Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Victory From Space (or Why Space Can Help Defete Radical Islam)
Original OpEd appeared in Space News ^ | 10/10/2001 9:09:04 AM | Robert Zubrin

Posted on 10/13/2001 10:15:01 PM PDT by anymouse

How can America's space program contribute to victory? There are a number of obvious ways. Our reconnaissance satellites will spot the terrorist encampments, our navigation satellites will guide us to them, and our communication satellites will allow us to coordinate our forces to assure that they prevail in combat.

To previous invaders, Afghanistan was a maze of death. Because of our spacecraft, however, we will be able to view the maze from above, rather than within. These are critical capabilities. They will provide the essential margin needed to eliminate Bid Laden's guerillas before they can strike too many more and deadlier blows.

Unfortunately, however, the enemy is not just a few thousand cultists. It is a cult. To defeat the enemy, we must not only destroy its current forces, we must discredit the ideology that allows it to recruit.

We are not at war with a handful of savages. We are at war with an idea.

The Sept. 11 attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon signaled the beginning of a war by fundamentalist Islam against the West. Why does fundamentalist Islam hate the West? it hates the West because of its core beliefs.

The central idea behind western civilization is the radical proposition advanced by the Greek philosopher Socrates that there is an innate faculty of the human mind capable of distinguishing right from wrong, justice from injustice, truth from untruth.

This idea was embraced by early Christianity as the basis of the concept of the conscience, which thereupon became the axiomatic foundation of western morality. It is also the basis of our highest notions of law ("We hold these truths to be self evident ...") and science, man's search for universal truth through the tools of reason.

Fundamentalist Islam denies all of this. It denies the existence or deserved authority of the conscience. Instead, right and wrong can only be known through the Koran, as interpreted by fundamentalist mullahs.

It denies moral responsibility further because it denies the existence of free will. It denies reasoned investigation of nature completely because it denies the idea of causality. Instead, it argues that the universe is created and destroyed repeatedly in every succeeding instant by the will of Allah. Thus scientific activity is useless, and in fact is proscribed.

It should thus be clear why fundamentalist Islam is at war with the West. But the West has not been its first target. Its first victim was rationalist Islam.

In the Islamic world, the fundamentalists have not always been on top.

In its formative period, Islamic society included a strong rationalist current led by the Mu'tazilites, who believed in the parity of reason and revelation, and produced many profound philosophers such as Al Farabi, Averroes (Ibn Rushd), and Avicenna (Ibn Sina).

A thousand years ago, it was not the West, but Islam, that had the broadest intellectual horizons. Islamic thinkers created algebra and radically advanced astronomy and medicine. At a time when there were no colleges in Europe, the Islamic world had hundreds. At a time when the largest European libraries contained a few hundred volumes, there were Islamic libraries with hundreds of thousands.

But then the fundamentalists took over. The philosophers were made into fugitives. Scientific inquiry was banned. Libraries that were found to contain scientific works were burned.

Printing, which appeared briefly in the Islamic world several hundred years before its advent in Europe, was banned, and did not reappear until its reintroduction by American missionaries in the 1830s.

The colleges were turned from centers of inquiry into mental slaughterhouses where generation after generation of the brightest youth were made to memorize the Koran by rote.

With the fundamentalist takeover, the most glorious civilization humanity had ever known was turned into a dung heap of misery, mental slavery, degradation and ignorance. A quarter of the world was turned into a graveyard of the mind, which for the past 700 years has not produced a single significant scientific advance.

It is thus ironic to hear the arguments of the apologists for Fundamentalist terror who claim that the terrorist actions are some kind of counterattack against the maceration of the Islamic world supposedly caused by the West, or even more absurdly, the minute state of Israel.

In fact, it is the internal combustion engines invented and manufactured in the West that have for the better part of the past century supplied the Islamic world with its only significant source of wealth. No, the poverty and degradation of the Islamic world has been caused solely by the fact that those within it who would use reason to advance its condition have been suppressed by fundamentalism.

I believe we need to use science to defeat not only the fundamentalists, but fundamentalism itself. A grand work of reason is not simply an object of utility, but a celebration of the human spirit. This is nowhere more true than when man looks out into space to attempt to comprehend the universe itself.

As the Renaissance scientist Johannes Kepler, the discoverer of the laws of planetary motion, put it, “Geometry is one and eternal, a reflection out of the mind of God. That mankind shares in it is one reason to call man the image of God.”

There it is. The human mind, because it is the image of God, is able to understand the laws of the universe. It was the forceful demonstration of this proposition by Kepler, Galileo, and others that let loose the scientific revolution in the West.

