Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Saudis Alarmed By Spate Of U.S. Media Attacks
Reuters/ABCnews.com ^ | 10/17/01 | Mariam Isa

Posted on 10/17/2001 10:37:46 AM PDT by veronica

Saudis Alarmed by Spate of U.S. Media Attacks

By Mariam Isa

RIYADH (Reuters) - Prominent Saudis are alarmed at a spate of scathing articles about the kingdom which have appeared in top U.S. publications this week, saying they may further damage ties already strained by the U.S. bombing of Afghanistan. Newspaper and magazine articles in the United States have accused the ruling family and other rich Saudis of funneling millions of dollars to "terrorist" Muslim groups -- including Osama bin Laden -- in return for political support.

One American commentator even suggested, albeit tongue in cheek, that the United States should bomb Saudi Arabia if it was serious about punishing the supporters of last month's suicide attacks on New York and Washington.

"The articles are biased and bent on provoking the situation more and more, rather than healing anything," Salah al-Hejailan, a top Saudi lawyer, told Reuters. "I think they are very destructive to the (U.S.-Saudi) relationship. It's very frustrating because they are sensational and biased," he said.

Analysts say the 50-year-old strategic alliance between the world's largest industrial power and the conservative desert kingdom -- the world's largest oil producer and a key market for many Western export businesses -- is already being tested by the U.S. military campaign against Afghanistan.

CALLS FOR HEALTHIER RELATIONSHIP

Many recent U.S. editorials have resurrected an oil-boom cartoon stereotype of wealthy Saudis not practicing the piety they preach and buying U.S. military might to help prop up an allegedly corrupt regime.

"The frank criticism and candid opinion contained in your October 14 editorial 'Regarding Saudi Arabia' is to be welcomed for its honesty," Saudi businessman Hassan Youssef Yassin said in a letter to the New York Times.

"But I fear that the person who stands most to gain from it is Osama bin Laden. Among his stated goals is the intention to sever the warm relationship that exists between Saudi Arabia and America," he said.

The newspaper had said both countries should try to fashion a healthier relationship based on greater frankness and honesty. U.S. officials in the kingdom, worried about growing public anger against Western support for the attacks on Afghanistan, also say that the articles are not helping to foster trust. Many Saudi officials are becoming convinced that there is a coordinated media campaign against the kingdom, the birthplace of Islam 14 centuries ago.

Some articles criticized Saudi Arabia, birthplace of Islam, for barring the launch of attacks against Muslim Afghans from its soil -- a move most ordinary Saudis would strongly oppose.

Other articles have alleged that the Saudi government has refused to cooperate with Washington's investigation into the hijacked airliner attacks, in which nearly 5,400 people died.

The U.S. government says Saudi Arabia is fully co-operating by sharing intelligence and adding its weight to the global crackdown on the financing of terrorism. "Relationships between governments can change overnight. It takes generations to repair what happens between people... America should take that into account," Hejailan said.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-158 next last

1 posted on 10/17/2001 10:37:46 AM PDT by veronica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: veronica
Many recent U.S. editorials have resurrected an oil-boom cartoon stereotype of wealthy Saudis not practicing the piety they preach and buying U.S. military might to help prop up an allegedly corrupt regime.

Was this in the news or editorial section?

2 posted on 10/17/2001 10:40:06 AM PDT by Ratatoskr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica
All evidence suggests that Saudi Arabia despises the US only slightly less than bin Laden himself.
3 posted on 10/17/2001 10:40:46 AM PDT by Blade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica
They dont like the freedom of press over here? Boo hoo.. dont listen then
4 posted on 10/17/2001 10:41:30 AM PDT by smith288
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica
If Saudi Arabia is refusing to freeze bin Ladens' accounts, as was reported by numerous new agencies, then Saudi Arabia should go on the list of those that are with the terrorists.
5 posted on 10/17/2001 10:41:46 AM PDT by eFudd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica
I get the impression they think the media are under gov't control. Not.

This is what we're fighting to protect--the right for media to sensationalize, the right for a late night comedian to make a stupid statement

If they feel these comments are factually wrong, then they should correct the media. Correcting them over an interpretation of the facts--not going to happen. Everyone has an opinion--and in the U.S. of A. we get to state it.

