and intelligence services to crack. The Washington Post reports that the FBI is poorly equipped to counter the terrorist threats that mass immigration has created. "Boxes of evidence have piled up in previous terrorist plots, but the FBI has not had translators to decipher them. It lacks Arab agents who can penetrate terrorist cells and has too few veterans who see connections among foreign suspects and far-flung sites." It's precisely cultural "diversity" that creates such problems, but they're not peculiar to Arab and Muslim subcultures. There are similar communities in this country from Latin America, Africa and Asia, and each has imported its ethnic quarrels and hatreds and cultural and linguistic barriers. These are the real results of the "diversity" the Treason Lobby has chirped about for so long. There's no sign they've learned anything or have any intention of shutting up, but it's time Americans started ignoring them and began paying attention to those who saw where the Treason Lobby's treachery was really leading. COPYRIGHT 2001 CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.
September 27, 2001 |
Or as Jorge Bush said of the Clinton mess when he took office---It's time we move on!!
Lets round 'em up, deport 'em, and seal the stupid border!!
Of course they were. They entered legally but then flouted the law as far as the duration of their visa. Or they came in on a student visa and never went to school. This is illegal and they then become illegal aliens. Roughly 40% of our illegal aliens are people who enter legally but overstay which makes them illegal aliens. Most of the remaining 60% were never legal. They just crashed our borders.
If we really want some Mexican lettuce pickers here then make them the first to be forced to have a national ID and be super strict about them only being temporary guest workers. Let them be vetted as much as those at airports.
Similarly, Sen. Christopher S. Bond (R-Mo.) said schools should be held more accountable for foreign students they sponsor who may violate the terms of their visas.
CLICK HERE FOR REST OF LOS ANGELES TIMES STORY "Foreign Students Scrutinized"
It's abut time someone did something
Let's see how the Feinstiens of this world behave 6 months from now
Let's see how the Feinstiens of this world behave 6 months from now
No system for tracking
Once a visitor is allowed into the United States for a temporary stay, there is no reliable system for tracking whether
they have left as scheduled.
That would not be that hard to correct. Credit cards have shown us the way. Simply issue a card that can be scanned with the
departure date programed into it. When they leave the card is scanned and they are credited with leaving. The data base
could show any card that hasn't been turned in by the departure date. Problem solved as to tracking overstays. Second,
anyone who doesn't leave in a timely manner should then be rounded up and deported. If it is a second offense then give them
some jail time first to discourage such actions.
The Immigration and Naturalization Service has no system for the timely monitoring of whether foreign students or
workers admitted to the United States have even shown up at the schools or workplaces named in their visas, much
less what they are studying or doing on the job.
This problem to shouldn't be that hard to monitor. These people don't just show up and say I want to go to school or I want a
job. They have mad prior arrangements for this. Make it incumbent on the school or the employer to report anyone who
doesn't show up. We are talking about aliens here after all. The same card that tracks whether they leave or not could be used as proof they showed up at the school or job they were scheduled to show up at.
None of this in any way limits the freedoms of American citizens but would limit aliens to the activities they came here for.
We are in a computer age, lets use them for more than video games.
When our government gets serious about controlling our borders it will be done. When profits are second to national security it will be done.
The ball is in the governments court, lets see what they do with it. We will see where the priority's are won't we?
WarHawk42
You are wrong. I'm not "still" defending them, I'm just beginning to defend them, apparently.
The way I read the article, the authur athur arturh writer is saying that mass immigration is bad because some of the immigrants are going to be terrorists.
Well, I can agree with that. But how do we decide how much immigration we should have? Should it be based on the unemployment numbers? If aculturation is the criteria, how do we measure the rate or level of aculteration?
In any event, sealing our borders is impractical if not impossible. The only other way to enforce immigration laws is with random checkpoints in every city to check if each person's papers are in order. Maybe laptops that get downloaded each day with everyone's name and ID number along with their citizen/resident/tourist status.
Perhaps we could implant ID numbers in everyone's skull that could be scanned at all elevators, grocery stores, etc...
Our current crop of "conservative leaders" worship Ted Kennedy's and LBJ's 1965 Immigration Law. That's the one they're defending like a pack of pitbulls. It's Dubya who appointed deposed Sen. Spencer Abraham, R-Middle East & Open Borders, to his Cabinet- and until Abraham's sent packing I don't expect anything of substance to be done. I will take more horrors on the scale of 9-11 to arouse the public to demand that something be done about our casual ideas on immigration, asylees, etc.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.