Posted on 10/09/2001 1:09:04 PM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
WASHINGTON -- A family that wanted to swim and sunbathe naked together at a public beach lost a free-speech appeal in the Supreme Court on Tuesday.
The court, without comment, declined to review a court decision that allowed authorities near Austin, Texas, to ban nudity for children in a lakeside park called Hippie Hollow, and prosecute adults who appeared naked in the presence of children there. The ban was intended to protect children from sexual predators.
Robert and Christine Morton and their three children describe themselves as naturists who have wholesome attitudes about the human body. Appearing naked as a family, in public, is essential to the naturist philosophy, the Mortons claim.
Their parental rights and their rights to free expression under the First Amendment were violated by a 1995 change in the rules for Hippie Hollow, the Mortons' lawsuit said.
The Mortons asked the Supreme Court to consider whether the family's right to express their values together should trump Travis County's view that children under 18 should neither be displayed nude nor exposed to adult nudity.
In previous rulings the high court has made it easier for cities to ban nudity in some instances, but also have found that nudity combined with some activity can be considered expression under the First Amendment.
Last year, the high court ruled that in the interest of reducing crime a city can require nude dancers to be less than nude, even though dancers claimed pasties and a G-string restricted their freedom of expression.
The Lower Colorado River Authority, which owns the park, and Travis County, which leases and operates it, have said they want to keep children out of the park to protect them from sexual predators.
A midlevel state appellate court ruled against the Mortons and Central Texas Nudists last year, and the state Supreme Court declined to hear the case.
The appeals court said nudity, including family nudity, was not unduly restricted by the park rules, because the family could simply go somewhere else. Hippie Hollow, formally known as McGregor Park, did not change its rules allowing adults to go without clothing if they chose.
The Mortons noted that Hippie Hollow is the state's only public nudist park.
The case is Central Texas Nudists v. Travis County, 01-214.
Appearing naked as a family, in public, is essential to the naturist philosophy, the Mortons claim.
What a bunch of nuts.
I'm surprised that you of all people would say this, because upon reflection you will probably recall that nude beaches tend to be full of people who shouldn't even be allowed to be nude in the privacy of their own home.
The primary argument to be made is an aesthetic one. :)
It's not the kids the Court was worried about.
What's the matter with kids today, wanting to go to the park. It's not right.
Just call it like you see it!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.