6 posted on 10/17/2001 10:43:29 AM PDT by Forgiven_Sinner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica
We have a long and established relationship with the Wahhadist fanatic government of the Saud family, a.k.a. Saudi Arabia.

We want their oil, and they want our money.

7 posted on 10/17/2001 10:44:11 AM PDT by ZULU
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica
The US needs to surreptitiously spread the rumor that we have retargeted several ICBM's to Mecca and Medina. The official word should be "neither confirm nor deny".
8 posted on 10/17/2001 10:44:45 AM PDT by atafak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica
Dear Saudi Arabia,
Truth hurts you hypocritical bunch of daiper heads.
Sincerely,
An american.
9 posted on 10/17/2001 10:45:21 AM PDT by vetvetdoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica
"Relationships between governments can change overnight. It takes generations to repair what happens between people... America should take that into account," Hejailan said.

Oh we ARE, you arrogant clymer.

10 posted on 10/17/2001 10:46:27 AM PDT by ScreamingFist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica
If our war against the Taliban is straining our relationship with the Saudis then they aren't our allies are they. This muslim brotherhood stuff is crap. We should seize their oilfields and let the street mobs do whatever they please. Who needs allies like this?
11 posted on 10/17/2001 10:46:27 AM PDT by Asuryan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica
The Saudis should be alarmed the growing realization in the United States that the Saudi monarchy, its support of Wahhabism and the contemptuous attitudes of Saudis towards Westerners in general and Americans in particular, are really a major source of problmes for the West. They know that if the push comes to shove, their only source of protection from other Arabs and their own people is the United States, and that the political consensus to support the Saudi regime is shallow and based solely on our need for oil. They know that if we can figure a way to have a reliable oil supply without Saudi, they're toast.
12 posted on 10/17/2001 10:47:15 AM PDT by CatoRenasci
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica
2002: Saudi Arabia?? What's that? Oh, you mean Saudi America
13 posted on 10/17/2001 10:47:32 AM PDT by spycatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blade
You are so right, and its time for us to be released from their apron strings with our dependence on their oil.
14 posted on 10/17/2001 10:49:16 AM PDT by gulfcoast6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Blade
That is not true. There is great affection for the US in Saudi Arabia. Before you go storming off based on the news reports that you are getting, I would recommend that you see how the "umbiased talking heads treat the news you know." Check out Mediawatch.com or today's Lucianne.com.
15 posted on 10/17/2001 10:49:31 AM PDT by pompelmous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: veronica
As well they should be, the treacherous bastards.
16 posted on 10/17/2001 10:49:38 AM PDT by Cicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pompelmous
There is great affection for the US in Saudi Arabia.

And you believe this based on?

17 posted on 10/17/2001 10:53:18 AM PDT by Blade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: veronica
"The articles are biased and bent on provoking the situation more and more, rather than healing anything," Salah al-Hejailan, a top Saudi lawyer, told Reuters. "I think they are very destructive to the (U.S.-Saudi) relationship. It's very frustrating because they are sensational and biased," he said.

OK.
This is a reaction of how this sensitive arab "feels".
Now if he can identify which criticisms are unfounded, or untrue, that would be useful.

Or he suggesting that no criticism is tolerated?

18 posted on 10/17/2001 10:53:18 AM PDT by Publius6961
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica
It is time to drive the vicious Wahhabi vermin of the House of Saud back into the desert squalor from which they sprang only a few generations ago.

Mecca and Medina, to say nothing of the vast oil wealth of Arabia, belong by historical right to the Hashemite King of Jordan. H.M. King Abdullah is pro-Western, moderate, and humane.

After we destroy Afghanistan, forget about it. If we are going to do any nation building, it ought to involve extirpation of the Wahhabi scum from the Arabian peninsula, and restoration of the Hashemite dynasty to the united thrones of Jordan and Arabia. Call it Greater Arabia, and put Hussein and Assad on notice that Iraq and Syria will be its next provinces if they so much as look cross-eyed at us.

-ccm

19 posted on 10/17/2001 10:53:52 AM PDT by ccmay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica
I thought they were alarmed at the anthrax attacks on the media.

(Attacks on the Saudis, media or otherwise, are warranted at this point.)

20 posted on 10/17/2001 10:54:14 AM PDT by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-158 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson