Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Osama's Endgame
Time.com ^ | 15 October, 2001 | LISA BEYER

Posted on 10/10/2001 4:30:59 PM PDT by anapikoros

His aims are clear--to expel the U.S. from the Islamic world and unite Muslims in one empire

There is a word that gets attached to elusive international villains. The word is shadowy. Carlos the Jackal was shadowy. Abu Nidal was shadowy. One of the novelties of Osama bin Laden is that he is hardly shadowy at all. There is little mystery about bin Laden's life except his precise whereabouts now. For a terrorist ringleader, he has given a remarkable number of interviews. He has even played host at a press conference. Bin Laden has talked articulately about his history, his outlook, his strategy to defeat the U.S. What he hasn't told journalists he has laid out in fairly eloquent treatises. While the world was surprised by what bin Laden or his associates did on Sept. 11, it cannot be surprised by his intentions. These have been made clear for years by his many pronouncements.

What's He After?

Bin Laden's ambitions in the short run are plain. His first goal is to compel the U.S. to withdraw its military forces (today numbering 6,000) from his native Saudi Arabia. The presence of foreign troops in the cradle of Islam is, for him, "the latest and the greatest" of all infidel aggressions against the religion in its 14-century history. By their very presence, he believes, the U.S. forces defile the Muslim holy land. "Now infidels walk everywhere on the land where Muhammad was born and where the Koran was revealed to him," he lamented to TIME in a 1998 interview.

Because the U.S. troops are in Saudi Arabia at the invitation of the Saudi government, which was frightened into the move by a threat of invasion by Iraq's Saddam Hussein in 1990, the Saudi regime, says bin Laden, "is fully responsible" for their presence. Thus he has called on his countrymen to overthrow the House of Saud. Still, he has targeted his attacks not on the rulers but on the Americans, noting that "the American enemy is the main cause of the situation."

To bin Laden, the U.S. troops in Saudi Arabia are the worst but not the only manifestation of U.S. ill will. Asked by CNN in 1997 whether their withdrawal would appease him, he said no. The holy war will not stop, he said, until the U.S. "desist[s] from aggressive intervention against Muslims in the whole world." Bin Laden counts as unacceptable the American military presence in other Arab states, including Bahrain, the United Arab Emirates and Egypt. He is offended by continued U.S. sanctions against Iraq as well as Syria, Sudan, Libya and Iran. And he objects to America's substantial support of Israel, which he considers a partner to the U.S. in a "Jewish-Crusader" conspiracy against Muslims.

Bin Laden stretches his definition of American aggression further. He blames the U.S. for the killing of Bosnian Muslims by Christian Serbs because of a U.N. arms embargo against Bosnia until 1994. He even counts in this category the 1992-94 mission by U.S. troops to mostly Muslim Somalia as part of a U.N. effort to assist a famine-starved population caught between battling warlords. In bin Laden's book, the troop landing was simply a show of force by the U.S. "to scare the Muslim world, saying that it is able to do whatever it desires." He asked, "How can we believe your claims that you came to save our children in Somalia while you kill our children in all those [other] places?"--meaning Iraq, Bosnia and, through the Israelis, Lebanon and the Palestinian territories.

And Then What?

After the infidels have been expelled from the land of Islam, bin Laden, like other Islamic radicals, foresees the overthrow of current regimes across the Muslim world and the establishment of one united government strictly enforcing Shari'a, or Islamic law. This vision harks back to the age of the caliphs, the successors to Muhammad who ruled Islam's domain from the 7th century to the 13th. What might a caliphate look like today? In bin Laden's view, it would look something like the Taliban regime in Afghanistan, which he has praised as "among the keenest to fulfill [Allah's] laws." Bin Laden may imagine himself to be a potential new caliph. One of the titles he uses is "emir," which means ruler. However, he swears allegiance to (and thereby ranks himself below) the Taliban ruler, Mullah Mohammed Omar, so whatever political ambitions bin Laden may have are not yet on display.

Some bin Laden watchers speculate that he particularly has his eye on Saudi Arabia and Pakistan, as they possess, respectively, 25% of all proven oil reserves and the Islamic world's only known nuclear bomb. Bin Laden has referred to the Saudi oil fields as "a large economic power essential for the soon-to-be-established Islamic state." Asked by TIME in 1998 about reports that he was trying to acquire nuclear and chemical weapons, he replied, "If I seek to acquire these weapons, I am carrying out a duty. It would be a sin for Muslims not to try to possess the weapons that would prevent the infidels from inflicting harm on Muslims."

But for bin Laden, the game is not as simple as taking Saudi Arabia and Pakistan. Says Daniel Benjamin, a former National Security Council staff member now writing a book on religious terror: "He is looking for a world in which Islam regains the dominant role, and naturally that would include oil and nukes. But to say it's about oil and nukes suggests it's not a metaphysical struggle, which it is for him. He thinks this is a big moral battle in which he's got Allah's sanction to attack the West." In a 1996 proclamation, bin Laden asked, "O Lord, shatter their gathering, divide them among themselves, shake the earth under their feet and give us control over them."

Rest of article here.


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last
His aims are clear--to expel the U.S. from the Islamic world and unite Muslims in one empire
1 posted on 10/10/2001 4:30:59 PM PDT by anapikoros
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: anapikoros
And after he unites the Muslim world.....
2 posted on 10/10/2001 4:37:21 PM PDT by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anapikoros
Not such a bad article..but 6000 people are still dead and pulverized from WTC......I dont care about Ladens motives or ambitions at this point..I want a ticker tape parade down Broadway with his head....at least I am brave enough to say it.
3 posted on 10/10/2001 4:37:37 PM PDT by alisasny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anapikoros
He has no game left. He is toast.
4 posted on 10/10/2001 4:38:15 PM PDT by Pete53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alisasny
Right-o. The parade should end with his head on a pole in front of the Pentagon. We can smear it with pig fat to endure the weather. There is plenty of space for the hundreds of poles we will need for his friends.
The Brits used to do this with their enemies on Blackfriars Bridge.
5 posted on 10/10/2001 4:41:13 PM PDT by ScholarWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: anapikoros
That will seem preposterous to Americans, but like many Islamic radicals, bin Laden takes a long view of history. "Can bin Laden, a very intelligent guy, really think that he could end the U.S.?" asks Jessica Stern, Harvard lecturer and author of The Ultimate Terrorists. "He refers to historical periods when Muslims have conquered the West, so yes, perhaps he thinks he can accomplish that once again."

With reporting by Bruce Crumley/Paris, Rahimullah Yusufzai/Peshawar and Rebecca Winters/New York

Turnarounds are more than fair in this game he is playing!

6 posted on 10/10/2001 4:49:48 PM PDT by f.Christian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anapikoros
which he considers a partner to the U.S. in a "Jewish-Crusader" conspiracy against Muslims.

While from their point of view this statement is perfectly valid, what he is not telling you is the next part of this statement. And not telling you the whole truth is deception. But fear not, I will complete the stateme for all of you.

If we can stop this conspiracy against Muslims, then the Muslims, headed by yours truly, can take over the world.

So you can see, regardless of the way he describes our intentions, they are not so bad for the world at large.

The world cannot be united, and Osama and his nation of Islam are a perfect example of why. Who wants to unite with them? And so we see the UN as the perfect enemy of those of us who wish to remain non Islamic... :)
7 posted on 10/10/2001 4:51:26 PM PDT by greggy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ScholarWarrior
When I think of 6000 innocents going to work that day I am beyond sick..the head of the man who conspired this is one I want to see.
8 posted on 10/10/2001 4:54:18 PM PDT by alisasny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: anapikoros
Poor guy, he has no idea how fast the US would develop alternate fuels. In the current situation, it's not worth the trouble or expense, but if there was a takeover, we'd merely invent something else to use and Bin Laden and his crew would be sitting atop the largest sandbox in the world. It would be the economic ruin of the Muslim countries.
9 posted on 10/10/2001 4:55:53 PM PDT by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anapikoros
bttttttttttttttttt
10 posted on 10/10/2001 4:59:30 PM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anapikoros
ping, then bang.
11 posted on 10/10/2001 5:06:22 PM PDT by pointsal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pointsal
Go to http://www.newgrounds.com/ View the "Diplomacy" video. This is probably how we should handle him.
12 posted on 10/10/2001 5:11:20 PM PDT by gswilder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: alisasny
I want a ticker tape parade down Broadway with his head....at least I am brave enough to say it.

What is brave about a statement like that?

This is a war between Islam and the rest of the world. If you kill all islamic combatants, the civilians (Egyptians, Pakistanis, Iraqis, Syrians, Sudanese, etc.) will take their place. At least, their crazy actions in the streets of their cities lead me to believe this.

Now this is a brave statement in that the FR editors may consider my comments as racist. I would respectfully ask FR editors to consider this- What if I am right? Is it racist to acknowledge the truth?
13 posted on 10/10/2001 5:17:30 PM PDT by greggy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: alisasny
I want a ticker tape parade down Broadway with his head....at least I am brave enough to say it.

You and about 20,000 other Freepers are brave enough to say it.

What we know but Time won't state is that bin Laden is just a homocidal demagogue. He wants to destroy what fifty years of commerce has built for the vast majority of Muslims. He can't stand to see people free, happy, and successful.

WFTR
America's War Options.
Bill

14 posted on 10/10/2001 5:18:11 PM PDT by WFTR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: f.Christian
"Can bin Laden, a very intelligent guy, really think that he could end the U.S.?" asks Jessica Stern, Harvard lecturer and author of The Ultimate Terrorists. "He refers to historical periods when Muslims have conquered the West, so yes, perhaps he thinks he can accomplish that once again."

The Muslims haven't "conquered" the West in hundreds of years.

The West didn't have long-range nuclear weapons then, either.

Bin Laden can't win. He just wants to kill as many Westerners as he can. That's why he must be stopped. And all the nations who support terrorists must either root them out, or have their governments replaced.

15 posted on 10/10/2001 5:20:20 PM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: anapikoros
The megalomanical plans detailed herein are only exceeded by those of Hillary Rodham Blythe Clinton's.



..........be afraid........be very afraid.

16 posted on 10/10/2001 5:25:11 PM PDT by DoctorMichael
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anapikoros
Historians will look back on bin Laden and laugh. I mean, what kind of fool do you have to be to think that just because you have a couple of hundred million dollars at your disposal, you can declare and win a war against the entire Western world, which has trillions of dollars to throw at any military problem it encounters? Furthermore, not only will bin Laden lose, he will accomplish what is even more anathema to him than his own death: awaken the entire world, not just the West, to the fact that arabs must never be allowed to possess weapons of mass destruction, resulting in even more of us "infidels" walking in the land of Mohammed -- this time in perpetuity. I love unintended consequences.
17 posted on 10/10/2001 5:27:56 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
No one can unite the Muslim world or the Arab world. They hate each other as much as they hate the West.
18 posted on 10/10/2001 5:40:27 PM PDT by johniegrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999
To McGavin999-- disagree-- we should move to "alternate" fuels now. Most oil usage in this country is for autos--easily replaced by CNG, electricity, even gassified coal. Eventually Hydrogen. All our fuel needs be created domestic and with Canada, just a little oil imported. Give OBL what he wants--these countries are only of note because of their oil--they aren't going to develop like the far east, or even India. Now is the time for us to take advantage of this historic opportunity. 'Fraid to say it, the current oil crowd that runs our gubment will do everything to dissuade us from this rational and logical choice.
19 posted on 10/10/2001 5:44:32 PM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
Too much trouble and too much expense to do this if it's not required for national security. We'd only make a move like that under dire circumstances, such as a war effort. The sacrifice to the economy and the disruption of lives would be too severe to make it a voluntary choice.
20 posted on 10/10/2001 5:48:16 PM PDT by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson