Skip to comments.
Fight yes, number no
WorldNetDaily ^
| 10/01/2001
| Joseph Farah
Posted on 10/01/2001 12:49:21 PM PDT by sheltonmac
Fight yes, number no
By Joseph Farah
© 2000 WorldNetDaily.com--> © 2001 WorldNetDaily.com
It was predictable that, with the advent of the devastating terror attack on America, there would be moves by Washington to encroach on our unalienable rights.
I know this is war, so to speak (even though it hasn't been declared which is more than a technicality), but Americans must not yield to the temptation in this crisis to give the federal government everything it demands without question.
The proposal to rush forward with a national identification number is one such proposal that should be rejected out of hand, unequivocally, without a second thought.
Perhaps we need some reminders why:
- The federal government has, in fact, utilized with reckless abandon a numbering system for all Americans. It's called the Social Security number. It wasn't designed to be a form of national ID, but it has certainly evolved into one. Despite that numbering system, the federal government with all of its vast resources, intelligence agencies, police forces, databases, eavesdropping capabilities and enforcement capacity, still allowed four airliners to be hijacked and crashed Sept. 11 three of them into the World Trade Center and Pentagon. Does anyone really believe that a better numbering system would have prevented such a disaster?
- This is the same federal government that has abdicated its legitimate authority to police our borders to ensure that, among other things, terrorists don't walk or drive into our country undetected.
- This is the same federal government that ignored, or failed to heed, countless warnings about a major terrorist action planned for the general time frame of the Sept. 11 attacks.
- This is the same federal government that covered up yes, deliberately covered up strong evidence of previous terrorist involvement in the Oklahoma City federal building bombing and the downing of TWA Flight 800.
- This is the same federal government that is ignoring the history of terrorist activity of many international groups and individuals committed prior to Sept. 11 in its attempt to build a broad coalition against the perpetrators of the latest attack.
- This is the same federal government that has failed to build a missile-defense system for the last 15 years another legitimate step in protecting the lives of citizens from a future foreign attack some believe is as inevitable as the attacks on the World Trade Center.
- This is the same federal government that sent many millions of dollars to the Afghan Taliban regime a month before the attacks.
- This is the same federal government that sends aid to Yasser Arafat's Palestinian Authority a group with the longest track record of international terrorist acts and one that is directly implicated in the murders of U.S. diplomats and other Americans.
- This is the same federal government that has failed to require sensible security measures on airliners such as locked cabin doors, armed crews and sky marshals.
- This is the same federal government that urges allies, such as Israel, to repatriate terrorists, negotiate with them, sign meaningless peace pacts with them and compromise their security in efforts to improve relations with their sponsors.
- This is the same federal government that has systematically disarmed the American people and now preaches about the need for "homeland security." The best form of homeland security is an armed and vigilant populace. Always has been, always will be.
- This is the same federal government that has spread its weakened military forces thinly throughout the world in an endless array of never-ending peace-keeping engagements and left the homeland undefended.
When Washington reviews and corrects some of its missteps of the past, then it might have a case to come to the American people for more authority, more power, more self-sacrifice.
Let's be realistic. The government is not very good at protecting us and our rights. It has an abysmal track record. The government does very little well and efficiently. One thing it can do, through military force, is to wreak havoc on enemies. That's where I am all for the federal government mobilizing maximum force and resources against the terrorists and their sponsors.
You'll find me waving the flag, paying my taxes eagerly and praising our elected leaders when those responsible for attacking Americans are dead, destroyed, vaporized, kaput. But, please, don't ask me to get behind the building of a police state in America. It won't work. It won't deter terrorism. It is counterproductive. It is wrong. It is immoral. It is unconstitutional.
Let's bring the war to the enemy not victimize the American people, again, for what could accurately be characterized as a failure of government to perform its most vital mission: protecting its citizens.
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
To: Inspector Harry Callahan; Snuffington; Greg 4TCP; Loopy; ouroboros; cva66snipe; Askel5; ppaul; kidd
.