But works of reason can be more than contemplative; they can be creative. Consider the object of the terrorists rage; the World Trade Center. A triumph of the human mind, the WTC was the most recent of the series of astonishing feats of civil engineering New York City has shown the world over the past 118 years.

These architectural marvels have their uses, but their value goes much deeper. The creator of the first of them, Johann Roebling, designer of the Brooklyn Bridge, said it well; “No one will be able to look at it and not feel prouder to be a man.”

Prouder, indeed. Roebling's bridge doesn't just have Gothic arches, it is a Gothic cathedral, whose unprecedented span and poetic form constitute a soaring salute to the power of the human mind. But some people have not gotten the message yet. So I propose we hit harder. Let's build a gothic cathedral whose significance no one can miss. Kepler et al showed that we could understand the heavens.

Let's drive the point home by using our space program to show that we can navigate them, or better yet, take possession.

There are those who, panic-stricken in the current crisis, would gut our space exploration programs. This makes no more sense than a decision to tear down our skyscrapers. In fact, it is worse, because it would undermine our war effort.

To defeat fundamentalism we need to do more than hunt down its current batch of expendable pawns. We need to utterly humiliate the doctrine itself by demonstrating for all to see the sublime and infinite power of human reason. So let's send probes to Europa and humans to Mars. Better yet, let's settle on Mars, and bring the dead planet to life.

Let's show that we can not only understand creation, but continue its process, by transforming barren worlds into new homes for life and civilization.

This is no time for science to retreat; it must attack.

Let's launch an offensive to free forever the minds of men from fundamentalist tyranny.

A universe open to humanity would be a hymn to reason written large across the firmament. It would be the key to true victory. Because no one will be able to look upon it and not feel prouder to be human.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: clashofcivilizatio
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
I can argue with some particulars about Zubrin's facts or assumption that the government space program will get use regular folk into space, but hard to argue with his assessment of the flaws in the basic assumptions of fundamentalist Islam and it's effect on Muslim civilization in modern times.

Space offers tangible hope only if it is acessable.

Meanwhile space assets are making radical terrorists in Afghanistan 'acessable' by our military and three-letter agencies.

Modern Islam must reject those that would impose a cultural death sentance on them (and the rest of the World if the radicals had there way), for to further enable this cancer goes against the very core beliefs of Islam as well as most other major religions - that God loves mankind and expects us to better ourselves in every way possible.

1 posted on 10/13/2001 10:15:01 PM PDT by anymouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: anymouse
Bump for Sunday crowd.
2 posted on 10/14/2001 2:44:29 PM PDT by anymouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anymouse
Great post! Love this line:

Unfortunately, however, the enemy is not just a few thousand cultists. It is a cult. To defeat the enemy, we must not only destroy its current forces, we must discredit the ideology that allows it to recruit.

3 posted on 10/14/2001 3:06:50 PM PDT by l'inconnue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: anymouse
Another bump for a deserving read. And here's an intriguing idea from the article:

To defeat fundamentalism we need to do more than hunt down its current batch of expendable pawns. We need to utterly humiliate the doctrine itself by demonstrating for all to see the sublime and infinite power of human reason. So let's send probes to Europa and humans to Mars. Better yet, let's settle on Mars, and bring the dead planet to life.

4 posted on 10/14/2001 3:25:11 PM PDT by l'inconnue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: l'inconnue
Thanks for the bump.
5 posted on 10/14/2001 8:24:54 PM PDT by anymouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: anymouse
I've heard about this article, it was denounced by Keith Cowing at Nasawatch as racist blah blah blah....

I think the guy at Nasawatch needs to grow a couple. Bump for Zubrin!

6 posted on 10/14/2001 8:52:03 PM PDT by Brett66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brett66
Brett66,

Cowing is a flaming liberal (I know this from personal exposure to him and from years of communications with him, prior to him insisting that I not communicate with him, after he realized that I was conservative and knew he was biased left.)

For Zubrin's many faults (I also have known him for about 11 years) he hits pretty close to the mark on this article. And he is taking a lot of heat for it by many liberal space activists.

Feel free to let other FReepers know about this thread.

7 posted on 10/15/2001 11:54:10 AM PDT by anymouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale; gcruse; RadioAstronomer; NonZeroSum; Cincinatus' Wife; Cincinatus; jimkress...
Ping..
8 posted on 10/15/2001 12:51:02 PM PDT by Brett66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Brett66
With the fundamentalist takeover, the most glorious civilization humanity had ever known was turned into a dung heap of misery, mental slavery, degradation and ignorance. A quarter of the world was turned into a graveyard of the mind, which for the past 700 years has not produced a single significant scientific advance.

You could substitute communism and 40 years and you'd have Cuba.
Ever wonder what with all that "superior" education why they haven't made great scientific advances?

Let's drive the point home by using our space program to show that we can navigate them, or better yet, take possession.

Exactly!!!! U.S Air Force and NASA Work Closer on Strategic Space Control

9 posted on 10/15/2001 1:09:20 PM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: l'inconnue
we must discredit the ideology that allows it to recruit

I believe "we" can't do this. "They" have to do it for themselves.

10 posted on 10/15/2001 1:09:27 PM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: anymouse
Let's drive the point home by using our space program to show that we can navigate them, or better yet, take possession.

Taking possession of the moon would drive a stake through the heart of Islamism.

11 posted on 10/15/2001 1:11:47 PM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anymouse
And he is taking a lot of heat for it by many liberal space activists.

Indeed. I too saw the Keith Cowling "hit" on him over at NASAwatch. Now, having read this piece for the first time, I see nothing in it that is either wrong or that I disagree with.

In re: "liberal space activists." I find this sociological phenomena really interesting. Liberals in general do not like space or the space program -- it costs too much money that would be "better spent" on our earthly problems. Pressed on this point, you quickly find that liberals mean more social spending. When challenged that $5 trillion (and counting) spending on "social problems" over the last 30 years have yet to "solve them," you just get a blank stare. They want to believe.

What's happened in the last 10 years or so is the resurrection of a liberal constituency for space. This is largely due to Carl Sagan, whose articulation of the "mysteries of the cosmos" led to the creation of a "search for life" ethic that has become, under Dan Goldin, the principal raison d'etre for NASA. So, you now have the spectacle of Birkenstock-wearing, Volvo-driving, latte-drinking, PBS-pledging liberals suddenly ga-ga over NASA. And the "Mars mania" that infests the agency.

Whether this is a "good thing" or a bad one is a matter of taste. I just find it amusing to have a bunch of flaming liberals beholden to, what is basically, a military infrastructure and ethic for space access and operations.

12 posted on 10/15/2001 2:17:14 PM PDT by Cincinatus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus
The problem is that the liberal star-gazers don't want to go into space themselves (nor do the want anyone else going for that matter), they want to ogle space through a telescope or remotely explore a planet via a robot.

They see space as an extention of their concept of a Gia utopia that should be off limits to greedy, polluting, uncaring humans. And if anyone gets to go, it should be uber-liberal PhD scientists on the government dole.

Anything else is a blaspheme against nature in their warped mind.

If you want to get them riled just start talking about commercial space. Or to get them really wound up just mention 'terraforming'. :)

13 posted on 10/15/2001 3:17:16 PM PDT by anymouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Brett66
--BUMP-- from vannrox
14 posted on 10/15/2001 3:51:18 PM PDT by vannrox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Brett66
Thanks for the ping...

Bump for a great read!

15 posted on 10/16/2001 7:40:21 AM PDT by The_Victor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
"'They' have to do it for themselves."

100% true.

16 posted on 10/17/2001 8:13:37 AM PDT by sadamico
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: sadamico
I heard the interview with the American Muslim on radio last night. The one who was reported in the NY Post rag as being ready to renounce citizenship and go fight in Afghanistan. I listened carefully, and I think I see where he is coming from. It seems there is a huge gulf between America and Islam, and they won't ever come together. Islam won't move, and neither will America. We have to coexist on this planet or it's going to only get worse.

Like they say in the cowboy westerns, "This town ain't big enough for both of us. Be out of town by sundown."

It's a big universe out there. They don't want to go, but I believe our future as a species in in outer space. they probasbly won't even wonder where we went, since it would be of no concern to them.

17 posted on 10/17/2001 9:46:03 AM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
"It seems there is a huge gulf between America and Islam, and they won't ever come together."

The same could be said about the gulf between the liberals and conservatives here in our own country.

I say launch them all into the sun.

18 posted on 10/17/2001 2:28:17 PM PDT by sadamico
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
I forgot the ;-) at the end of my last.
19 posted on 10/17/2001 2:29:13 PM PDT by sadamico
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus
So, you now have the spectacle of Birkenstock-wearing, Volvo-driving, latte-drinking, PBS-pledging liberals suddenly ga-ga over NASA.

The big problem with this is that, just like with the "War on Poverty", liberals can throw huge, gargantuan amounts of cash around and accomplish absolutely nothing.

They should love NASA.

20 posted on 10/17/2001 2:37:44 PM PDT by hopespringseternal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson