Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Delta IV Rockets Have New Pad
dailynews.yahoo.com ^ | October 9, 2001 | WESH NewsChannel2000.com

Posted on 10/09/2001 1:56:00 PM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife

A brand new launch pad was dedicated Tuesday in a ceremony attended by several dignitaries. Many involved in U.S. military operations depend on satellites launched from the Space Coast to guide them in these difficult times.

That is why the new launch complex at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station is so vital.

Launch Complex 37 was an impressive sight as a Delta IV rocket sat on its pad.

The tower is 32-stories tall, much taller than the traditional launch pad.

Located near the launch pad is the new horizontal-integration building. Representatives of the Air Force station said that it is the first of its kind. In the building, rockets are laid on their side as they are being prepared for launch. The close proximity to the launch pad allows crews to quickly get the rocket up and launched.

The launch pad and horizontal-integration building represent a major upgrade at the Cape Canaveral Air Force Station at a time when military bases are getting a higher priority.

The whole project was developed in just four years. The Delta IV is as big around as the giant Saturn V moon rockets, but it will not be as tall. It is designed to reduce the cost of putting payloads into space by 25 percent and it will have the first American-built rocket engine in 28 years.

The dedication of the launch pad comes at a time when the military is trying to make more use of space in the future, as the secretary of the Air Force said at the ceremonies Tuesday.

"We will be increasingly making use of space to help us monitor a whole world. And the fact that you are able to produce these launch vehicles at a much lower cost will enable us to buy these services and will enable us to think more about putting things into space," Air Force Secretary Dr. James Roche said.

Boeing is the builder of the Delta IV and will be using it at first for military launches, but is also selling commercial launches.

The first launch of the Delta IV is scheduled for next April.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Pentagon Report Calls for the United States Control of Space

China Plans to Send Probe to Moon

1 posted on 10/09/2001 1:56:00 PM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Boeing Delta IV Family
2 posted on 10/09/2001 2:05:21 PM PDT by snopercod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
I wonder where they build this dude; anything that big would have to be barged in like the Space Shuttle External Tank.
3 posted on 10/09/2001 2:09:21 PM PDT by Ben Hecks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
Nice rocket!!
4 posted on 10/09/2001 2:11:03 PM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ben Hecks
Sept. 26, 2001 News Release : HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIF. Sept. 25, 2001 - The first stage of the Boeing Delta IV is on its way to Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, Fla., in preparation for its first launch. On Tuesday, the first stage - also referred to as the common booster core (CBC) - was rolled out of the Delta Launch Vehicle Factory in Decatur, Ala. The Delta IV is heading to Space Launch Complex 37 riding aboard the M/V Delta Mariner.


5 posted on 10/09/2001 2:14:23 PM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
I'm wallowing in my confusion again. I thought the max payload capability of a Saturn V was 120+ tons. The Delta IV is lifting 15 tons? Even the shuttle can lift 22 tons. When do we catch up to the '60's?
6 posted on 10/09/2001 2:15:25 PM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: &amp;amp;lt;1/1,000,000th%
When do we catch up to the '60's?

The Shuttle system can actually launch 250,000 lb into LEO -- of which ~200,000 lb is the Shuttle itself.

As for the Delta IV capacity -- that's a function of what people want to launch. For the moment, there's no demand to lauch Saturn-sized payloads.

Note, however, that the EELV program (which includes the Delta IV and Atlas V) also has a "heavy" variant which has more payload capacity than this one. There was also a "light" variant which was cancelled, as it was not significantly different from the current Delta II and Atlas varieties.

Finally, Boeing also builds the Delta III.

7 posted on 10/09/2001 2:21:22 PM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
The Shuttle system can actually launch 250,000 lb into LEO -- of which ~200,000 lb is the Shuttle itself.

True but so what? Should we count the empty SII stage?
NASA67-95

8 posted on 10/09/2001 2:27:53 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: &amp;amp;lt;1/1,000,000th%
As to why the Delta IV is large compared to its throw weight, the key is knowing the fuel is hydrogen. The Saturn used kerosene [special blend for rockets]. The difference is that hydrogen has much less density than kerosene, and needs a bigger tank. It is more efficient overall to use hydrogen, but the rocket must be larger. Delta IV will not add to the atmospheric CO2 load, since the exhaust is nothing but water vapor.
9 posted on 10/09/2001 2:30:25 PM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: r9etb bump
Bump!
10 posted on 10/09/2001 2:51:39 PM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Thanks! You answered my question - great photo. I would guess that it stays on the KMAG transporter until it gets to the processing facility at the launch site.
11 posted on 10/09/2001 2:59:41 PM PDT by Ben Hecks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: John Jamieson
True but so what? Should we count the empty SII stage?

Just a FWIW for now, until somebody decides to resurrect the "Shuttle-C" concept -- basically replacing the Shuttle structure with a big shroud with an aft propulsion module. The payload for that would be something on the order of 100 tons.

The idea was dropped about 1990 or so due to insufficient demand. Still, it would be a relatively straightforward conversion should the occasion ever arise.

12 posted on 10/09/2001 3:05:38 PM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
I think we are all adding to the C02 load. What about the tons of Hydrocloric acid from those strapons?
13 posted on 10/09/2001 3:26:47 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
I understand your response but one of the reasons the International Space Station had to be built in smaller modules was the lack of lift capacity. It looks more to me like there is an absence of lift supply rather than demand.

(And what about the rocket to Mars?)

14 posted on 10/09/2001 3:54:58 PM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: &amp;amp;lt;1/1,000,000th%
Plenty of supply at $10,000 a pound or better.
15 posted on 10/10/2001 3:39:51 AM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson