Posted on 10/19/2001 3:14:01 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
Patriotism: No refuge for scoundrels
© 2001 Creators Syndicate, Inc.
The anti-American crowd has adopted as its motto, "Dissent is the true mark of a patriot." How about instead, "Dissent from such mindless strictures of political correctness is a surer mark of a patriot"?
Before you easy-to-offend types jump to the wrong conclusion, I am not suggesting that those who love America never dissent from its policies. I'm not even saying that all those who oppose a military response to the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks are not patriotic. But some aren't.
Why all the fuss? Does patriotism even matter? George Washington obviously thought so. In his farewell address he said, "The name of American, which belongs to you, in your national capacity, must always exalt the just pride of patriotism, more than any appellation derived from local discriminations."
This exhortation to national pride would doubtless make some elitists squirm. Some see America as a wretched symbol of imperialism and oppression. Others consider the nation-state as an outmoded concept. They disdain the notion of national sovereignty and believe we should relinquish more political power to international bodies.
Still others think there is something inherently offensive about expressions of national unity. Their mindset arises from the postmodern concept of multiculturalism, which rejects the melting pot and its accompanying slogan, "E pluribus Unum" (Out of many, one.) They want to keep every culture and language conspicuously discrete and oppose the furtherance of a unique American culture. They regard demonstrations of nationalism as threatening to their vision of America as a culturally segregated society. I'm not exaggerating.
Recently, students from several colleges in New York joined to create a global peace flag because they wanted to avoid creating the impression that this was "a nationalistic Americans-only kind of thing."
A member of the Jewish Council of Urban Affairs similarly cautioned, "We need to start thinking of ourselves as an international family." The Council is discouraging the display of American flags because they "may become a symbol for an overzealous patriotic fervor that could exclude some Americans." Instead, they are distributing window signs that say, "We Support Our Arab American and Muslim Neighbors."
A university professor was accused by two separate colleagues of being jingoistic (warlike) for flying the American flag. And, the head librarian at Florida Gulf Coast University ordered employees to remove "Proud to be an American" stickers to avoid offending foreign students.
Just exactly what is it about displaying national pride that could possibly be offensive to foreigners who are among us as a matter of privilege? Why would anyone be offended at our cause against terrorism? And, if they are, should we defer to their misguided thinking?
No flag-waving American that I've run across is advocating that we indiscriminately declare war on nations uninvolved with the genocidal attacks on our soil. None of us believes that we are in Afghanistan to absorb that nation into some global American empire.
We are not even at war against Afghanistan itself, only the Taliban and al-Qaida. This is not just a semantic distinction. We are fighting alongside the Afghan Northern Alliance, making food drops to the Afghan people and striving mightily to avoid civilian casualties. Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld has made it quite clear that America seeks "no real estate" in its war against the terrorists.
We shouldn't sit idly by while others with questionable agendas endeavor to twist the concept of patriotism and, in the process, undermine ours. Patriotism is not an outmoded concept. It is not jingoistic. It is not the cause of this war the terrorists are. But our patriotism will help to keep us united and focused as we face the enemy.
Most of us don't love America simply because we are its citizens. Patriotism for us is not some mindless emotional attachment to our nation. While it generates visceral feelings of pride it has intellectual moorings as well. It springs forth from a deep devotion to our founding principles, chief among them being our glorious freedom safeguarded by the rule of law.
Patriotism is vitally important because it is about more than mere survival. It emboldens us in our struggle to preserve our distinct way of life, because it understands that peace is not "so sweet as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery."
As founding father Dr. Benjamin Rush noted, "Patriotism is as much a virtue as justice, and is as necessary for the support of societies as natural affection is for the support of families."
Related offer:
David Limbaugh's "Absolute Power," a pull-no-punches exposé of corruption in Reno's Justice Department, is available in the WorldNetDaily online store.
For Education And Discussion Only. Not For Commercial Use.
The template of what appeared to be an emerging media strategy blossomed into full display on CNN's Talk Back Live on Wednesday.
The looming media game plan could be neatly summed up as follows: Portray the outbreak of Anthrax as purely 'home-grown' -- the product, not of foreign Islamic extremists nor state-sponsored terrorism, but of domestic "right wing" hate groups.
Ah, yes, the Old Vast, Right Wing Conspiracy canard yet again. Yep, that's the ticket.
Host Bobbie Battista slipped into spasms of delight as one of her guests took political demagoguery to new heights (or new lows) in suggesting a partisan whiff behind the flare-up of Anthrax cases.
Why -- notice who the victims are: Liberal media icons and Democrat politicians, he said (or words to the effect).
Gee, what about the case of New York Governor George Pataki? Last time I checked, he was still a Republican.
Well, never mind that one, we are told -- Pataki is only an aberration, a pesky anomaly, don'tchaknow?
Yeah, sure.
Or what about Republican House Speaker Denny Hastert? Move on, nothing to see here...
The disclosure yesterday of the written contents contained in the letters sent to Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle and NBC anchorman Tom Brokaw -- both letters were laced with Anthrax -- put the final kabash to the Vast, right wing conspiracy theory.
Sorry, Hillary: This dog won't hunt -- not this time.
Both letters used strikingly similar language -- and writing style. Both were postmarked September 18, and both were mailed from Trenton, New Jersey.
The letter to Sen. Daschle's office -- written in block-letters -- said the following:
"09-11-01
You can not stop us.
We have this anthrax.
You die now.
Are you afraid?
Death to America
Death to Israel.
Allah is great."And the letter to NBC's Tom Brokaw was almost identical:
"09-11-01
This is next.
Take penacilin now.
Death to America
Death to Israel.
Allah is great."In both, the wacko closes by praising Allah, God in the Koran.
In both, the same chilling phrases 'Death to America, death to Israel' are used, in the same sequence, no less.
Moreover, it is rather apparent in both letters that English is not the writer's first language.
In short, as far as culprit(s) go, the overwhelming evidence strongly points in the direction of foreign, Islamic extremist(s) -- rather than 'home-grown', "right wing" hate groups, as the media obviously prefers.
However, let me make one thing abundantly clear: This is not in any way to excuse the odious neo-Nazis, Arryian Nation-types, Skinheads and their ilk. These screwballs have praised the hijackers and lauded the bloodbath they wrought on September 11th.
They, like Osama Bin Laden himself, are to me the lowest scum of the earth.
No, the point here is to show how a crafty, PC media trial balloon to artfully shift blame for the outbreak of Anthrax onto 'home-grown' elements of the political "right" has blown up in their faces.
(Incidentally, all neo-Nazi groups, like the Hitler figure they worship, share a virulent hatred for free-market capitalism -- hardly the political portraiture one would associate with followers of Edmund Burke, media swill to the contrary notwithstanding.)
Psst! Psst! I guess we were all supposed to ignore or conveniently forget all about reports of another one of these suspicious packages, this one recieved at a Microsoft licensing subsidiary in Reno, Nevada.
Place of origin? Malaysia, an Al-Qaeda bastion.
Special note to residents of Palm Beach County Florida: Malaysia is not a dreaded disease, but a country nestled in southeast Asia.
While the C.D.C. announced on Monday that follow-up tests had come back negative for Anthrax (after initial 'positives'), the results are in no way conclusive. More tests are in the works.
But the (now defunct) *blame-the-right-for-Anthrax* maneuver had another cynical purpose beyond merely politicizing the Anthrax phenomenon.
Like Osama Bin Laden, the press never even remotely imagined the man they routinely mocked as a drooling buffoon would handle the gravest crisis confronting our nation in generations with such deftness, steadiness and aplomb.
They are mortified by polls consistently giving the President astronomically high marks, both in overall job performance and his handling of the 9-11 aftermath.
As for the flags, the patriotism, the bonding and unprecedented national unity, the flustered media presstitutes wonder if there is any end in sight.
They hate all of it with a passion.
In fact, the clowns at Taliban TV...er, CNN, are falling all over themselves to "win" the "ultimate" "get": A fawning exclusive "interview" with Osama Bin Laden, the network's new folk hero.
Evidence in any way pointing towards Baghdad as the source for the onslaught of the deadly bacteria would -- to put it mildly -- have enormous implications, politically and militarily. It would immediately suggest a broadening of the war on terrorism -- and prolongation of the media's agony.
Hence, the press' pooh-poohing the possibility -- even in the face of growing evidence -- of Saddam's involvement.
From whence emerged the now discredited strategy to blame the VRWC for Anthrax.
To hear the media tell it, the highly refined, airborne spores shipped to Daschle and Brokaw can be readily purchased at virtually any friendly neighborhood convenient store.
Yep, just take a short walk to your local Pigly-Wigly, and right there on the shelf you'll find a wide selecton of state-of-the-art Anthrax spores.
Preposterous? Of course it is.
But listening to Judy Woodruff spouting off her latest vast, right wing conspiracy clap-trap you would never know it.
But equally ridiculous is the notion that Al-Qaeda Mullahs brewed the deadly spores from caves in Afghanistan.
Here's a little datum the media would rather Americans forget: Mohamed Atta - chief hijacker -- met not once but twice with senior Iraqi intelligence officers in Prague, Czech Republic.
The first meeting, according to U.S. and Czech intelligence sources, occurred last Autumn and involved a high-level emissary of Iraqi intelligence, a man by the name of Ahmed Samir al-Ahani.
The second, follow-up meeting reportedly took place in the spring, this time with a former director of Saddam Hussein's external secret services, a Mr. Farouk Hijazi (currently Iraqi Ambassador to Turkey), who personally met with Osama Bin Laden.
Now, what does the media suppose was the main topic of discussion?
Were Mohamed and his Iraqi buddy-buddies playfully exchanging the latest cookie recipes? Or perhaps they were bantering about the weather -- or, would you believe they were flapping their jaws about the New York Yankees?
Gee, I wonder, wonder, wonder, don't you?
Only a drooling moron would countenance these secret encounters as anything other than strategy sessions, perhaps even more than that.
Without question, Iraq is technologically capable of producing a whole range of weapons of mass destruction, including Anthrax.
Just ask former chief U.N. weapons inspector, Richard Butler.
He strongly suspects Iraqi involvement, and points to high-ranking Egyptian officials who are convinced Atta was given some Anthrax during those meetings, as well as false identification papers.
To believe the hijackers and their accomplices were not in possession of biological and/or chemical weapons leaves utterly inexplicable a couple of incidents involving Mohamed Atta at an airstrip in Belle Glade, Florida.
James Lester, a mechanic at the airstrip, said Atta on two separate occasions had visited, strongly wanting to buy a crop-dusting plane from the company. He recalled Atta peppering him with specific questions relating to the plane's capacities, its fuel requirements, its load capacity, etc.
Now, why do you supposed this murderous scumbag so suddenly took such a keen interest in crop-dusters? To take his fellow hijackers on little joy rides, perhaps? Or how to glimpse the beautiful landscape from on-high, or to cruise over the gorgeous Florida beaches -- ah, yeah, that's it!
I got quite a chuckle the other night while watching one of these silly cable talking head shows. An "expert" insisted there was no way one could logically deduce any linkage between the hijackers and weapons of mass destruction from the crop-duster episodes.
His "reasoning"?
Are you ready for this? Why -- it is technologically impractical for Crop-Dusters to serve as delivery agents of chemical and/or biological weapons.
Well, Duh -- that may very well be the case, but the dim-wit missed the point entirely!!
The point? Why in the heck would the hijackers even be interested in Crop-Dusters unless they in fact possessed biological and/or chemical weapons?
And let's not forget another tell-tale piece of damning evidence: Atta and some of the hijackers lived only a mile from American Media Incorporated (AMI), site of the first reported cases of Anthrax.
Just another coincidence, eh?
But here's yet another: AMI publishes the National Enquirer which ran a story about an American prostitute who mocked the size of Bin Laden's genitalia.
Ah -- I could already hear the Iraqi apologists now: It's only about sex...move on, nothing to see here, move on...
My two cents...
"JohnHuang2"
Great stuff as always.
Let alone vote for them!
Congressional Progressive Caucus
Member/Position/District-- Address-- Phone-- Website (linked at site)
Dennis Kucinich (Chairman) (CHAIR, OHIO-10) 1730 LHOB 225-5871 WEBSITE
Barbara Lee (Vice Chair) (OFFICER, CALIFORNIA-09) 426 CHOB 225-2661 WEBSITE
Cynthia McKinney (OFFICER, GEORGIA-04) 124 CHOB 225-1605 WEBSITE
Major Owens (OFFICER, NEW YORK-11) 2309 RHOB 225-6231 WEBSITE
Bernie Sanders (OFFICER, VERMONT) 2135 RHOB 225-4115 WEBSITE
Paul Wellstone (OFFICER, MINNESOTA) 136 HSOB 224-5641
Neil Abercrombie (MEMBER, HAWAII-01) 1502 LHOB 225-2726 WEBSITE
Tammy Baldwin (MEMBER, WISCONSIN-02) 1022 LHOB 225-2906 WEBSITE
Xavier Becerra (MEMBER, CALIFORNIA-30) 1119 LHOB 225-6235 WEBSITE
David Bonior (MEMBER, MICHIGAN-10) 2207 RHOB 225-2106 WEBSITE
Corrine Brown (MEMBER, FLORIDA-03) 2444 RHOB 225-0123 WEBSITE
Sherrod Brown (MEMBER, OHIO-13) 2438 CHOB 225-3401 WEBSITE
Michael Capuano (MEMBER, MASSACHUSETTS-08) 1232 LHOB 225-5111 WEBSITE
Julia Carson (MEMBER, INDIANA-10) 1339 LHOB 225-4011 WEBSITE
William "Lacy" Clay (MEMBER, MISSOURI-01) 415 CHOB 225-2406 WEBSITE
John Conyers (MEMBER, MICHIGAN-14) 2426 RHOB 225-5126 WEBSITE
Danny Davis (MEMBER, ILLINOIS-07) 1222 LHOB 225-5006 WEBSITE
Peter DeFazio (MEMBER, OREGON-04) 2134 RHOB 225-6416 WEBSITE
Rosa DeLauro (MEMBER, CONNECTICUT-03) 2262 CHOB 225-3661 WEBSITE
Lane Evans (MEMBER, ILLINOIS-17) 2211 RHOB 225-5905 WEBSITE
Eni Faleomavaega (MEMBER, AMERICAN SAMOA) 2422 RHOB 225-8577 WEBSITE
Sam Farr (MEMBER, CALIFORNIA-17) 1221 LHOB 225-2861 WEBSITE
Chaka Fattah (MEMBER, PENNSYLVANIA-02) 1205 LHOB 225-4001 WEBSITE
Bob Filner (MEMBER, CALIFORNIA-50) 2463 RHOB 225-8045 WEBSITE
Barney Frank (MEMBER, MASSACHUSETTS-04) 2252 RHOB 225-5931 WEBSITE
Luis Gutierrez (MEMBER, ILLINOIS-04) 2452 RHOB 225-8203 WEBSITE
Their stated agenda--(Bad enough)
FReegards, Rob
I just love this! President Bush continues to amaze me and has handled this crisis in a manner that has far surpassed even my already high expectations. We are truly blessed to have him as our president in times like these!
I agree with Hugh, my suggestion is that you should put (+2cents) at the end of the title
I may just do that next time.....maybe..hehe.=^)
Amen =^)
Earl Hilliard (MEMBER, ALABAMA-07) 1314 LHOB 225-2665 WEBSITE
Maurice Hinchey (MEMBER, NEW YORK-26) 2431 RHOB 225-6335 WEBSITE
Jesse Jackson, Jr (MEMBER, ILLINOIS-02) 313 CHOB 225-0773
Sheila Jackson-Lee (MEMBER, TEXAS-18) 403 CHOB 225-3816 WEBSITE
Stephanie Tubbs Jones (MEMBER, OHIO-11) 1516 LHOB 225-7032 WEBSITE
Marcy Kaptur (MEMBER, OHIO-09) 2366 RHOB 225-4146 WEBSITE
Tom Lantos (MEMBER, CALIFORNIA-12) 2217 RHOB 225-3531 WEBSITE
John Lewis (MEMBER, GEORGIA-05) 343 CHOB 225-3801 WEBSITE
Jim McDermott (MEMBER, WASHINGTON-07) 1035 LHOB 225-3106 WEBSITE
James P. McGovern (MEMBER, MASSACHUSETTS-03) 430 CHOB 225-6101 WEBSITE
Carrie Meek (MEMBER, FLORIDA-17) 2433 CHOB 225-4506 WEBSITE
George Miller (MEMBER, CALIFORNIA-07) 2205 RHOB 225-2095 WEBSITE
Patsy Mink (MEMBER, HAWAII-02) 2210 RHOB 225-4906 WEBSITE
Jerry Nadler (MEMBER, NEW YORK-08) 2334 RHOB 225-5635 WEBSITE
Eleanor Holmes Norton (MEMBER, D.C.) 2136 LHOB 225-8050 WEBSITE
John Olver (MEMBER, MASSACHUSETTS-01) 1027 LHOB 225-5335 WEBSITE
Ed Pastor (MEMBER, ARIZONA-02) 2465 RHOB 225-4065 WEBSITE
Donald Payne (MEMBER, NEW JERSEY-10) 2209 RHOB 225-3436 WEBSITE
Nancy Pelosi (MEMBER, CALIFORNIA-08) 2457 RHOB 225-4965 WEBSITE
Jan Schakowsky (MEMBER, ILLINOIS-09) 515 CHOB 225-2111 WEBSITE
Jose Serrano (MEMBER, NEW YORK-16) 2342 RHOB 225-4361 WEBSITE
Hilda Solis (MEMBER, CALIFORNIA-31) 1641 LHOB 225-5464 WEBSITE
Pete Stark (MEMBER, CALIFORNIA-13) 239 CHOB 225-5065 WEBSITE
Bennie Thompson (MEMBER, MISSISSIPPI-02) 2432 LHOB 225-5876 WEBSITE
John Tierney (MEMBER, MASSACHUSETTS-06) 120 CHOB 225-8020 WEBSITE
Tom Udall (MEMBER, NEW MEXICO-03) 502 CHOB 225-6190 WEBSITE
Nydia Velazquez (MEMBER, NEW YORK-12) 2241 RHOB 225-2361 WEBSITE
Maxine Waters (MEMBER, CALIFORNIA-35) 2344 RHOB 225-2201 WEBSITE
Mel Watt (MEMBER, NORTH CAROLINA-12) 2236 LHOB 225-1510 WEBSITE
Henry Waxman (MEMBER, CALIFORNIA-29) 2204 RHOB 225-3976 WEBSITE
Lynn Woolsey (MEMBER, CALIFORNIA-06) 2263 RHOB 225-5161 WEBSITE
"I am not a jingoist."
I am not a racist."
"I am not a homophobe."
"I am not a Puritan or Victorian."
"I am not intolerant."
It is basically a self-centered ideology.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.