To: JohnHuang2; sauropod; RaceBannon; GeronL; Mercuria; Ricardo4CP; sola gracia; Dawntreader; calypgin
.
To: Benighted; WarHawk42; satadru; manumission; Rowdee; A+Bert; Uriel1975; JonathanG; Ted; AnnaZ
.
To: MSSC6644; Okiereddust; George Frm Br00klyn Park; ServesURight; 11th Earl of Mar; tberry; MVV
.
To: bayourod; Keyesertarian; don-o; Uncle Sham; Jolly Rodgers; tpaine; JoeGar; t-shirt; Darth Sidious
.
To: logician2u; Demidog; enemy of the people; Linda Liberty; Extremely Extreme Extremist; LibertyBelt
.
To: rb22982; A.J.Armitage; Derville; Mike2Right; shuckmaster; skunkworks; Who is John Galt?; tex-oma
.
To: The_Eaglet; ReformedBeckite; another1; ashrad; c-b; jgrubbs; Eagle Eye; electron1; far rightist
.
To: sheltonmac
As Farah points out, we already have a national ID system in place with SSN.
So if we already live under the burden, why not get some advantages out of a national ID system? We've already got the downside of this, lets get a bit of upside.
As it is, we can't get a handle on illegal aliens here in Arizona. An ID card would help. As long as it is possible for these people to sneek in here in massive droves, then the Terrorists will come too.
Until 9/11, I was against an ID as well. And I know all the quotes about "trading liberty for security", so no one needs to respond to me about that.
But we've already traded the liberty years ago. Let's just get some security out of it too.
10
posted on
10/01/2001 1:02:42 PM PDT
by
narby
Comment #11 Removed by Moderator
To: narby
Let's just get some security out of it too. I'm still baffled about how exactly we could derive any kind of security out of a national ID. In what way would it prevent the acts of the terrorists culminating on 9/11?
Comment #13 Removed by Moderator
To: narby
we already have a national ID system in place with SSN. Then this National ID would be redundant and useless. Of course the National ID card will not merely duplicate the SS#. It is proposed to be a 'Smart Card', with an imbedded microchip. It is supposed to be integrated and interactive with numerous object oriented databases. It could and would quickly compile dossiers on the most personal details: purchases, travel/movement, associations, etc
All retail sales would require presentation of the card, akin to preferred customer cards. No card: no food, no water, no gasoline, nothing. Not so with SS#.
As it stands, driver's licenses are not required, they are voluntary. You can live your entire life without one if you so choose. Unless you are driving, you don't have to present one upon demand. Not so with a National ID. It could and would be required to be carried at all times, failure to comply will be literally the equivalent of not having 'Your Papers In Order'. Not carrying it would be an infraction in and of itself. As opposed to driver's licenses which give permission to drive, National ID's would be required as permission to merely exist. The difference may be lost to many but it is extremely profound.
why not get some advantages out of a national ID system? We've already got the downside of this, lets get a bit of upside.
Maybe you could explain these advantages. What are they, exactly? How would they have stopped the attacks? How would they prevent future ones? How exactly, by specifically what mechanism?
In reality, these National ID's would only give employment to forgers, and be used to harass and spy on innocent people. Not to mention the incredible division they would cause between Americans, something we don't need now.
14
posted on
10/01/2001 1:21:42 PM PDT
by
freeeee
Comment #15 Removed by Moderator
To: sheltonmac
How about a citizenship endorsement on one's driver's license? It might also include non-felon endorsement, so that you could buy a gun simply by flashing it (no records kept.)
If you have it, you go in the fast line at security, and are less scrutinized, and allowed to carry the means for your self defense. You are allowed to travel domestically without your info being recorded.
To: sheltonmac
Okiereddust was sacked some time ago.
To: freeeee
National ID's would be required as permission to merely exist I Am Not Inventory Bump
To: sheltonmac
Well said!
To: tex-oma
I have yet to see anyone even attempt to answer that question. That's why I keep asking it.
20
posted on
10/01/2001 1:39:46 PM PDT
by
freeeee
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson